According to the Code of Criminal Procedure, a written statement that is filed and presented on behalf of the State of Texas by a district attorney that charges a person with an offense that may be prosecuted according to law is called a/an __________. (10)

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer: Even with limited knowledge of evidence and it's preservation, a police officer who is the first responder to a crime scene can properly protect, preserve, and, in some cases, collect evidence.

Explanation: :)

Answer:

B.A couple is filling for divorce and needs to determine support payments.

Answer:

A majority of Hispanic Voters of all ages favored Joe Biden over Donald Trump.

Explanation:

While viewing the graph you see the majority of Hispanics (all) voted for Biden. Hopes this makes sense.

According to the data the true statement that is about the Hispanic voters in 2020 is that A majority of Hispanic voters of all ages favored Joe Biden over Donald Trump.

The answer to this question can be gotten from looking at this map. The blue voters refers to those that are voting for Joe Biden while the red voters are those that are in support of Donald Trump.

In all categories, Joe Biden was shown to have more percentage of Hispanic voters than Trump.

From the graph, we conclude that option A is the right answer to the question.

Read more on https://brainly.com/question/25723257?referrer=searchResults

The pairing below correctly matches both constitutional protection of voting rights and a past or current structural barrier to voting would be the right of citizens who are 18 years or older to vote cannot be denied and Poll taxes.

The "Jim Crow" laws, which sought to deny black voters the right to vote and impose segregation, were developed in the South after Reconstruction, and the poll tax was a prime example of these laws. It is prohibited for the federal government or any state to restrict or deny an American citizen's ability to vote because of their age. This includes those who are eighteen years of age or older.

No state may enact or carry out any legislation that restricts the rights or privileges of US citizens; no state may rob anyone of their life, liberty, or property without first obtaining a court order; no state shall deny anyone living under its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.

Learn to know more about Voting rights on

https://brainly.com/question/28592066

#SPJ4

The legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario are the Breach of Contract and Contractual Remedies. Valerie has a case in this scenario.

What can be done to solve the problem in this scenario is that a demand letter can be sent to Major Tom’s Ground Control company. This letter should indicate that they breached the contract by failing to clean the property after completing the work and that she will not be paying the balance of $5000.00. In addition, Valerie should include that she is willing to pay a fair amount to have another company come in and clean up the property. Finally, she could inform Major Tom’s Ground Control that if they fail to comply with her demands, she will take legal action against them.

It is necessary to note that a demand letter should be sent with registered mail. This ensures that the letter is received by the intended recipient. If the letter is ignored, Valerie may need to file a claim in Small Claims Court. The evidence to support her claim includes the contract, deposit, pictures of the property, the demand letter, and any other correspondence between her and Major Tom's Ground Control.

Learn more about Small Claims Court: https://brainly.com/question/16507110

#SPJ11

Answer:

a ah f smug fsbadbmry dd afngsjstnafbd wbatnysmstbsvs svebarbevs

The Supreme Court's review of a law passed by Congress best demonstrates the principle of judicial review.

Judicial review is the power of the Supreme Court to review and declare the constitutionality of laws passed by Congress. This power is derived from the Constitution, specifically from the Marbury v. Madison case in 1803, where Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle of judicial review.
The Supreme Court's review of laws also relates to federalism, which is the division of power between the national government and state governments. Through the review process, the Supreme Court can determine whether a law passed by Congress exceeds its authority under the Constitution, and whether it encroaches on the powers reserved to the states. This balance of power between the federal government and state governments is a key aspect of American government, and the Supreme Court's review of laws plays an important role in maintaining this balance.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court's review of a law passed by Congress is a demonstration of the principle of judicial review and is closely related to federalism. This process ensures that the balance of power between the federal government and state governments is maintained and that laws passed by Congress are in compliance with the Constitution.

To know more about supreme court visit:

brainly.com/question/29759733

#SPJ11

Answer:

Students with disabilities have special schools where they are properly equipped.

Explanation:

As a matter of fact, Why does a school want to suspend a student with a disabiliy?

1.Maybe the student committed a crime.

2.The child's disability is affecting other students.

3.The child is constantly weakened and the environment condition is unsuitable for the child.

I'm not very sure of my answer but..

Answer:

its c

Explanation:

The French police structure is characterized as "multiple coordinated." However, there are some areas of friction between the Police Nationale and the Gendarmerie Nationale that put stress on the coordination of French police. The two forces work together in the fight against crime and threats to national security, but their areas of jurisdiction have long been blurred.

The French police structure consists of three main entities: the police nationale, the gendarmerie, and the municipal police.The police nationale are responsible for crime prevention, police investigations, and maintaining public order in towns and cities.

The gendarmerie is under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Defense, while the police are under the authority of the Ministry of the Interior.Some of the factors that put stress on coordination between the two entities include a lack of coordination between the two forces in sharing information and intelligence.

To know more about French police visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/17357629

#SPJ11

He proposed the law of conservation of mass as a result of these discoveries. Antoine Lavoisier discovered in 1789 that mass is neither generated nor destroyed in chemical processes, which led to the formulation of the Law of Conservation of Mass.

Antoine Lavoisier conducted a number of tests to determine what transpired when a chemical burnt in the late 1700s. He noticed that the weight of a container and its contents remained constant throughout each trial, equal to what it had been at the start.

That is to say, the mass of any one element at the start of a reaction will be equal to that element's mass at the conclusion of the reaction.

Learn more about Conservation of Mass Visit: brainly.com/question/27891057

#SPJ4

Answer: mala prohibita

Explanation:

Malum in se is simply a Latin phrase that means that something wrong or evil. Examples include murder, assault, robbery etc. These act are wrongful.

Malum prohibitum, simply m and that something that's considered to be wrong because it's prohibited. Examples include indecent exposure, not using helmets by bikers etc.

Answer:

This includes the power to coin money, to regulate commerce, to declare war, to raise and maintain armed forces, and to establish a Post Office. In all, the Constitution delegates 27 powers specifically to the federal government.

☺️☺️☺️

Answer:

Res judicata

Explanation:

Res judicata is a Latin word which means matter decided. It is a situation in which an apex court has ruled over a case and there is no more room for any appeal or retrial of any form.

The judgement is usually final with both parties having no option than to accept it.

Res judicata is also known as the doctrine that forever bars the parties in a lawsuit to bring action again for the same claim.

The two constitutional amendments adopted in part because of wartime influences were the 18th amendment, which dealt with prohibition, and the 19th amendment, whose subject was woman suffrage.

The 18th amendment prohibited the manufacture, sale, and transportation of intoxicating liquors, while the 19th amendment granted women the right to vote.

Both of these amendments were influenced by wartime events and attitudes, as the 18th amendment was passed in part due to concerns about the impact of alcohol on soldiers during World War I, and the 19th amendment was passed in part due to the contributions of women during the war.

To know more about constitutional amendments, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/699977#

#SPJ11

Answer: The answer is A

Explanation:

Answer:

getting milk for youuuuuu :)

Answer:

I really don't know but hopefully, you find out.

Explanation:

Judicial restraint is the refusal to exercise judicial review in deference to the process of ordinary politics.

Here are some Supreme Court justices who practiced it:

Due to a failure to prove all four components of a negligence action, the plaintiff will be barred from receiving compensation.

Duty, breach, harm, and causation are the four components of negligence claims.

Duty: The plaintiff must prove that the defendant owed them a duty in order to pursue a personal injury claim. Breach: In order to prove negligence, the plaintiff must show that the defendant violated the duty of care that was owed to them. When we say someone acted carelessly, we mean they disregarded the standard of care we would expect of them in that circumstance.

Injury: The plaintiff in a personal injury lawsuit must show that they were "injured" as a result of the defendant's actions in order to be awarded damages. Depending on the situation, injury might take the shape of monetary loss, physical harm, or even psychological harm. Causation: Lastly, the plaintiff must show that the defendant's negligence was the real reason the plaintiff suffered the harm they did. The plaintiff would not have a case against the defendant if a truck driver ran a stop sign but completely missed the plaintiff, who was later struck by lightning.

Learn more about plaintiff visit: brainly.com/question/7315287

#SPJ4

Answer:

c.               Hope this helps!

Explanation:

c

Answer:

C. The defendant is given a new trial for the same crime.

Explanation:

Got it correct on ed2002 quiz, hope this helps :)

Answer:

I may not be 100% correct but I believe its B

Answer:

The answer is Anti-lock braking system

Explanation:

I hope this helped!! :)

Answer:

what are you asking?

Explanation:

Answer:

The weights crushed him.

Explanation:

I think because he was in a room full of weigths or maybe it was a murder. These are just guesses based on the text since there is not much of a question.

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

I don't think I have any explanation

Explanation:

ROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

Sections

HomePolitics, Law & GovernmentPolitics & Political Systems

Proportional representation

politics

Cite Share More

WRITTEN BY

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree....

See Article History

Proportional representation, electoral system that seeks to create a representative body that reflects the overall distribution of public support for each political party. Where majority or plurality systems effectively reward strong parties and penalize weak ones by providing the representation of a whole constituency to a single candidate who may have received fewer than half of the votes cast (as is the case, for example, in the United States), proportional representation ensures minority groups a measure of representation proportionate to their electoral support. Systems of proportional representation have been adopted in many countries, including Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Russia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.





The sex trade and globalization intersect in the context of Canada, presenting complex social and economic dynamics.

Globalization has facilitated the expansion of the sex trade by enabling the movement of people, ideas, and capital across borders. In Canada, the sex trade involves various forms, including street-based sex work, brothel-based work, and online platforms.

Globalization has both positive and negative implications for the sex trade in Canada. On one hand, it has created opportunities for migrant sex workers to seek better economic prospects, escape poverty, or support their families in their home countries.

However, it has also increased vulnerabilities for many individuals, exposing them to exploitation, human trafficking, and unsafe working conditions.

In response to these challenges, Canada has undergone legal and policy changes related to the sex trade. In 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada struck down certain provisions of the Criminal Code related to prostitution, recognizing the right of sex workers to work safely.

The subsequent implementation of the Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act aimed to target exploitative practices while focusing on the safety and well-being of individuals involved in the sex trade.

Learn more about poverty here

https://brainly.com/question/30771214

#SPJ11

A nonintent crime is one that does not require the prosecutor to prove that the defendant had a specific intent or mental state to commit the crime. Instead, these crimes are based solely on the defendant's actions or conduct. Examples of nonintent crimes include strict liability offenses like traffic violations and some environmental crimes. These crimes do not require the prosecutor to prove intent or knowledge on the part of the defendant, and they can be punished with fines, imprisonment, or both.

A nonintent crime is one that does not require the prosecutor to prove that the defendant had a specific intent or mental state to commit the crime. Instead, these crimes are based solely on the defendant's actions or conduct. Examples of nonintent crimes include strict liability offenses like traffic violations and some environmental crimes. These crimes do not require the prosecutor to prove intent or knowledge on the part of the defendant, and they can be punished with fines, imprisonment, or both. In contrast, intent crimes require the prosecutor to prove that the defendant had a specific mental state or intent to commit the crime, such as murder or theft. Overall, nonintent crimes are an important category of criminal offenses that are used to protect public safety and ensure that individuals are held accountable for their actions, regardless of their intent.

To know more about environmental visit:

https://brainly.com/question/21976584

#SPJ11

Answer:

Human rights violations against women and children are unfortunately prevalent in many communities around the world. The response of the community can vary depending on a range of factors, such as cultural norms, legal protections, and social attitudes.

In some cases, communities may rally together to support women and children who have experienced human rights violations. This may involve setting up support networks, providing counseling services, or advocating for legal and policy changes to prevent future abuses. Such responses can be vital in ensuring that survivors of human rights violations are able to access the resources and support to recover and manage their lives.

In other cases, communities may stigmatize and ostracize women and children who have experienced human rights violations. They may blame them for their own victimization and perpetuating harmful cultural attitudes that contribute to ongoing abuse. This can make it difficult for survivors to come forward and seek help and can further entrench cycles of violence and exploitation.

Ultimately, the response of the community to human rights violations against women and children depends on a complex interplay of factors.The main factors include cultural, social, and economic conditions, as well as legal and policy frameworks. To promote ethical practices and prevent human rights violations, communities should work together to address the root causes of such abuses. They should create a culture of respect and dignity for all individuals regardless of their gender or age.

Explanation: