White-collar crimes are less likely than other crimes to be given lenient plea bargains. Option A
This is because white-collar crimes typically involve financial or economic offenses committed by individuals in positions of power or trust, such as corporate executives, bankers, and government officials. These crimes often involve complex legal and financial issues, making them difficult to prosecute and negotiate plea bargains for.
Additionally, white-collar crimes tend to have a lower public perception of harm than other crimes, such as drug-related or vandalism offenses. As a result, prosecutors may be less inclined to offer lenient plea bargains to individuals charged with white-collar crimes in order to deter future similar offenses and maintain public confidence in the justice system.
In contrast, drug-related crimes and vandalism offenses are often seen as more direct and violent offenses that pose a greater risk to public safety. As such, prosecutors may be more willing to offer lenient plea bargains in exchange for information or cooperation in order to expedite the legal process and reduce the overall impact of these crimes on society.
Immigration offenses, while still serious, are often subject to their own unique legal frameworks and may not be subject to plea bargaining in the same way as other crimes. Overall, the nature of the crime and its impact on society will play a significant role in determining the likelihood of a lenient plea bargain being offered. Therefore option A is correct.
For more such questions on crimes visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31393957
#SPJ11
Through a series of compromises the delegates were able to agree on the important points of the new plan. After its approval by the convention, the Constitution still had to be ratified by the states. The promise to add a Bill of Rights helped convince Anti-Federalists to approve the new government. In June 1788, New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify the document and the Constitution took effect.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation did not solve some of the problems that the republic was going through and that was why it was necessary to create the federal constitution, which created and gave power to a unified government and which managed to suppress the problems and challenges that the country presented. However, the constitution had to be approved by the delegates of each state and not everyone was willing to approve it. A group of delegates called anti-federalists, believed that the constitution gave the president too much power and that was dangerous.
To have the support of anti-federalists, the federalists agreed to add a bill of rights to the new document, which ended up working.
Ralph is a landlord who owns several apartment buildings. Which of these actions does the federal Fair Housing Act prohibit Ralph from taking?
A. Establishing a "no pets" policy for one of his apartment buildings
B. Evicting a female tenant who's found to be distributing illegal drugs
C. Refusing to show, sell, or rent property to smokers
D. Threatening to evict a couple because they filed a complaint of harassment against him
The answer to the given student question is that the federal Fair Housing Act prohibits Ralph from refusing to show, sell, or rent property to smokers.
What is the Fair Housing Act?
The Fair Housing Act is a federal law in the United States that was passed in 1968. The act prohibits discrimination in housing transactions based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, and familial status. The law is aimed at providing equal opportunities to everyone in the United States housing market.
What actions does the federal Fair Housing Act prohibit Ralph from taking?
The federal Fair Housing Act prohibits Ralph from refusing to show, sell, or rent property to smokers. This is because smoking is not included among the seven protected classes in the Fair Housing Act.The act prohibits any sort of discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, and familial status. This means that Ralph cannot establish a "no pets" policy for one of his apartment buildings, cannot evict a female tenant who's found to be distributing illegal drugs, and cannot threaten to evict a couple because they filed a complaint of harassment against him.
To know more about federal law:
https://brainly.com/question/14867447
#SPJ11
What are the powers of Congress, described in Article I of the U.S.
Constitution?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; ArtI. S8.
when the executive branch and its agencies translate laws into routine procedures and practices, this is called
Answer: Federal administrative law
Explanation:
Define and describe gender based violence
A high school principal has reason to suspect some students of bringing weapons on to campus. After receiving a tip from a teacher, the principal search is the lockers of three students and finds a pocket knife in one student's locker. The other two lockers turned up nothing. 3) On the high school campus authorities be allowed to search students lockers whenever they want?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Campus authorites are allowed to search lockers because anything brought on campus or that belongs to the school there allowed to search
The government uses population information for all of the following reasons EXCEPT:
A.
to declare war
B.
to plan for the future
C.
to meet citizens’ needs
D.
do you believe that the law is too restrictive or not restrictive enough?
Answer:
too restrictive, they have way to much power and control over us nowadays... this is not the land of the free anymore
Explanation:
Answer:
no
Explanation:
i do nor think so because the law is grate right now
alternative dispute resolution is favored in international disputes because of questions surrounding awards and jurisdiction. True or false?
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is favored in international disputes for several reasons. The statement is false.
While concerns about awards and jurisdiction may arise in some cases, they are not the primary factors driving the preference for ADR. The main advantages of ADR in international disputes lie in its efficiency, flexibility, and confidentiality. ADR methods such as mediation and arbitration offer a quicker and more cost-effective resolution compared to traditional litigation.
The ability to select neutral and expert decision-makers ensures a fair and knowledgeable outcome. Moreover, ADR provides a level of privacy and control over the process, allowing parties to tailor solutions that best suit their needs and maintain business relationships. These factors collectively contribute to the widespread preference for ADR in the international arena.
Therefore, the statement is false.
For more details regarding alternative dispute resolution, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30332485
#SPJ4
Police response to crime during loadshedding example burglary, shoplifting etc
During load shedding, police response to crimes such as burglary and shoplifting can be affected due to the lack of electricity. With power outages, the visibility of police officers can be significantly reduced, making it more challenging to respond to incidents and detect criminal activity. Additionally, load shedding may also impact the communication and response times of the police force, particularly if their communication systems rely on electricity.
To address these challenges, police departments may need to adapt their strategies during load shedding periods. This could include increasing patrols in areas with a high likelihood of criminal activity or using alternative communication methods, such as handheld radios or satellite phones. Furthermore, police departments could work with local communities to increase awareness of crime prevention measures, such as improving lighting and securing property during power outages.
Overall, while load shedding may present challenges for police response to crime, proactive measures and community engagement can help mitigate the impact and ensure public safety.
Is there a defense of crime we talked about in this chapter that you think should not be a valid defense?
Answer: yes. Over 50% of defendants' statements about the case are 1. not supported; 2. cannot be proved; 3. are provably wrong.
On top of it, the federal judge appointed to the case, introduced obvious procedural fraud into it - used the incorrect date the case was officially filed and thus timebarred important claims, on top of other violations of plaintiff's rights.
Explanation:
The United States Postal Inspection Service was created to prevent _____. A. people from sending mail without proper postage B. the national mail system from being used for criminal or illegal purposes C. Protecting mail carriers from inadvertently delivering toxic material D. United States Marshals from policing the postal system
It is B
Answer:
B. the national mail system from being used for criminal or illegal purposes.
Explanation:
The United States Postal Inspection Service is a federal law enforcement sector of the posting service that inspects and makes sure that the mail system is used in a fair and safe manner. This process safeguards the general public from any harm and also ensures the mail system from any illegal or dangerous activity.
Thus, the correct answer is that the US Postal Inspection Service was created so that the national mail system will not be used for any criminal or illegal purposes and also to safeguard people from any harm.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
holly was convicted of a crime, but her conviction has been overturned on appeal. she is convinced that she would never have been charged with the crime in the first place if her case had been handled by a different prosecutor instead of someone who already had a grudge against her. does holly have grounds for a malpractice lawsuit against the prosecuting attorney?
Yes, Holly can use a legal malpractice lawsuit but she has to prove the legal, monetary, or other negative ramifications that were caused by the negligence.
It is not enough for a legal malpractice claim to be valid to show that an attorney was just careless. Additionally, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the negligence had unfavorable consequences in terms of law, money, or other factors. A negative outcome by itself does not constitute misconduct. A breach of the professional conduct norm must have a direct causal effect on the undesirable outcome. Legal malpractice cases cost a lot to defend. The plaintiff must demonstrate severe losses as a result of the negligent act for the case to be successful. If the damages are minimal, the expense of filing the lawsuit could exceed the amount that is ultimately recovered
For similar questions visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/25996351
#SPJ4
The fifteenth amendment guaranteed _______________ for all us citizens, regardless of previous condition of servitude.
The fifteenth amendment guaranteed to vote for all us citizens, regardless of the previous condition of servitude.
What was the fifteenth amendment?The fifteenth amendment guaranteed the right to vote to all citizens, regardless of previous servitude. The United States Constitution's Fifteenth Amendment (Amendment XV) prohibits the federal government and each state from denying or limiting a citizen's right to vote "on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." It was ratified as the third and final of the Reconstruction Amendments on February 3, 1870. During the final years of the American Civil War and the Reconstruction Era that followed, Congress debated the rights of millions of former black slaves on numerous occasions.Therefore, the fifteenth amendment guaranteed to vote for all us citizens, regardless of the previous condition of servitude.
Know more about the fifteenth amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/620540
#SPJ4
What is the most accurate description of the criminal justice system?
Answer:
The criminal justice system is a network of government and private agencies intended to manage accused and convicted criminals. The criminal justice system is comprised of multiple interrelated pillars, consisting of academia, law enforcement, forensic services, the judiciary, and corrections.
Hope I helped
A state law that violates the U.S. Constitution:
O Can be enforced by that state's government only.
O Can be enforced by the United States Supreme Court only.
o Can be enforced by the federal gchernment only.
Cannot be enforced.
Answer:
Not sure, but this helps! :)
Explanation:
The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution [source: FindLaw]. Basically, if a federal and state law contradicts, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the fed can decide to stop you.
What governmental policy could be developed to avoid funneling low-income defendants in the criminal justice system for the sake of revenue?
Lorena files a suit against Milton. Before going to trial, the parties, with their attorneys, meet to try to resolve their dispute. A third party suggests or proposes a resolution, which the parties may or may not decide to adopt. This is
a. arbitration. b. mediation. c. negotiation. d. not a legitimate form of dispute resolution
A third party suggests or proposes a resolution, which the parties may or may not decide to adopt. This is mediation. The correct option is b.
A neutral third party helps disputing parties come to a mutually acceptable resolution during the voluntary and confidential process of mediation. The mediator helps the parties explore potential solutions while facilitating communication and fostering understanding. Mediation gives the parties the ability to reach their own decisions as opposed to arbitration where one is imposed.
Although the mediator may make suggestions or proposals, these are not legally binding unless both parties accept them. Mediation encourages candid communication, protects privacy, and permits original problem solving. It is frequently employed in a variety of conflicts such as domestic disputes, workplace conflicts, and civil matters. Mediation is a useful alternative to traditional litigation because of its adaptability and collaborative nature. The correct option is b.
Learn more about mediation at:
brainly.com/question/30783013
#SPJ4
The 4th, 5th, 6th & 8th Amendments are sources of criminal law, specifically ____________________ criminal law.
Explanation:
These amendments include the fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and the fourteenth amendments. Their purpose is meant to ensure that people are treated fairly if suspected or arrested for crimes.
Which staffing policy results in executives who are comfortable working in a number of cultures?
The staffing policy that results in executives who are comfortable working in a number of cultures is the "geocentric staffing" policy.
Geocentric staffing is a strategy where a company seeks to recruit and promote individuals regardless of their nationality or country of origin. It focuses on selecting the most qualified individuals for key executive positions without any restrictions based on their home country. By adopting a geocentric staffing policy, organizations prioritize competence and skills over nationality, allowing executives to have a broader understanding and experience of different cultures. This policy promotes diversity and enables executives to adapt and navigate effectively in various cultural contexts. Executives under a geocentric staffing approach are likely to possess cross-cultural competencies, including cultural sensitivity, adaptability, and the ability to manage diverse teams. They are comfortable working in different cultures and are better equipped to lead multinational operations, fostering global collaboration and achieving organizational goals in diverse markets.
Learn more about Geocentric staffing here: brainly.com/question/32374807
#SPJ11
describe two ways in which a right to say no protect citizens
Answer:
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Question 2 Which is not one of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment? A) My client did it but is insane. B) My client did it for a good reason. C) My client did it D) My client did not do it.
One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.
Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.
Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.
The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.
Learn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/26318342
#SPJ9
Of the following, turnout among young voters is likely to be highest among
black educated females
low-income male college students
young white, non-Hispanic males
non-college factory workers
Answer:
Black educated females
Najmi, a 15-year-old boy became an orphan after both of his parents died in a tragic car accident in January 2018. His uncle, Pak Mat is now taking care of him and managing all the properties left by his late parents. Pak Mat is planning to sell one of the properties located at Mantin Negeri Sembilan. He later met Faisal to make a valuation as to the price of the property. Faisal discovered that the price value is lower and advise Pak Mat not to sell the property. Pak Mat however still wants to proceed with his plan and managed to sell it to Ricky. Advise Najmi on the validity of the contract. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and decided case law
Najmi would be responsible to understand the validity of the contract entered by his guardian Pak Mat concerning the sale of one of the properties of his late parents left to him.
Generally under contract law, a minor is considered to lack the capacity to enter into a valid and binding agreement as established in the Malaysian case of Verinder Singh v Kamikar Singh and another appeal ([1994] 2 MLJ 438). Under s 20 of the Contracts Act 1950, a minor is not capable to enter into a valid contract.
Thus, any contract entered into by a minor is said to be voidable at his/her option. Consequently, any contract entered into by a minor is voidable which allows him/her to avoid the contract and seek restitution.
To know more about contract law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31340061
#SPJ4
Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete sentences. Scroll down to view additional questions.
Online Content: Site 1
What is perspective and point of view? (Site 1)
What are two different perspectives of the American Revolution? (Site 1)
What can identifying perspective and point of view help you to do? (Site 1)
Gidgits Galore can request "Superfund" (or CERCLA) assistance to assess and clean up the brownfield (i.e.
real property, possibly contaminated, considered for reuse) that it would like to develop for another gidgits
factory.
O False
O True
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Explain the effects of the case Furman vs Georgia had on the death penalty. Is it still in effect today?
The court found that the death penalty was being applied arbitrarily and discriminatorily, resulting in an excessive number of death sentences.
The Furman decision effectively halted all executions in the United States, and many states responded by re-evaluating their death penalty statutes. In 1976, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty in Gregg v. Georgia, which allowed states to reinstate the death penalty under revised statutes that addressed the concerns raised in Furman. As a result, many states revised their death penalty laws to make the application of the penalty more consistent and less arbitrary.
Today, the death penalty is still in effect in 27 states, but there is ongoing debate and litigation over its constitutionality and fairness. The effects of the Furman decision can still be seen in the continued efforts to ensure that the death penalty is applied fairly and consistently.
Read more about constitutionality here:https://brainly.com/question/14918421
#SPJ11
Leteisha McCarthy had a confirmed two-night reservation at the Oracle Hotel in Boston, Massachusetts. The nightly rate for Oracle was $175.00. Unfortunately, when Ms. McCarthy arrived at the front desk to check-in, the hotel explained that it did not have a room available. Multiple guests in a block of rooms had decided to add another night to their stay. The hotel did not offer Ms. McCarthy an alternative and the only available accommodations she was able to find were at a nearby hotel called the Oasis, which had a nightly rate of $300.00. Having no other options, Ms. McCarthy registered for a two-night stay at the Oasis and spent $35.00 on a cab ride to get there. When she arrived home, Ms. McCarthy sent a demand letter to the Oracle Hotel insisting that she be reimbursed for the full cost of her two-night stay at Oasis, plus cab fare. Under the law, Ms. McCarthy should be able to collect:
a.
$630.00, the full cost of two nights at Oasis plus cab fare.
b.
$600.00, the full cost of two nights at Oasis as Ms. McCarthy is not entitled to cab fare.
c.
$380.00, the full cost of two nights at Oracle, plus cab fare.
d.
$285.00, the difference between the cost at Oasis minus the cost at Oracle, plus cab fare.
Under the law, Ms. McCarthy should be able to collect:d. $285.00, the difference between the cost at Oasis minus the cost at Oracle, plus cab fare.
What is the law about?Ms. McCarthy had a confirmed two-night reservation at the Oracle Hotel in Boston, Massachusetts, but upon arrival, she was informed that the hotel did not have a room available for her. She had to book a stay at a nearby hotel, the Oasis, which had a higher nightly rate of $300.00. She is now claiming reimbursement from the Oracle Hotel for the full cost of her two-night stay at the Oasis ($600.00) plus the cost of her cab ride ($35.00), which would come to a total of $635.00.
Therefore, Under the law, the answer to the question of what Ms. McCarthy should be able to collect would depend on the contract between her and the Oracle Hotel, as well as the laws of the state where the hotel is located. The most accurate answer would be d. $285.00, the difference between the cost at Oasis minus the cost at Oracle, plus cab fare.
Learn more about law form
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
Ethics has to do with what my feelings tell me is right or wrong?
Answer:::: True.
Explain your answer:
What difference does Geoghegan draw between the case he observes in the German labor court versus the case he had recently tried in Chicago
Answer:
Explanation:
Geographer and author Tim Geoghegan, in his book "Which Side Are You On?: Trying to Be for Labor When It's Flat on Its Back," distinguishes a labour case he observed in a German labour court and a case he had recently tried in Chicago.
In the German case, Geoghegan notes that the labour court seemed to be more focused on protecting the dignity of the workers involved in the case, rather than simply following the letter of the law. He observed that the judge seemed to take the time to listen to the workers and to understand their perspective and that there was a greater sense of respect for the workers as individuals. This, in turn, led to a more equitable and just outcome for the workers.
In contrast, Geoghegan's experience in the Chicago case was characterized by a more adversarial and impersonal approach. He notes that the judge in the case was more concerned with following the strict legal procedures and rules, rather than considering the broader context of the workers' situation. As a result, the workers in the case received a less favourable outcome.
Overall, Geoghegan's observations suggest that the approach of labour courts can vary greatly depending on the cultural and legal context in which they operate. While some courts may prioritize the dignity and well-being of workers, others may be more focused on following the letter of the law.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Geoghegan draws a difference between the case he observes in the German labor court and the case he had recently tried in Chicago in terms of the approach to resolving the conflict.
In the German labor court, Geoghegan notes that the judge's primary focus was on finding a compromise that would benefit both parties and preserve the employment relationship. The judge's decision was based on a nuanced understanding of the industry and the needs of both the employer and employee.
In contrast, in the case he tried in Chicago, Geoghegan describes a more adversarial approach where the judge was focused on applying the letter of the law and making a definitive ruling. The decision did not take into account the nuances of the industry or the potential impact on the employee's future job prospects.
Overall, Geoghegan suggests that the German approach may be more effective in resolving labor disputes because it prioritizes maintaining the employment relationship and finding a mutually beneficial solution. The difference that Geoghegan draws between the case he observes in the German labor court and the case he had recently tried in Chicago is the approach towards resolving labor disputes and the level of worker protection.
There is a more collaborative and balanced approach to resolving disputes between workers and employers. The legal system focuses on providing fair and just outcomes for both parties, ensuring that workers are protected and their rights are upheld.
To Know more about balanced approach
https://brainly.com/question/15097510
#SPJ11