Answers
Compete doesn't deal with conflict.
What is the best way to resolve conflict?
Whether a disagreement arises at work or at home, we commonly resort to the propensity to try to change the other person's or group's perceptions by lecturing them about why we're right—and they're wrong. We all know that this method of dispute resolution frequently fails to end the problem and frequently simply makes it worse.
Recognize that we all have distorted views of fairness.
Avert inciting conflict by not using threats and inflammatory actions.
Get above the "we vs them" mindset. Group ties foster loyalty and solid relationships, but they may also foster mistrust and animosity against those who belong to other groups.
To find more serious problems, go deeper.
Distinguish between true and false religious topics.
to learn more about conflict click:
https://brainly.com/question/13990331
#SPJ1
Related Questions
A request for a change of venue is an example of a _______________motion
Answers
Answer:
venue
Explanation:
Vivian (28) is the beneficiary of her deceased grandmother's traditional IRA. She received a Form 1099-R reporting the $10,000 gross distribution. The form had a distribution code "4" in box 7, indicating that the distribution is due to death. What is the tax consequence of this distribution?
Answers
The tax consequence of the distribution is that the Gross distribution will be taxable income but Vivian may claim an exemption from the 10% additional tax on early distributions.
The tax consequence entails the amount of taxable income which must be contributed to the tax authorities.
Here, because she received a Form 1099-R reporting the $10,000 gross distribution, then, she is liable to pay tax.
In conclusion, the tax consequence of the distribution is that the Gross distribution will be taxable income but Vivian may claim an exemption from the 10% additional tax on early distributions.
Read more about taxable income
brainly.com/question/25307637
when a statute is clearly designed to protect a certain class of people, a member of that class can enforce a contract in violation of the statute even though the other party cannot. true or false
Answers
True, when a statute is clearly designed to protect a certain class of people, a member of that class can enforce a contract in violation of the statute even though the other party cannot. This is known as the doctrine of "in pari delicto," which means "in equal fault."
Here is a step-by-step explanation:
1. Identify the statute: First, it's important to determine which specific statute is in question and whether it is designed to protect a certain class of people.
2. Determine the protected class: Next, identify the class of people that the statute aims to protect. This could be consumers, employees, or any other group specified by the law.
3. Analyze the contract: Review the terms of the contract to see if it violates the statute in question. If it does, then the contract is considered illegal.
4. Establish standing: Determine whether the person seeking to enforce the contract is a member of the protected class. If they are, then they have standing to enforce the contract despite its illegality.
5. Apply the doctrine of in pari delicto: Since the person enforcing the contract is a member of the protected class, the doctrine of in pari delicto allows them to enforce the contract even though the other party cannot.
This is because the purpose of the statute is to protect this specific class of people, and allowing them to enforce the contract serves that purpose.
In summary, when a statute is designed to protect a certain class of people, members of that class can enforce contracts in violation of the statute, even if the other party cannot.
This is because the doctrine of in pari delicto recognizes that the protected class should not be held to the same standard as the party violating the statute, as the law is intended to safeguard their interests.
To know more about pari delicto refer here: https://brainly.com/question/15095413#
#SPJ11
a previous court decision that influences and is the basis for deciding later, similar cases is called question 23 options: a precedent. criminal law. a judicial maxim. common law. statutory law.
Answers
A previous court decision that influences and is the basis for deciding later, similar cases is known as a precedent.
Precedent is a fundamental principle in the common law system, which relies heavily on the use of prior court decisions as guidance in resolving current cases. Precedent can be binding or persuasive, depending on the hierarchy of courts and the facts of the case. Binding precedent must be followed by lower courts in the same jurisdiction, while persuasive precedent is not binding but may be considered by the court.
The use of precedent helps to promote consistency and predictability in the law, as it provides a framework for judges to make decisions based on similar cases that have already been decided. It also ensures that the law evolves gradually and is not subject to abrupt changes.
In contrast to statutory law, which is created by legislatures, precedent is created by judges through their interpretations of the law. This is why the common law system is often described as a judge-made law system.
Overall, precedent is a critical component of the common law system and plays a crucial role in shaping the development of the law.
Learn more about statutory here:
https://brainly.com/question/28620883
#SPJ11
Sunny enters into a contract with Trey to act as his personal sports trainer. If a dispute later arises and the contract contains unclear terms, the rules of contract interpretation will give effect to
the parties' intent as expressed in their contract.
what the promisor claims was the parties' intent.
what the promisee claims was the parties' intent.
what the parties now agree they intended.
Answers
The statement "the rules of contract interpretation will give effect to the parties intent as expressed in their contract" is correct.
The courts will typically interpret a contract to give effect to the parties intent as stated in the contract itself when there is a disagreement over the parties intentions or when there are ambiguous terms in the contract. According to the objective meaning of the words used and taking into account the context and circumstances of the contract's formation, the court's job is to interpret and uphold the agreement.
This method makes sure that the contract is interpreted in a way that is consistent with the parties understanding at the time of entering the contract and that the parties original intentions as expressed in the written agreement, are respected.
Learn more about contract interpretation at:
brainly.com/question/32810710
#SPJ4
Utilitarian approach O a. accounts for values such as justice and individual rights O b. None of the given statements O c. says with certainty whether the consequences of our actions will be good or bad O d. It is not the most common approach to moral reasoning used in business because of the way in which it accounts for costs and benefits
Answers
The utilitarian approach to moral reasoning focuses on maximizing overall happiness or well-being by considering the costs and benefits of actions. It weighs the consequences of actions and aims to achieve the greatest net benefit for the greatest number of people.
In business ethics, while the utilitarian approach can be applied, it is not always the most common approach. This is because it may require weighing the costs and benefits of actions in a way that can be challenging or subjective, especially when considering factors such as individual rights, justice, and other moral values.
Other approaches, such as deontological ethics or virtue ethics, may also be employed in business ethics depending on the specific circumstances and values involved.
Decide whether each problem contains mitigating factors or aggravating factors.
1. The defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter.
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation.
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed.
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics.
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school.
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family.
Answers
Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.
What is the Mitigating and Aggravating factor?A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.
On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.
Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.
Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341
#SPJ1
in the context of life and death decisions, there is a distinction between killing and letting die. which of the following is classified as letting die?
Answers
Removing a patient from life support.
There is a moral difference between murdering and letting die in non-consequentialist ethical theory. Letting someone die entails withholding care, as opposed to killing.
There is a moral difference between euthanasia and letting someone die in the context of medical ethics.
It is reasonable to assume that when an agent kills, she accepts responsibility; yet, when an agent permits a death, she does not.
The moral difference between killing and letting someone die is found there. However, when an agent is already in charge of the surrounding circumstances, the distinction is lost.
According to Winston Nesbitt, he has demonstrated that, in all cases, killing someone is worse than letting them die. However, this conclusion is false.
Nesbitt is right when he says that sometimes killing is worse than letting someone die, but this isn't always the case.
To know more about euthanasia, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3378948
#SPJ4
A single public utilities company is responsible for supplying electricity for an entire state. As a result, the utilities company can set the price of electricity.
Answers
A single public utilities company is responsible for supplying electricity for an entire state.
As a result, the utilities company can set the price of electricity.
This results in a monopoly, which means that the utilities company has complete control over the pricing of electricity.
The lack of competition can be a disadvantage for consumers, as the company may be able to charge higher prices without fear of losing customers to other suppliers.
In some cases, the government may regulate the pricing of electricity to ensure that consumers are not being exploited by the utilities company.
This regulation may take the form of price caps or other measures to ensure that electricity prices remain affordable.
However, this can also have unintended consequences, such as limiting the company's ability to invest in infrastructure improvements.
In summary, a single public utilities company holding a monopoly on supplying electricity can set prices and control the market.
While government regulation may mitigate the negative effects of monopolies, it can also create other issues that need to be considered.
Learn more about electricity from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/29281740
#SPJ11
What are some of the pros/cons of each of the four correctional ideologies?
Answers
1. Rehabilitation:
Pros:
- Rehabilitation aims to address the root causes of criminal behavior and help offenders reintegrate into society.
- It can reduce recidivism rates and prevent future crimes.
- It is based on the principle of individualized treatment, which takes into account the unique needs and circumstances of each offender.
Cons:
- Rehabilitation programs can be expensive and time-consuming.
- There is no guarantee that rehabilitation programs will be effective for all offenders.
- Critics argue that rehabilitation can be too lenient and fail to hold offenders accountable for their actions.
2. Deterrence:
Pros:
- Deterrence aims to prevent crime by punishing offenders and sending a message to others that crime will not be tolerated.
- It can be cost-effective, as it does not require extensive rehabilitation programs.
- It is based on the principle of swift and certain punishment, which can be a powerful deterrent.
Cons:
- Deterrence may not be effective for all offenders, especially those who are impulsive or have substance abuse issues.
- Critics argue that deterrence can be too harsh and fail to take into account the underlying causes of criminal behavior.
- There is debate over whether the threat of punishment is a strong enough deterrent to prevent crime.
3. Incapacitation:
Pros:
- Incapacitation aims to protect society by removing dangerous offenders from the community.
- It can be effective in preventing repeat offenses by high-risk offenders.
- It is based on the principle of public safety, which is a primary goal of the criminal justice system.
Cons:
- Incapacitation can be expensive, especially for long-term sentences or for the elderly or sick.
- Critics argue that incapacitation can be too harsh and fail to address the underlying causes of criminal behavior.
- Overreliance on incapacitation can lead to overcrowded prisons and strain on the criminal justice system.
4. Retribution:
Pros:
- Retribution aims to punish offenders in proportion to their crimes and to provide a sense of justice to victims and society.
- It can be based on the principle of desert, which holds that offenders deserve to be punished for their crimes.
- Retribution can be seen as a necessary aspect of a just and fair criminal justice system.
Cons:
- Retribution can be too harsh and fail to take into account the individual circumstances and needs of offenders.
- There is debate over whether retribution is an effective deterrent to crime.
- Overreliance on retribution can lead to a punitive and harsh criminal justice system that does not prioritize rehabilitation or prevention.
Overall, each of these four correctional ideologies has its own strengths and weaknesses, and there is ongoing debate over which approach is most effective in reducing crime and promoting public safety.
in trials that receive a lot of media attention the judge my sequester ,the jury to prevent them from having access to outside influences like television or the Internet do you think this is fair ? why or why not?
Answers
Answer:
It is necessary to sequester the jury in order to avoid accidental or deliberate tainting by outside forces. I.E., The media or social media. The reason this can be a detriment is because you're basing your judgment with bias. Therefore, the trial is not impartial.
Explanation:
Judges have done this in high profile cases. The jury is more selective and more discreet.
if u have 10 cookies then your friend takes 2 what do you have.
Answers
Answer:
Hello There!!
Explanation:
The answer is 8 because you had 10 and your friend takes 2 off from the 10.(10-2=8)
hope this helps, have a great day!!
~Pinky~
what is deviant behavior in crime
Answers
Answer:
Deviant behavior is an action that voilate the social norms including a formally enacted rule (e.g., crime)..
HOPE THIS HELPS..
1.Who is the MLA (Member of the Legislative Assembly)? What party does he/she belong to?
2. What are the 2 conditions that candidates must fulfill before their names can appear on a ballot?
3. In order to be elected, what must candidates convince the voters of?
4. What 4 things make people eligible to vote in a provincial election?
5. What will eligible voters receive before election day?
6.List the 4 stages of how people vote on election day.
Answers
1. MLA is a member of the legislative assembly is one who is elected by the public as their representative in the legislative assembly.
2. The two conditions that candidates must fulfill before their names can appear on a ballot are:
a. The candidate must sign petition signatures by the people who did not participate in any election through any political party.
b. He should fill out the application form and sign it after that his/her name will be able to come on the ballot.
3. The candidate must convince all the voters that he is a good leader for them and also fulfill all the necessary needs and demands. he /she should raise up from the caste, gender, religion, etc. as these social aspects may lead to the defeat of the candidate in elections.
4.a. One should be a citizen of the country.
b. One should meet their state's residency requirements.
c. Should be 18 yrs old on or before the day of the election.
d. Should be registered to vote by the state's voter registration deadline.
5. Before the election day the eligible voters receive the final speech by their representative o the candidate standing in elections.
6. The four stages through which people vote on election day are:
1. First of all the voter has to decide who is the correct representative according to their point of view.
2. Now he should have to go to the polling booth.
3. Now he has to select their representative on the ballot machine.
4. Now he has to click on the election symbol of their representative.
read more about MLA at:
https://brainly.com/question/30404365
Which of the following is NOT a right that the state has in privately owned property?
Answers
Answer:
Although unpaid taxes result in a lien (which is an encumbrance), an encumbrance is not a state right in and of itself in private property.
Explanation:
IF IT HELPED UH PLEASE MARK ME A BRAINLIEST :))Ewan is a nonresident of California and holds a partnership interest in a California partnership. He received a Schedule K-1 from the California partnership that included net income of $10,000 from California sources. What amount of the distributive share of partnership net income is taxable by California?
Answers
Answer:
The amount of the distributive share of partnership net income that is taxable by California is the share of the partnership's net income of $10,000 that can be attributed to Ewan.
Assuming he holds a 50% interest in the partnership, he is expected to pay tax on his share of the $10,000 (which is equal to $5,000) in California, where the income is earned and not where he resides.
Explanation:
A partnership as an entity does not pay taxes. But individual partners must pay taxes on their shares of the partnership income, whether it is actually distributed or not. The partnership usually lists the partners' income on Schedule K-1, while individual partners fill the normal individual tax returns.
what are common work contexts for Farmworkers and Laborers, Crop? Check all that apply.
outdoors, exposed to weather
exposed to disease or infections
spend time using hands to handle objects, tools, or controls
spend time climbing ladders, scaffolds, or poles
exposed to contaminants
Answers
Answer: Duties may include tilling soil and applying fertilizers; transplanting, weeding, thinning, or pruning crops; applying pesticides; or cleaning, grading, sorting, packing, and loading harvested products. May construct trellises, repair fences and farm buildings, or participate in irrigation activities.
Job Zone Examples: These occupations involve ...
Education: Some of these occupations may re...
Explanation:
Answer:
A, C, E
1, 3, 5
Explanation:
this won't help you author of this question, but it will people using edge in 2022
How has the Minneapolis domestic violence experiment changed police policies that now mandates in domestic violence cases in Illinois?
Answers
Answer:
Based on the results of the Minneapolis domestic violence experiment, which concluded that arrest was the most effective in most domestic violence cases, the Minneapolis Police Department started requiring police officials to use it as the main approach and to make a report on the reasons not to do it if they fail to do it.
Explanation:
The police policies were changed in March of 1984 and led to a record of people in jail on spouse assault charges.
Cristina and Jordan have been volunteering with a campus group that works to help underserved populations in the community. A major goal of this program is keeping clients with cognitive or psychological problems out of the criminal justice system. The program also hopes to keep students like Cristina and Jordan interested enough to focus some of their time on these issues once they are out of school.
In the scenario below, you will need to consider these questions as you read:
What are some of the ways that people with mental health issues, developmental disabilities, and head injuries end up in the criminal justice system?
How do cognitive and psychological problems make a person more vulnerable to victimization?
How do cognitive and psychological problems make a person more likely to engage in criminal behavior?
Answers
People who have mental disabilities and head injuries end up in the criminal justice system for committing crimes.
What are some of the ways people with mental health problems end up in the criminal justice system?People with mental health problems or developmental disabilities end up in the criminal justice system because they commit criminal acts such as: robbery, murder, attempted murder, damage to private property, among others.
How do these mental problems make individuals more vulnerable to victimization?These problems mean that individuals do not have a complete perception of reality, so they tend to interpret reality in a different way and do not have the ability to rationalize the consequences of their actions. Due to the above, on some occasions they act without thinking about the consequences and commit criminal acts.
How do mental problems cause a person to engage in criminal behavior?As we mentioned before, people with mental and cognitive problems are not fully aware of the consequences of their actions. Due to the above, they usually use excessive force and take some situations very personally, which is why they develop feelings of revenge. This makes these people have no control over their feelings and this leads them to act violently towards others.
Learn more about mental problems in: https://brainly.com/question/27700694
#SPJ1
1. what is the canada-china foreign investment promotion and protection agreement about? what are the main objectives of this treaty?
2. what is the canada-costa rica foreign investment promotion and _______.
Answers
Bilateral treaty promoting and protecting foreign investment between Canada and China, ensuring predictability, fair treatment, and dispute resolution are the main objectives of this treaty.
A bilateral agreement between Canada and China called the Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA) aims to encourage and safeguard foreign investment between the two nations. This treaty's main goals are to increase predictability and security for investors, ensure fairness and equity, ease the flow of capital, and create a process for resolving investment disputes.
A bilateral agreement called the Canada-Costa Rica Foreign Investment Promotion Agreement aims to encourage and facilitate foreign investment between Canada and Costa Rica. Its primary goals include fostering an environment that is conducive to investment, making sure that investments are protected and treated fairly, and setting up mechanisms for dispute resolution.
The agreement aims to promote economic cooperation, improve market access and give investors from both nations legal certainty and predictability. The provisions on non discrimination, expropriation compensation, and free fund transfers are among the rights and responsibilities of investors that are outlined in this document. The agreement aims to deepen economic ties and promote investment flows that benefit both Canada and Costa Rica.
Learn more about bilateral agreement at:
brainly.com/question/28214309
#SPJ4
Before parliamentary acts were passed to regulate working, how many hours per day did most children work?.
Answers
Before the given parliamentary acts were passed in order to the regulate working, then children are not allowed to work for more than 12 hours in a day.
By 1833, any Government exceeded what become to be the primary of many acts handling running situations and hours. At first, there has been restricted energy to implement those acts however because the century advanced the guidelines have been enforced extra strictly.
Nonetheless, the hours and running situations have been nevertheless very difficult with the aid of using today’s standards, and no guidelines have been in region to defend person male workers. Working in the road jobs protected shining shoes, promoting newspapers, canning fish, making garments and weaving fabrics. With the understanding that youngsters labored in factories, mines, and different jobs we could speak approximately their wages and hours. A regular day for those abused youngsters become everywhere from 12 to 19 hours a day.
Learn more about parliamentary visit: brainly.com/question/1504316
#SPJ4
preponderance of the evidence standard of proof applies to the competency to stand trial, just as it does in many types of court cases. in the case of competency to stand trial, the defense must prove that
Answers
Preponderance of the evidence standard of proof applies to the competency to stand the trial : the defense must prove that it is more likely than not the accused is incompetent.
What do you mean by Preponderance?
It can be defined as one type of evidentiary standard which is majorly used in a burden of proof analysis. In this the whole process revolves around around to prove that something is most likely than not. It is a very strong and important component in proving cases based on law.
is majorly based upon two factors
burden of productionburden of persuasionHence ,the defense must prove that it is more likely than not the accused is incompetent.
To learn more about Preponderance from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/26765712
#SPJ4
Exploring the Essential Question
Making Connections Imagine that you are a detective on the police force in your city. Your
supervisors believe that a local shipping and delivery business is really a front for moving and selling
drugs in your state and beyond. They think that the business receives large shipments of illegal
drugs disguised as car parts. It then distributes them around town using a fleet of delivery trucks.
As an investigator, what would you want to examine to learn more about this case and gather
evidence? Make a list of the places you would want to look, records you would want to see, and
evidence you might look for. How might your investigation violate the privacy of people associated
with the shipping and delivery business?
Answers
Answer: send an undercover officer in, tap the phones
Explanation:
The first thing you want to do is gather physical evidence, buy a used car part and see if there are drugs inside. You also wanna stake out their shop and observe their movements and if you see any make sure you get it on video and put it in your report. Also go through their trash and try to find physical evidence. send in an wired undercover officer, and tap their phones and try to catch any suspicious phone calls. Once you have done all of these things. type up a warrant and get it signed by a judge.
The law requires the DoD to recover costs for the GPC officials who have used the GPC for illegal, improper, or erroneous purchases. T/F
Answers
The statement is false. The law does not require the Department of Defense (DoD) to recover costs for Government Purchase Card (GPC) officials who have used the GPC for illegal, improper, or erroneous purchases.
However, the DoD and other government agencies have internal policies and procedures in place to address and rectify such situations. If an official has made unauthorized or inappropriate purchases, there may be disciplinary actions, investigations, or auditing processes to hold individuals accountable and ensure compliance with regulations and financial responsibilities. The focus is generally on preventing misuse, promoting accountability, and maintaining the integrity of the procurement process.
To read more about Department of Defense click here
https://brainly.com/question/28566498
#SPJ11
What is the sharing of power among state national and local governments called ?
Answers
Federalism is a style of government in which power is divided between the federal government and the states, as in the United States, where each have a sizable amount of power.
What is a fundamental government definition?A government is the governing structure of a state or community. The Columbian Encyclopedia defines government as "a method of social management where the ability to propose laws and also the right to enforce laws is invested in a specific portion of society."
Why is government action required?Governments are vital because they maintain law and order. Laws are necessary for society to operate. Without laws, existence would be unpredictable and hazardous.
To know more about Government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26119802
#SPJ4
which form must accompany the vehicle when transporting ammunition over public roads?
Answers
When transporting ammunition over public roads, the form that must accompany the vehicle is the DD Form 626, Motor Vehicle Inspection/Shipping Document.
This form provides a record of all inspections and safety measures that are taken when transporting ammunition over public roads. Ammunition is defined as the collection of bullets, bombs, shells, and other explosive materials used in combat or war. Ammunition is a dangerous material that requires specialized handling and transport. Therefore, transporting ammunition over public roads requires a great deal of care and attention to detail. To ensure that the transport of ammunition is safe, the Department of Defense (DoD) has put in place specific regulations that must be adhered to when transporting ammunition.DD Form 626The DD Form 626, Motor Vehicle Inspection/Shipping Document, is a standard form used by the DoD to document the shipment and inspection of military cargo, including ammunition.
The form includes a detailed record of all inspections and safety measures taken when transporting ammunition over public roads. The DD Form 626 is a critical document that must be presented to law enforcement officials and other regulatory agencies when transporting ammunition over public roads. In conclusion, to transport ammunition over public roads, it is mandatory to fill out the DD Form 626, Motor Vehicle Inspection/Shipping Document, to ensure the safety of the transport.
To know more about transporting click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29851765
#SPJ11
The requirement for two or more branches of government to have to work together to make something happen, e.g. -selection of federal judges, is an example of both separation of powers and checks and balances
Answers
Answer:
The Constitution nowhere contains an express injunction to preserve the boundaries of the three broad powers it grants, nor does it expressly enjoin maintenance of a system of checks and balances. Yet, it does grant to three separate branches the powers to legislate, to execute, and to adjudicate, and it provides throughout the document the means by which each of the branches could resist the blandishments and incursions of the others. The Framers drew up our basic charter against a background rich in the theorizing of scholars and statesmen regarding the proper ordering in a system of government of conferring sufficient power to govern while withholding the ability to abridge the liberties of the governed.
Explanation:
Which event must happen for a case to be heard before the Supreme Court?
O Five of the nine justices must agree to hear the case.
O Three of the nine justices must agree to hear the case.
O Six of the nine justices must agree to hear the case.
O Four of the hine justices must agree to hear the case.
Answers
Answer:D
Explanation:
What is the first thing a forensic scientist should do when they see this evidence?
A.
Make a plaster mold of it.
B.
Scrape soil samples from it.
C.
Take a photograph of it.
D.
Draw a sketch of it.
Answers
The first thing a forensic scientist should do is take a photograph of the evidence for documentation and preservation. The correct option is c.
When a forensic scientist comes across evidence, the first thing they should do is take a picture of it. Photographs provide a visual record that can be referred to later in the investigation or during court proceedings, serving as essential documentation of the original condition and location of the evidence.
It guards against tampering with the evidence and maintains its integrity. Depending on the nature of the evidence and the investigation, forensic scientists can continue with other necessary procedures after the evidence has been properly photographed such as collecting samples, creating molds or making sketches.
learn more about forensic scientist here
brainly.com/question/29293791
#SPJ3
In general, explain how the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news.
Answers
Answer: In general, the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news by recognizing that the freedom of the press is an essential part of a democratic society. The courts have held that the First Amendment protects the right of journalists to gather and disseminate news, and that this right is not limited to members of the traditional news media. However, the courts have also recognized that this right is not absolute and can be subject to reasonable restrictions. For example, the courts have held that journalists may be required to testify in court under certain circumstances, such as when the information they possess is relevant to a criminal investigation. Overall, the courts have generally been supportive of the right to gather news, recognizing its importance to a free and democratic society while also balancing it against other important interests, such as public safety and the administration of justice.
Explanation:
Answer:
Some people think that the First Amendment gives them the right to go anywhere and ask anything in the name of journalism. They believe that they can sneak into private property, record confidential conversations, or demand access to government secrets. Well, the courts have a different opinion. They have ruled that the First Amendment does not grant a special privilege to the press that overrides other laws and rights. They have said that journalists must respect the privacy, property, and security of others, and that they cannot use illegal means to obtain information. The courts have also recognized that some information is legitimately classified or restricted for national security or public safety reasons. So, the next time you see a reporter trying to break into a military base or a celebrity's home, don't be surprised if they end up in jail instead of on the front page.