What else would need to be congruent to show that ABC= A DEF by SAS?
B
E
Given:
AC DF
ZCZE
А
O A. BC = EF
O B. ZCEF
O C. ZAŁ ZD
O D. AC = DF

Answer: b

Step-by-step explanation:

yes

Answer:

  B. Carla is on the right track because she is finding the slopes of consecutive sides to check for right angles.

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to know if Carla or Jonah has the right approach to determining whether quadrilateral CDEF has a right angle.

Carla is finding the slopes of segments CD and DE. These are consecutive sides, so the slopes will tell if they are perpendicular.

Carla is on the right track because she is finding the slopes of consecutive sides, choice B.

Jonah is finding the slopes of segments CD and EF. These are opposite sides of the quadrilateral, so their slopes will tell nothing about the angles between consecutive sides.

Jonah is not on the right track.

__

Additional comment

The calculations of slope that each is doing are the correct calculations for their approach. Jonah's mistake is in the approach, not in the math.

<95141404393>

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

103.8 seconds

68.11024 inches

Answer:

The coordinate of the image of a point is (2, +3) under the translation (x , y) → (x - 2),( y + 3). Find the coordinate of the preimage.

We are just looking for x and y and we know (2, +3) → (x - 2, y + 3)

2 = x - 2

x = 4

-3 = y + 3

y = -6

(x , y) = (4, -6)

How to find a 

Answer:

1.)Sam Houston

2.)Mirabeau Lamar

3.)Sam Houston

4.)Mirabeau Lamar

Step-by-step explanation:

I just going by what makes since to me so yeah not 100% sure but I am sure

Answer:

\(x=\frac{5}{k}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given expression is,

\(\text{log}_{3^k}243=x\)

By using the law of logarithm,

\((3^k)^x=243\)

\(3^{kx}=243\)

\(3^{kx}=3^5\)

By comparing exponents on both the sides of the equation,

\(kx=5\)

\(x=\frac{5}{k}\)

Therefore, \(x=\frac{5}{k}\) will be the answer.

The equilibrium point for the supply and demand equations p² + 4q = 253 and 183p² + 6q = 0 is (q, p) = (3, 10).

To find the equilibrium point, we need to solve the system of equations formed by the supply and demand equations. By substituting the value of q = 3 into the first equation, we get p² + 4(3) = 253, which simplifies to p² + 12 = 253.

Solving this equation gives us p = 10. Substituting the values of q = 3 and p = 10 into the second equation, we get 183(10)² + 6(3) = 0, which simplifies to 18300 + 18 = 0.

Since this equation holds true, we have found the equilibrium point to be (q, p) = (3, 10), where the equilibrium quantity is q = 3 and the equilibrium price is p = 10.

Learn more about Equation click here :brainly.com/question/13763238

#SPJ11

The volume of the balloon before the addition of the extra gas was 7.01 liters.

We will use ideal gas law equation, PV = nRT, where P is the pressure, V is the volume, n is the number of moles, R is the ideal gas constant and T is the temperature.

Given data:

Initial number of moles of helium in the balloon (before addition) = 4.51 moles

Additional number of moles of helium added = 1.25 moles

The total number of moles of helium in the balloon (after addition) is:

= 4.51 moles + 1.25 moles

= 5.76 moles

Volume of the balloon after addition = 8.97 liters

To find the volume of the balloon before the addition, we can rearrange the ideal gas law equation to solve for V:

V = (nRT)/P

The volume before the addition will be found using: V_initial = (n_initial * V_final) / n_final

V_initial = (4.51 * 8.97) / 5.76

V_initial = 7.02 liters.

Read more about volume

brainly.com/question/27710307

#SPJ4

Answer: It will take her 15 hours to walk 60 miles at the constant rate of 4 miles an hour.

Step-by-step explanation:

60/4 is 15. Kira's total is 60, and her rate is 4. Rate*time=distance, and distance/time=rate.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 min => Run 12 laps around the track

1 min => 12/6 = 2 laps around the track

Therefore Lin runs 2 laps per minute.

Answer:

2 laps per minute

Step-by-step explanation:

What we know:

Lin runs

12 laps

in 6 minutes

Laps per minute = \(\frac{Laps}{Minute} = \frac{12 laps}{6 minutes} = \frac{12}{6} = 2 \frac{laps}{minute}\)

Coordinate of circumcenter of the given triangle = (3, 2)

What is circumcenter of a triangle?

Circumcenter of a triangle is the point of intersection of the perpendicular bisectors of every sides of the triangle.

Let the coordinate of circumcenter be (x , y)

Distance of Circumcenter from (4,2) =

\(\sqrt{(x - 4)^2 + (y-2)^2\)

Distance of Circumcenter from (3, 3) =

\(\sqrt{(x - 3)^2 + (y-3)^2\)

Distance of Circumcenter from (2,2) =

\(\sqrt{(x - 2)^2 + (y-2)^2\)

By the problem,

\(\sqrt{(x - 2)^2 + (y-2)^2} = \sqrt{(x - 3)^2 + (y-3)^2}\\(x - 2)^2 + (y-2)^2} = (x - 3)^2 + (y-3)^2}\\x^2 - 4x + 4 + y^2 -4y + 4 = x^2 -6x + 9 + y^2-6y + 9\\6x - 4x +6y -4y = 18-8\\2x +2y = 10\\x+ y = 5\\\)..... (1)

Again,

\(\sqrt{(x - 4)^2 + (y-2)^2} = \sqrt{(x - 3)^2 + (y-3)^2}\\(x - 4)^2 + (y-2)^2} = (x - 3)^2 + (y-3)^2}\\x^2 - 8x + 16 + y^2 -4y + 4 = x^2 -6x + 9 + y^2-6y + 9\\8x - 6x +4y -6y = 20-18\\2x -2y = 2\\x- y = 1\\\)...... (2)

Adding (1) and (2)

\(2x = 6\\x = \frac{6}{2}\\x = 3\)

Putting the value of x in (1),

3 + y = 5

y = 5 - 3

y  = 2

Coordinate of circumcenter = (3, 2)

To learn more about circumcenter of a triangle, refer to the link-

https://brainly.com/question/2294833

#SPJ4

Answer:

7.1 square feet

Explanation:

The area of a circle can be found using the below formula;

where pi = 3.14

r = radius of the circle = d/2 = 3/2ft

Let's go ahead and substitute the above values into our formula and solve for A,

We need approximately 10 deposits to reach a balance of $31,300 four years after the last deposit which is compounded semi-annually.

To solve this problem, we can use the formula for the future value of an annuity:

\(FV = P * ((1 + r)^n - 1) / r\)

Where:

FV is the future value of the annuity

P is the periodic payment or deposit amount

r is the interest rate per period

n is the number of periods

In this case, the deposit amount is $726.56, the interest rate is 6.45% compounded semi-annually, and the future value is $31,300. We need to find the number of deposits (n).

We can rearrange the formula and solve for n:

n = log((FV * r) / (P * r + FV)) / log(1 + r)

Substituting the given values:

n = log((31,300 * 0.03225) / (726.56 * 0.03225 + 31,300)) / log(1 + 0.03225)

Using a calculator or software, we find that n ≈ 9.989.

Therefore, we need approximately 10 deposits to reach a balance of $31,300 four years after the last deposit.

To know more about annual rate click here

brainly.com/question/6026546

#SPJ4

The simplified form of inequality -3x - 1 ≥ 20 is x ≤ -7.

The correct option is option (A).

A number line is a line on which numbers are pointed at some intervals, it is used to show numerical operations.

The given inequality is,

-3x - 1 ≥ 20.

To find the right number line from the options

Solve the inequality,

Add 1 to both the sides,

-3x -1 + 1 ≥ 20 + 1

-3x ≥ 21

-x ≥ 21 / 3

-x ≥ 7

x ≤ -7

The value of x are less than or equal to -7. Implies that, in number line graph close circle.

The number line in option (A), is correct option.

To know more about Number line on:

https://brainly.com/question/27114736

#SPJ1

To calculate the Value-at-Risk (VaR) for this investment at a 99% confidence level, we need to determine the loss amount that will be exceeded with a probability of only 1% (i.e., the worst-case loss that will occur with a 1% chance).

Given that there is a 0.5% chance of a loss of $10 million and a 99.5% chance of a loss of $1 million, we can express this as:

Loss Amount | Probability

$10 million | 0.5%

$1 million | 99.5%

To calculate the VaR, we need to find the loss amount that corresponds to the 1% probability threshold. Since the loss of $10 million has a probability of 0.5%, it is less likely to occur than the 1% threshold. Therefore, we can ignore the $10 million loss in this calculation.

The loss of $1 million has a probability of 99.5%, which is higher than the 1% threshold. This means that there is a 1% chance of the loss exceeding $1 million.

Therefore, the Value-at-Risk (VaR) for this investment at a 99% confidence level is $1 million.

The Value-at-Risk (VaR) for this investment at a 99% confidence level is $1,045,000.

To calculate the Value-at-Risk (VaR) for this investment at a 99% confidence level, we need to determine the loss amount that will be exceeded with only a 1% chance.

Given that the investment has a 0.5% chance of a loss of $10 million and a 99.5% chance of a loss of $1 million, we can calculate the VaR as follows:

VaR = (Probability of Loss of $10 million * Amount of Loss of $10 million) + (Probability of Loss of $1 million * Amount of Loss of $1 million)

VaR = (0.005 * $10,000,000) + (0.995 * $1,000,000)

VaR = $50,000 + $995,000

VaR = $1,045,000

Therefore, the Value-at-Risk (VaR) for this investment at a 99% confidence level is $1,045,000.

To learn more about 99% confidence level

https://brainly.com/question/15873157

#SPJ11

Answer:

Coordinates of R = (1,2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the coordinate of R be (x, y)

Since coordinates of S and T are S(-9,-4) and T(6,5). Then we can use the Formula for length of line from coordinates to find coordinates of R since SR/RT = 2/1

Thus; 1(S) = 2(T)

Coordinates of R = [(1(-9) + 2(6))/(1 + 2)], [(1(-4) + 2(5))/(1 + 2)

Coordinates of R = (3/3), (6/3)

>> (1, 2)

As per the details given, there are 37 dots in the 5th step.

To locate the pattern and decide the range of dots in the 5th step, allow's examine the given records:

Step 1: 6 dots

Step 2: 14 dots

Step 3: 21 dots

Looking on the variations between consecutive steps, we will see that the quantity of additional dots in each step is growing via eight.

In other phrases, the distinction among Step 1 and Step 2 is eight, and the difference between Step 2 and Step 3 is likewise eight.

Thus, we can preserve this sample to decide the quantity of dots within the 4th and 5th steps:

Step 4: 21 + 8 = 29 dots

Step 5: 29 + 8 = 37 dots

Therefore, there are 37 dots in the 5th step.

For more details regarding patterns, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30571451

#SPJ1

Answer:

x = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

8(x - \(\frac{5}{2}\) ) = 3x ← distribute the parenthesis by 8

8x - 20 = 3x ( subtract 3x from both sides )

5x - 20 = 0 ( add 20 to both sides )

5x = 20 ( divide both sides by 5 )

x = 4

Answer:

6 Apples

Step-by-step explanation:

There would be six apples and 2 oranges left over.

Hope this Helps!

:D

Answer:

I was kind of confused on this one but is it 15 apples?

Step-by-step explanation:

3, 6, 9, 12, 15

4, 8, 12, 16, 20

I think the answer is 15 apples.

Answer:

it depends on the choices

Step-by-step explanation:

The length should be x ≥ 3 inch and 4x ≥ 12 square inches.

What is linear inequality?

The mathematical expression for inequality states that neither side is equal. In mathematics, inequality occurs when the relationship results in a non-equal comparison between two expressions or numbers. Any of the inequality symbols, such as greater than (>), less than (<), greater than or equal to (≥), less than or equal to (≤), or not equal to (≠), can take the place of the equal sign "=" in this expression. Polynomial inequality, rational inequality, and absolute value inequality are the various kinds of mathematical inequalities.

Given a rectangle, length  = 4 inches

area is at least 12 square inches

inequality equation for area

A ≥ 12

area  = l x b

where l = length = 4 inches and b = breadth = x

A ≥ 12

4x ≥ 12

x ≥ 3 inches

Hence the breadth should be x ≥ 3 inches and equation of area is

4x ≥ 12 square inches.

Learn more about length here ;

brainly.com/question/11897796

#SPJ4

Answer:

i am having trouble with that too

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Since we are told that the two given polygons are said to  similar, their corresponding side lengths are proportional to each other.

so to solve

(x - 3)/2.5 = 16/4

(x - 3)/2.5 = 4

Multiply both sides by 2.5

x - 3 = 4 × 2.5

x - 3 = 10

Add 3 to both sides

x = 10 + 3

x = 13

So the value of x is 13.

hope this helps

The iterated integral evaluates to zero when converted to polar coordinates.

The iterated integral can be converted to polar coordinates using the following equation:

0 0 4x2y dx dy = 2π ∫0 a r dr dθ

This can be further simplified by integrating with respect to r:

2π∫0 a (a2−r2) dr

The integral can now be evaluated by calculating the definite integral between 0 and a:

2π [a3/3 - r3/3] |0 a

The evaluated integral is then simplified to:

2π[a3/3 - a3/3]

Finally, the evaluated integral is multiplied by 2π to give the final result:

2π(0)

Therefore, the answer is 0.

The iterated integral can be converted to polar coordinates using the equation

0 0 4x2y dx dy = 2π ∫0 a r dr dθ.

This can then be further simplified by integrating with respect to r, resulting in

2π∫0 a (a2−r2) dr.

The integral can be evaluated by calculating the definite integral between 0 and a, which is

2π [a3/3 - r3/3] |0 a.

This evaluated integral is simplified to

2π[a3/3 - a3/3]

and is then multiplied by 2π to give the final result; 2π(0). Therefore, the answer is 0.

Learn more about integral here

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ4

Answer:f

Step-by-step explanation:

its not that hard

The function is concave up for  x < 1 and concave down for x > 1 because the second derivative is positive for x < 1 and negative for x > 1. As a result, the critical point at x  < 1 is a relative maximum.

A function is an equation with just one solution for y for every x. A function produces exactly one output for each input of a certain type. Instead of y, it is common to call a function f(x) or g(x). f(2) indicates that we should discover our function's value when x equals 2. A function is an equation that depicts the connection between an input x and an output y, with precisely one output for each input. Another name for input is domain, while another one for output is range.

Here,

The derivative of the function f(x) can be found by taking the derivative of the expression e^(-x) (x^2 + 2x) using the product rule:

f'(x) = -e^(-x) (x^2 + 2x) + e^(-x) (2x + 2) = 2e^(-x) - 2xe^(-x) (x + 1)

Setting f'(x) equal to zero and solving for x gives us the critical points:

0 = 2e^(-x) - 2xe^(-x).(x + 1)

2xe^(-x).(x + 1) = 2e^(-x)

x(x + 1) = e^x

x^2 + x - e^x = 0

Next, we determine the concavity of the function at the critical points by analyzing the second derivative of the function:

f''(x) = 2e^(-x) + 2xe^(-x) + 2xe^(-x).(x + 1) - 2e^(-x).(x + 1)

= 2e^(-x).(1 - x)

Since the second derivative is positive for x < 1 and negative for x > 1, the function is concave up for x < 1 and concave down for x > 1. Thus, the critical point at x < 1 corresponds to a relative maximum.

To know more about function,

https://brainly.com/question/28193995

#SPJ4

The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) for Starbucks' new project can be determined by considering the subjective approach. To calculate the WACC, information such as the cost of equity and the cost of debt is required, along with their respective weights in the company's capital structure.

In this scenario, the given information only mentions Starbucks' overall WACC, which is 12%. However, to determine the WACC for the new project, additional details specific to the project, such as its risk profile and capital structure, are necessary. Without this specific information, it is not possible to calculate the WACC for the new project. The WACC is influenced by various factors, including the riskiness of the project, the expected return on equity and debt, and the proportion of equity and debt in the project's capital structure. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation of the project's risk and financial structure is required to determine an accurate WACC for the new project.

Learn more about Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) here:

https://brainly.com/question/30746642

#SPJ11

Answer:

∠1 = 52

∠2 = 128

∠4 = 128

Step-by-step explanation:

∠3 and ∠1 are vertical angles

As we now vertical angles are congruent

So if ∠3 = 52°, then ∠1 also equals 52°

∠3 and ∠4 are supplementary angles

supplementary angles add up to equal 180

Thus, ∠3 + ∠4 = 180

If ∠3 = 52°

Then 52 + ∠4 = 180

180 - 52 = 128

Hence, ∠4 = 128

∠4 and ∠2 are vertical angles

Like stated previously vertical angles are congruent

So if ∠4 = 128 then ∠2 also equals 128

The solution to the linear programming problem is:

Maximum value of z = 120

x₁ = 0, x₂ = 6

To solve the given linear programming problem using the graphical method, we first need to plot the feasible region determined by the constraints and then identify the optimal solution.

The constraints are:

x₁ + x₂ ≥ 12

x₁ + x₂ ≤ 6

x₁, x₂ ≥ 0

Let's plot these constraints on a graph:

The line x₁ + x₂ = 12:

Plotting this line on the graph, we find that it passes through the points (12, 0) and (0, 12). Shade the region above this line.

The line x₁ + x₂ = 6:

Plotting this line on the graph, we find that it passes through the points (6, 0) and (0, 6). Shade the region below this line.

The x-axis (x₁ ≥ 0) and y-axis (x₂ ≥ 0):

Shade the region in the first quadrant of the graph.

The feasible region is the overlapping shaded region determined by all the constraints.

Next, we need to find the corner points of the feasible region by finding the intersection points of the lines. In this case, the corner points are (6, 0), (4, 2), (0, 6), and (0, 0).

Now, we evaluate the objective function z = 15x₁ + 20x₂ at each corner point:

For (6, 0): z = 15(6) + 20(0) = 90

For (4, 2): z = 15(4) + 20(2) = 100

For (0, 6): z = 15(0) + 20(6) = 120

For (0, 0): z = 15(0) + 20(0) = 0

From the evaluations, we can see that the maximum value of z is 120, which occurs at the corner point (0, 6).

Know more about linear programming problem here:

https://brainly.com/question/29405467

#SPJ11

The price per T-shirt should be at least $15 to achieve a profit of $250.

To calculate the price per T-shirt that will yield a profit of at least $250, we need to consider the cost of production, the desired profit, and the number of shirts to be sold.

Given that the cost to make each T-shirt is $10, and we want to sell 50 shirts, the total cost of production would be 10 * 50 = $500.

Now, let's calculate the minimum revenue needed to achieve a profit of $250. We add the desired profit to the total cost of production: $500 + $250 = $750.

Finally, to determine the price per T-shirt, we divide the total revenue by the number of shirts: $750 ÷ 50 = $15.

Therefore, to make a profit of at least $250, the price per T-shirt should be set at $15.

By selling each T-shirt for $15, the total revenue would be $15 * 50 = $750. From this revenue, we subtract the total production cost of $500 to calculate the profit, which amounts to $750 - $500 = $250. Thus, by charging $15 per T-shirt, the desired profit of $250 is achieved.

For more question on profit visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30495119

#SPJ8

Answer:

2.44948974278

i think it's this one .