A third party who is not part of an original contract but who is transferred a duty to perform set forth in the original contract is called a Delegatee.
Delegation in contract law and legal principles refers to the act of assigning another person the duty of executing out the performance specified in a contract. Three parties are involved in this act: the delegator, the delegatee, and the obligee. The delegator assumed the duty to perform under the contract; the delegatee takes on the responsibility of doing so; and the obligee is the one to whom this action is owed. If the delegatee doesn't perform up to par, the obligee can choose to treat this as a breach of the initial contract by the delegator or he can claim third-party beneficiary status and pursue all remedies available to third-party beneficiaries under the agreement between delegator and the delegatee. If there was no regard for the delegation, the delegator would still be responsible for any failure to perform, but the delegatee would have no further obligations.
Learn more about Delegation here
https://brainly.com/question/10594256
#SPJ4
2. How many police officers die each year?
Answer:
According to the FBI database, there are an average of 64 police officers dying per year.
security personnel need to be aware of policy and standards change requirements. business drivers for policy and standards changes may include_____
Security personnel need to be aware of policy and standards change requirements because business drivers for policy and standards changes may include Changes in laws and regulations, Changes in technology, Changes in threats etc.
1. Changes in laws and regulations: Security personnel need to be aware of changes in laws and regulations that may affect the organization's security policies and standards.
2. Changes in technology: Security personnel need to be aware of changes in technology that may affect the organization's security policies and standards.
3. Changes in business processes: Security personnel need to be aware of changes in business processes that may affect the organization's security policies and standards.
4. Changes in threats: Security personnel need to be aware of changes in threats that may affect the organization's security policies and standards.
By being aware of these business drivers, security personnel can ensure that the organization's security policies and standards are up to date and can effectively protect the organization's assets.
To know more about Security personnel:
https://brainly.com/question/30742940
#SPJ11
What do you think of my opinion of gadgets used by the police? Explain your answer!
Vehicle Mounted GPS Launcher
The police pursuits, in my opinion, is just something that is very dangerous, not just for the police officers responding or for the offender but is also very dangerous for the community around, for the kids crossing the streets, the joggers running down the avenue, the vehicles stopped at the traffic light, everyone is at risk. When the pursuit starts, the offender's intent is to run away from the police no matter what. Don't tell me that you never watched on the television how the police pursuits ended up like. Most of the time, the pursuits end up in big accidents causing harm to innocent people that were just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Currently, the police patrol vehicles are equipped with technology that can in fact support them during pursuits like license plate readers, radio communication systems, and GPS devices. The new vehicle-mounted GPS launcher showed in the video could be something that can make a difference in the future of pursuits. The police officers would be able to launch the tag (GPS tracker) from inside or outside of the patrol vehicle and once the tag is attached to the vehicle, it will transmit a constant GPS signal to the receiving device without compromising the officer and the community safety. This will allow the responding agency to abort the pursuit and let the technology do its job and instead of chasing the vehicle, the law enforcement agency can send the police vehicles to the location of the vehicle once the vehicle gets to a complete stop.
This Technology can be very promising but I can see situations where the effectiveness can be compromised, for example, motorcycles, how you will be able to launch the device and attach it to such a small target efficiently? It can be situations that the technology can't be used as planned but, in my opinion, the combination between technology and the existing law enforcement resources, like air units, undercover patrols, can be the perfect combination and together come up with the best and safest plan to avoid put the officers and the community at risk.
Answer:
good,because everything is explained and correct
Explanation:
HOW DID U GET TO WRITE ALL OF THAT?
Read Shelly v Kraeme, Moose Lodge v. Irvis and Georgia v. Mccollum.
Which case is most compelling?
Answer:
Georgia v. Mccollum.
Explanation:
why Allah created you? and why Allah create earth and sky?
Answer:
allah has created us to worship him only and no one else
Use the quotation to answer the question.
"We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare,
and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United States of America."
-excerpt from the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution
Which of the following most clearly reveals the Founders ideas about the source of
government power?
O "We the People"
O "a more perfect Union"
O "this Constitution"
O "our Posterity"

Answer:
A
Explanation:
The founders wanted the people to be the source of government power. Hence elections.
What was the greatest weakness of the
Articles of Confederation?
A) It failed to limit the president’s power
B) The national government held almost no power or authority
C)States were unstable to pass protective tariffs
Answer:
B I think
Explanation:
Joe, 17 year old teen, dented someone's parked car on accident. He sees cameras on the owners car and possible house and out of gulit left a note with his name and number on it apologizing. The owner of the car finally called and was nice about the situation but wants to discuss how it should be fixed. Joe discussed this with his parents next. They were furious, saying that it was a bad idea and that he should've driven off and left nothing. They don't think they can afford the dent as they don’t have collision insurance. His parents said to never contact the owner of the car again. Joe, not knowing this parents didn't have that type of insurance nor not knowing what to do, he just sits in frustration and confusion.
What should he do?
What should his parents do?
How could this situation in general be solved?
What would happen if Joe didn't try to contact the owner of the car ever again?
(PLEASE ANSWER IN FULL DETAIL)
Answer:
Joe did the right thing by leaving a note with his name and number on it to take responsibility for the accident. It shows maturity and responsibility, and it is the ethical thing to do. Even though his parents may have been angry about the situation, leaving the scene of the accident without taking responsibility could have resulted in legal consequences and could have caused more problems in the future.
In this situation, Joe should communicate with the car owner and discuss how the dent can be fixed. He can offer to pay for the damages out of his own pocket, or suggest getting a few quotes from different body shops to compare prices. If the owner agrees to accept payment from Joe, he should get a written agreement or receipt of payment to avoid any legal disputes in the future.
Joe's parents should support him in taking responsibility for his actions and help him find a solution to the problem. They can work together with Joe to find a solution that works for everyone involved, and help him negotiate with the car owner to reach a fair resolution.
In general, situations like this can be solved through open communication and taking responsibility for one's actions. By communicating honestly and openly with the other party involved, it is often possible to find a solution that works for everyone.
If Joe didn't try to contact the owner of the car ever again, it could result in legal consequences. Leaving the scene of an accident without taking responsibility is a serious offense, and could result in criminal charges or a civil lawsuit. It is always best to take responsibility for one's actions and try to find a solution to the problem.
When Morty leased his new car, he was required by law to _________ to ______________ of financial loss caused by a vehicle collision.
Answer:
purchase insurance; reduce the risk
Explanation:
When Morty leased his new car he was forced by law to buy insurance in order to minimize the possibility of financial damage incurred by a collision with a vehicle.
If you rent a car, the contract specifies you are liable for any damage to the vehicle, irrespective of how the damage was caused. And, before you leave the rental car lot, you have to check it very carefully, note any harm on the form they send you, and make sure that you have a copy for yourself.
Answer:
Purchase insurance; Reduce the risk is the correct answer to this question.
Explanation:
Insurance policy is a contract, expressed by a policy, where an insurance provider gives an individual or institution economic individual or entity receives financial. The business shares liabilities for consumers in order to make premiums more manageable for the insured.
Risk reduction steps to reduce loss frequency or extent, also known as regulation of losses. Can include engineering, fire safety, security checks, or the management of claims.
20. The difference between law and regulation is that A. regulation is created by Congress B. regulation isn't created by Congress C. law is created by a non-government agency D. Iaw is associated with penalties
The difference between law and regulation is that regulation isn't created by Congress. So the correct option is B.
Laws, also known as statutes, are created by legislative bodies such as Congress. They are the formal rules enacted by a government that apply to individuals and entities within a jurisdiction. Laws are established through the legislative process and carry the force of the government's authority. They address fundamental legal principles, rights, obligations, and prohibitions.
On the other hand, regulations are created by administrative agencies or executive branches of government. They are derived from the authority granted to these agencies by the laws passed by Congress or other legislative bodies. Regulations provide specific details, guidelines, and procedures for implementing and enforcing the laws. They are more focused and specific than laws and often deal with technical or operational aspects within a specific domain or industry.
While laws are associated with penalties for non-compliance, the option D ("law is associated with penalties") does not capture the complete difference between law and regulation, as regulations can also be associated with penalties for non-compliance. Therefore, option D alone does not sufficiently differentiate between law and regulation.
To know more about obligations.
https://brainly.com/question/32907342
#SPJ11
A taxpayer is not required to make estimated tax payments if he or she meets any of the following requirements, except Select one: a. Owes less than $1,000 in tax for 2020 b. Owes more than $1,000 in tax for 2020 c. The withholding and refundable credits are at least 90% of the 2020 tax liability d. The withholding and refundable credits are at least 100% of the 2019 tax liability
A taxpayer is not required to make estimated tax payments if he or she meets any of the following requirements except one of the options given below:A. Owes less than $1,000 in tax for 2020B. Owes more than $1,000 in tax for 2020C. The withholding and refundable credits are at least 90% of the 2020 tax liabilityD.
The withholding and refundable credits are at least 100% of the 2019 tax liability.Estimated tax payments are paid to the IRS to avoid penalties and interest. The IRS recommends taxpayers to make quarterly estimated tax payments if their income is not subject to withholding or if the amount of tax withheld is not sufficient.
Taxpayers must pay the estimated tax to the IRS in equal installments to avoid penalties.A taxpayer is not required to make estimated tax payments if he or she owes less than $1,000 in tax for the current year. For example, if a taxpayer owes $800 in tax for the current year, he/she is not required to make estimated tax payments.
To know more about taxpayer visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30158939
#SPJ11
What is the name of the proceeding in which the homeowner files suit in the courts after paying taxes under protest when he is challenging the assessed value of his home
the name of the proceeding in which the homeowner files suit in the courts after paying taxes under protest when he is challenging the assessed value of his home is Certiorari Proceeding
Legally, certiorari is a judicial process that seeks judicial review of decisions by lower courts or government agencies. Certiorari comes from the name of the English privilege written by the High Court to order the lower court case to be sent to the High Court for retrial.
The term certiorari is derived from the Latin language of law and means "to provide more comprehensive information." The warrant orders the lower court to keep a record of the case for consideration by the High Court. The US Supreme Court uses discretionary appeal to select most cases to be heard.
Learn more about Certiorari here:https://brainly.com/question/12106865
#SPJ4
A penny can be used in which part of vehicle maintenance?
A: checking oil level
B: checking tire tread depth
C: monitoring emissions
D: checking brake fluid
Answer:
Make sure your tires have enough tread. You can use a penny to do it, or look out for the wear indicators on the tire treads. If anything's out of the ordinary, don't ignore it.
Which of the following is the system designed to protect the right of a government to control its citizens’ behaviors through written law? A. Criminal law B. Specific criminal law C. General criminal law D. Common law
Answer:
criminal law
i am confused
Answer: the government use civil service examinations based on the teachings of Confucianism or just C
Explanation: I also use brainly.com I was just searching it up and I saw nobody was doing the answer so here you go
current issues with the 2nd amendment
Answer:
The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right of citizens to bear arms. However, the interpretation and application of the Second Amendment have been a subject of debate and controversy in recent years. Here are some current issues related to the Second Amendment:
Gun Control: There have been numerous mass shootings in the United States, and gun control advocates argue that stricter gun laws are necessary to reduce gun violence. However, Second Amendment supporters argue that any infringement on the right to bear arms is a violation of the Constitution.
Access to Guns: There are concerns that some individuals who should not have access to guns, such as those with a history of violence or mental illness, are able to obtain them. This has led to calls for stricter background checks and other measures to prevent dangerous individuals from acquiring guns.
Open Carry and Concealed Carry: Some states allow individuals to openly carry guns in public, while others allow individuals to carry concealed weapons. This has led to debates about whether these practices make society safer or put people at risk.
Stand Your Ground Laws: Some states have Stand Your Ground laws, which allow individuals to use lethal force in self-defense without first attempting to retreat. These laws have been controversial, with critics arguing that they can lead to unnecessary violence and discrimination.
Overall, the Second Amendment continues to be a divisive issue in the United States, with strong opinions on both sides of the debate.
Explanation:
what is stated by the laws of segregation and independent assortment
Every person has two alleles, and only one of them gets passed down to the next generation, according to the law of segregation. A pair of genes can be inherited independently of another pair, according to the law of independent assortment.
What is the definition of the law of segregation with an example?A single gene copy, chosen at random, is given to each gamete when an organism produces gametes. The law of segregation is responsible for this. In order to forecast the genotypes (combinations of alleles) and phenotypes (observable traits) of offspring from genetic crossings, a Punnett square can be utilized.According to Mendel's law of segregation, each gene separates from the others during gamete production, resulting in each gamete having just one copy of each gene. The second inheritance law is the separation legislation.The alleles for each gene segregate from one another during gamtee production, according to the law of segregation, leaving only one allele per gene in each gamete.To learn more about law of segregation, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/25710344
What are the 14 steps in the criminal process
Answer:
Investigation
Arrest
Prosecution
filing or information by a prosecutor
Arraignment by a judge
pretrial detention or bail
plea bargaining
Trial/Adjudication of guilt
sentencing by a judge
appeals
punishment or rehabilitation
Explanation:
I hope that helps you
In state court, a ballerina brought suit against a non-diverse manufacturer of an over-the-counter drug that the ballerina ingested as directed on the packaging. The ballerina claims that, as a result of the drug, she suffered serious vision impairment. The ballerina asserted state law product liability claims and claims for improper labeling of the drug in violation of state law requirements. In its defense, the manufacturer asserts that the ballerina's improper labeling claim is preempted by federal law, and that the manufacturer complied with the federal law requirements regarding the labeling of the drug. The manufacturer also filed a timely notice of removal with the local federal district court. The ballerina then moved to remand the case back to state court and asserts that the federal court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction.
Should the court grant the ballerina's motion to remand the case back to state court?
The court should deny the ballerina's motion to remand the case back to state court and uphold the removal and retain subject-matter jurisdiction over the case.
The manufacturer's removal of the case to federal court was appropriate because the federal court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the case. The manufacturer raised a federal defense based on preemption, asserting that the ballerina's improper labeling claim is preempted by federal law.
This defense presents a federal question, which gives rise to federal jurisdiction. The fact that the manufacturer complied with federal law requirements regarding drug labeling further supports the federal court's jurisdiction. The dispute revolves around the interpretation and application of federal law, making it appropriate for resolution in federal court.
To learn more about jurisdiction follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
A ________ is a municipal or regional facility that houses pretrial individuals believed to present a risk of danger or flight, those awaiting probation or parole revocation, and those sentenced to less than one year incarceration.
A correctional facility is a municipal or regional facility that houses pretrial individuals believed to present a risk of danger or flight, those awaiting probation or parole revocation, and those sentenced to less than one year incarceration.
A correctional facility is a place where criminals are kept and punished. Correctional facilities are used as a place of detention for inmates in the legal process. This refers to pre-trial inmates or inmates awaiting sentencing. The goal of the prison is to separate the offenders from the rest of society and rehabilitate them so they can reintegrate and be functional members of society.
Correctional facilities are often operated by the government, with the state or federal government responsible for the majority of them. Private correctional facilities, on the other hand, are managed by for-profit firms that may house inmates for governments. Despite being owned by private corporations, private prisons are still subject to government regulation and must adhere to the same laws as public prisons.
To know more about Correctional facility visit-
brainly.com/question/14666606
#SPJ11
When you conduct a forensic investigation, which of the following initial actions is appropriate for preserving evidence?
A. Turn off the system.
B. Document what is on the screen.
C. Remove the hard drive.
D. Stop all running processes.
B. Document what is on the screen.
An investigation that uses a scientific approach or another skill, such as accounting or valuation knowledge, and looks backward to make a decision about something that happened in the past is referred to as a forensic inquiry.
A crucial component of the criminal justice system is forensic science. To produce unbiased conclusions that can aid in the investigation and prosecution of crime perpetrators or clear an innocent person of suspicion, forensic scientists examine and analyse evidence from crime scenes and other locations.
A forensic scientist's three duties include the following: gathering evidence, examining the evidence, interacting with law enforcement and providing testimony in court.
To know more about forensic, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3049628
#SPJ4
What are some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities?
Some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities include the Jewish community during the Holocaust, Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps, and Indigenous peoples throughout colonization.
- The Jewish community during the Holocaust: During World War II, Jewish people were targeted by the Nazis and subjected to systematic genocide, forced labor, and mass extermination in concentration camps.
- Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps: Following the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were unjustly perceived as a threat to national security and forcibly relocated to internment camps, where they faced harsh conditions and loss of personal freedom.
- Indigenous peoples throughout colonization: Indigenous communities around the world have faced marginalization, dispossession of land, cultural suppression, and discrimination due to colonial expansion and policies implemented by colonizing powers.
These examples demonstrate the experiences of discrete and insular minorities who have endured discrimination, persecution, and marginalization based on their ethnicity, religion, or cultural background. It is important to acknowledge these historical injustices to promote understanding, empathy, and the protection of human rights for all individuals, regardless of their minority status.
For more such questions on colonization, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/27868020
#SPJ8
among the reasons for a welfare state is a desire to alleviate income inequality and to:
Promote social welfare. A welfare state is a government system that provides for the basic needs of its citizens through various social programs and services.
One of the main reasons for the existence of a welfare state is to help reduce income inequality by providing financial assistance to those who are in need. This can include programs such as unemployment benefits, food assistance, and housing subsidies.
However, a welfare state also serves to promote social welfare by ensuring that citizens have access to basic necessities such as healthcare, education, and adequate housing.
By providing these essential services, a welfare state can help to create a more equal and just society where everyone has the opportunity to succeed regardless of their socioeconomic background. In addition, a welfare state can also help to reduce poverty, improve health outcomes, and promote overall well-being.
Overall, a welfare state is an important tool for promoting social justice and ensuring that all citizens have access to the resources they need to thrive.
To know more about social welfare refer here
https://brainly.com/question/30588244#
#SPJ11
Do all of the Justices have to be present in order to hear a case?
Answer:
A quorum of six Justices is required to decide a case. Justices may also participate in a case by listening to audio recordings of the oral arguments and reading the transcripts.
Explanation:
hELP PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASE I JUST NEED THE ASNWER PLEASE PLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASE
With respect to prayer in public schools, the united states supreme court has ruled that.
With respect to prayer in public schools, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that school-sponsored prayer violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment.
What does the the Supreme Court say ?The United States Supreme Court, on many occasions, has made a declaration stating that participation in any school-related prayer or activity with religious association ensuing from public education institutions infringes upon the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
This law bars governing forces from having allegiance to a particular religion and/or endorsing its beliefs. One of the most acclaimed rulings was made in Engel v. Vitale (1962), whereby the apex court declared that sustained instruction for learners to chant a prayer preceding each academic session contravened the nation's law.
Find out more on the Supreme Court at https://brainly.com/question/28917468
#SPJ1
ALAP
What is law really
Decide whether each problem contains mitigating factors or aggravating factors.
1. The defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter.
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation.
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed.
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics.
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school.
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family.
Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.
What is the Mitigating and Aggravating factor?A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.
On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.
Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.
Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341
#SPJ1
Which of the following may private club not do
Why was it difficult or impossible for the government of the United States,
under the Articles, to settle disputes between the states or between
citizens of different states?
state and explain the three types of voting
Answer:
the 3 types if voting is plurality, majority, and proportiona representations
Explanation: