Answer: as Vice Presidents next in the line of succession
Explanation:Answer:
The Whig Party was a political party formed in 1834 by opponents of President Andrew Jackson and his Jacksonian Democrats. Led by Henry Clay, the name “Whigs” was derived from the English antimonarchist party and and was an attempt to portray Jackson as "King Andrew." The Whigs were one of the two major political parties in the United States from the late 1830s through the early 1850s. While Jacksonian Democrats painted Whigs as the party of the aristocracy, they managed to win support from diverse economic groups and elect two presidents: William Henry Harrison and Zachary Taylor. The other two Whig presidents, John Tyler and Millard Fillmore, gained office
Explanation:
What are three qualities of God that are present everywhere? (Use complete sentences). use complete sentences please this is my last assignment please
Answer:
I'm western (Christian) thought, god is traditionally described as a being that possesses at least three necessary properties: Omniscience (all-knowing), Omnipotence (all-powerful), and Omnivenevolence (supremely good). In other words, god knows everything, has the power to do anything, and is perfectly good.
What did the jurors learn while deliberating the case?About the trial?About themselves?About the Constitution?
In deliberating the case, the jurors in the Twelve Angry Men learned C. About the Constitution.
The jurors learned that the framers of the Constitution were deliberate, based on past experiences, to insist on the necessity to protect the accused from unfounded charges and obeisant judges. Some unscrupulous charges can be brought against enemies to ensure their elimination.
In most criminal cases, jurors are influenced by the evidence presented, the witnesses, the prosecution and defense lawyers, and defendants in the trials. But they should learn more about the Constitution framers' intent.
Thus, in deliberating the case, the jurors learned about the Constitution.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/20787326
Answer the following question using 8-10 thoughtful,
university-level sentences each.
2. What is Manifest Destiny
and why is it an important concept in understanding American
frontier history?
Manifest Destiny is the belief and ideology that emerged in the 19th century in the United States. It asserts that it was the nation's destiny and inherent right to expand its territorial boundaries from coast to coast. It was fueled by cultural, economic, and political factors, reflecting American exceptionalism. It also reflected the desire for territorial expansion.
This concept is crucial in understanding American frontier history. This is because it shaped the nation's expansionist policies and influenced politicians, settlers, and pioneers. Manifest Destiny justified the annexation of newly acquired territories, such as the Louisiana Purchase, the Texas acquisition, and the territorial gains from the Mexican-American War.
Furthermore, belief in Manifest Destiny led to the exploration and settlement of the western frontier. This was done by individuals and families seeking new opportunities, fertile lands, and economic prosperity. It played a significant role in the migration patterns and development of the American West, as it encouraged westward movement and the establishment of new towns, cities, and industries.
Moreover, Manifest Destiny ideology also had profound implications for Native American tribes and their displacement. The pursuit of territorial expansion often involved displacement, forced removal, as well as violent conflicts with indigenous peoples, as the American settlers believed it was their divine mission to occupy and "civilize" the land.
In summary, Manifest Destiny was a powerful and influential concept in American frontier history. It drove the nation's territorial expansion, influenced settlement patterns, and had far-reaching consequences for both settlers and Native Americans. Understanding this concept is essential for comprehending the motivations, actions, and conflicts that shaped the development of the United States. This is as it expanded its boundaries and solidified its identity as a continental nation.
Manifest Destiny is a term used to refer to the belief held by Americans in the 19th century that the United States was destined to expand its borders and its democratic form of government throughout North America.
The concept of Manifest Destiny is significant for American frontier history as it is a term that refers to the set of beliefs that drove the push westward in the United States. Manifest Destiny was a key factor in motivating Americans to move westward and take up land, often at the expense of Native American populations.
In conclusion, Manifest Destiny was an important concept in American frontier history as it fueled a period of territorial expansion and helped to shape the American identity. The concept of Manifest Destiny was based on the belief that the United States was destined to expand its borders and its democratic form of government throughout North America. This idea played a significant role in motivating Americans to move westward and take up land, often at the expense of Native American populations.
The idea of Manifest Destiny also contributed to the concept of the American frontier, which was a central theme in American history during the 19th century. It played a role in the belief in American exceptionalism and contributed to the belief that the United States was destined to become a world power.
Choose the word or phrase that best completes each sentence.
Maya who lived in the highlands produced
to trade for other goods.
The lowlands were best known for producing
.
Mayan trade centers were often located near
.
Answer:
obsidian
cotton
water routes
Explanation:
Answer:
obsidian
cotton
water routes
Explanation:
What was so significant about the Declaration of Independence?
Answer:
The Declaration of Independence is an important part of American democracy because first it contains the ideals or goals of our nation. Second it contains the complaints of the colonists against the British king. Third, it contains the arguments the colonists used to explain why they wanted to be free of British rule.
Explanation:
Help asap! question in pic! will give brainliest!
Were the poor or the rich more likely to be Muslim in Mali? Explain your answer.
The right answer gets 25 points
Answer:
well mali is a poor country so most people are poor and 95 percent people are Muslims Soo most likely the person living in mali is poor and Muslim
Answer:
Mali has had a great history. Ancient Mali but now in the present. Mali is very poor. But because of the spread of the religion Muslim back then, Im going to have to say they are more likely to be Muslim.
During the 1920s and 1930s, colonized people in Asia and Africa created nationalist, anticolonial movements that were partly inspired by Western ideals of freedom and democracy or by revolutionary Marxism. How did Asian and African nationalists modify these Western-inspired ideals with local cultural and political traditions to create unique movements of their own?
Asian and African nationalists blended Western ideals with local traditions to create unique movements reflecting their specific contexts and aspirations.
Asian and African nationalists in the 1920s and 1930s drew inspiration from Western ideals of freedom and democracy, as well as revolutionary Marxism, but they also modified these ideas to create unique movements that resonated with their own cultural and political traditions. They blended Western concepts with their indigenous values, customs, and historical experiences to forge a distinct nationalist identity.Nationalist leaders emphasized the importance of self-determination, liberation from colonial rule, and the establishment of independent nation-states. They tailored these aspirations to the specific conditions and grievances of their respective regions, addressing issues such as land reform, racial equality, cultural revitalization, and economic self-sufficiency.Asian and African nationalists incorporated local cultural and political traditions into their movements. They sought to revive indigenous languages, traditions, and cultural practices, promoting a sense of national identity and pride. They also adapted Western concepts to fit their own societal structures and historical contexts, often emphasizing communal solidarity, traditional values, and spiritual or religious beliefs.Overall, Asian and African nationalists combined Western-inspired ideals with their local cultural and political traditions, creating unique movements that reflected their specific contexts and aspirations for self-determination and decolonization. This blending of influences allowed them to forge their own paths toward independence and shape the future of their nations.For more such questions on African nationalists:
https://brainly.com/question/30616779
#SPJ8
How did the bantu of the Congo savanna differ from the bantu of the grazing county
Whereas the Bantu people of the grazing nation were mostly pastoralists who lived in an area with extensive grasslands, the Bantu people of the Congo savanna were primarily agriculturalists who lived in a region with tropical grasslands.
In the southern section of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, there is a grassy area known as the Congo savanna. There are many different species of fauna in this area, which is distinguished by its tropical grasslands and scatted trees. The Bantu people that inhabited this area were largely farmers, raising crops including yams, cassava, and beans. They hunted and went fishing as well.
On the other side, the grazing country is an area in East Africa that includes portions of Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda and is characterized by extensive grasslands. The Bantu people that inhabited this area were largely pastoralists who kept animals like cattle, sheep, and goats. Moreover, they did some gathering and hunting.
To know more about Bantu
brainly.com/question/3152177
#SPJ4
non examples of propaganda?
Answer:
you mean propaganda technique? if so
propaganda technique
BANDWAGON
CARD STACKING
PLAIN FOLKS
TRANSFER
TESTIMONIAL
How does Columbus "show off" what he has found/discovered in the New World after he has
returned to Spain? -
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can comment on the following.
The way Columbus "show off" what he has found in the New World after he has returned to Spain was the following.
After the discovery of the American continent on October 12, 1492, Christopher Columbus returned to Spain on March 15, 1493. He went to report his findings to his sponsors, King Ferdinand de Aragón and Queen Isabella del Castille.
Columbus wrote a letter that made it to be translated into Latin to send a copy to the Vatican.
Columbus informed that he had taken possession of the new land in the name of the King and Queen of Spain, to honor and increment the kingdom of Spain. Columbus affirmed that he encountered no resistance from the island natives. Columbus added some descriptions about the geography of the land and the characteristics of the native people that inhabited the territory.
Finally, he ended up writing that the new territories could be easily conquered by the Spanish navy and that the native Indians were open to the Spanish religion and rule of the Kingdom of Spain.
United States History for Credit Recovery
18. (02.06 LC)
Which term describes a system in which the government determines the production and distribution of goods? (1 point)
Free economy
Mixed economy
Market economy
Planned economy
Answer:
Planned economy
Explanation:
i just took the test. Hope this helps :}
How did George Washington know what was going on at Mount Vernon while he
was away?
PLSSS HELP. in need of help immediately!!! (check whole picture)
Answer:
Cattails.
Explanation:
Answer: Cattails
Explanation: good luck
the differences in culture between those who lived in america (native americans) and the newly arrived colonists (europeans) lead to decades of conflict, mainly over land. after the american revolution, george washington believed that the wisest policy was encouraging native americans to assimilate into white european/american culture. he thought this would prevent wars and conflict. some tribes took his advice, most notably the cherokee. but washington's vision proved to be too optimistic. most white american settlers didn't care whether native americans wore european clothes and went to church. they wanted their land, no matter what. why did george washington want native americans to assimilate? a he thought white european/american culture was super
Answer:
George Washington's belief that Native Americans should assimilate into white European/American culture was based on his belief that it would prevent future conflicts and wars. He saw the cultural differences between Native Americans and the colonists as a major source of tension and conflict, particularly over land.
Washington believed that if Native Americans adopted European/American culture and customs, they would become more like the colonists and would be more likely to peacefully coexist with them. He also believed that assimilation would help Native Americans become more prosperous and successful in the white-dominated society.
However, Washington's vision of assimilation was overly optimistic and failed to take into account the deeply ingrained cultural and historical differences between Native American and European/American societies. Many Native American tribes resisted assimilation and saw it as a threat to their identity and way of life. Additionally, the colonists' desire for land and resources often trumped any desire for peaceful coexistence, leading to continued conflicts and displacement of Native American communities.
Overall, Washington's policy of assimilation was well-intentioned but ultimately unrealistic and failed to address the underlying issues of cultural differences and the colonists' expansionist goals.
The Iraq War is a subject of much debate. In the space below, construct a claim that supports or refutes the decision to invade Iraq. Your claim should be at least 250-words and follow these directions:
Research on your own and find a primary source on the Iraq War
A primary source is an original document or artifact that comes from the period of time being studied.
Someone from that time period actually wrote, created, or used the object the historian is studying.
Using the information from your primary source, and the information from the lesson, develop a claim concerning the decision to invade Iraq.
Fulfill the following concerning your claim:
Your claim should clearly state whether or not the U.S. should have invade Iraq.
Your claim must have supporting statements that are original ideas, as well as facts and evidence from your source, and information from the lesson, that supports it.
You should have a counterclaim that refutes your claim. Your writing will identify the stance and prove that it is false.
Write an informative essay that meets the following expectations:
Establishes and maintains formal and objective tone
Uses words, phrases, and clauses to link each section of writing together and create cohesion between claims and evidence
Follows expectations of conventions
Provide a concluding paragraph that:
Synthesizes your original claim
Summarizes your key points
Adds concluding thoughts
Cite your primary source and this lesson as a secondary source at the bottom of your essay.
Claim: The decision to invade Iraq by the United States was unjustified and should not have been undertaken.
Lack of substantial evidence: Despite claims of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), the presence of such weapons was not conclusively proven, as stated by intelligence reports and subsequent investigations.Questionable motives: Some argue that the invasion was driven by geopolitical interests and a desire for control over Iraq's oil resources rather than genuine concerns for national security or democracy promotion.Destabilization of the region: The invasion led to a power vacuum, contributing to sectarian violence, the rise of extremist groups, and regional instability, rather than achieving stability and peace as intended.Humanitarian and economic costs: The war resulted in significant loss of civilian lives, military casualties, and financial burdens, diverting resources from pressing domestic needs and contributing to long-lasting consequences for the Iraqi population.Counterclaim: The invasion was necessary to remove a dangerous regime and promote democracy.Conclusion: Considering the lack of substantial evidence for WMDs, questionable motives, destabilization of the region, and the human and economic costs incurred, it can be argued that the decision to invade Iraq was unwarranted and should not have been pursued.For more such question on invade Iraq
https://brainly.com/question/26172813
#SPJ8
During the seventeenth century, English colonists in the Chesapeake sawA. women significantly outnumber men.B. a life expectancy for men of just over forty years.C. few single adults.D. eight out of ten children dying in infancy.E. an increasingly unbalanced sex ratio.
Option ( B ). Life expectancy for men is just over 40 years. (Life expectancy is based on estimates of the average age at which members of a particular population die.)
What age is the life expectancy?
With rare exceptions, life expectancy in the United States is increasing.
In 1900 he was 47 years old, in 1950 he was 68 years old and in 2019 he was almost 79 years old. However, by 2020, it had fallen to 77, and by 2021 it had fallen further to just over 76. This is her biggest two-year decline since the 1920s.
What Increases Life Expectancy?
"However, common sense, regular exercise, a healthy weight, avoiding red meat, not smoking, managing stress, and other healthy habits can help you get 'healthier as you get older.'" says Perls. Aging is fully involved in life mentally, physically and socially.
To know more about Life Expectancy visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/7184917
#SPJ1
The map shows where the Bering land bridge once existed. A map titled Area of the Bering Land Bridge. A key shows Land with present-day coastlines in dark green and Land exposed during the last ice age due to lower sea levels in green. Green surrounds the coast of Northeast Russia and Alaska, USA and an area between those two areas. Which statement does the map support? Humans from North America crossed the Bering land bridge to follow animal herds. The Bering land bridge connected the Arctic Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. The Bering land bridge was hundreds of miles wide at its narrowest spot. North America was cut off from Asia when rising sea levels covered the Bering land bridge.
Statement D. supports the map.
Where did the Berlin land once exist?Berlin land once exists in Germany. North America was cut off from Asia when rising sea levels covered the Bering land bridge.
The Bering Land Bridge country-wide maintain is one of the most far-off national parks in the USA, located on the Seward Peninsula in northwest Alaska. The preserve protects a small remnant of the land bridge that linked Asia and the North us for more than 10,000 years in the past.The Bering land bridge is a postulated path of human migration to the Americas from Asia approximately 20,000 years ago.Beringia additionally called Bering Land Bridge and is a series of landforms that after existed periodically and in diverse configurations among northeastern Asia and northwestern us and that were related to intervals of world glaciation and subsequent decreasing of sea ranges.Learn more about Bering land here:-https://brainly.com/question/5535329
#SPJ2
compare and contrast the colonies of virginia and massachusetts in the 17th century
The 17th-century colonies of Virginia and Massachusetts differed in terms of their origins, religious beliefs, economy, and social structure.
The colonies of Virginia and Massachusetts in the 17th century had distinct origins and purposes. Virginia, established in 1607, was primarily driven by economic motives. The Virginia Company sought profits from the New World, particularly through the cultivation of tobacco. The economy of Virginia relied heavily on large-scale plantations worked by indentured servants and later enslaved Africans. This system led to a hierarchical social structure with wealthy plantation owners at the top.
On the other hand, Massachusetts was founded in 1620 by the English Puritans, who sought religious freedom and the establishment of a "city upon a hill" where they could practice their faith without persecution. The Puritans established a theocratic society, governed by their strict interpretation of Christianity. They believed in a covenant with God and aimed to create a moral and harmonious community. Unlike Virginia, Massachusetts had a more equal social structure, with a focus on small-scale agriculture, trade, and skilled crafts.
To learn more about economy click here:
brainly.com/question/30131108
#SPJ11
Explain the enlightenment views of social contract, natural rights + consent of the governed
Answer:
believed that governments had a responsibility to hold up their end of the social contract.
Explanation:
A. Identify one change in the use of technology by Europeans before 1450 that facilitated
European exploration.
B. Explain one change in patterns of trade from Europe due to innovations in ship design in
the period 1450 to 1750.
C. Explain the extent to which economic opportunities influenced European states to change
policies to support transoceanic voyages in the period 1450 to 1750.
A. The developments in ship and navigational (and, to some degree, military) technology allowed European countries to embark on an age of exploration. The major change in ship technology was the development of a caravel that was larger than previous ships.
B. The most significant change in global trade between 1450 and 1750 was the rise and involvement of the Europeans. Beginning with Portugal and Spain, European countries would commission the exploration, charting, and colonization of a huge portion of the world.
C. Europeans also developed their own technology that helped with navigation, such as the Portuguese caravel - useful for maneuvering the challenging winds and waters off west Africa Europeans used advances in military technology to conquer territories and establish footholds once they reached their destination
These three points explains the essence the given question.
To know more about European Exploration from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/8125036
#SPJ1
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
1. What did the Nazis do to try to hide the Holocaust from the world?
2. Why did President Truman decide to drop atomic bombs on Japan?
The Nazis tried to hide the Holocaust from the world by destroying evidence, such as burning bodies in crematoriums, burying bodies in mass graves, and dismantling gas chambers.
The Nazi and holocaust -They also forced prisoners to work in concentration camps to maintain a facade of normalcy and created propaganda to portray the camps as humane resettlement centers
President Truman and atomic bomb-President Truman decided to drop atomic bombs on Japan in order to bring a swift end to World War II and avoid the high casualties that would result from a land invasion of Japan. He believed that the use of atomic weapons would demonstrate the overwhelming power of the United States and force Japan to surrender.
To know more about the Nazi and the holocaust -
https://brainly.com/question/29778588
#SPJ1
What did conservation mean in the Progressive Era (about
1890–1920)? How much did this vary over time and from person to
person? Were there core ideas that remained consistent?
In the Progressive Era (approximately 1890-1920), conservation referred to a broad range of efforts aimed at the responsible management and preservation of natural resources, environmental protection, and the promotion of sustainable practices.
The movement was driven by concerns about the depletion of natural resources, industrial pollution, and the effects of rapid urbanization and industrialization on the environment.
The concept of conservation during this era encompassed multiple dimensions:
Natural Resource Conservation: Progressive-era conservationists recognized the finite nature of natural resources and advocated for their wise and efficient use. They emphasized the need to protect forests, waterways, minerals, and other resources from excessive exploitation or degradation. This involved promoting sustainable forestry practices, advocating for the establishment of national parks and reserves, and encouraging responsible mining and water management.
Environmental Protection: The Progressive Era witnessed growing concerns about industrial pollution and its impact on public health and the environment. Conservationists aimed to mitigate pollution through regulation and legislation, promoting clean air and water standards, and pushing for the development of environmental regulations and agencies
Learn more about resources link:
https://brainly.com/question/14289367
#SPJ11
What did the aristocracy, rich landowners, do that allowed them to take power away from the King?
Answer:
By building pressure on the king.
Explanation:
The aristocracy, rich landowners, do that allowed them to take power away from the King is the nobility in the society and popularity among the people. They are very powerful due to high amount of wealth and the name of their forefathers which work very hard for the prosperity and development of the country. So by using their name, their popularity and wealth they take away the power from the king by building pressure on it.
unskilled worked with little to no education and training nickname
Answer:
Lazy
Explanation:
3. Close reading: What does Cotton say that God will do for the foreign people
when they arrive in the new land?
Puritans
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Cotton said that God would do for the foreign people when they arrive in the new land was that God would help the Puritans by casting out the former inhabitants of the new land. Let's have in mind that the North American territories were already inhabited by many Native American Indian tribes that considered those territories as their lands, inherited by the ancestors.
John Cotton was one of the Puritan leaders that traveled to North America trying to find a new place to live and practice their strict religious teachings. He preached his people that God was going to help them settle in the new land and convince former inhabitants to accept the English Colonists.
Cotton said that God force out the former inhabitants of the new land. He told his people that God was going to help them settle in the new land and convince former inhabitants to accept them.
how did the agitator, a womenโs rights journal, go beyond suffrage?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Agitator was a women's rights journal that was published in the United States during the late 1800s and early 1900s. While the publication was instrumental in the suffrage movement and played an important role in securing the right to vote for women, it also went beyond suffrage and advocated for a wide range of women's rights issues. Here are some examples:
Education: The Agitator believed that women should have access to the same education opportunities as men. The journal advocated for women to have equal access to higher education, including universities and professional schools.
Employment: The Agitator argued that women should have the right to work and receive fair pay for their labor. The publication supported equal pay for equal work and denounced discrimination against women in the workplace.
Marriage and divorce: The Agitator challenged traditional gender roles in marriage and advocated for women to have more control over their own lives. The publication supported women's right to choose their own partners, and also advocated for easier divorce laws that would allow women to escape abusive or unhappy marriages.
Health and hygiene: The Agitator recognized that women's health was often neglected and called for improved healthcare and hygiene standards. The publication also advocated for women's sexual and reproductive rights, including access to birth control and safe abortion.
Overall, the Agitator played a critical role in advancing women's rights beyond suffrage by addressing a wide range of issues that were important to women's lives and well-being.
Explain two reasons why Lincoln was a racist?
Answer:he did not like black people like that but over time he did.
Explanation:
The three estates of French society were primarily distinguished by _____
The three estates of French society were primarily distinguished by their social status and level of privilege.
The clergy, who were exempt from paying taxes and had substantial political clout, made up the First Estate. The nobility, who were also exempt from paying taxes and occupied the majority of the top positions in the executive, judicial, and armed forces, made up the Second Estate. Everyone else, including urban laborers, peasants, and members of the bourgeoisie (middle class), who lacked political clout and paid high taxes, made up the Third Estate. The tensions and inequities that finally gave rise to the French Revolution were a result of this societal separation based on social standing and privilege.
To know more about French Revolution
brainly.com/question/2796465
#SPJ4