Answers
A (novation) is a method of discharging a contract in which a third party becomes bound upon a promise to the obligee.
The term novation occurs when a third party agrees to take over the obligations and responsibilities of a contract, essentially replacing the original party. A typical example of novation in property law is when a tenant passes the lease over to another person making him or her responsible for rent payments and any property damages according to the original lease contract.
The new party assumes all liabilities and benefits of the original agreement, while the original party is released from any further obligations. Novation can be an effective way to resolve disputes or change the terms of a contract without voiding the entire agreement.
Read more about Contract at brainly.com/question/13037087
#SPJ11
Related Questions
why is ralsei ralsei
Answers
Answer:
because she is
Explanation:
i did not understand the question
The Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Answers
The Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is a crucial component of the American legal system. This amendment states that any power not specifically granted to the federal government by the Constitution is reserved for the states or the people. This provision is often referred to as the "reserved powers" clause.
The Tenth Amendment was added to the Constitution in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights, which was designed to protect individual liberties and limit the power of the federal government. The amendment reflects the principle of federalism, which divides power between the federal and state governments.
Under the Tenth Amendment, the states have the authority to regulate a wide range of issues that are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. For example, states have the power to regulate education, public health, and criminal justice. This allows for a diversity of laws and policies across the country, reflecting the unique needs and priorities of individual states and communities.
The Tenth Amendment has been the subject of much debate and interpretation throughout American history. Some argue that it reinforces states' rights and limits federal overreach, while others argue that it can be used to justify discriminatory or oppressive state policies.
Overall, the Tenth Amendment is an important safeguard of individual liberty and state autonomy in the United States. It serves as a reminder that the federal government's powers are limited and that the states have a critical role to play in shaping our laws and policies.
For more such questions on Constitution
https://brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ11
Which type of defense involves the defendant
admitting wrongdoing and the defense attor-
ney introduces facts that support the defen-
dant's conduct?
Answers
This is affirmative defense in which involves the defendant admitting wrongdoing and the defense attorney introduces facts that support the defendant's conduct.
An affirmative defense is one in which the defendant introduces evidence that, if found credible, will negate criminal or civil liability even if the defendant committed the alleged acts.
The term "affirmative defense" refers to the requirement that the defendant prove the defense rather than refuting the prosecution's evidence of a crime element. An affirmative defense works to keep a person from being convicted even if the prosecutor has proof of every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
Learn more on affirmative defense-
https://brainly.com/question/25559359
#SPJ9
Laws of conservation of mass
Answers
Answer:
mass in an isolated system is neither created nor destroyed by chemical reactions or physical transformations.
Explanation:
*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
Answer:According to "https://courses.lumenlearning.com/" "The law of conservation of mass states that mass in an isolated system is neither created nor destroyed by chemical reactions or physical transformations"
Explanation:
I hope this helped!
<!> Brainliest is appreciated! <!>
- Zack Slocum
*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
LAW:
What does the Bad Frog case stand for? Do you agree with any of the
courts' decisions? How would you have ruled and why if you were the
judge in this case?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The Bad Frog case is a legal case that involves the First Amendment rights of a beer company. The court's decisions vary, but it primarily stands for the protection of free speech. However, if I were the judge, I would have ruled in favor of the beer company, as I believe in upholding freedom of expression.
____ is defined as the search for, collection, and review of items stored in electronic (or, more precisely, digital) format that are of potential evidentiary value based on criteria specified by a legal team.
Answers
Electronic Discovery (eDiscovery) is defined as the search for, collection, and review of items stored in electronic (or, more precisely, digital) format that are of potential evidentiary value based on criteria specified by a legal team.
Electronic discovery (eDiscovery) is the process of finding, collecting, and reviewing electronically stored information (ESI) that may be relevant to a legal case. ESI can include a wide range of digital documents, such as emails, text messages, social media posts, digital images, and other digital data.
The process of eDiscovery typically involves the following steps:
Legal Hold: The first step is to issue a legal hold, which is a formal request to preserve any ESI that may be relevant to the case.
Collection: Once a legal hold has been issued, the next step is to collect the relevant ESI from various sources, including servers, computers, mobile devices, and cloud-based storage systems.
Processing: Once the ESI has been collected, it must be processed and prepared for review. This may involve filtering out irrelevant data, redacting confidential information, and converting the data into a searchable format.
Review: The next step is to review the ESI to identify relevant documents and information. This may involve the use of technology such as keyword searches and predictive coding.
Production: Once relevant documents have been identified, they must be produced to the opposing party or to the court. This may involve the production of hard copies or the use of electronic file transfer protocols.
Learn more about ESI Visit : brainly.com/question/26477035
#SPJ11
The ruling in the landmark case of new york times v. Sullivan was that a public official can win a defamation case.
Answers
Answer:
I'm sorry, but that statement is incorrect. The ruling in the landmark case of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan was actually the opposite - that a public official cannot win a defamation case unless they can prove that the statement was made with "actual malice." In other words, the Supreme Court ruled that public officials have a higher burden of proof in defamation cases than private citizens. This decision was a significant victory for freedom of the press and the First Amendment.
Define price ceiling and floor amd give am example for each. Which leads to a surplus? Why?
Answers
Answer:
A price ceiling prevents a price from rising above a certain level. Hence, the name price "ceiling". If the price is set below the equilibrium price what results is the quantity demanded will exceed the quantity supplied. Two things will be achieved either the excess in "demand" and "shortages" will ensue. Whereas, the price floor prevents the price from plummeting below a certain level or threshold.
Explanation:
Price Ceiling and Price Floors prevent the price from going either up or down.
*Please note that this not a legal or "law" related question. This is an Economics Social Science one.
Answer that question
Answers
Answer: lol im taking ur points scammer
Explanation:
For instance, imagine that a bank robber enters a bank, robs the bank, and kills a few people. This offender was unmasked and was caught on camera committing the crime. Under the theory of crime control model, what can be the actions taken considering the above scenario.
Answers
1. Immediate apprehension of the offender: The police should immediately apprehend the offender and bring him to justice.
2. Deterrents: The police should also implement deterrents to discourage similar criminal acts, such as increased surveillance and security measures in the bank and the surrounding area.
What are Deterrence techniques?3. Deterrence techniques: The police should also use deterrence techniques such as the death penalty or life imprisonment to discourage further criminal acts.
4. Increased public awareness: The police should also increase public awareness of the crime and the consequences of committing similar criminal acts.
5. Victim support: The police should also provide support to the victims of the crime, such as financial compensation, counseling, and medical treatment.
6. Education and prevention: Finally, the police should educate the public on the risks of committing similar criminal acts and provide prevention strategies to reduce the likelihood of similar criminal acts occurring in the future.
Read more about Deterrence techniques
https://brainly.com/question/14904611
#SPJ1
he American Law Institute publishes and revises explanations and examples of the law in various areas of the law, known as: ______.
Answers
Answer:BrhfdjExplanation:shut up brainly admin is trash
As a result of having no power to collect taxes under the Articles of Confederation, the confederal government could only raise funds by doing which of the following?
Select one:
A. borrowing money on credit
B. taxing the individual states
C. regulating internal trade
D. raiding Canadian mines
Answers
Answer:
borrowing money on credit
Explanation:
The federal government under the Articles of Confederation had to take out loans from foreign governments, though they also had no way of raising funds from the states to pay back these loans. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government quickly accumulated a large amount of national debt.
a plaintiff has sued a defendant, alleging that she was run over by a speeding car driven by the defendant/
Answers
The plaintiff has initiated a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging that she was hit by a speeding car driven by the defendant
The plaintiff is the party who files the lawsuit and asks the court to grant them their request, whereas the defendant is the party who is being sued and must refute the claims stated by the plaintiff.
The plaintiff might be able to seek damages from the defendant if she can demonstrate that the defendant was actually operating the vehicle that struck her and that the defendant was moving too quickly. Compensation for medical expenses, lost pay, and pain and suffering are all examples of damages.
The plaintiff may be required to present evidence to support her claims, including witness statements, medical records, any available security film, and police reports.
For such more question on lawsuit:
https://brainly.com/question/30707234
#SPJ11
Which of the following should a supervisor do to discourage unions?
A. Promise employees that they will receive favorable terms or conditions of employment if they forgo union activity
B. Threaten employees with harsher terms and conditions of employment or employment loss if they engage in union activity
C. Limit direct contact with employees
D. Interrogate employees about pro-union or anti-union sentiments that they or others may have
E. Report any direct or indirect signs of union activity to a core management group
Answers
Correct option is option (A) .Promise employees that they will receive favorable terms or conditions of employment if they forgo union activity. This option provides a positive view that discourages union activity, thus creating an atmosphere of mutual respect and trust between employees and management.
To avoid union activities, it's important for management to create an environment that recognizes and respects employees' needs and interests, and to listen to employees' opinions. As a result, any issues or problems that arise can be addressed in a way that benefits both the company and its employees.To avoid union activities, the following tips can be considered by management:
Create a positive environment: To avoid union activities, create an environment where employees feel valued and respected, with open communication, feedback, and support provided. Employee satisfaction should be the main focus of the organization. Positive incentives should be given to employees who work hard and are loyal to the company.Provide better working conditions: Management should provide better working conditions to employees, such as better pay and better benefits. This will show employees that they are valued, and as a result, union activities will be less likely to occur.
Communicate effectively: Communication is critical in maintaining a healthy relationship between management and employees. Management should communicate with employees regularly, clearly, and honestly about the company's plans and goals. This will help employees feel more connected to the company and less likely to join a union.
To know more about Employee Union visit-
brainly.com/question/25906246
#SPJ11
why is Uhuru Kenyatta in pandora papers
Answers
Answer:
The father of the Uhuru Kenyatta was Jomo Kenyatta.
Explanation:
Gregory, a resident of Idabel, has been bombarded with emails from a local real estate licensee. He keeps opting out of receiving the emails, but they just keep coming. What federal law is the licensee possibly violating
Answers
Idabel resident Gregory receives a flood of emails from local real estate licensees. He keeps refusing to receive emails, but he keeps getting them. The federal law , the licensee possibly violating the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.
The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a federal law that protects consumers from unsolicited e-mail solicitations.
Therefore, if Gregory continues to receive emails from you, you are in violation of our efforts to protect Gregory from spam.
This law was enacted in 2003. It established the first US national standard for sending commercial email to anyone. So it is important.
To learn more about ‘Federal law’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28498485
#SPJ4
Three men agreed to rob a restaurant in a nearby town and bought pistols, ski masks, and gloves for that purpose. Prior to entering the restaurant, the man who was to be the lookout had a change of heart and wanted to call off the robbery. The other two men refused so the lookout threw down his gun and went to the nearby bus station to catch a bus back to his home. The remaining two men went into the restaurant and robbed it and it patrons. A patrol car happened by as they were leaving, and one of the men seized one of the customers as as hostage. In the exchange of gunfire with the police, a police officer and the hostage were killed. Both men escaped initially, but one of them was later captured and charged with robbery and murder. However, because of illegal police conduct in connection with his arrest and subsequent confession, all evidence connecting him with the charged crimes was suppressed and the charges dismissed.
If the lookout is also arrested and charged with rude,r which of the following is his strongest defense?
He had withdrawn from the plan before the two others began the robbery that led to the killings. The lookout will not be guilty of murder if he withdrew from the plan before the robbery and killings took place. At common law, each person who took part in the planning of a crime was criminally liable for the crime of conspiracy and for each offense committed in furtherance of the conspiracy. However, if one of the conspirators "withdrew" from the criminal effort before the substantive crimes occurred, he was not liable for the subsequent crimes. To successfully withdraw, the actor must notify all members of the conspiracy that he has withdrawn; this must be done in time for them to have an opportunity to abandon the planned crimes. The facts in the question clearly indicate that he had withdrawn. (A) is not as good an answer as (C) because,
if the lookout had not withdrawn, he would be guilty of murder under a felony murder theory.
His strongest argument is that he withdrew. (B) is wrong because it is no defense to a charge
of murder that the actor did not physically participate. The lookout would be guilty if he had
not withdrawn, even without physical participation. (D) is wrong because, if the theory of the prosecutor's murder charge was that the lookout was a conspirator and is liable for all crimes committed in furtherance of the conspiracy, it would make no difference whether the other conspirators are being prosecuted. (All persons must be acquitted for this defense to be effective.)
Answers
The strongest defense for the lookout is that he had withdrawn from the plan before the two others began the robbery that led to the killings, and he had notified all members of the conspiracy that he had withdrawn in time for them to abandon the planned crimes.
The lookout's strongest defense is that he backed out of the scheme before the two others started the heist that led to the killings, and he told all members of the conspiracy that he had backed out in time for them to cease the intended crimes. This defense is based on the common law principle that anyone who participates in the planning of a crime is criminally liable for the crime of conspiracy as well as any offense committed in furtherance of the conspiracy, but anyone who withdraws before the substantive crimes occur is not liable for the subsequent crimes.
For such more question on defense:
https://brainly.com/question/30673507
#SPJ4
one difference between a veto and a pocket veto is that ____
group of answer choices A. the courts can rule a veto unconstitutional but cannot make the same ruling about a regular veto. B. congress can override a regular veto but cannot override a pocket veto. C. the president can only use a pocket veto once per year. D. pocket vetoes are carried out by governors, whereas the president has a regular veto.
Answers
One difference between a veto and a pocket veto is that Congress can override a regular veto but cannot override a pocket veto.
A veto is a power granted to the President of the United States to reject a law passed by the Congress. When a law is vetoed by the president, it is sent back to the Congress. If two-thirds of both houses of Congress agree to override the veto, the law becomes valid despite the president's veto. A regular veto occurs when the President returns the unsigned legislation to the originating house of Congress without approval within 10 days.
Pocket VetoA pocket veto is a legislative veto in which the President of the United States allows a bill to die by neither signing nor vetoing it. The pocket veto occurs when Congress adjourns during the ten-day period when the President would typically sign or veto legislation. When Congress adjourns, the President cannot return the bill to the originating house of Congress, and the bill becomes ineffective.
Therefore, the key difference between a veto and a pocket veto is that Congress can override a regular veto but cannot override a pocket veto.
For more such questions on pocket veto
https://brainly.com/question/8295403
#SPJ11
When one party makes a mistake as to a material fact and the nonmistaken party is unaware of the mistake and is not the cause of the mistake, generally the court will hold that contract is
Answers
Answer:
Valid
Explanation:
From the question, the type of mistake described in which one party made the mistake, is known as Unilateral Mistake. However, Unilateral mistake rarely void or cause invalidation of a contract, except if the nonmistaken party is aware of the mistake or is the cause of the mistake.
However, in this case, the nonmistaken party is unaware of the mistake and is not the cause of the mistake, then it is generally expected that the court will hold that contract is VALID.
I will give the BRAINIEST
Is it enough to be suspected of terrorism , or should these suspects have the right to a fair trial before being detained indefinitely?
Answers
Answer:
fair trial
Explanation:
because just cuz something is suspected does not mean it is true.
plz mark brainlest
this is the cartoon from my previous question
Answers
Answer:
sick cartoon lol
Explanation:
Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly. Complete the sentence with the correct word. In the united states, the 401(k) plan or individual retirement account is a defined plan.
Answers
A defined contribution plan, often known as a cash or deferred arrangement, is a 401(k) plan. Employees have the option to elect not to receive a portion of their pay, which is instead put into the 401(k) plan on their behalf and before taxes. The employer may occasionally match these donations.
While both programs offer retirement income, they are each administered differently. An example of an employer retirement account is a 401K. An individual retirement account, or IRA, is one. A standard 401(k) is a type of retirement savings plan that enables employees to put money aside for retirement, invest that money, and postpone paying income taxes on that money and its gains until after they retire.
A qualifying profit-sharing plan's 401(k) element enables employees to set aside a percentage of their salaries for personal accounts. Elective salary deferrals are not considered taxable income for the employee (except for designated Roth deferrals). Employers may make deposits into their employees' accounts.
To learn more about 401(k) plan, refer: brainly.com/question/27159207
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
In the united states, the 401(k) plan or individual retirement account is a defined plan for what.
Which of the following is NOT one of the basic rules that must be followed when shaping a policy?
A. Policy should never conflict with law
B. Policy must be able to stand up in court if challenged
C. Policy should be agreed upon by all employees and management
D. Policy must be properly supported and administered
Answers
The option that is NOT one of the basic rules that must be followed when shaping a policy is C. Policy should be agreed upon by all employees and management
What does it mean to create policies?When you formulate something, like a strategy or proposal, you invent it after carefully considering all the intricacies.
The "preparation" or "pre-baking" of the decisions is the responsibility of those working on this phase of the process. This means that prior to the stage of negotiation and agreement-making, the draft policy is prepared and blended.
Note everyone can agree on one thing or policy hence option C is correct.
Learn more about policy from
https://brainly.com/question/13965038
#SPJ1
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answers
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Which of the following would most likely be considered a violation of the Fourth Amendment?
OA.
Confiscating the cellphone of a student who made a bomb threat
OB.
Searching the lockers of all students with black hair
O c. Stopping a vehicle believed to be involved in a bank robbery
OD
Stopping and searching all cars at the US-Mexico border
Answers
Answer:
OB
Explanation:
There is no reason to confiscate them but people in all other options could be doing something, have done, or they are currently doing it. Everything but OB is reasonable.
Dona offers to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Erma responds that she will pay that price if Dona’s TV set is included. Neither party is a merchant. Their contract is formed according to a. whatever is reasonable. b. the new terms of the acceptance. c. none of the terms. d. the terms of the original offer.
Answers
D. The terms of the original offer.
Dona offers to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Erma responds that she will pay that price if Dona’s TV set is included. Neither party is a merchant. Their contract is formed according to the terms of the original offer. Thus, option (d) is correct.
What is contract?
An agreement between two or more people to do something is referred to as a contract. Two or more parties must agree to the terms of the agreement in order to create a legally binding commitment. A contract was the deal with the two parties are the agreed to the terms and the conditions.
Dona is offered the to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Ema was the suggested to also add the TV set are the pay for $700. The terms according to case are the original offer. Original Offer are those type of the contract are the purchased to the all the items or asset to the other parties.
Therefore, option (d) is correct.
Learn more about on contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ2
Julian entered the U.S. in 2002 and was arrested for human trafficking in 2004. He served 10 years in prison, and returned to his native country in 2014. He attempted to regain entry into the U.S. at a valid port of entry in 2019. The immigration officer denied his re-entry in 2019. Were the officer's actions valid? Why or why not?
Answers
Answer:
Much of this depends on his immigration status when he committed the crime. If we assume he had illegal status and If he was ordered to leave, he would not be allowed reentry for 5-20 years, if ever. Even if he had a green card, he would be barred from reentry. He was most likely barred from reentry because of a felony. A felony charge will ensure no reentry. The officer was correct.
These are for trafficking, each state will have other laws.
The U.S. Code, Title 22, Chapter 78 – Trafficking Victims Protection
The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Prevention Act (TVPA)
The Customs and Facilitations and Trade Enforcement Reauthorization Act of 2009
The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004
The PROTECT Act of 2003
The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (CAFRA)
The Mann Act of 1910
the phrase "…but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attained" forbids two more aspects of treason. any ideas?
Answers
1) The only ways to commit treason against the United States are to declare war on them or to support and comfort their enemies. 2) The Congress shall have the authority to establish the treasonous offense's punishment, but no attainder of treason shall result in the corruption of blood or in forfeiture other than while the attained person is still alive.
A person or organization in a position of authority may engage in corruption, a kind of dishonesty or a criminal conduct, in order to receive illicit benefits or abuse power for one's own gain. Corruption can involve a variety of actions, such as bribery, buying influence, embezzlement, and other actions that are lawful in many nations. When a government official or other officeholder uses their position for personal benefit, political corruption develops. Kleptocracies, oligarchies, narco-states, and mafia states all have high rates of corruption. Crime and corruption are endemic sociological phenomena that occur frequently and in varied degrees in almost every nation on a worldwide scale. Each country allocates domestic resources for the prevention of crime, the policing of corruption, and the control and regulation of corruption. The general term "anti-corruption" is frequently used to describe tactics used to combat corruption. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 16 and other international programs also have a specific objective that is designed to significantly reduce corruption in all of its forms.
Learn more about corruption here
https://brainly.com/question/472198
#SPJ4
What is "pay-as-you-go" as it relates to the state budget of Texas?
Answers
"Pay-as-you-go" is a budgeting principle that requires the state government to fund current expenditures with current revenues rather than borrowing from future revenues. In the context of the state budget of Texas, pay-as-you-go means that the state must balance its budget each fiscal year by ensuring that expenditures do not exceed revenues.
Texas has a constitutional provision that requires a balanced budget, which means that the state cannot carry a deficit from one fiscal year to another. This pay-as-you-go requirement helps ensure that the state government operates within its means and does not create long-term financial obligations that future generations will have to pay.
The pay-as-you-go principle applies to both the operating budget, which funds day-to-day operations of state government, and the capital budget, which funds infrastructure and construction projects. The state must ensure that it has sufficient revenue to cover both types of expenditures without relying on borrowed funds.
In summary, pay-as-you-go is a budgeting principle that requires the state to balance its budget each fiscal year by ensuring that expenditures do not exceed revenues. This principle helps ensure that the state operates within its means and avoids creating long-term financial obligations.
Learn more about revenues here:
https://brainly.com/question/29567732
#SPJ11
what are the three steps of the blanchard peale model
Answers
The three steps of the Blanchard-Peale Model are: Diagnosis; Flexibility; and Leadership Style Matching.
The Blanchard-Peale Model, also known as the Situational Leadership II (SLII) Model, is a leadership model developed by Ken Blanchard and Norman Vincent Peale. It emphasizes the importance of adapting leadership styles based on the readiness or development level of followers.
It aim to enhance communication, build trust, and develop the potential of their followers, ultimately improving performance and achieving organizational goals. It involves assessing the individual's competence (knowledge and skills) and commitment (motivation and confidence) for a specific task or goal.
Learn more about Blanchard-Peale Model here:
https://brainly.com/question/20709076
#SPJ4