Answers
The prosecution's decision to drop the case would be justified by the fact that the evidence gathered during the unauthorised search is not admissible in court.
The rationale for the prosecutor's dismissal of the case would be that the evidence obtained from the illegal search is inadmissible in court. This means that the prosecutor cannot use the illegally obtained evidence to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, as it would be a violation of the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights. Therefore, the prosecutor cannot proceed with the case and must dismiss it. It is important to uphold the law and protect citizens' constitutional rights, even if it means the prosecution cannot proceed with a case.
Learn more about unauthorised here
https://brainly.com/question/30123464
#SPJ11
The rationale for the dismissal of the case by the prosecutor in this scenario is based on the principle of legality and the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures.
The illegal search conducted by the police would violate this constitutional protection and render any evidence collected during the search inadmissible in court.
Prosecutors are required to follow ethical guidelines and uphold the law, and allowing evidence obtained through an illegal search to be used in court would be a violation of both. In addition, pursuing a case based on illegally obtained evidence could damage the integrity of the legal system and set a dangerous precedent.
Thus, the prosecutor's decision not to proceed with the case is based on upholding the principles of legality and the Constitution, as well as maintaining the ethical standards of the legal profession. The prosecutor's responsibility is to ensure that justice is served, and this can only be achieved through the use of legal and ethical means.
For more such questions on prosecutor visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29242671
#SPJ11
Related Questions
Plzz help
Which two sentences in the scenario show
some of the symptoms of stress among law
enforcement, correctional, and public
security workers?
1, Not only has she started drinking copious
amounts of alcohol, but she's also started
smoking excessively.
2, Ruiz put on a charming and witty façade
at a recent family dinner to quell her
parents' worries about her.
3, It's become impossible for her to get a
good night's sleep-she fears she's
developing insomnia.
4, However, Ruiz is still hopeful. She's
planning to visit her counselor to improve
her mental and physical health.
Answers
Answer:
Not only has she started drinking copious amounts of alcohol, but she's also started smoking excessively
help me pleaseeeeeee
Answers
The correct answer is C. Sworn police officers who work in patrol and as detectives make up the majority of local law enforcement employees.
Explanation
A local police department is a police force that covers a territory to protect a population. A police department is made up of police officers who patrol around the city, there are also detectives tasked with investigating cases that require an investigation, and other forces to maintain public order in a city. According to the above, the correct answer is C. Sworn police officers who work in patrol and as detectives make up the majority of local law enforcement employees.
Anyone know the answer to this?
Answers
When you are driving in bad weather or bad road conditions, you should
Use the same following distance that you use in good conditions.
Use one and a half times the following distance that you use in good conditions.
Use two times the following distance that you use in good conditions.
Answers
Answer:
so this question is kind of ambiguous in normal conditions. you should be 3 to 4 seconds behind the car Infront of you and for each bad condition ie rain fog hail sleet snow each additional condition should add an extra second behind
Explanation:
my states driving handbook
Which constitutional provision forbids conflict between state and federal laws?
Supremacy Clause
Habeas Corpus
Elastic Clause
Ex Post Facto
Explain your reasoning for choosing this answer:
Answers
Answer:
doctrine of preemption
Explanation:
Under the doctrine of preemption, which is based on the Supremacy Clause, federal law preempts state law, even when the laws conflict.Jun 2, 2017
"Supremacy Clause" constitutional provision forbids conflict between state and federal laws. Correct option is a.
The Supremacy Clause is found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, and it states:
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land, and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
The Supremacy Clause establishes that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties take precedence over any conflicting state laws. This ensures that there is uniformity in the application and enforcement of federal laws across all states and prevents conflicts or inconsistencies between state and federal regulations.
To know more about constitutional:
https://brainly.com/question/4555568
#SPJ6
If a petitioner is successful in a reverse FOIA suit the result is that
Answers
Answer:
If a petitioner is successful in a reverse FOIA suit, the result is that the government agency is compelled to disclose the requested information that was previously withheld.
Explanation:
If a petitioner is successful in a reverse FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) suit, the result is that the government agency is compelled to disclose the requested information that was previously withheld.
In a reverse FOIA suit, the petitioner is typically seeking to compel a government agency to disclose records or information that the agency had previously denied access to under the FOIA. If the petitioner is successful, the court may order the agency to disclose the requested information or records, and may also award attorneys' fees and other costs to the petitioner. This type of suit is also sometimes referred to as a FOIA "enforcement" action, as it seeks to enforce the provisions of the FOIA and compel compliance by the government agency.
Answer:
Explanation:If a petitioner is successful in a reverse FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) suit, the result is that the government agency that initially denied the petitioner's FOIA request will be ordered to disclose the requested information. In other words, the court will compel the government agency to release the information that it had previously withheld. This can be a significant victory for the petitioner, as it can provide access to information that may be critical to understanding government actions or decision-making processes. Additionally, the government agency may be ordered to pay the petitioner's legal fees and costs associated with the reverse FOIA lawsuit.
what to do if the mother left y'all baby with you and she has a family protection order on you In the person bring the baby you saying they done with him
Answers
Answer:
Well kinda depend on the situation. I don't know much about this but i believe you can take it to court, if she doesn't give a good explanation that family protection order can get overruled.
I hoped this helps
which department would you approach if your human rights had been violated?
Answers
shanice drives a delivery truck. it is during the holiday season, so she is busy delivering packages. shanice does not see the man approaching her truck. he assaults her with a knife, killing her. then he takes as many packages as he can carry and runs off. this is an example of what kind of crime? question 10 options: expressive crime instrumental crime serial murder mass murder
Answers
this is an example of instrumental kind of crime. Instrumental crimes are those conducted for explicit, future goals such as to acquire money or improve one's social position.
The instrumental theory of criminal justice is founded on the notion that criminology and criminal justice are two of the principal techniques used to manage the underclass. If this is the case, sociotechnical transformation cannot be conceptualized in terms of instrumental categories because applying criminal justice itself reproduces what is meant to be reformed. The commonsense presumption that the topic of an action can be defined irrespective of its means is shared by instrumentalist theory. "Offenses meant to better the financial or social position of the guilty," according to Siegel (2007).
To know more about Instrumental crimes:
https://brainly.com/question/29650390
#SPJ4
What is filed between two parties in a civil case?
Answers
Answer:
A complaint.
Explanation:
A complaint is a document that outlines the jurisdictional basis for the court demanding a judicial relief to the plaintiff. It is a pleading by the plaintiff that starts a case between the two parties in a civil case.
The complaint is to be drafted by an attorney, outlining the plaintiff's claims against the defendant. A complaint also specify any remedy that plaintiff desires from the defendant.
Therefore, the correct answer is a complaint.
Discuss and explain your expectations as to how the police
as an institution are to navigate through all these
expectations. Can we (the public) have it all – safety and
perfect policing? If not, why not? If yes, how do you think it
can it be accomplished?
Answers
Answer:
Since the United States was established there was always a great importance to maintain a relationship between both the states and the nation, both politically and economically. In the late 1700's to the early 1800's, George Washington's treasurer, Alexander Hamilton, had opted for a "Bank of the United States", which was fully within Congress's authority. He was wanting the bank to circulate and print paper money and expand economic development. This was eventually signed into legislation and a national government was created. The Bank taxed both the states and the nation as a whole. The Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson, did not support the national bank nor did his supporters, the Jefferson Democratic-Republicans. The bank's charter expired in 1811, and the supporters along with Jefferson wanted to block its renewal. This lead to various questions and conflicts such as "Could Congress charter a national bank?" or "Could the federal government tax the states?" The Barron vs Baltimore case ("James McCulloch, an agent for the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank, refused to pay a tax that Maryland had imposed on all out-of-state chartered banks") declared that the Bill of Rights could NOT restrict the powers of the state governments. After this, there was a rise of dual federalism. Dual federalism was the states and national government exercising exclusive authority in distinctly delineated spheres of jurisdiction. Then there was a rise of cooperative federalism, which was when both levels of government coordinated their actions to solve national problems, such as the Great Depression. Then came an era of new federalism which is what the nation uses today. By decentralizing policies, authority can blend between the national, state and local governments.
Explanation:
Question 6 of 10
As part of the global economy, the United States plays the role of:
A. the country with the lowest standard of living.
O B. the largest of the developing countries.
O C. the most economically powerful country.
D. the country most focused on agriculture.
Answers
Answer: C. The most economically powerful country.
Explanation:
As part of the global economy, the United States plays the role of the most economically powerful country. Option C. This is further explained below.
What is the economy?
Generally, The global economy may be described as the total of all actions that happen within and between nations. The Economy of a nation is a broad collection of interconnected production and consuming programs that help determine how limited resources are distributed.
In conclusion, As a member of the global economy, the United States is the most economically powerful country.
Read more about Economy
https://brainly.com/question/2421251
#SPJ2
Why is our legal system and imperfect
Answers
the assize of arms required all british citizens between the ages of and to own arms corresponding with the financial ability to purchase the arms. group of answer choices 15, 45 20, 45 20, 40 15, 40
Answers
The Assize of Arms was established in 1181 by Henry II, who is regarded as the founder of common law. All British citizens between the ages of 15 and 40 were mandated to acquire and maintain guns.
What did the 1181 Assize of Arms entail?Navigation jump Go to search now. King Henry II of England issued a proclamation in 1181 called the Assize of Arms outlining the requirement for all English freemen to carry weapons for the king.
What does King Henry's oath of armed service mean?Additionally, each of them must promise to possess these weapons before the feast of St. Hilary, to be loyal to the lord king Henry, who is the son of the Empress Matilda, and to use them in his service as per his orders and in devotion to the lord king and his realm.
To know more about Arms visit:-
brainly.com/question/28862538
#SPJ4
HELP, WIL MARK BRAINLEST
Answers
The answer should be D-Learners license. From what I can tell, this is the Drivers license course. You don't need a high school diploma, you don't need a private pilots license, and I don't know of an ID card course. The Learners license in Florida must be held for 12 months before you can get your license.
I hope I've helped! :)
Can police arrest me without evidence of my guilt? Why or why not
Answers
Answer:
no he has no right to arrest you
the presence of fraud in a contract also affects the authenticity of the innocent party's: a. duress. b. undue influence. c. consent. d. any of the choices.
Answers
The presence of fraud in a contract likewise influences the realness of the blameless party's consent. option (C) is correct.
Even though misrepresentation is a misdeed, the presence of extortion likewise influences the genuineness of the honest party's to agree to an agreement. At the point when an honest party is deceitfully instigated to go into an agreement, the agreement generally can be kept away from because that party has not deliberately agreed to the terms.
Assuming that deception is displayed to have happened, the impact will be that the agreement becomes voidable. This implies that the party who was incited into the agreement because of the deception might decide to repeal the agreement. Therefore, option (C) is correct.
Learn more about innocent party's:
https://brainly.com/question/7008449
#SPJ4
Examine each situation described below. Which case does not involve a privilege?
A. An attomey wants a physician to testify that his patient has Alzheimer's disease.
B. An abused woman is willing to testify against her husband to send him to jail for assaulting her.
C. A man confesses to his clergyman that he murdered two people.
D. A state prosecutor wants a psychiatrist to testify that a woman confessed to him that she used to beat her son when he was little.
Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page)
Answers
Answer: A
Explanation:
But i might be wrong if so it is D
If your license is a must wear a correct of glass lenses you
Answers
Answer: Driving without corrective lenses can result in injury to yourself and others. If your driver's license includes a corrective lenses restriction, you have to wear your glasses when driving.
Explanation:
2. Explain how juvenile courts developed?
Answers
Answer:
by to many issues
Explanation:
government sometimes supports protectionist tariffs because:
Answers
Government sometimes supports protectionist tariffs because: Protecting domestic industries, Economic security, National security.
Protecting domestic industries: Tariffs can be implemented to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. By imposing tariffs on imported goods, the government aims to make domestic products more competitive by increasing their price relative to imported alternatives. This helps to safeguard domestic industries, preserve jobs, and prevent the decline of key sectors.
Economic security: Tariffs can be seen as a measure to ensure economic security. By reducing reliance on foreign goods, the government aims to protect the domestic economy from potential disruptions in global supply chains, market fluctuations, or geopolitical conflicts that could affect trade.
National security: Tariffs can be used as a tool to protect industries that are considered vital for national security. This may include industries related to defense, critical infrastructure, or strategic resources. By imposing tariffs, the government aims to maintain self-sufficiency in key sectors and reduce dependency on foreign sources.
To know more about National security, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2639721
#SPJ11
Which of the following may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law? US District court decision. Temporary Treasury Regulation. Revenue Ruling. Technical advice memorandum. Tax Treaty with Canada. Question 5 Which of the following taxes is NOT paid by wage eamers? FICA tax FUTA Social Security tax Medicare tax Income tax
Answers
A US District Court decision may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law. A US District Court decision is not a primary source of tax law. Question 5: FUTA is the tax that is NOT paid by wage earners.
A primary source of tax law is a statute or regulation that contains the law on a specific topic. US District Court decisions are secondary sources that interpret primary sources such as statutes and regulations. Temporary Treasury Regulation, Revenue Ruling, Technical Advice Memorandum, and Tax Treaty with Canada can be cited as primary sources of tax law.
These are regulations and official interpretations of the law that are published by the government and carry the force of law. The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) is a tax imposed on employers that funds state and federal unemployment insurance programs. Wage earners do not pay this tax. FICA tax, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and Income tax are taxes that are paid by wage earners.
You can learn more about US District Court at: brainly.com/question/29887517
#SPJ11
Guidance for reduction in rate of enlisted personnel due to incompetency is found in what MILSPERSMAN article?
A. 1450-010
B. 1450-020
C. 1430-016
D. 1430-013
Answers
Guidance for reduction in rate of enlisted personnel due to incompetency is found in 1450-010 MILPERSMAN article .
Option A is correct.
The Navy's military human resources policy and procedures are primarily carried out in accordance with the MILPERSMAN, a living document.
MILPERSMAN Article :In accordance with this article, COs or officers in charge (OICs) may demote an enlisted member under their command or in their charge to the next lower grade if the promoted grade falls under their promotion authority.
What else defines Milpersman besides honorable?A discharge in "absentia" is granted for an authorized discharge that is not honorable (OTH); The member must be in detention, confinement, or unauthorized absence (UA) status. While in a UA status, it is inappropriate to award an honorable discharge or under honorable conditions (general).
Learn more about Navy policies :
brainly.com/question/30193278
#SPJ4
Glen is a dairy farmer who owns 500 milk cows. His fences are in poor repair, and his cows are often found eating the grass on Hank's land. Hank believes that Glen is responsible for damages to Hank's land on a theory of strict liability. The court will most likely find that Glen is:
Answers
Answer:
I would say that Glen is responsible for all of the damages that are caused to Hank's land because the cows belong Glen and it is Glen's responsibility to fix things that are broken on his land so that way the animals don't escape. There fore I would say that Glen is responsible for the damages because he failed to keep his cows under control.
Explanation:
Do you think it is possible to find a balance between justice and the implementation of Ubuntu and it’s inherent ideas rehabilitative justice
Answers
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Ubuntu is the long tradition of african cultures where criminals or people that have done something wrong have to do right by the people they injured or hurt, and they have to help them healing the social tissue and restoring relationships in order to be able to go back into society.
It's a very close matter to rehabilitative justice, in the sense of wanting to restore the social tissue and helping the person get back to society as a good, productive and healthy member of the society, Ubuntu has proven to be a good method and state of mind when dealing with hurt societies by the narcotrafic and organized crime.
What Would You Do?
You are the rookie. As you start working shifts on your own, you develop your own style of investigating crime, based on your
training. You are also beginning to get a handle on what your supervisor (your shift sergeant) expects from you in terms of report writing. Generally, his philosophy is that as long as you articulate the elements of the crime, he will pass the report along. He believes it's up to the prosecutor to clean up the reports and make the case. His patrol officers should be able to write reports quickly and get "back on the street. "For most patrol officers, especially rookies, having such a sergeant would be a dream.
However, you keep thinking about what your training officer regarded as one of the most valuable parts of training. Do you
decide to spend ample time on report writing or do you do only what is required to get by?
A. You take the time to make sure your reports are of the best quality you can produce. You
understand that your reports might be seen by many different professionals in the criminal justice
system, and you want them to be a reflection of your best work.
B. At this point in your career, you need street experience - and you want to take as many calls for service as you can and learn how to handle yourself and survive. There will always be time later to
develop writing skills. You write the minimum that is required by law and your supervisor.
Answers
Prioritize quality reports to showcase professionalism and ensure they reflect your best work for the criminal justice system. Therefore, the correct option is (A).
The correct option is (A):
As the rookie, you are faced with a decision regarding report writing. Option A suggests taking the time to ensure your reports are of the best quality possible. This approach acknowledges the importance of well-written reports, as they can be reviewed by various professionals in the criminal justice system. By producing high-quality reports, you aim to showcase your dedication and professionalism.On the other hand, Option B suggests prioritizing street experience and survival, focusing on taking as many calls for service as possible. This approach emphasizes the need to gain practical skills and knowledge while leaving the development of writing skills for a later time. The focus is on meeting the minimum requirements set by the law and your supervisor.Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities and the balance you wish to strike between building experience on the street and investing time in honing your report writing skills. Consider the long-term benefits of both options and how they align with your career aspirations in the law enforcement field.For more such questions on Professionalism:
https://brainly.com/question/15203170
#SPJ8
which court decision held that the basic elements of procedural due process must be present when decisions are made concerning the disciplining of an inmate?
Answers
The court decision that held that the basic elements of procedural due process must be present when decisions are made concerning the disciplining of an inmate is the landmark case of Wolff v. McDonnell.
In this 1974 decision, the United States Supreme Court held that prisoners are entitled to certain procedural protections when facing disciplinary sanctions, including advance written notice of the charges, an opportunity to present evidence and call witnesses, and a written statement explaining the reasons for the disciplinary action taken. This decision established that prisoners are entitled to due process protections, even though they are in a custodial environment and have limited rights compared to the general public. The ruling in Wolff v. McDonnell has had a significant impact on the administration of justice in prisons and has helped to ensure that prisoners are treated fairly and justly.
To know more about court click here:
brainly.com/question/15147174
#SPJ4
What is a permanent feature if a representative form of government?
Answers
Answer:
Elections
Explanation:
I would guess that elections are what make a representative form of government actually representative. Without elections, the ones in power would not actually represent the views of the people.
Family law is handled by which type of court?
Answers
Answer: Family law is handled by the California Superior Court.
Explanation:
Answer:
gaily cort
Explanation:
guiiiiiiiifet6jnff
Najmi, a 15-year-old boy became an orphan after both of his parents died in a tragic car accident in January 2018. His uncle, Pak Mat is now taking care of him and managing all the properties left by his late parents. Pak Mat is planning to sell one of the properties located at Mantin Negeri Sembilan. He later met Faisal to make a valuation as to the price of the property. Faisal discovered that the price value is lower and advise Pak Mat not to sell the property. Pak Mat however still wants to proceed with his plan and managed to sell it to Ricky. Advise Najmi on the validity of the contract. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and decided case law
Answers
Najmi would be responsible to understand the validity of the contract entered by his guardian Pak Mat concerning the sale of one of the properties of his late parents left to him.
Generally under contract law, a minor is considered to lack the capacity to enter into a valid and binding agreement as established in the Malaysian case of Verinder Singh v Kamikar Singh and another appeal ([1994] 2 MLJ 438). Under s 20 of the Contracts Act 1950, a minor is not capable to enter into a valid contract.
Thus, any contract entered into by a minor is said to be voidable at his/her option. Consequently, any contract entered into by a minor is voidable which allows him/her to avoid the contract and seek restitution.
To know more about contract law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31340061
#SPJ4