All questions in the attached photo

The statement best describes the effects of allusions in the passage is option C. The allusions create a peaceful image of different ethnic groups discussing art and literature together.

The allusion is discernment of speech, wherein an object or situation from an unrelated context is noted covertly or indirectly. it's miles left to the target market to make the direct connection. in which the relationship is immediately and explicitly said with the aid of the writer, it's far as an alternative normally termed a reference.

In literature, an allusion is an inferred or indirect connection with someone, occasion, or element, or to a part of any other e-book. As in line with the given passage, the reference to Shakespeare and sonnets is relevant to allusions.

We could become aware of allusions by wondering significantly approximately what a part of a sentence or paragraph talks about some thing by touching on it to something that comes from outdoor the textual content.

Learn more about allusions here:-https://brainly.com/question/27445284

#SPJ1

Answer:

The allusions show that the police and the skinheads shared a common language based on their race.

Explanation:

This statement best describes the effects of allusions in the shown passage :)

Answer:

Quickly and late.

Explanation:

What we know from adverbs, they describe a verb. Quickly describes how he gathered up his homework. Late describes how he was for school.

Justyce's debate instructor, Dr. Dray, is the one whose words motivate him to become a better person in chapter 6 of the book.

Justyce's thoughts were prompted to a deeper level of reflection as a result of Dr. Dray's comments regarding the societal issues of race and justice.

Justyce was one of the many people he inspired to use their intellect and voices to effect positive change in the world.

Justyce was motivated by the counsel of Dr. Dray to take a more active role in activism and to advocate for causes that are important to him.

Justyce is ultimately moved to make some positive improvements in his life as a result of this inspiration.

Read more about societal issues.

https://brainly.com/question/2117303

#SPJ11

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

just because

Answer:

A B A

Explanation:

The prefixes can be used in the blanks to make complete meaningful sentences as,

Prefixes are such tools of the English language, in which a set of letter(s) is added to a word, in order to form another word that is completely different, sometimes opposite, in meaning of the actual word. Prefixes are commonly used in the English language.

When prefixes such as review; illogical; and repressed are used in the blanks of the sentences given above, they perfectly fit the sentence, and maintain a meaningful structure of the word.

Therefore, the significance of the use of prefixes in the above sentences have been aforementioned.

Learn more about prefixes here:

https://brainly.com/question/14161952

#SPJ6

Answer:

I beleive b is numb. 2

c is numb.1

Explanation:

Answer:

maybe it's because you added no context, let me check.

Explanation:

Answer:

Its B

Explanation:

Because  Yes

The narrator's distance allows him to reveal everyone's thoughts. Hence, option B is appropriate.

A story is told to an audience through narration, which can be done either orally or in writing. A narrator, who may be a specific person or an ambiguous literary voice, conveys narration. This person or voice is chosen by the story's author to teach the audience, particularly the storyline.

The narrative voice that the author uses is carefully considered because it can have a significant impact on both the story as well as the reader's reaction. The narrative is told by one of the characters.

The person who tells a narrative from their point of view is the narrator. The text is narrated by the narrator. Only fictional works or narrative poems contain a narrator. A narrator does not necessarily have to be a personality in the text; they can be.

Learn more about the Narrator here:

https://brainly.com/question/20038946

#SPJ6

Answer:

part a is answer a and part b is d? correct me if im wrong

Explanation:

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Answer:

C. I took the test

Explanation:

When writing an attention getter in MLA formatting, it is not appropriate to use the word “things” as it is a vague and imprecise term that does not convey any specific meaning. The attention getter is a crucial part of the introduction to an essay or paper as it is meant to capture the reader's attention and interest them in reading further.

Therefore, it is important to use clear and concise language that communicates the purpose of the essay or paper. This can be achieved by using descriptive language that creates a vivid mental image in the reader's mind.

Some examples of attention getters that could be used in MLA formatting include:

1. A quote from a famous person or notable source that relates to the topic of the essay or paper.

2. An anecdote or personal story that illustrates the main point of the essay or paper.

3. A surprising or shocking statistic that highlights the significance of the topic.

4. A rhetorical question that encourages the reader to think critically about the topic.

It is important to note that the attention getter should be relevant to the topic of the essay or paper and should lead into the thesis statement, which is the main point or argument that the essay or paper will explore.

In summary, while the attention getter is a creative element of the essay or paper, it should still adhere to the standards of MLA formatting and use precise and descriptive language to engage the reader's attention.

For more such questions on MLA formatting

https://brainly.com/question/30404852

#SPJ8

Answer: Practice is more important than talent because it allows one to fully grasp the concept and know how to get to the point they're at. Talent is great to have however you can never reach your full talent without practice. Therefore, talent is great to have, but it is practice that will help you truly excel.

Explanation:

I don't know hope this helps

Answer:

The scary atmosphere grabs the reader's attention and dramatizes the loss of public schools.

Explanation:

Critical thinking phrase would best describe the intellectual quality that Kennedy is describing in this passage. Thus, option C is correct.

"The President of the United States, John F. Kennedy, said: No country can possibly move ahead, no free society can possibly be sustained unless it has an educated citizenry whose qualities of mind and heart permit it to take part in the complicated and increasingly sophisticated decisions."

The act of critically analyzing a situation, comparing potential solutions, then selecting and putting into action the best strategy for problem-solving is known as critical thought. The intellectual trait that Kennedy is discussing in this line is most effectively summarized by the word "critical thinking."

Therefore, option C is the correct option.

Learn more about John F. Kennedy, here:

https://brainly.com/question/1577421

#SPJ2

The Jim Crow era of the late 19th and early 20th centuries was a period of extreme racial segregation in the United States.

Segregation is the practice of separating groups of people based on characteristics such as race, religion, or gender.

During this time, many states enacted laws to limit the civil rights of African Americans, and they were largely excluded from economic and social progress. This period of discrimination and subjugation has come to be known as the “Jim Crow” era.

The Jim Crow era was marked by a number of oppressive laws and regulations, such as the “separate but equal” doctrine, which declared that African Americans could use the same public facilities as white people, as long as these facilities were kept separate. African Americans also lacked the right to vote and were excluded from a number of educational opportunities. As a result, many African Americans were forced to struggle to survive in an environment where they were denied basic rights.

The daily life of African Americans in the Jim Crow era was often difficult and oppressive. African Americans were segregated in virtually all aspects of life, from public restrooms and drinking fountains to restaurants, hotels, and even parks. African Americans were also excluded from many public facilities and places of employment, and were often subjected to racial slurs and other forms of mistreatment by white people. In addition, African Americans were often denied fair representation in the courts, and even in the voting booth.

To learn more about segregation

https://brainly.com/question/12498653

#SPJ1

Extreme racial segregation was prevalent in the United States during the Jim Crow era, which lasted from the late 19th to the early 20th centuries.

Segregation is the act of dividing apart different racial, religious, or gender-based groupings of individuals. African Americans were generally excluded from economic and social growth during this time because numerous states passed legislation restricting their civil rights. This period of discrimination and repression is known as the "Jim Crow" era.

The "separate but equal" theory, which said that African Americans could utilise the same public facilities as white people as long as these facilities were maintained segregated, was one of many discriminatory laws and regulations that defined the Jim Crow era. Additionally, African Americans were denied the ability to vote as well as many educational possibilities.

During the Jim Crow era, African Americans frequently experienced oppression and a bad quality of life. Nearly every element of daily life for African Americans was segregated, including restaurants, motels, and even parks in addition to public restrooms and drinking fountains. African Americans were frequently the targets of racist epithets and other forms of maltreatment by white people, as well as excluded from many public spaces and places of employment. Additionally, African Americans frequently did not receive fair representation in the courts or even at the polls.

To kow more about segregation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/20398762

#SPJ1

When faced with different estimates, a project manager should consider factors such as data credibility, expertise, historical performance, risks, and assumptions. Evaluating both estimates and seeking further input will help make an informed decision for a realistic project estimate.

1. In the case study, two different estimating techniques were discussed. The first technique mentioned is the use of historical data or previous experience to estimate the time and effort required for a particular task or work package.

This is demonstrated when Barbara states that she had performed the task in question on previous projects, and it required one person full-time for fourteen weeks.

The second technique mentioned is the three-point estimate, which considers the optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic scenarios for estimating time and effort. The estimating group used this technique to arrive at a twelve-week estimate for the critical work package.

2. When faced with different estimates, a project manager needs to consider various factors to determine which estimate is better.

These factors may include the credibility and accuracy of the data used for estimation, the expertise and experience of the individuals providing the estimates, the historical performance of similar tasks or projects, and any specific risks or uncertainties associated with the project.

Project managers may also evaluate the assumptions and methodologies employed in the estimation process. Additionally, they can seek input from subject matter experts or conduct further analysis to refine the estimates.

3. As the project manager, considering Barbara's previous experience with the task and her skepticism about the three-point estimate, it would be prudent to carefully evaluate both estimates.

Barbara's own experience of fourteen weeks provides a valuable data point, indicating that the task may require more time than the twelve-week estimate derived from the three-point technique. However, it is essential to consider the estimating team's approach as well.

The three-point estimate takes into account a range of possibilities, providing a more comprehensive view of the potential time needed.

As a project manager, a balanced approach would involve reviewing the assumptions, methodologies, and historical data behind both estimates, seeking further input from experts if necessary, and making an informed decision based on the available information.

Ultimately, the goal would be to arrive at a realistic estimate that adequately considers potential risks and uncertainties to ensure successful project execution.

To learn more about project managers

https://brainly.com/question/27995740

#SPJ11

Complete question:

Barbara just received the good news: She was assigned as the project manager for a project that her company won as part of competitive bidding. Whenever a request for proposal (RFP) comes into Barbara?s company, a committee composed mainly of senior managers reviews the RFP. If the decision is made to bid on the job, the RFP is turned over to the Proposal Department. Part of the Proposal Department is an estimating group that is responsible for estimating all work. If the estimating group has no previous history concerning some of the deliverable or work packages and is unsure about the time and cost for the work, the estimating team will then ask the functional managers for assistance with estimating. Project managers like Barbara do not often participate in the bidding process. Usually, their first knowledge about the project comes after the contract is awarded to their company and they are assigned as the project manager. Some project managers are highly optimistic and trust the estimates that were submitted in the bid implicitly unless, of course, a significant span of time has elapsed between the date of submittal of the proposal and the final contract award date.

Barbara asked the estimating group how they arrived at this estimate. The estimating group responded that they used the three-point estimate where the optimistic time was four weeks, the most likely time was thirteen weeks, and the pes-simistic time was sixteen weeks. Barbara believed that the three-point estimate was way off of the mark.

Read the case study "The Estimating Problem" and then answer the questions. 1. How many different estimating techniques were discussed in the case? 2. If each estimate is different, how does a project manager decide that one estimate is better than another? 3. If you were the project manager, which estimate would you use?

We can actually deduce here that the two options that shows how the story of William Offet contribute to the structure of the passage are:

A. It contrasts examples provided later in the text of Black men who were lynched without trial in the South.

B. It demonstrates how easily Black men were wrongfully convicted based upon false claims of a white person.

The structure of a passage refers to the way and manner a passage is arranged and organized in order to make flow of events to be well understood by readers. Authors structure the passage of a story in paragraphs and sections that can easily be read without much ambiguity.

We see that this question is taken from the "Excerpt from Southern Horrors: Lynch Laws in All Its Phases" which was written by Ida B. Wells. The passage reveals how the Black men were convicted wrongfully.

Here are the options that complete the given question.

A. It contrasts examples provided later in the text of Black men who were lynched without trial in the South.

B. It demonstrates how easily Black men were wrongfully convicted based upon false claims of a white person.

C. It provides evidence of the fairness of the legal system in the North by showing how it eventually uncovered the truth.

D. It shows that white women who falsely accused Black men faced serious legal consequences when discovered.

E. It explains the law that prohibited Americans from engaging in inter-racial romantic relationships during this time period.

F. It highlights how seriously accusations of ra-pe were treated during this time, regardless of where they were reported in the United States.

Attached is the full passage from which the question was taken from.

Learn more about structure of a passage on https://brainly.com/question/10255256

#SPJ1

It concerns second-class roads toward small towns that already have an access to their community centre, but the roads between them have not been fixed.

English considers the definite article "the" as well as the indefinite articles "a" and "an" to be articles. A speaker assumes that the listeners are aware of who the referent is when they use a definite article.

When a word or its equivalent is employed, an article, a sort of adjective, is used before it. The definite article (the) is placed before a noun to demonstrate that the reader is aware of the word's identity. The indefinite article (a, an) is used before a noun when it is uncertain who it is or when it is ambiguous.

The indefinite articles are a and an. They start the sentence out and define general concepts or nouns that the speaker or audience is not familiar with. Indefinite articles define generic or brand-new nouns.

To learn more about Articles click here :

brainly.com/question/1351830

#SPJ4

I think something that you need to get better at is being strong emotionally. The first reason is that you will be critisized by your fellow workers. There are just some people that like to get on your case about things, and you will have to deal with that.

             Also, your boss will be telling you things harshly or yell at you if you do the wrong thing. You should be prepared for that. Some bosses can have a bad day, or are grumpy.

       ANd lastly, to deal with stress. SOmetimes work can take over your whole day and how it happens. Don't let it control or get to you. Take a deep breath in and out, and shrug it off. We have to be strong to make it through the day.

             These are teh reasons why I think, you should be strong emotionally to go to work! But don't forget to always be ready for work too!

(i hope this isnt like a huge essay if so i would add some more detail but thx!)

Asking dominant participants to allow others to speak: Effective action. This action is effective as it helps to create a more inclusive and democratic discussion environment.

By asking dominant participants to step back and allow others to speak, it ensures that all voices are heard and all perspectives are considered. This can lead to more diverse and well-rounded discussions.

Interrupting the speaker to ensure that everyone is taking notes: Disruptive action. This action is disruptive as it interrupts the flow of the discussion and may make the speaker feel disrespected. It is better to remind participants to take notes before the discussion begins, or to ask the speaker to pause briefly to allow everyone to catch up with note-taking.

Asking participants to stop speaking if they get off topic and politely asking a speaker to explain their point: Effective action. These actions are effective as they help to keep the discussion on track and ensure that all participants understand each other's points. It is important to do so politely and respectfully, to avoid discouraging people from speaking up.

If a person rudely objects to a speaker's point, ask that person to respect the speaker's opinion: Effective action. This action is effective as it helps to maintain a respectful and constructive discussion environment. It reminds participants to engage in civil discourse and to treat each other's opinions with respect.

Making sure you get as many opportunities as possible to speak: Disruptive action. This action is disruptive as it can come across as self-centered and can monopolize the discussion, limiting opportunities for others to speak. It is important to balance active participation with active listening and to give others an equal chance to contribute.

To learn more about disruptive action

https://brainly.com/question/10987328

#SPJ4

Answer:

c) historical letter

Explanation:

In his excerpt from "Hokusai's The Great Wave" by Neil MacGregor, MacGregor uses the historical letter as an outside source.

By relying on first-hand data from an outside source, MacGregor ensures the accuracy and authenticity of his research findings. This approach allows him to gain a deeper understanding of the historical events and perspectives surrounding US-Japan relations during that period.

Additionally, using primary sources like the letter from the US president enhances the credibility of MacGregor's study, as it provides direct insights into the thoughts and actions of key individuals involved in shaping those ties.

Click on the link https://brainly.com/question/32728157 to learn more about Hokusai's "The Great Wave off Kanagawa."

Based on the given narration, it can be seen that the setting is a local shop where seven-year-old Claire has been placed with a local shopkeeper, Madame Gaëlle.

This is because, although you did not include the excerpt, you made some narration and the literary elements used in your narration show that Claire is a poor girl whose father wants to get better work and she has to stay with Madame Gaëlle in the meantime.

This refers to the physical location or historical significance that an action is made.

Hence, we can see that Based on the given narration, it can be seen that the setting is a local shop where seven-year-old Claire has been placed with a local shopkeeper, Madame Gaëlle.

This is because, although you did not include the excerpt, you made some narration and the literary elements used in your narration show that Claire is a poor girl whose father wants to get better work and she has to stay with Madame Gaëlle in the meantime.

Read more about setting here:

https://brainly.com/question/25605883

#SPJ1

Answer:

In "Mr. Pirzada Comes to Dinner" the main character faces guilt when he remains in America while the news from India and Pakistan worsens. Mr. Pirzada fears that his family is dead because the war

Explanation:

I hope I have helped! :)

Emily Carr was a Canadian artist and writer who made a significant contribution to modernist painting in Canada.

Carr was born in Victoria, British Columbia, in 1871, and is best known for her paintings of Indigenous peoples' villages in British Columbia's coastal rainforest and her books about her travels. Carr is also recognized for her independent spirit, strong will, and commitment to her work. Carr faced significant challenges in her life, including financial difficulties, health problems, and difficulty finding acceptance in the art world during her lifetime.

However, despite these challenges, Carr continued to paint and write throughout her life, developing her own distinctive style that combines elements of post-impressionism, fauvism, and indigenous art. Her work has been recognized as a significant contribution to Canadian art history, and she has been the subject of numerous exhibitions and publications over the years.

In conclusion, Emily Carr's professional achievements are significant contributions to the development of modernist painting in Canada, her paintings of Indigenous peoples' villages in British Columbia's coastal rainforest, her books about her travels, and her independent spirit, strong will, and commitment to her work. Despite the challenges she faced during her lifetime, Carr continued to paint and write, developing her own distinctive style that has been recognized as a significant contribution to Canadian art history.

Know more about art here:

https://brainly.com/question/1995169

#SPJ8

Answer:correct

Explanation:

Answer:

ive always liked lucy

Explanation:

or for boy jake