After an adjudicatory hearing, the juvenile probation officer is often tasked with conducting a social background investigation.
A probationary or parole officer is a public official who is appointed or sworn to investigate, inform, and monitor the behavior of convicted felons on supervision or those transferred from incarceration to social oversight, such as parole.
Probation officials assist lawbreakers in rehabilitating and bettering themselves. They provide guidance to probationers that ensure that they refrain from participating in criminal conduct while on probation. Aside from employment stability, being a probationary officer allows you to give back to the community.
A parole officer is an official of the courts who regularly meets with individuals who have been condemned to supervised probation. These individuals are typically perpetrators and modest criminals. The great majority of probationary offenders are first-time offenders.
learn more about probation officers here:
https://brainly.com/question/30049015
#SPJ4
After an adjudicatory hearing, the juvenile probation officer is often tasked with conducting a social background investigation.
After an adjudicatory hearing, the juvenile probation officer is often tasked with conducting a social background investigation. This investigation involves gathering information about the youth's family, school, and community to better understand their circumstances and help inform any potential sentencing or rehabilitation plans. The information gathered may include interviews with family members, teachers, and other community members, as well as a review of the youth's educational and medical records. This process helps the court to make more informed decisions about the youth's future and provides valuable insights into how best to support their rehabilitation and reintegration into society.
Know more about probation officer here:
https://brainly.com/question/16679161
#SPJ11
Did I do these correctly and what's the answer for question 7.
A conditional sentence is a sentence that allows an offender to serve their sentence in the community, rather than in jail.
What is sentence?A sentence is a group of words that expresses a complete thought. It typically contains a subject and a verb and conveys a statement, question, command, or exclamation.
In order to impose a conditional sentence, the sentencing judge must first decide that a jail sentence of less than two years is appropriate for the offence, and then must determine that the sentence can be served in the community in a way that is consistent with the fundamental purpose and principles of sentencing. This two-stage process ensures that an offender is not given a sentence that is too lenient for the offence and that the sentence is in line with the overarching principles of criminal justice.
To learn more about sentence
https://brainly.com/question/28143259
#SPJ1
The differences between federal and state law enforcement agencies?
An example of an asset is everfi
An example of an asset, are a car, money, and time. Where and when you work is entirely up to you.
What is the definition of an asset?
A resource having economic worth that a person, business, or nation possesses or controls with the hope that it would someday be useful is referred to as an asset.
The balance sheet of a business lists assets. They're classified as current, fixed, financial, and intangible. They are acquired or produced in order to raise a company's value or improve the operations of the company.
Whether it's manufacturing equipment or a patent, an asset can be viewed of as anything that, in the future, can generate cash flow, lower expenses, or increase sales.
To learn more about asset visit;
https://brainly.com/question/14404094
#SPJ1
Correct question:
What is an example of an Everfi asset, in the same vein?
In the “Little Albert” experiment, psychologist John Watson conditioned a(n) ____________.
A.
lab rat to fear an infant
B.
infant to fear Santa Claus
C.
infant to fear a lab rat
D.
lab rat to fear loud noises
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Answer:
C. Infant to fear a lab rat
Explanation:
The Little Albert Experiment expressed that traditional conditioning the relationship of a particular incentive or behavior with an irrelevant incentive or behavior works in human beings. In the research, psychologist John Watson was able to condition an earlier unafraid baby to become afraid of a rat.
Please give Brainliest :)
3. How can it be said that courts adjudicate the allocation of the costs of a consumer-oriented economy?
Answer:
It can be said that the courts assess the consumer profile and consumption pattern in a region, determining which sectors will receive more subsidies to reduce expenses, but increase the production of goods and services, optimizing the regional economy.
Explanation:
A consumer-oriented economy is one that is oriented and driven by consumer spending. Therefore, regions that have this type of economy should study and analyze the consumer profile that citizens have, evaluating the goods and services that are most consumed and that are sustaining this economy more efficiently. Thus, the allocation of expenditures should be determined by the courts in that region, based on the sectors that are most in line with the consumer's profile, being the most profitable sectors and the ones that should be more stimulated.
Which of the following has original jurisdiction over cases involving disputes between two or more states?
U.S. Circuit Court
U.S. District Court
U.S. Supreme Court
US. Intermediate Appellate Court
The court which has original jurisdiction over cases involving controversies between two or further countries is the US Supreme Court.
Original jurisdiction is the capacity of a court to hear a case for the first time. It can be distinguished from appellate governance, which is a court's capability to consider a case that a lower court has preliminarily heard and determined.
The Supreme Court's governance — its power to hear cases is established under Composition III, Section II of the Constitution. Certain cases, similar as suits involving two or further countries and/ or cases involving ministers and other public ministers, fall under the Court's original governance.
To learn more on original jurisdiction, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13961368
#SPJ4
All III inquiries must be logged with the requestor's name, agency, and terminal operator's name, and the justification why the criminal history was requested. These logs must be kept for a minimum of _____ year(s).
The logs of inquiries of criminal history must be kept for a minimum of one year.
What is Criminal Record?The term Criminal record refers to the list of the actions and crime activities of the criminal kept properly and being interacted at the time of the criminal justice. It is also known as Criminal record.
This includes the activities of the Arrests, detentions, convictions, and other interactions with the legal system and law enforcement authorities
Here criminal activity includes the term crime which means any action or inaction that is prohibited by the law. The violation of a legal obligation may also be the focus of a criminal investigation.
All III requests must be recorded together with the identity of the requestor, the agency, the terminal operator, and the reason why the criminal history was required. These records must be retained for at least a year.
Therefore, it can be concluded that logs of inquiries of criminal history must be kept for a minimum of one year.
Learn more about Criminal here:
https://brainly.com/question/4543636
#SPJ2
What is the purpose of a grand jury?
The purpose of a grand jury is to ascertain if there is reason to think that one or more people committed a specific Federal offense within the district court's jurisdiction.
A grand jury's role is to accuse those who may be guilty of a crime, but it also serves as a safeguard against unfair and unjust prosecution. It provides an opportunity for community members to engage in the administration of justice as lay citizens. Additionally, it has the ability to show data on local crime and poor administration. A grand jury typically consists of 23 people.
Two different forms of written statements are used as the accusation method: Either in a formal manner (indictment) outlining the offense with the appropriate accompaniments of time and occasion, the certainty of deed and person, or in a less formal manner (presentment), which is typically the grand jury's spontaneous act.
Learn more about grand jury, here;
https://brainly.com/question/1927043
#SPJ6
In general, independent regulatory commissions are created primarily for the purpose of…
Pilihan jawaban
supporting and helping cabinet-level departments
proposing policy alternatives during periods of crisis
regulating the activities of other bureaucratic agencies to ensure that they act in a fair and objective manner
regulating certain industries to protect the public interest
In general, independent regulatory commissions are created primarily for the purpose they act in a fair and objective manner regulating certain industries to protect the public interest.
Federal organizations that are autonomous of the executive departments are known as independent regulatory agencies. Despite being included in the executive branch, these organizations are designed to establish and enforce laws without regard to politics.
The Commission, the Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the Consumer Products Safety Commission, and the Energy Regulatory Commission are all examples of independent regulatory agencies.
Independent regulatory agencies are regarded as independent because Congress has restricted the president's ability to choose its top employees (either by statute or custom), not because their regulations differ from those of executive agencies.
Learn more about Independent regulatory agencies here:
https://brainly.com/question/28259528
#SPJ4
Elsa, 26 years of age, was employed as a rigger for Frozen Pty Ltd. While she operated one crane at work, she was struck in the face by a heavy steel chain which slipped out from a machine operated by another crane worker. The blow to her face rendered her unconscious for several minutes. The blow also broke bones in her nose and cheeks. She spent 12 days in hospital, including having cranial surgery to insert plates. From the surgery, she has scarring over her head mostly behind her hairline. She has been left virtually blind in her left eye. She has lost sensation on the left side of her forehead and cheek. She lost her sense of smell and, because of that, most of her sense of taste. She has some degree of memory impairment and some
mood effects. After four months, she had recovered sufficiently to return to her work as a rigger, on light duties. A month later, she was back to working full hours and after another month, she was doing her full pre-injury duties. Nevertheless, she no longer felt comfortable performing those duties and, in any event, was offered new employment in a field she had been pursuing for some years, working as a construction supervisor in a large building company. She took up that employment in November 2015, earning a higher salary than she earned in her previous employment as a rigger. However, Elsa found that although she really enjoyed the new job, her health problems from the original accident at Frozen Pty Ltd worsened while at her new job
which meant that she had to leave. Elsa now wants to sue Frozen Ply Ltd in negligence for injuries sustained from her
original workplace injuries Task: Advise whether Elsa may be successful in a claim for compensation through the Common Law of Negligence. Discuss the relevance of vicarious liability and any defences which may be raised by Frozen Pty Ltd as part of
your response. Use case references to support your answer.
Elsa may have a viable claim for compensation through the Common Law of Negligence against Frozen Pty Ltd. The employer has a duty of care towards its employees to provide a safe working environment and take reasonable measures to prevent accidents and injuries.
Vicarious liability may be relevant in this case, as it holds an employer liable for the actions of its employees performed within the scope of their employment.
Frozen Pty Ltd may raise defenses to mitigate or avoid liability. One possible defense is contributory negligence, arguing that Elsa's own actions or conduct contributed to the injuries. However, the severity of the injuries and the fact that Elsa was simply performing her job duties as a rigger may weaken this defense.
Case references and further legal analysis would be necessary to fully assess Elsa's chances of success in her claim. Consulting with a legal professional specializing in personal injury law would provide a comprehensive evaluation of the specific circumstances and applicable laws in this jurisdiction to determine the strength of Elsa's case.
Learn more about jurisdiction : brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ11
Why is it difficult to reduce the national debt?
It is very difficult to reduce the national debt of a nation because little amounts are left after goods and services need to be paid for to ensure the welfare of the nation.
The national budget of the nation:
Includes the various expenses of the government Includes debt interest paymentsBecause the national budget includes the various expenses of the nation such as salaries and national defense, there is usually very little left to enable the repayment of debt so the nation sticks to paying interest payments instead.
In conclusion, the national debt of a nation is hard to reduce because the government has to cover national expenses.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/3467411.
The validity of a piece of evidence is called:
implicit bias
O liability
objectivity
directness
admissibility
O
reliability
esl Law in the United States
Submit Test
Reader
2
Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
Which law helps maintain relationships in society, as well as between states and branches of the federal government?
law helps maintain fundamental relationships in society, as well as between states and branches of the fede
government
Reset
Next
Answer:
Environmental should be the answer
Explanation:
Audrey was granted stock appreciation rights in 10,000 shares of company stock when the share price was $50. If she exercised her rights when the share price was $70, how much income, if any, must she recognize at that time?
The income of Audrey is $200000 after an increase of share from $50 to $70.
Audrey will earn $200000 if she sells all the shares when the share price is $70 because there is $20 increase occur from the time when she receives the share until now. When she receives the share, its price is $50.
But after sometime when the share price increases and reaches up to $70 so we can conclude that the income of Audrey is $200000 after an increase of share from $50 to $70.
Learn more about shares here: https://brainly.com/question/1957305
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/26058343
Larry, Moe, and Curly own the Three Stooges as joint tenants with rights of survivorship. Curly conveys his interest to Shemp. Subsequently, Moe dies. Who owns Moe's interest in the Three Stooges?
Answer:
Larry, Moe and Curly own an investment property as tenants in common. Because of a recent business disagreement, Curly wants to divest himself of the property. If the three owners cannot mutually agree on a plan to settle the matter, Curly may seek an equitable distribution of the property
All three own Moe's interest in the Three Stooges as all of them were the tenants.
This is due to the fact that a business with a survivorship right legally goes to the person who survives. As a result, the property cannot be considered part of both the estate of the dead owner under the law.
Joint property owners have the right of succession, which guarantees that, in the event of one owner's passing, the surviving owner(s) will take over ownership of the deceased owner's part of the property.
As renters in common, Curly, Moe, and Larry jointly own a rental. Cindy wishes to sell property due to a recent economic quarrel. Curly may ask for a fair division of the land if the three owners are unable to come to an arrangement. The Three Stooges are owned by Larry, Moe, and Curly as equal partners with right of survivorship.
Learn more about the rights of survivorship, Here:
https://brainly.com/question/14140061
#SPJ5
when linda's lawyer questions jules, it is called _______, and when ronaldo's lawyer questions jules, it is called _______.
Direct examination occurs when Jules is questioned by Linda's attorney. Cross-examination is the process through which Jules is questioned by Ronaldo's attorney.
What is meant by Direct examination?The person who called the witness to the stand will first interrogate them, which is known as direct examination. Leading questions are not permitted during direct examination, unless an exemption arises, according to the civil procedure regulations. Key witnesses might be questioned directly during direct examination in order to get their accounts of what they saw, heard, or participated in during an occurrence. For instance, a witness might be called to the stand in a personal injury lawsuit involving a car accident to describe what they saw in the moments leading up to, during, or following the collision. Direct examination is typically used to extract facts supporting evidence that will satisfy a necessary aspect of a party's claim or defense. It is generally forbidden to ask leading questions during direct examination.To learn more about Direct examination, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/13030738
When Linda's lawyer questions Jules, it is called direct examination, and when Ronaldo's lawyer questions Jules, it is called cross-examination.
Direct examination is when a lawyer questions their own witness in order to establish the facts of the case.
Cross-examination is when the opposing lawyer questions the witness in order to test their credibility or to find inconsistencies in their testimony.
Both types of examination are important parts of the trial process and are used to help the jury or judge make a decision about the case.
When Linda's lawyer questions Jules, it is called direct examination, and when Ronaldo's lawyer questions Jules, it is called cross-examination. Direct examination is when a lawyer questions their own witness in order to establish the facts of the case. Cross-examination is when the opposing lawyer questions the witness in order to test their credibility or to find inconsistencies in their testimony.
Both types of examination are important parts of the trial process and are used to help the jury or judge make a decision about the case.
For more similar questions on examination:
brainly.com/question/22241827
#SPJ11
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.
what is a legal document that the supreme court sends to a lower court ordering it to send up a complete record of a case?
A legal document that the Supreme Court sends to a lower court ordering it to send up a complete record of a case is called a "writ of certiorari."
This writ is issued by the Supreme Court to review the decision of a lower court, ensuring that the case was handled correctly and the judgment was just.
The process is:
1. A party involved in a case requests the Supreme Court to review the lower court's decision by filing a petition for a writ of certiorari.
2. The Supreme Court reviews the petition and decides whether to grant it or not. The Court typically only accepts cases that involve significant legal issues or inconsistencies among different lower courts.
3. If the Supreme Court grants the writ of certiorari, it orders the lower court to send up the complete record of the case.
4. The lower court complies with the order and sends the case record to the Supreme Court.
5. The Supreme Court then reviews the case, hears arguments from both sides and makes a final decision.
This process ensures that the Supreme Court can maintain consistency and fairness in the application of laws throughout the country.
Know more about the supreme court here:
https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ11
if a volunteer violates the volunteer standards of conduct, what are the possible consequences?
Volunteers play a vital role in the success of many organizations, but they are also expected to adhere to certain standards of conduct.
If a volunteer violates these standards, they may face various consequences depending on the severity of the situation. The first step is typically a conversation between the volunteer and their supervisor to discuss the issue and find a resolution. If the violation is more serious, the organization may terminate the volunteer's service. In extreme cases, the volunteer may face legal action if their behavior results in harm or damages. It is important for volunteers to understand and respect the standards of conduct set forth by the organization they are serving, and to take any violations seriously. Clear communication and expectations can help prevent potential issues and ensure a positive experience for both the volunteer and the organization.
To learn more about conduct, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29998734
#SPJ11
1. In your own words define reckless homicide.
Which statement best describes qualitative research?
Answer:
I think there were a few points missing from your question. But I think this is the right answer.
The Whole Question:
Which statement best describes qualitative research? Select All That Apply:
A: Studies are conducted in natural settings
B: Data are collected from a large number of subjects
C: Data collected tend to be numeric
D: The research design is systematic and subjective
Explanation:
The right answers are
A: Studies are conducted in natural settings
D: The research design is systematic and subjective
the prison litigation reform act states that prisons must pay the court filing fees for people who are incarcerated. true false
True. The Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) is a federal law that was passed in 1996. One of its provisions is that if an incarcerated individual wants to file a civil lawsuit against a prison or its employees, they must pay a filing fee.
However, if the inmate cannot afford to pay the fee, the PLRA requires the prison to pay it on their behalf. This is to prevent frivolous lawsuits and to ensure that those who have legitimate claims have access to the courts. The fee is typically deducted from the inmate's account, but prisons cannot take more than 20% of the inmate's income per month to pay for legal fees.
To know more about inmates account refer :
brainly.com/question/2814306
#SPJ11
Is bullying a problem in schools? Who do you think should address this problem? Schools? Parents? Police officers? Do you think that David’s Law does enough? Or does it go too far?
Bullying is a problem in schools, and the victim can suffer serious and lasting effects as a result. It may harm psychologically, resulting in depression, anxiety.
Police officers, parents and schools all have a part to play in combating the issue of bullying. Schools should implement stringent policies to stop bullying and deal with it quickly and forcefully when it does occur.
Parents should instruct their children to treat others with kindness and respect and to report any instances of bullying that they become aware of. Police officers may be requested to look into cases of severe bullying that constitute criminal offenses like assault or harassment.
A Texas anti-bullying law called David's Law was passed in 2017 with the intention of preventing and combating cyberbullying. It increases the severity of the penalties for cyberbullying, mandates that schools look into and report incidents of cyberbullying and permits the issuance of restraining orders against cyberbullies.
Learn more about anti-bullying law at:
brainly.com/question/6358273
#SPJ1
8. Law enforcement/police calls are
______based upon_____
by urgency and dispatched
priority levels and responder availability.
When is a lie a lie?
Happy Law Offices has total assets of $880 million. Its total liabilities are $293 million and its revenue is $112 million. Calculate the debt ratio in decimal format to 2 places; for example, 19.5% would be .20).
The debt ratio for Happy Law Offices is approximately 0.33.
The debt ratio is a financial metric that measures the proportion of a company's total assets that are financed by debt. It is a measure of the company's leverage or the extent to which it relies on borrowed funds to finance its operations.
Debt Ratio = Total Liabilities / Total Assets
Total Assets = $880 million
Total Liabilities = $293 million
Debt Ratio = $293 million / $880 million
Debt Ratio = 0.333 (rounded to three decimal places)
Learn more about debt ratio at:
brainly.com/question/11249578
#SPJ4
The PMC industry performs a service that cannot be provided by any other source
A PMC (private military company) is a private company that provides security services in exchange for money. Technically speaking, armies are able to preform the same service. So the PMC industry DOES preform a service that CAN be provided by another source. Also mercenaries, pirates, and rent-a-cop companies do the same thing.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
A private military company (PMC) is a private company providing armed combat or security services for financial gain. PMCs refer to their operationally deployed personnel as "security contractors" or "private military contractors".
Explanation:
PMCs specialize in providing combat and protection forces. Their work ranges from running small-scale training missions to providing combat units composed of up to several hundred highly trained soldiers equipped with powerful weapons platforms, including tanks and attack helicopters.
E=mc cubed, true or false?
Answer: false
Explanation:
Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
I think but I'm not sure
Which statement best explains how Kayla can identify her purpose for writing? The word “research” suggests that her main purpose is to learn about the Civil War. The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim. The word “present” suggests that her main purpose is to entertain with interesting facts. The word “cause” suggests that her main purpose is to inform and educate.
Answer:
the answer is B) The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim.
Explanation:
have a good day
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Canada Contractual Law
Valerie wants to splurge on her new she-shed (outdoor female equivalent of a man cave) Although her she-shed did have a lovely wine fridge and a crystal chandelier, something was missing. She hired a landscaping company – Major Tom’s Ground Control to provide a boxwood hedge, an angel stone path leading up to the shed, and several exotic plants and trees. A contract was drawn up which spelled out what Major Tom would do in exchange for $10,000.00. Valerie provided Major Tom with a $5,000.00 deposit to begin the work they had agreed upon. One stipulation in the contract, was that Major Tom would remove all leftover plant material and debris and clean the property before they left.
On the afternoon the landscaping was to be completed, she arrived home from work with her friends ready to begin enjoying the she-shed. The she shed looked lovely. Major Tom was nowhere to be found but they had left behind a hill of dirt, several shovels, a pair of work boots and two empty cases of beer. Valerie was not happy. She called Major Tom and told them that she would not pay the balance of $5000.00 because they had failed to clean the property as indicated by the contract after the work was completed.
What are the legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario? Does she have a case?
Based on the material in Chapter 7, provide a clear and detailed rationale as to what can be done to solve the problem in this scenario.
The legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario are the Breach of Contract and Contractual Remedies. Valerie has a case in this scenario.
What can be done to solve the problem in this scenario is that a demand letter can be sent to Major Tom’s Ground Control company. This letter should indicate that they breached the contract by failing to clean the property after completing the work and that she will not be paying the balance of $5000.00. In addition, Valerie should include that she is willing to pay a fair amount to have another company come in and clean up the property. Finally, she could inform Major Tom’s Ground Control that if they fail to comply with her demands, she will take legal action against them.
It is necessary to note that a demand letter should be sent with registered mail. This ensures that the letter is received by the intended recipient. If the letter is ignored, Valerie may need to file a claim in Small Claims Court. The evidence to support her claim includes the contract, deposit, pictures of the property, the demand letter, and any other correspondence between her and Major Tom's Ground Control.
Learn more about Small Claims Court: https://brainly.com/question/16507110
#SPJ11