A social worker is a qualified professional who works with a variety of weak individuals, communities, and groups to teach them how to live better lives. People who may be suffering from poverty, prejudice, or other social injustices are often the focus of social workers' efforts.
The goal of the profession of social work is to assist communities and vulnerable individuals in overcoming difficulties they encounter on a daily basis.
Social workers frequently identify as artists, making them original and creative thinkers who thrive in environments that encourage self-expression. They also tend to be social, which means they do best when they can talk to, influence, or assist other people.
Learn more about Social Worker here:
https://brainly.com/question/32260621
#SPJ1
In RA9184 or the Government Procurement Act, the term Government Underspending refers to a scenario when a certain agency was not able to spend all of its allotted budget for a certain year leading to a low "Budget Utilization". If a budget is unused, the government therefore was not able to perform its duty of providing the country with good services and can lead to low infrastructure project, low employment and corruption. Underspending can happen for one of the following reasons: a. Failed Bidding where bidders and suppliers either are reluctant to bid to the project. b. Poor planning by the Procurement Agency and Bidding Committee. c. Intentional corruption to allot the money for bonuses rather than for projects. This is the reason why senators are proposing to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and just resort to a negotiated bidding where the Government will eliminate the competitive bidding and will just give the rights of doing the projects to big corporations. In your opinion, a. What will be the pros and cons of the proposed Law? b. Do you agree with the proposal? Explain your answer.
No, I disagree with the proposal to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and favor big corporations for projects.
The proposed law to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and resort to negotiated bidding has potential pros and cons. Pros include faster project implementation, involvement of big corporations, and reduced corruption.
However, there are cons such as limited competition, potential for inflated costs, decreased transparency, and favoring big corporations over small businesses.
I do not agree with the proposal as it may undermine fair competition, transparency, and accountability, while potentially excluding smaller businesses and increasing the risk of corruption in procurement processes.
Preserving the Bidding Process promotes fairness, efficiency, and integrity in government procurement.
Learn more about Procurement Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/30019470
#SPJ4
what is tourism, leisure, and development
Answer:
Tourism: the commercial organization and operation of vacations and visits to places of interest.
Leisure: free time.
Development: the process of developing or being developed.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
is the largest investigative agency in the DHS-mission: to enforce the nation's immigration and customs laws
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is DHS's principal investigation unit, and its goal is to uphold and enforce the country's immigration and customs laws.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is home to the federal law enforcement organization known as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The stated goal of ICE is to defend the country against cross-border crime and illegal immigration that endanger public safety and national security. The ICE mission is carried out by enforcing more than 400 federal laws, with a particular emphasis on preventing terrorism, enforcing immigration laws, and stopping the unlawful movement of persons and things.
Know more about the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) at: https://brainly.com/question/24186771
#SPJ4
What are the significance of the NAPOLCOM in the operation of the PNP
Answer:
Explanation:
The National Police Commission abbreviated as NAPOLCOM, is an attached agency of the Department of the Interior and Local Government responsible for the administration and control of the Philippine National Police (PNP).6975 and 8551 to administer and control the Philippine National Police, the DILG “ for the purpose of effectively discharging the functions prescribe in the "To exercise administrative control and operational supervision over the PNP.
plz mark as brainliest
which school of jurisprudential thought emphasizes using law as a tool for market efficiency while solving legal disputes?
The school of jurisprudential thought that emphasizes using law as a tool for market efficiency while solving legal disputes is the Law and Economics School. The Law and Economics School approach to jurisprudence uses economic principles to determine the legal rules, and policies that would most effectively improve social welfare.
The Law and Economics School is a school of jurisprudential thought that emphasizes using law as a tool for market efficiency while solving legal disputes. It has been said that this approach emerged from the work of neo-classical economists such as Ronald Coase and Richard Posner. The Law and Economics School argues that the efficiency of the market can be used as a tool to solve legal disputes. This approach assumes that people are rational actors who make decisions based on self-interest.
Therefore, the Law and Economics School argues that the law should be designed to promote the efficient allocation of resources and to minimize the costs of legal disputes.In conclusion, the Law and Economics School is a school of jurisprudential thought that emphasizes using law as a tool for market efficiency while solving legal disputes. The Law and Economics School argues that the efficiency of the market can be used as a tool to solve legal disputes. This approach assumes that people are rational actors who make decisions based on self-interest.
Therefore, the Law and Economics School argues that the law should be designed to promote the efficient allocation of resources and to minimize the costs of legal disputes.
To know more about jurisprudential refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14254828#
#SPJ11
you are the surety for your nephew's study loan. the bank that gave the loan to your nephew has brought a claim against you. write out a set of valid legal defenses for yourself by commercial law?
The set of valid legal defenses for the surety holder by commercial law includes:
Illegality of suretyship contractSurety's incapacity etcWhat is a surety?In legal practice, this refers to a guaranty involving a promise by a party who has assume a responsibility for the debt obligation of a borrower if that borrower defaults.
Here, there is little defense for the surety holder because the responsibility has been held by him/her on the loan, thus, the bank that gave the loan to the nephew has a higher chance of recovering then loan from him.
Read more about surety
brainly.com/question/7303089
#SPJ1
Read the following excerpt from a speech:
My fellow citizens: Young Roxanne Jones stands here
today for the many victims of industrial pollution who
cannot. She has fought a long, hard recovery after
suffering serious illness due to the inaction and
irresponsibility of companies like Trevose Inc. Because the
law allows companies like Trevose exceptions to the
currently allowed pollution levels, more children like
Roxanne will be poisoned unless we fix these loopholes.
Which is the most logical connection between Roxanne Jones and the
campaign to change the law?
OA. She is an exception to most mainstream thinking about the law.
OB. She demonstrates the complicated circumstances surrounding
the law.
O C. She is the primary reason people want to change the law.
O D. She is symbolic of a class of victims hurt by the current law.
The most logical connection between Roxanne Jones and the campaign to change the law is that she is symbolic of a class of victims hurt by the current law. Option d is correct.
Roxanne Jones is a representative of all the victims of industrial pollution who can't stand up to fight for themselves. She has struggled to recover after falling seriously ill as a result of the carelessness and inaction of companies like Trevose Inc. Roxanne Jones is not an exception to most mainstream thinking about the law.
It is her circumstances that make the situation complicated, and she's not the primary reason people want to change the law.
The correct answer is D. She is symbolic of a class of victims hurt by the current law.
Learn more about campaign https://brainly.com/question/32161257
#SPJ11
According to some functionalists, what are people feeling when they are compelled to commit crime because of too few legitimate means to acquire the trappings of material success?
Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
Rodney is a medical examiner. He has to classify the death of a victim. The victim had died from gunshots from an officer who was trying to
defend himself. How will Rodney classify the death?
Rodney can classify the victim's death as a homicide. However, because It was not an unlawful homicide, it was not a
Answer:
Culpable homicide
When a police officer shoots a suspect in the line of duty, it is considered as homicide but not a murder.
weaknesses of the articles of confederation and how did it affect
Lack of a centralised government, the inability to tax, a weak military, the inability to control business, and the incapacity to enforce laws were the weaknesses of the articles of confederation.
What was the effect of weakness?The shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation had a number of detrimental impacts on the new country. The lack of a The shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation had a number of detrimental impacts on the new country. The lack of a centralised authority had a number of significant impacts, one of which was a weak and ineffectual national government. The government struggled to maintain a powerful military, control business, and uphold the law because it was unable to raise enough money through taxes. As a result, states frequently took independent actions and sought their own interests, resulting in state separation and hostility. Due to the government's inability to address commercial, financial, and diplomatic concerns, the economy became unstable, and the country's negotiating position abroad suffered.
To learn more about confederation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11649223
#SPJ4
With reference to the relevant provision of law, discuss whether the death penalty is against human rights.
Answer:
The U.S. death penalty system flagrantly violates human rights law. It is often applied in an arbitrary and discriminatory manner without affording vital due process rights. Moreover, methods of execution and death row conditions have been condemned as cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment and even torture.
Explanation:
May aircraft wreckage be moved prior to the time the NTSB takes custody?a) Yes, but only if moved by a federal, state, or local law enforcement officerb) Yes, but only to protect the wreckage from further damagec) No, it may not be moved under any circumstances
Answer:
b) Yes, but only to protect the wreckage from further damage.
Explanation:
While the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has the primary responsibility for investigating aircraft accidents in the United States, it may take some time for NTSB investigators to arrive at the accident site. In the meantime, it may be necessary to move the wreckage to protect it from further damage, such as from weather conditions or other hazards.
According to the NTSB's guidelines for the preservation of aircraft wreckage, "if the wreckage must be moved to protect it from further damage, the party moving the wreckage should take steps to preserve evidence, such as taking photographs and measurements of the wreckage and the surrounding area, and collecting any debris or other evidence that may have been displaced." The guidelines also state that "any movement of wreckage should be done only after consultation with the NTSB, if possible, and only after appropriate documentation and photographs have been taken."
However, it's important to note that moving the wreckage without proper documentation and consultation with the NTSB can compromise the integrity of the investigation and the accuracy of the findings. Therefore, any movement of wreckage should be done only when necessary to protect the wreckage from further damage, and with great care to preserve all relevant evidence.
Hope this helps!
Yes, but only if moved by a federal, state, or local law enforcement officer or to protect the wreckage from further damage. According to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), aircraft wreckage should be preserved until NTSB personnel arrive to take custody of it.
However, if the situation requires the aircraft wreckage to be moved, then it is possible but only under specific circumstances.The wreckage may be moved if it is required for life-saving activities or to prevent further damage to the wreckage. Moreover, the wreckage may be moved by a federal, state, or local law enforcement officer if they are carrying out their official duties. These individuals are authorized to move the wreckage if it is necessary for them to do so.The wreckage may also be moved if it presents an imminent danger or is required for evidence preservation. In some cases, the NTSB may approve the removal of the wreckage if they feel that the wreckage may pose a threat to public safety.
However, all actions related to the removal of the wreckage must be well documented to ensure that all the evidence is available for examination by the NTSB.The NTSB has the authority to investigate the cause of the accident, and it is imperative that the wreckage is preserved until they arrive. They have the expertise and the equipment to carry out a thorough investigation. It is essential that the wreckage is preserved as it may contain evidence that could help to determine the cause of the accident. Therefore, it is important that the aircraft wreckage is left undisturbed until the NTSB arrives to take custody of it.
To know more about National Transportation Safety Board visit-
brainly.com/question/31226772
#SPJ11
4 orginazations /agencies that work to adress human rights violations
Answer:
Amnesty International
Human Rights Watch
UN human rights council
Human rights first
Explanation:
Do you think the federal government should be able to force Texas and other
states to follow federal policies that they normally wouldn't have to in exchange for receiving money
from the federal government?
I do not think that the federal government should force Texas and other states to follow federal policies in exchange for federal aid because the constititution discourages this.
What is federal aid?Federal aid includes federal grants, loans, or other federal assistance for certain federal programs or policies.
The constitution does not empower the federal government to hamstring states to follow its policies. However, with federal aid, the federal government can influence states, including Texas.
Thus, I do not think that the federal government should force Texas and other states to follow federal policies in exchange for federal aid.
Learn more about federal aid and constitutional conflicts at https://brainly.com/question/5496965
#SPJ1
How the Bill of Rights is supposed to protect defendants from situations like the Scottsboro boys case. What has happened between the time of this case and today that make it less likely this will happen? Is it likely that something similar might happen in our criminal justice system today?
Answer:
After filing the first post-Janus First Amendment labor law challenge in the United States Supreme Court, The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in support of a related challenge, Miller v. Inslee, that calls on the U.S. Supreme Court to recognize that laws forcing recipients of government benefits to accept union representation are unconstitutional. As it did in its brief in Bierman v. Dayton, Buckeye argues that the lower courts have improperly exempted such “exclusive representation” schemes from scrutiny under the First Amendment.
“In its Janus ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court raised serious questions about the constitutionality of forced exclusive representation, and in three legal cases, The Buckeye Institute has outlined why it is unconstitutional to force public employees to be represented by unions that advocate against their interests,” said Robert Alt, president and chief executive officer of The Buckeye Institute. “Like Buckeye’s clients, Katherine Miller—a Washington state childcare provider—should not be forced to speak through a government union with which she disagrees.”
The Miller case, brought by National Right to Work Foundation, raises similar claims to Buckeye’s cases—Uradnik v. Inter Faculty Organization, Reisman v. Associated Faculties of the University of Maine, and Thompson v. Marietta Education Association—and challenges state laws which force individuals, in this case state childcare providers, to allow a government-designated union to speak for them.
Explanation:
two things about "i've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck"
1. implying that nixon's denial of the watergate break in is hard to believe
2. attorney general mitchell would support nixon
The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon.
The Watergate scandal was a political scandal that occurred in the United States during the 1970s. The scandal arose after a break-in at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters in the Watergate office complex in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1972.The events that followed the break-in resulted in President Richard Nixon's resignation from office in August 1974.
Nixon was accused of trying to cover up his involvement in the break-in and other illegal activities. The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon. This statement is related to the Watergate scandal and suggests that Nixon was involved in a cover-up.
To know more about Nixon's visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1131063
#SPJ11
If you steal your entire speech from another source and present it as if it was your own, you are committing what kind of plagiarism?.
which law states that the volume of a gas is proportional to the moles of the gas when pressure and temperature are kept constant? a. boyle’s law b.dalton’s law c. charles’s law
The law that states that the volume of a gas is proportional to the moles of the gas when pressure and temperature are kept constant is known as Avogadro's law.
What is Avogadro's law?
Avogadro's law, also known as Avogadro's hypothesis, is the principle that states that the volume of a gas is directly proportional to the number of moles of gas present at a constant temperature and pressure. In essence, the amount of gas in a system is proportional to its volume when the temperature and pressure remain constant.
In mathematical terms, the law can be expressed as follows: V ∝ nWhere V is the volume of the gas and n is the number of moles of gas present in the system.
Therefore, if the volume of a gas is doubled, the number of moles of gas will also double if the pressure and temperature are constant.
Hence, the right answer is Avogadro's law.
Read more about Gas at https://brainly.com/question/14812509
#SPJ11
requirements for disease reporting in the united states are mandated by what entity?
In the United States, the requirements for disease reporting are mandated by state and local health departments.
Each state has its own laws and regulations that require healthcare providers, laboratories, and other entities to report certain communicable diseases to the state or local health department. These laws and regulations also specify what diseases must be reported, the time frame for reporting, and the method of reporting.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a federal agency, provides guidance and support to state and local health departments for disease surveillance, investigation, and control. The CDC also maintains the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS), a national system that receives and aggregates data on notifiable diseases from state and local health departments.
While the federal government does not mandate disease reporting requirements, it plays a role in supporting and coordinating disease surveillance and response efforts across states and localities through agencies such as the CDC and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
To know more about local health departments here:
https://brainly.com/question/14500670
#SPJ4
explain what is the legal source of the powers of administrative agencies, then identify an agency that you find of particular interest or importance for public goals and explain in at least three full sentences the reason(s) why you consider that agency to be relevant. only 8 sentences max
The legal source of the powers of administrative agencies is a statutory authority granted by Congress.
What is the basis for the powers of administrative agencies?Administrative agencies derive their powers from statutes passed by Congress. These statutes outline the objectives, functions, and specific powers delegated to each agency.
The enabling legislation provides the legal framework within which administrative agencies operate and defines their authority to regulate and enforce laws within their designated areas of expertise.
One agency of particular interest and importance for public goals is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The EPA plays a crucial role in safeguarding the environment and protecting public health.
It is responsible for enforcing environmental laws and regulations, conducting research, setting standards, and promoting sustainable practices.
The EPA's authority, derived from legislation such as the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act, allows it to address pressing environmental issues, regulate emissions, protect natural resources, and promote environmental justice.
The relevance of the EPA lies in its ability to tackle complex environmental challenges that affect communities and ecosystems nationwide.
Through its regulatory and enforcement powers, the EPA contributes to mitigating pollution, preserving natural resources, and ensuring a healthy and sustainable environment for present and future generations.
The agency's expertise, scientific research, and collaborative efforts with stakeholders are essential in addressing environmental concerns, combating climate change, and fostering responsible environmental stewardship.
Learn more about Environmental Protection Agency
brainly.com/question/13292139
#SPJ11
bankruptcy courts are the only courts in the state or federal system that handle bankruptcy declarations and proceedings. true false
The given statement "bankruptcy courts are the only courts in the state or federal system that handle bankruptcy declarations and proceedings." is true as federal courts have total jurisdiction over all bankruptcy cases.
Congress has decided that bankruptcy cases should be heard in federal courts rather than state courts, so federal courts have complete jurisdiction over all bankruptcy cases. Therefore, a bankruptcy case cannot be brought before a state court.
By selling their assets to pay off debts or by coming up with a repayment plan, honest people who are unable to pay their creditors can get a fresh start under bankruptcy law. Laws governing bankruptcy also offer assistance to struggling companies and enable orderly distributions to creditors through reorganization or liquidation.
Learn more about federal courts at:
brainly.com/question/10732122
#SPJ4
Your first big case is a multiple murder.As defense attorney for Sy Kopath, you have come to the realization that he really did break into a couple's home and torture and kill them in the course of robbing them of jewelry and other valuables. He has even confessed to you that he did it. However, you are also aware that the police did not read him his Miranda warning and that he was coerced into giving a confession without your presence. What should you do? Would your answer be different if you believed that he was innocent or didn't know for sure either way?
Answer: ok he did it
Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.
37.)Which of the following statements is NOT accurate with respect to judicial notice?
a) a judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute
b) judicial notice promotes trial efficiency
c) judicial notice is treated differently with respect to civil and criminal trials
d) judicial notice is only appropriate during the prosecutors case in chief
38.)Tom Markell is stopped by the police while driving his automobile on his way home from
work. It turns out that there are tow other passengers in the car, Jay and Larry. The police
observe a handgun on the floor of the interior of the automobile. All three occupants of the
vehicle state, "what gun..I didn't know there was a gun in the vehicle. As the prosecutor
on the case, can all three occupants of the vehicle be charged with criminal possession of a weapon?
a) yes, under the theory of judicial notice
b) yes, under the open view presumption under the law
none of the occupants of the vehicle constructively possessed the firearm
c) no, none of the occupants of the vehicle constructively possessed the firearm
d) no, it is pure speculation that any of the occupants of the vehicle possessed the firearm
Answer:
Explanation:
37.)Which of the following statements is NOT accurate with respect to judicial notice?
a) a judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute
b) judicial notice promotes trial efficiency
c) judicial notice is treated differently with respect to civil and criminal trials
d) judicial notice is only appropriate during the prosecutors case in chief
38.)Tom Markell is stopped by the police while driving his automobile on his way home from
work. It turns out that there are tow other passengers in the car, Jay and Larry. The police
observe a handgun on the floor of the interior of the automobile. All three occupants of the
vehicle state, "what gun..I didn't know there was a gun in the vehicle. As the prosecutor
on the case, can all three occupants of the vehicle be charged with criminal possession of a weapon?
a) yes, under the theory of judicial notice
b) yes, under the open view presumption under the law
none of the occupants of the vehicle constructively possessed the firearm
c) no, none of the occupants of the vehicle constructively possessed the firearm
d) no, it is pure speculation that any of the occupants of the vehicle
Murders are usually committed by strangers.
True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
They usually happen randomly
Which factor is a reason for persistent delinquent behavior according to life course theory?
A stable marriage
A permanent residence
Unemployment
Good upbringing
Is law school worth it ?
your choice
Explanation:
Law school take 3 year
it's intense and comptive
have to read really long books
But it easier to get into than medical school
Answer:
Law school is not a bad idea for every student
Explanation:
but it certainly can be a bad idea for some students. If you have unreasonable expectations of what a lawyer's work entails, how much money you will make, or if you have the wrong reasons for wanting to attend, than law school can be a bad idea.
Brainlest
good luck! :D
Establishing partnership in community policing in South Africa?
Answer:
current South African context community policing must be based on principles which include the acceptance of public oversight and accountability to representative civilian structures, transparency in relation to most aspects of police work and a commitment to operational flexibility on the part of the police.
Explanation:
Consider your daily routine and government agencies that you may interact with as you pump gas, buy groceries, go to work or make purchases in the store or online. Locate an agency (federal, state or local) and prepare a short summary of the agency including when and why it was created as well as how you interact with it.
Answer:
One example of a government agency that I interact with on a daily basis is the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC was created in 1914 as part of the Federal Trade Commission Act, with the purpose of protecting consumers from unfair business practices, such as false advertising and monopolies.
I interact with the FTC in various ways. For example, when I make purchases online or in-store, the FTC ensures that the advertisements and marketing materials used by the companies are truthful and not misleading. The FTC also works to prevent companies from engaging in anti-competitive practices that would limit consumer choices or raise prices. Additionally, the FTC also has a role in protecting personal data and ensuring that companies implement adequate data security measures.
The FTC also provides information and resources for consumers to learn about their rights and how to protect themselves from fraud and scams. I can access these resources on the FTC's website, and I can also file a complaint with the FTC if I believe that a company has engaged in unfair or deceptive practices. The FTC also regularly takes action against companies that violate consumer protection laws and regulations, resulting in fines and penalties.
Qui tam suits are those cases in which a private citizen known as a whistleblower reports a fraudulent activity within his or her organization.
Yes, that statement is correct. Qui tam suits, also known as whistleblower suits, are legal actions in which a private citizen (often referred to as a whistleblower or relator) reports fraudulent or illegal activities being committed by an individual or organization.
These suits typically involve cases where the fraudulent activity is committed against the government, such as fraud involving government contracts, healthcare fraud, or tax fraud.
Under qui tam provisions, the whistleblower has the right to bring the lawsuit on behalf of the government. If the case is successful and results in a recovery, the whistleblower may be entitled to receive a portion of the monetary damages awarded as a reward for their role in exposing the fraud.
The purpose of qui tam provisions is to encourage individuals with knowledge of fraudulent activities to come forward and assist in combating fraud against the government.
To know more about whistleblower refer here
https://brainly.com/question/14330732#
#SPJ11
________ force—the highest degree of force—is considered reasonable only when used to counter an immediate threat of death or great bodily harm
Answer:
deadly force
Explanation:
Deadly force—the highest degree of force—is considered reasonable only when used to counter an immediate threat of death or great bodily harm.
What is Deadly force?Any force that could potentially cause death or serious physical harm is referred to as deadly force. Its use may only be justified under the most extreme conditions, when all other choices have failed or are impractical.
A person is justified in using lethal force if they have a good reason to believe that doing so is necessary to stop an imminent threat to their own or another person's life, a serious physical injury to another person, or the forced commission of a crime.
Thus, it is Deadly force.
For more details about Deadly force, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/24193741
#SPJ1