The individual who helped plan a crime and sent others out to actually perform the act while staying at home is called an accomplice.
An accomplice is a person who assists in the commission of a crime, either by helping plan the crime or by actually participating in some way. In some cases, an accomplice may not be present at the scene of the crime but may have played a significant role in its planning or execution.
The law treats accomplices as if they had committed the crime themselves, even if they did not actually carry out the act. Therefore, accomplices may face the same charges and penalties as the person who actually committed the crime.
In the scenario provided, the individual who helped plan the robbery and sent others out to perform the act while staying at home would be considered an accomplice to the crime.
For more questions like Law click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ11
Which phrase best completes the diagram?
• A. Increased inflation
• B. Decreased production
• C. Economic growth
D. Per capita GDP
the answer is c Economic growth
Hows ur day??????????????????????????????????
Answer:
bad really bad that my answer
Answer: goodddd
Explanation:
Bongani is 19 years old and lives with his parents. Without his guardian's consent, he concludes a contract of sale to sell his motorcycle for R2 000 to Mxali who is 25 years old. On enquiry by Mxali, Bongani lies about his age and says that he is 21 years old. Mxali pays the R2 000, but Bongani refuses to deliver the motorcycle to Mxali. Did Bongani breach any contract?
Answer: He did not breach any contract with Mxali
Explanation: Brainliest
How to write a good conclusion on a criminology paper on someone killing their spouse (criminal homocide - by 1 shot in the head).
Which assignment would require you to use domain-specific academic vocabulary from more than one domain?
Draft a persuasive essay about climate change.
What does domain-specific vocabulary actually mean?
The term "domain-specific vocabulary" describes words that are unique to a certain field of study. This is the precise, subject-specific terminology that permeates all of our lessons. These might be the terms found in our textbook glossaries for math, science, and social studies as well as on our word walls.
Domain-specific terms fall into the third group of the three tiers of vocabulary words, which are words that are not often a part of our vocabulary unless we are conversing or studying a specific subject.
Science-related terms like photosynthesis, hibernation, nocturnality, classification, species, hypothesis, etc. fall under this category.
Domain-specific math vocabulary includes phrases like equivalent, quotient, product, etc. that are quite exact.
Learn more about domain-specific vocabulary with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/17796090
#SPJ4
In the context of policing, which of the following statements is true about in-service training?
B. It is designed to provide a refresher to experienced officers on basic issues such as the use-of-force policy in a police department.
Can the police impose penalties?A senior officer may discipline him by giving him a warning if it is claimed (by a citizen or peer) that he has been disrespectful, behaved improperly, abused his authority, or neglected to perform his task.
Enforcement of economic laws and the pursuit of economic crime in India are the responsibilities of the Directorate of Enforcement (ED), a law enforcement and economic intelligence organisation. It is a component of the Ministry of Finance's Department of Revenue in India.
To know more about police visit:-
brainly.com/question/24655820
#SPJ9
Complete question:
In the context of policing, which of the following statements is true about in-service training?
A. It is the least effective training tool in communicating new state legislations or court decisions to experienced police officers.
B. It is designed to provide a refresher to experienced officers on basic issues such as the use-of-force policy in a police department.
C. It is usually given to new recruits before they join their police departments.
D. It is primarily used to weed out new recruits who underperform during their probationary period.
jeff is accused of shoplifting at a department store he is arrested goes to trial and is found not guilty the district attorney however after the trail is given new videotape evidence that jeff did in fact shoplift jeff is brought to trial again for the same act of shoplifting
Answer:
This is known as double jeopardy. Double jeopardy is the prosecution of a person for the same crime more than once. The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution includes a prohibition against being "subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb," and most state constitutions have similar clauses.
Explanation:
In the scenario you've provided, Jeff has already been found not guilty of shoplifting in a trial. If he is then brought to trial again for the same act of shoplifting, this would constitute double jeopardy and would be unconstitutional. However, there is an exception to this rule: if new evidence comes to light that was not available at the time of the first trial, and that evidence might reasonably have led to a different outcome, a person may be retried. But in such case it should be cleared that this new evidence is that substantial which would change the outcome of the trial, otherwise it will be considered as double jeopardy.
which event was a result of the civil rights act of 1964?
A) Elimination of racial tension
B) A ban on gender discrimination
C) Desegregation of public schools
D) Racial integration of the army
The desegregation of public schools event was a result of the civil rights act of 1964.
What are the events?The event, incident, episode, and scenario all refer to an occurrence or occurrence. A happening that occurs without intention, choice, or plan is referred to as an occurrence. a fortuitous meeting that happened to occur. the event often denotes a significant occurrence, often with a reason before it.
The provisions of the civil rights act, Forbade discrimination on the other basis. The hiring in race, promotion, and firing. The Act prohibited discrimination in public accommodations and federally funded programs.
The Legacy of the Civil Rights Act also paved the way for the two major laws. The voting rights act of 1965, prohibited literacy tests and the other was discriminatory voting practices and the fair housing act of 1968.
Therefore, Thus option (C) is correct
Learn more about events here:
https://brainly.com/question/12961938
#SPJ2
Evaluate the impact of personal values onthe success of the census campaign
There is a great impact of personal values onthe success of the campaign.
What is the effect of personal values on the census?There is a direct impact of personal values on the success of the census campaign because census can be done only with the help of cooperation. Without cooperature, this activity should not be done efficiently.
So we can conclude that there is a great impact of personal values onthe success of the census campaign.
Learn more about compaign here: https://brainly.com/question/1086036
The policy of targeting the leadership of Mexico’s drug cartels resulted in the cartels battling within and among themselves to reestablish supremacy. Over 100,000 have been killed in the cartel fighting (many of them civilians, police, politicians, and media) over the last 15 years. Is it more appropriate to address the drug problem of the U.S. from a public health perspective than from a law enforcement perspective? Should we simply end the war on drugs, recognize we have a problem with drug abuse, treat it as a disease, and allow the Mexican supply system to stabilize under new leadership; thereby, bringing to an end the major war (hidden from public view by American media) on our southern border?
A public health approach to drug abuse and ending the war on drugs could be more effective in reducing drug-related harm and undermining the power of drug cartels.
How the Problem of Drug Abuse can be Tackled?There is growing recognition that addressing drug abuse as a public health issue rather than a criminal justice issue may be more effective in reducing drug-related harm. The approach of treating drug abuse as a disease, rather than a crime, has been successful in other countries, such as Portugal, where it has led to reduced rates of drug use and related harms.
Ending the war on drugs and shifting resources towards public health approaches, such as drug treatment and harm reduction, could help to reduce drug-related harm and reduce the burden on law enforcement. This approach could also help to reduce the power and influence of drug cartels by undermining the illicit drug market.
However, simply allowing the Mexican drug supply system to stabilize under new leadership may not be enough to bring an end to the violence and instability caused by drug cartels. The root causes of the drug trade and drug-related violence are complex and deeply rooted in issues such as poverty, corruption, and political instability. Addressing these underlying issues will be crucial in achieving lasting change.
Learn more about drug abuse here: https://brainly.com/question/26254731
#SPJ1
How can you explain The Frank-Starling law of the heart? In simple words?
In simple terms, the Frank-Starling law of the heart states that the more blood that is in the heart, the more it will stretch and the stronger it will contract.
The Frank-Starling law of the heart is a principle that describes the relationship between the heart's ability to pump blood and the amount of blood that is in the heart. This law is named after two scientists, Otto Frank and Ernest Starling, who discovered it in the early 1900s.
This increased contractility leads to an increased stroke volume, which is the amount of blood that is pumped with each heartbeat.
The Frank-Starling law of the heart is important because it helps explain how the heart can respond to changes in the body's demands for blood. For example, if the body needs more oxygen, the heart will pump more blood to meet that demand.
This increased pumping ability helps maintain blood flow and ensures that the body's cells receive the oxygen they need.
The Frank-Starling law also helps explain why the heart can compensate for certain types of heart disease or damage.
For example, if the heart is weakened, it will work harder to pump more blood to meet the body's demands, and this increased contractility can help maintain blood flow and prevent the symptoms of heart failure.
The Frank-Starling law of the heart is a principle that describes the relationship between the heart's ability to pump blood and the amount of blood that is in the heart.
To learn more about Frank-Starling law refer here
https://brainly.com/question/16829494#
#SPJ11
is it inappropriate to brew traditional beer in terms of south african law
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
In South Africa, brewing beer at home is legal for own consumption. However, it is illegal to sell the beer and now during the lock down period transporting alcohol is also prohibited.
offering to another person as genuine a document known to be a fake
The term that means "offering to another person as genuine a document known to be a fake" is a forgery.
Forgery is the act of producing, adapting, or imitating objects, statistics, or documents with the intention to deceive. Forgery typically entails the creation of a fabricated written document or another item with the intention to deceive an individual or company. This may include the creation of counterfeit currency or personal documents, such as passports and driver's licenses.
Forgery may also include the signing of a document by someone who does not have the authority to do so. It's important to note that forgery is a crime, and those found guilty of forgery may face legal consequences such as imprisonment or fines.
Hence, the term that means "offering to another person as genuine a document known to be a fake" is a forgery.
Read more about Forgery at https://brainly.com/question/13582375
#SPJ11
Which of the following is an example of a vulnerable road user?
A. A sedan.
B. Utility workers.
C. A new driver
Answer:
a new driver is vulnerable of the road ️
Answer:
C. A new driver is a vulnerable road user
Which rule of evidence would an attorney break if they were to ask a witness to predict what would have happened had the defendant behaved differently?.
Speculation rule of evidence would an attorney break if they were to ask a witness to predict what would have happened had the defendant behaved differently.
About Speculation
Any subject that the witness has had no firsthand knowledge is off limits for testimony. A witness may only testify about an event that they have personally witnessed. Before such a witness can testify regarding an issue, they must first demonstrate personal knowledge of it.
It is not permitted to speculate or offer someone else's theory as to what might have occurred. A witness cannot draw inferences based only on what they saw or heard. An example would be asking a witness if he saw Kelly on Saturday.
Because the evidence is not regarded as trustworthy or true, speculation is indeed a legal justification for opposing to witness testimony for reasons related to the argumentative objection.
To know more about witness:
brainly.com/question/14567392
#SPJ4
I am allowed to drive myself to the testing center without a licensed driver? (T/F)
The statement "I am allowed to drive myself to the testing centre without a licensed driver" is false because a licensed driver is mandated by law.
The correct answer is false.
A person at least 14 years old may apply for a learner's license in Arkansas. With a learner's license, the individual can drive but must be accompanied by a licensed driver who is at least 21 years old and has held a valid driver's license for at least two years. The licensed driver must sit in the front passenger seat next to the person with the learner's license and must be able to take control of the vehicle if necessary.
The learner's license is valid for 4 years, and the individual must complete a certain number of hours of supervised driving practice before they can apply for a provisional driver's license. The provisional license is issued to individuals at least 16 years old who have held a learner's license for at least 6 months and have completed the required hours of supervised driving practice.
To know more about drivers, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/685799
#SPJ4
. What arguments can be made for and against favoring the term “white collar crime” over “elite deviance”?
1. What ethical guidelines will the soft drink
company need to follow to market a drink in
the UK (United Kingdom)?
One ethical guideline that soft drink companies follow to market in the United Kingdom is not to advertise to children under 16 years in some media.
What are ethical guidelines?Ethical guidelines are rules that must be observed in doing business to minimize breaking business ethical guidelines.
Ethical guidelines define actions that are morally right or wrong. The guidelines are provided to be followed to avoid violations and their consequences.
Thus, a soft drink company marketing a drink in the United Kingdom must follow ethical guidelines, including:
Ensuring proper labeling of their products. Indication of product contents, production and expiration dates, and other warnings.Learn more about ethical marketing at https://brainly.com/question/16025718
The purpose of the state of union address is to provide the opportunity for the
Answer:
The purpose of the State of the Union address is to provide the opportunity for the "President to address Congress and the nation about the legislative goals to be accomplished," since this is one of the few times that the President has the attention of the entire Congress.
Explanation:
True or False: Motorcyclists have half of the rights and responsibilities on public roadways as automobile
drivers
Answer:
No it's of course false it do not have
The statement that motorcyclists have half of the rights and responsibilities on public roadways as automobile drivers is false because they have same rights and responsibilities.
What are motorcyclists rights and responsibilities?Motorcycle ownership is a privilege rather than a right. If you don't keep your end of the contract, you can suffer dire penalties, including physical harm or even death. If they want to continue riding, motorcycle riders must fulfil a number of obligations, such as:
Obeying all applicable state traffic rules.Obeying all motorcycle-specific legislation; Possessing proof of legal financial responsibility in the form of bonds, liability insurance, or self-insurance.completing the necessary training and skill-building programmes, and obtaining a motorcycle licence or endorsement.using the proper safety equipmentdriving sensiblyTo know more about motorcyclist rights and responsibilities https://brainly.com/question/1510975
#SPJ2
Which of the following statements is true about CERTs? A. CERTs are restricted to disaster response activities in their neighborhood. B. CERTS often support emergency response agencies with nonemergency projects in the community. C. Being a CERT volunteer requires little time because disasters do not occur frequently. D. CERTS never support emergency response agencies with nonemergency projects.
Answer:
A. CERTs are restricted to disaster response activities in their neighborhood.
Explanation:
CERT is an educational program that seeks to instruct volunteers who can help their communities in emergencies or disasters, in addition to teaching concepts for preventing these disasters, low-complexity rescues and even simpler medical procedures that can make all the difference in safety of the victims .. As stated before, the goal is for the volunteer to be able to help their community in the face of a need.
True or False- Jury sizes and voting requirements are the same for all offenses in every state.
False. The size of juries and voting requirements can vary depending on the state and the type of offense being tried. In most states, the minimum size for a criminal jury is 12, but some states allow for smaller juries in certain types of cases, such as misdemeanors.
Some states also allow for non-unanimous verdicts in certain cases, such as in Louisiana where 10 out of 12 jurors must agree on a verdict for serious felony cases. However, in federal courts, the size of the jury is typically 12 and a unanimous decision is required for conviction in criminal cases.
Learn more about voting requirements
https://brainly.com/question/29783503
#SPJ4
Compare and contrast the five primary punishment philosophies.
300 words please
Answer:
The five primary punishment philosophies are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and restoration. Retribution is based on the idea of “an eye for an eye”, meaning that the punishment should fit the crime. This philosophy views punishment as a way to balance the scales of justice and to provide a sense of justice for the victim and society. Deterrence is based on the notion that the punishment should be severe enough to deter people from committing the same crime in the future. Incapacitation is based on the idea that the punishment should be severe enough to prevent the offender from committing the same crime again, either by removing them from society or by providing them with the tools to change their behavior. Rehabilitation is based on the idea that the punishment should be designed to help the offender change their behavior and become a productive member of society. Finally, restoration is based on the idea that the punishment should be designed to help the offender repair the harm they have caused and to restore the victim, the community, and the offender to a better state.
Retribution and deterrence are both focused on punishing the offender, while incapacitation, rehabilitation, and restoration are all focused on helping the offender. Retribution and deterrence are both focused on preventing future crimes, while incapacitation, rehabilitation, and restoration are all focused on helping the offender change their behavior. Retribution and deterrence are both focused on punishing the offender for their past actions, while incapacitation, rehabilitation, and restoration are all focused on helping the offender reform their behavior. Finally, retribution and deterrence are both focused on punishing the offender for their past actions, while incapacitation, rehabilitation, and restoration are all focused on helping the offender become a productive member of society.
Explanation:
_____ plaintiffs often need to know the identity of sources used by reporters in order to try to prove the story was untrue, fabricated, or published with actual malice.
Libel
In order to demonstrate that a story was false, made up, or published with actual malice, libel plaintiffs frequently need to know the names of the sources that journalists used to prepare a story.
What is a plaintiff who can prove libel?Being libel-proof simply implies that the plaintiff's image is so poor that any false statement also couldn't further damage that person's standing in the community. The reasoning for this is that a plaintiff's claim must be rejected because there was no injury caused by the misleading statement to the plaintiff.
Why is the plaintiff's status in a libel action so crucial?Because there are various legal requirements for various sorts of plaintiffs, the status of the plaintiff (the person filing a complaint) is significant in defamation law. Depending if the defamation claimant is a private or public figure, the legal norm changes.
Learn more about libel plaintiffs: https://brainly.com/question/29409476
#SPJ4
If you want to pass a slow moving vehicle you should do what
Answer:
As long as you're passing in a legal manner either in a passing zone read below.
Explanation:
Use your turn signal to let other drives know you are changing lanes.Check your side and rearview mirrors for traffic approaching from behind.Glance over your left shoulder if you are moving left. Glance over your right shoulder if you are moving right so you can see if there are any vehicles in your blind spot.(passing on a one lane road is completely different but you did not say which you were referring to)
in the_________, the attorneys give a brief version of the facts and the supporting evidence that they will present during the trial.
A case known as prima facie is one in which a judge found that pre-trial evidence was sufficient to justify the trial. In civil cases, where the plaintiff bears the burden of proof, prima facie is typically used.
Which side came out on top in the trial?The jury's final decision is called a verdict. A defendant may be found "guilty" or "not guilty" of each charged crime by a judge. A verdict of not guilty indicates that the jury was unable to reach a conclusion of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
What is "prima facie evidence" in law?a Latin expression that means "at first glance" or "at first sight."This is the standard of proof, which states that the party with the burden of proof only needs to provide sufficient evidence to establish a rebuttable presumption that the assertion is true.The standard of proof for prima facie is relatively low.
Learn more about pre-trial evidence here:
https://brainly.com/question/12397676
#SPJ4
Decide whether each problem contains mitigating factors or aggravating factors.
1. The defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter.
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation.
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed.
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics.
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school.
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family.
Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.
What is the Mitigating and Aggravating factor?A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.
On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.
Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.
Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341
#SPJ1
a specific version of a book is a/an
Answer:
volume, publication or edition
Explanation:
not really sure about which one it is but it's one of those
A specific or particular version or category of a book is claimed to be as an:
- Edition
'Edition' is described as 'a particular written work that is edited and published in a specific manner or by a specific editor. In case considerable stylistic or elemental changes are made to the original text, it is characterized as an edition.For example; The latest edition of the Oxford Dictionary contains all the updated pronunciations and meanings.Thus, 'Edition' is the correct answer.
Learn more about 'Book' here:
brainly.com/question/15780034
17. Which of the following are possible pleas by a defendant in a criminal case?
A. guilty
B.. not guilty
C.. nolo contender (no contest)
D., all of the above
Answer:
D all of the above why does this have to be 20 characters long
Which situation is the best example of competition in an economic system? A restaurant just opened down the block from a movie theater, and the restaurant owner hopes to attract diners after each movie. A small CD store slashed its prices to attract customers from a larger store that sells CDs and DVDs. A store that sells sneakers has offered a special deal to customers from a nearby health club. A federal agency has been created to monitor the production and distribution of food supplements.
d. A state agency has been created to monitor the production and distribution of sports drinks.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Answer:
it is B: a small CD store ...
Explanation:
i just took the test