A rectangular solar panel has a length that is 11 inches shorter than 4 times it’s width. If the perimeter of the panel is 178 inches, what are the dimensions of the panel?

The width of the panel is *blank* inches.

Answer:

A) x=40

Step-by-step explanation:

As 1 cm= 5 km

then, 8 cm= 5*8= 40

Ratio of scale in map to the actual distance in land = 1 cm : 5 km

We can write this ratio in fractional form as :

\( = \tt \frac{1}{5} \)

Distance between two cities in map = 8 cm

Let the distance between two cities in land be x.

This can be written as :

\( \hookrightarrow\tt \frac{1}{5} = \frac{8}{x} \)

Let us solve this equation to find the actual distance between the two cities :

\( = \tt \frac{1}{5} = \frac{8}{x} \)

\( = \tt 1 \times x = 8 \times 5\)

\( \hookrightarrow\color{plum} \tt \: x = 40 \: km\)

Thus, the actual distance between the two cities = 40 km

Therefore, the correct option is (A) \) \frac{1}{5} = \frac{8}{x} \(

The unit cost of an apple in a crate of 250 apples is $2.63.

Given the following data:

To determine the unit cost of an apple:

In this exercise, you're required to calculate the cost of one apple in a crate, knowing that there are 250 apples in total at a cost of $95.

Thus, we would divide the total number of apples by the total cost of all the apples as follows:

\(Unit\;cost = \frac{Total\;apples}{Total\;cost}\)

Substituting the given parameters into the formula, we have;

\(Unit\;cost = \frac{250}{95}\)

Unit cost = $2.63

Read more on cost here: https://brainly.com/question/13214374

The method of counting seeds by touching each can be more effective in enhancing strong number sense in children as it allows them to experience each number physically and helps them in developing a strong sense of numbers.

In order to enhance strong number sense in children, there are various methods that can be used.

In the given scenario, Mme Potatana asked the children to count as a whole class from 1 to 20 while Ntate Mafodi asked the children in his class to count seeds from the school's ground in a pile by touching each as they count.

Both methods have their own benefits, but the method of counting seeds by touching each can be more effective in enhancing strong number sense in children.

The method of counting seeds by touching each can be more effective in enhancing strong number sense in children because it allows them to experience each number physically.

This helps them in developing a strong sense of numbers. By touching each seed as they count, children can feel and see each number, which helps them in understanding numbers better. Additionally, it helps in developing the concept of one-to-one correspondence and counting by rote.

Here are some appropriate examples for enhancing strong number sense using the method of counting seeds by touching each:

1. Use counters: Provide children with counters such as small objects, blocks, or toys. Ask them to count the number of counters by touching each as they count.

2. Counting on fingers: Encourage children to count on their fingers. This helps them in developing a strong sense of numbers and helps them in understanding the concept of one-to-one correspondence.

3. Counting objects in a pile: Ask children to count objects in a pile by touching each as they count. This helps in developing the concept of counting by rote and helps in enhancing strong number sense.

Overall, the method of counting seeds by touching each can be more effective in enhancing strong number sense in children as it allows them to experience each number physically and helps them in developing a strong sense of numbers.

For more such questions on sense of numbers

https://brainly.com/question/31640478

#SPJ8

Answer:

7.55 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

Add the two values together:

0.75 + 6.8 = 7.55

The combined length of Jackie's ribbons is 7.55 inches!

Using the graph, it is found that:

a) The local minimum value of the function is of y = 0.

b) The values are x = -3, x = 3.

The local minimum of a function in a graph is the point at which the function changes from decreasing to increasing. In this problem, they are given by y = 0.

The values at which this happen is the values of x, that is, the horizontal axis. In this problem, they are at x = -3 and x = 3.

More can be learned about functions at https://brainly.com/question/25537936

Answer:

1. 8 2/3

2. 2 4/5

Step-by-step explanation:

1: Multiple across

First, change into improper fractions

8/3 and 13/4

8 * 13 = 104

3 * 4 = 12

104/12

8 8/12

Divide each side by 4

8 2/3

2: Keep, change. flip

Keep the first fraction. Change the sign. Flip the next fraction is how you divide fractions. First, put them into improper fractions.

5 * 9 + 4 = 49/5

2 * 3 + 1 = 7/2

49/5 (divided by) 7/2

49/5 * 2/7 = 98/35

2 28/35

Divide both the 28 and 35 by 7

2 4/5

Answer:

78

Step-by-step explanation:

a + 8b = 6 + 8 x 9 = 6 + 72 = 78

Answer: 78

Step-by-step explanation:

value of a=6

value of b=9

a+8b= 6+8*9

as the 8 will be multiplied by 9

6+8*9= 6+72

6+72 = 78

Answer:

$36.25 is the original price

Step-by-step explanation:

$25= on sale

to find out the original price, multiply .45* 25, then add 25

.45*25=11.25

11.25+25=36.25

Answer: Half of them are even and half of them are odd.

Step-by-step explanation:

The even numbers are 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30. An even number is defined as a number that is divisible by 2, meaning it has no remainder when divided by 2. For example, 6 divided by 2 equals 3 with no remainder, so 6 is even.

The odd numbers are 3, 9, 15, 21, and 27. An odd number is defined as a number that is not divisible by 2, meaning it has a remainder of 1 when divided by 2. For example, 9 divided by 2 equals 4 with a remainder of 1, so 9 is odd.

Therefore, out of the given numbers, half of them are even and half of them are odd.

________________________________________________________

Answer:

Here is your solution-

x³ times x⁷

means, x³×x⁷

Here you just have to add the powers as aⁿ×aᵐ=aⁿ⁺ᵐ

x³⁺⁷

x¹⁰

The equation of the graph is f(x) = -1|x + 4| + 3

The graph represents an absolute value function

The equation of an absolute value function is represented as:

y = a|x - h| + k

Where:

Vertex = (h,k)

From the graph, we have:

(h,k) = (-4,3)

So,we have:

y = a|x - (-4)| + 3

Expand

y = a|x + 4| + 3

The graph is opens down.

This means that a < 0

Assume a = -1, the equation becomes

y = -1|x + 4| + 3

Express as a function

f(x) = -1|x + 4| + 3

Hence, the equation of the graph is f(x) = -1|x + 4| + 3

Read more about absolute value graphs at:

https://brainly.com/question/3381225

The given equation is y + 2 = 2(x + 3) and the x-intercept is -2.

To find the x-intercept of the equation y + 2 = 2(x + 3), we need to set y equal to zero and solve for x. The x-intercept occurs when the value of y is zero, meaning the graph crosses the x-axis.

Let's substitute y with 0 in the equation:

0 + 2 = 2(x + 3)

Simplifying the equation:

2 = 2(x + 3)

Dividing both sides by 2:

1 = x + 3

Subtracting 3 from both sides:

-2 = x

The x-intercept is -2. This means that the graph of the equation y + 2 = 2(x + 3) crosses the x-axis at the point (-2, 0).

The x-intercept represents the value of x where the graph intersects or crosses the x-axis. In this case, it occurs when x is equal to -2, and the y-value is zero.

For more such questions on x-intercept

https://brainly.com/question/17932786

#SPJ8

The total cost of the pita bread and hummus dips will be $305.00.

To determine the cost of the pita bread and hummus dips, Toula can use the following expressions:

Cost of pita bread:

Number of crates needed = (150 bags) / (50 bags/crate) = 3 crates

Cost of each crate = $15.00

Total cost of pita bread = (Number of crates needed) × (Cost of each crate) = 3 crates × $15.00/crate = $45.00

Cost of hummus dips:

Number of boxes needed = (65 containers) / (5 containers/box) = 13 boxes

Cost of each box = $20.00

Total cost of hummus dips = (Number of boxes needed) × (Cost of each box) = 13 boxes × $20.00/box = $260.00

Therefore, the expressions Toula can use to determine the costs are:

Cost of pita bread = 3 crates × $15.00/crate

Cost of hummus dips = 13 boxes × $20.00/box

The total cost will be the sum of the costs of pita bread and hummus dips:

Total cost = Cost of pita bread + Cost of hummus dips

Total cost = $45.00 + $260.00

Total cost = $305.00

Therefore, the total cost of the pita bread and hummus dips will be $305.00.

for such more question on cost

https://brainly.com/question/8993267

#SPJ8

Actual time is much longer than the 50-year timeframe suggested by the speaker.

How to verify the statement?

This claim is based on the assumption that the rate of pollution reduction from each factory remains constant at 80%, and the number of factories increases by 3% per annum.

To verify this claim, we can use the following formula to calculate the expected total pollution after n years:

Total pollution after n years = \(Present \: pollution \: level x (1 + 0.03)^n \times (1 - 0.8)^n\)

Here, the first factor represents the increase in pollution due to the growth in the number of factories, and the second factor represents the reduction in pollution due to the 80% reduction in pollution from each factory.

We can set the expected total pollution after n years equal to the present pollution level and solve for n:

\(Present \: pollution \: level = Present \: pollution \: level \times (1 + 0.03)^n \times (1 - 0.8)^n\)

Simplifying this equation, we get:

\(1 = 1.03^n \times 0.2^n\)

Taking the logarithm of both sides of the equation, we get,

\(n \times log(1.03) + n \times log(0.2) = 0 \\ n \times (log(1.03) + log(0.2)) = 0 \\ n = \frac{0} { (log(1.03) + log(0.2))} \\ n = 271.56\)

Therefore, according to this calculation, it would take approximately 272 years for the total annual pollution to return to its present level if the number of factories in the country increases by 3% per annum, and they all immediately reduce the amount of pollution they produce by 80%. This is much longer than the 50-year timeframe suggested by the speaker.

It is important to note that this calculation assumes that the pollution reduction from each factory remains constant at 80% and does not take into account any other factors that may affect pollution levels, such as changes in technology or regulations. Therefore, this should be considered as a rough estimate and not as an exact prediction.

Learn more about pollution here,

https://brainly.com/question/24704410

#SPJ1

Correct question is "A speaker claimed that if the number of factories in the country increases by 3% per annum, then even if they all immediately reduced the amount of pollution they produce by 80%, the total annual pollution will be back to its present level in about 50 years. Verify the statement. (use logarithm)"

A juvenile court could not hear a case involving a contract dispute because it lacks subject matte jurisdiction.

Because a court does not have the legal authority to rule on a case if it does not have jurisdiction over it, jurisdiction is crucial.

The question of whether a particular court has the authority to hear a particular case or controversy is known as subject matter jurisdiction. In this instance, that is unimportant. Brooks is currently being tried in Waukesha County, Wisconsin, before a circuit court judge.

To learn more about federal laws here

https://brainly.com/question/28498485

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

For problem 4, lets use Angles C and D as variables (so C and D)

33 + 6D = C

C + D = 180

Rearrange and solve.

33 + 6D = 180 - D

33 = 180 - 7D

-147 = -7D

D = 21 and C is = 159 (You can use your equations to check this.

For problem 5 let's think of small bowls as X and medium bowls as Y

x + y = 150 bowls

4x + 6y = 764 oz

solve with these equations and you find

4x + 6(150-x) =764

4x + 900 - 6x = 764

-2x = -136

x = 68, and you can plug that into x + y = 150 to solve for y which is 82

(i) The exponential growth model to predict the number of rabbits after 'x' years is \(A = 2e^{6.21460809842x}\).

(ii) The number of rabbits at the end of 3 years will be 250000000.

A continuous exponential growth function is of the form \(A = Pe^{rt}\), where A is the final amount, which was initially P, growing continuously at the rate of r, after a time of t years.

In the question, we are asked to construct an exponential model to predict the number of rabbits after 'x' years.

We assume the exponential growth model to be a continuous model, of the form \(A = Pe^{rt}\), where A is the final amount of rabbits, which was initially P, growing continuously at the rate of r, after a time of t years.

The initial quantity of rabbits, P = 2.

Time, t = x years.

Substituting the values, we get:

\(A = 2e^{rx}\) ... (i)

We have been told that after 1 year, the number of rabbits was 1000.

Thus, substituting A = 1000, and x = 1, we get:

\(1000 = 2e^{r*1}\\\Rightarrow 1000 = 2e^r\\\Rightarrow e^r = 1000/2 = 500\)

Taking log on both sides, we get:

\(log_ee^r = log_e500\\\Rightarrow rlog_ee = log_e500\\\Rightarrow r = 6.21460809842\)

Thus, the rate of growth, r = 6.21460809842.

Substituting r = 6.21460809842 in (i), we get:

\(A = 2e^{6.21460809842x}\), which is the required model.

To find the number of rabbits at the end of 3 years, we put x = 3, in the above equation to get:

\(A = 2e^{6.21460809842*3}\\\Rightarrow A = 2e^{18.6438242953}\\\Rightarrow A = 2*125000000\\\Rightarrow A =250000000\)

Thus, there would be 250000000 rabbits at the end of 3 years.

Learn more about the exponential growth model at

https://brainly.com/question/13223520

#SPJ1

Answers:

==========================================

Explanation:

The relative frequency probability that she will make her next penalty kick is 66.6%.

A relative frequency distribution, which is similar to a probability distribution, which is frequently used in statistics, displays the percentage of the total number of observations connected to each value or class of values.

A measure of how frequently an event happens is called frequency. On the other hand, relative frequency is a means to compare the frequency of a specific event to all other occurrences.

An event's relative frequency in an experiment or survey is calculated by dividing its occurrences by the total number of trials.

Penalty kicks = 8

Total attempts = 12

Relative frequency = 8 / 12

= 0.66

The relative frequency probability that she will make her next penalty kick is 66.6%

The relative frequency probability will be 0.66 * 100

                                                                     = 66.6%

To know more about relative frequency visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16832475

#SPJ9

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To show that the expression \(\ln(\sqrt{2} + 1) - \ln\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)\) is equal to \(-\ln\left(1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)\), we can simplify both sides of the equation using the properties of logarithms. Here are the steps:

Step 1: Simplify the expression on the left side:

\(\ln(\sqrt{2} + 1) - \ln\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)\)

Step 2: Apply the logarithmic property \(\ln(a) - \ln(b) = \ln\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)\) to combine the logarithms:

\(\ln\left(\frac{\sqrt{2} + 1}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}}\right)\)

Step 3: Simplify the expression within the logarithm:

\(\ln\left(\frac{(\sqrt{2} + 1)}{\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)}\right)\)

Step 4: Simplify the denominator by multiplying by the reciprocal:

\(\ln\left(\frac{(\sqrt{2} + 1)}{\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)\)

\(\ln\left(\frac{(\sqrt{2} + 1) \cdot \sqrt{2}}{\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2}}\right)\)

\(\ln\left(\frac{(\sqrt{2} + 1) \cdot \sqrt{2}}{1}\right)\)

Step 5: Simplify the numerator:

\(\ln\left(\frac{(\sqrt{2} + 1) \cdot \sqrt{2}}{1}\right)\)

\(\ln\left(\sqrt{2}(\sqrt{2} + 1)\right)\)

\(\ln\left(2 + \sqrt{2}\right)\)

Now, let's simplify the right side of the equation:

Step 1: Simplify the expression on the right side:

\(-\ln\left(1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)\)

Step 2: Simplify the expression within the logarithm:

\(-\ln\left(\frac{\sqrt{2} - 1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)\)

Step 3: Apply the logarithmic property \(\ln\left(\frac{a}{b}\right) = -\ln\left(\frac{b}{a}\right)\) to switch the numerator and denominator:

\(-\ln\left(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{2} - 1}\right)\)

Step 4: Simplify the expression:

\(-\ln\left(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{2} - 1}\right)\)

\(-\ln\left(\frac{\sqrt{2}(\sqrt{2} + 1)}{1}\right)\)

\(-\ln\left(2 + \sqrt{2}\right)\)

As we can see, the expression \(\ln(\sqrt{2} + 1) - \ln\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)\) simplifies to \(\ln(2 + \sqrt{2})\), which is equal to \(-\ln\left(1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)\).

From the data given, we estimate the population mean and population standard deviation. Then, we use this estimate to find a 95% confidence interval for the population variance and the population standard deviation.

Sample:

Salaries in millions of dollars: 2.2, 1.5, 0.5, 1.3, 2.4, 1.5, 2.7, 0.3, 2.0, 0.3

Question a:

The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values. So

\(\overline{x} = \frac{2.2 + 1.5 + 0.5 + 1.3 + 2.4 + 1.5 + 2.7 + 0.3 + 2.0 + 0.3}{10} = 1.42\)

The sample mean salary is of 1.42 million.

Question b:

The standard deviation is the square root of the difference squared between each value and the mean, divided by one less than the number of values.

So

\(s = \sqrt{\frac{(2.2-1.42)^2 + (1.5-1.42)^2 + (0.5-1.42)^2 + (1.3-1.42)^2 + (2.4-1.42)^2 + (1.5-1.42)^2 + (2.7-1.42)^2 + ...}{9}} = 0.8772\)

Thus, the estimate for the population standard deviation is of 0.8772 million.

Question c:

The sample size is \(n = 10\)

The significance level is \(\alpha = 1 - 0.05 = 0.95\)

The estimate, which is the sample standard deviation, is of \(s = 0.8772\).

Now, we have to find the critical values for the Pearson distribution. They are:

\(\chi^2_{\frac{\alpha}{2},n-1} = \chi^2_{0.025,9} = 19.0228\)

\(\chi^2_{1-\frac{\alpha}{2},n-1} = \chi^2_{0.975,9} = 2.7004\)

The confidence interval for the population variance is:

\(\frac{(n-1)s^2}{\chi^2_{\frac{\alpha}{2},n-1}} < \sigma^2 < \frac{(n-1)s^2}{\chi^2_{1-\frac{\alpha}{2},n-1}}\)

\(\frac{9*0.8772^2}{19.0228} < \sigma^2 < \frac{9*0.8772^2}{2.7004}\)

\(0.3641 < \sigma^2 < 2.5646\)

Thus, the 95% confidence interval for the population variance is (0.3641, 2.5646)

Question d:

Standard deviation is the square root of variance, so:

\(\sqrt{0.3641} = 0.6034\)

\(\sqrt{2.5646} = 1.6014\)

The 95% confidence interval for the population standard deviation is (0.6034, 1.6014).

For more on confidence intervals for population mean/standard deviation, you can check https://brainly.com/question/13807706

Answer:

1000

Step-by-step explanation: