A police officer responds to a call about a young person with a gun sitting on a park bench. Upon arriving at the park in his cruiser, the officer tells him three times to “show your hands.” The young person did not show his hands and may have reached toward his belt. Within two seconds of arriving, he was shot and killed by the police officer. The young person turns out to be 12 years old and the gun turns out to be a toy. Is this a justifiable use of force by the officer? Explain your answer.
Answers
In my opinion, the action of the police officer is not a justifiable use of force.
Why is the Police Officer's Action not a Justified use of Force?It is appropriate to consider the president cases of Tamir Rice and Tyre King instances. In both cases, the victims are typically described as men with guns in 911 calls, but no ages are given. Because they now lack the luxury of knowing whether a gun is fake or genuine, police officers have perilous jobs.
Both times, the 911 operator made a mistake by failing to disclose that the "weapons" the young boys were holding might be fake and that they are likely minors, which could have resulted in the lives of innocent people being saved. In the case of Tamir Rice, the fatal shot that took Rice's life was fired just a few seconds after the officers arrived on the scene.
Hence, the police officer in the instant case, ought to probe further, whether the minor was with a gun indeed.
Learn more about police officers here: https://brainly.com/question/26085524
#SPJ1
Related Questions
Against utilitarianism, which of the following authors would object, “To maximize utility by imposing burdens on some individuals is to treat all of society like a single person. But society is not like a single person, and so utilitarianism is mistaken.
Answers
Answer:
(D) A and B or both correct
Explanation:
Rich and Archie sign an agreement in which Archie agrees to deliver ten cases of champagne in 5 days. The parties negotiated and meant to say in the written agreement, delivery in 50 days. If the evidence is clear that the two parties intended to agree to 50 days, the courts will probably
Answers
Answer:
Reform the contract
Explanation:
Contract reformation means that both parties, in this case, Rich and Archie, ask the courts to rewrite the contract or make a change in a specific part of the contract to express what both of the parties want. Then, Rich and Archie would agree that Archie has to deliver ten cases of champagne in 50 days, not 5.
What is the dogmatic principle of fingerprint
Answers
Answer:
Dogmatic goes back to the Greek words dogma, which means basically “what one thinks is true” and dogmatikos, “pertaining to doctrine.” To be dogmatic is to follow a doctrine relating to morals and faith, a set of beliefs that is passed down and never questioned. ... Dogmatic people are usually not very popular.
Dogmatic is also a Greek word that's dogma, which suggests that “what one thinks is true” and also dogmatics, “about doctrine.” To be dogmatic is to follow a doctrine pertaining to morals and also faith, a set of beliefs that's passed down and never questioned.
Dogmatic Principles Of FingerprintsThe Three Dogmatic Principles Of Fingerprints are:
The First principle of constancy: A fingerprint will remain unchanged during somebody's lifetime.
The Second principle of variation: No two fingerprints of various persons or the neighboring finger of the identical person have ever been found to be identical altogether respects.
Then The third principle of infallibility: Forged fingerprints are often distinguished from genuine fingerprints.
Find out more information about Dogmatic Fingerprints here:
https://brainly.com/question/22558775
esl Law in the United States
Submit Test
Reader
2
Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
Which law helps maintain relationships in society, as well as between states and branches of the federal government?
law helps maintain fundamental relationships in society, as well as between states and branches of the fede
government
Reset
Next
Answers
Answer:
Environmental should be the answer
Explanation:
1
Which statement best describes recent voter trends in the United States?
• A.
People living in the Midwest and the South mostly vote Democratic.
B.
Women since the 1950s mostly vote Republican.
C
People living on the US coasts mostly vote for conservative candidates.
D.
Cuban American families mostly vote Republican.
Answers
The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.
Why did Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican?The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.
While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.
To learn more about vote visit:
https://brainly.in/question/20481185
#SPJ13
When a court decision consider as a decree?
Answers
Answer:
A court decision may be considered as a decree in certain legal systems when it has the force of law and requires compliance by the parties involved. In general, a decree is a final judgment or order issued by a court that determines the rights and obligations of the parties in a legal dispute.
In some jurisdictions, a court decision is automatically considered a decree if it meets certain criteria, such as being final and not subject to appeal. In other jurisdictions, a court decision may be designated as a decree by the court or by the parties involved in the case.
The term "decree" is often used in the context of family law, where it may refer to a court order that sets out the terms of a divorce, child custody arrangement, or other family-related matter. In these cases, the decree is a legally binding document that must be followed by the parties involved.
Answer:
Explanation:
In legal terms, a decree is a formal court order that resolves a particular legal issue or dispute. Decrees are typically issued by judges and can be applied in various types of legal cases, including civil cases, divorce cases, and probate cases.
A court decision may be considered a decree if it meets certain criteria, such as being a final and binding determination of the issues in the case, and if it includes a specific order or ruling that must be followed by the parties involved. The term "decree" is often used interchangeably with terms like "judgment," "order," or "final decision," depending on the type of case and the jurisdiction in which the case is being heard.
Substantive law establishes how to enforce the rights and duties of people in a society.
True or False
False
Answers
Statement is true, Substantive law does not establish how to enforce the rights and duties of people in a society.
Rather, substantive law defines the legal rights and obligations of individuals and provides the legal framework within which disputes are resolved. It is the procedural law that sets out the methods and rules for enforcing these rights and duties. Therefore, the statement is false. It is important to note that substantive law and procedural law are closely intertwined and both are necessary for a functioning legal system.
True. Substantive law establishes the rights and duties of individuals in a society and provides the framework for how these rights and duties can be enforced. It is different from procedural law, which focuses on the rules and processes governing legal proceedings. In essence, substantive law defines what people can and cannot do, while procedural law sets out the steps for resolving disputes and enforcing the substantive law.
To know more about law visit:
brainly.com/question/30615336
#SPJ11
Are the courts more trustworthy than elected officials ?
Answers
I have the answer now .
Answers
yayyyyyy congrates, good job hope you have a great day
If you need any other help thought comment in the comments
The distance it takes you to stop your vehicle depends on: road condition, but not your speed. the number of vehicles in front of you. reaction of the driver, vehicle condition, wind direction, and road conditions
Answers
Answer:
vehicle condition
Explanation:
if the brakes on a car are all messed up it'll make stopping alot harder.
The due process clause of the United States Constitution is specifically
stated in which amendment?
Answers
Answer:
The 5th amendment
Explanation:
The fifth amendment of the U.S. constitution states that citizens are entitled to due process
Answer:
5th Amendment!
according to the article, the president does not need the consent of members of the legislative branch to .
Answers
In front of the Senate and House of Representatives, the President of the Senate will open all the certificates, and the votes will then be counted.
What presidential decisions require congressional approval?Shane. The Constitution states that the President "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present consent" in Article II, Section 2, paragraph 2. As a result, the President and the Senate both have the authority to make treaties.
What does the president require the Senate's approval for?According to the American Constitution, the president "shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to establish Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur" (Article II, section 2). Treaties are legally binding agreements that are incorporated into international law.
What may states do without congressional approval?No State shall impose any Tonnage Duty, maintain troops or ships of war during times of peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State or with a foreign Power, or engage in War without the consent of Congress, unless actually invaded or in such immediate danger that delay is not an option.
Know more about legislative:
brainly.com/question/809346
#SPJ4
If Massachusetts has a sales tax of 6 percent and New Hampshire has no sales tax, how much money can be saved by buying a $1,000 television in New Hampshire? O $6 O $16 O $60 O $600
Answers
Answer:
$60
Explanation:
6 percent of 1,000 is 60
Based on the tax in both states, the amount that you would save is $60.
Purchase price of television in Massachusetts= Purchase price x ( 1 + sales tax)
= 1,000 x ( 1 + 6%)
= $1,060
Difference between price in both states.= Price in Massachusetts - Price in New Hampshire
= 1,060 - 1,000
= $60
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on sales tax at https://brainly.com/question/9437038.
The Three (3) Branches of Government and anything that changes your Mood -Behavior or Perception is a ?
Answers
Anything that alters your mood, behavior, or perception is a psychedelic, according to the Three (3) Branches of Government.
How may your behavior and emotions alter after taking a psychology course?Studying psychology is beneficial if you want to comprehend how people express their emotions, deal with stress, give and receive love, and why some situations affect some people more than others.
Which of psychology's many subfields are you familiar with?Psychology is the study of thought, behavior, and emotions. There are many different types of psychology, such as forensic, developmental, social, and cognitive psychology. For someone with a mental health condition, getting a psychological evaluation and starting a treatment plan may be beneficial.
Learn more about psychology: https://brainly.com/question/29436774
#SPJ1
To whom is Roosevelt addressing his remarks
Answers
Answer:
i have no clue
Explanation:
sorry
When you are stopped by a law enforcement officer, which of the following should you not do?
Pull to the right curb or shoulder
Get clear of traffic
Exit your vehicle and ask the officer why you were stopped
Turn off your engine
Answers
Answer: You should only turn off your engine
The burden of proof in civil cases is fairly low. A plaintiff wins a lawsuit if he is 51 percent convincing, and then he collects 100 percent of his damages. Is this result reasonable
Answers
A plaintiff wins a lawsuit in a civil case when he is 51% convincing. After winning the case, he collects 100% of his damages.
Yes, the result is reasonable because in a civil lawsuit, the burden of proof is lower than that in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the defendant must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, which means that the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant's guilt. A civil case, on the other hand, only requires the plaintiff to prove that their claims are more likely than not to be true. This is often referred to as a preponderance of the evidence, which means that there is more evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims than there is supporting the defendant's claims.
In addition, a civil lawsuit is typically about resolving a dispute between two parties, whereas a criminal trial is about punishing someone for committing a crime. Because the stakes are lower in a civil case, it makes sense that the burden of proof would be lower as well. Allowing a plaintiff to win a case when they are only 51% convincing is a way to ensure that the party who is more likely to be in the right is the one who is awarded damages. Overall, the burden of proof in civil cases is a reasonable standard that strikes a balance between protecting the rights of the plaintiff and ensuring that the defendant is not punished unjustly.
Learn more about lawsuit from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ11
A plaintiff wins a lawsuit in a civil case when he is 51% convincing. After winning the case, he collects 100% of his damages.
Yes, the result is reasonable because in a civil lawsuit, the burden of proof is lower than that in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the defendant must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, which means that the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant's guilt. A civil case, on the other hand, only requires the plaintiff to prove that their claims are more likely than not to be true. This is often referred to as a preponderance of the evidence, which means that there is more evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims than there is supporting the defendant's claims.
In addition, a civil lawsuit is typically about resolving a dispute between two parties, whereas a criminal trial is about punishing someone for committing a crime. Because the stakes are lower in a civil case, it makes sense that the burden of proof would be lower as well. Allowing a plaintiff to win a case when they are only 51% convincing is a way to ensure that the party who is more likely to be in the right is the one who is awarded damages. Overall, the burden of proof in civil cases is a reasonable standard that strikes a balance between protecting the rights of the plaintiff and ensuring that the defendant is not punished unjustly.
Learn more about lawsuit from the given link:
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ11
Which international conflict resulted from tensions between the US and Soviet Union A)Cuban missile crisis B)the Vietnam war C) the Korean War D) The bay of pigs invasion
Answers
Answer:
The bay of pigs invasion
Explanation:
The Bay of Pigs Invasion in April 1961 was a failed attack launched by the CIA during ... Bay of Pigs: President Kennedy and the Cold War ... with the Soviet Union, and the United States responded by prohibiting the ... In 1962, the Cuban missile crisis inflamed American-Cuban-Soviet tensions even further.
Trumps creation of the presidential advisory commission on election integrity was an example of which authoritarian strategy for consolidating power?
Answers
Answer:
On May 11, 2017, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order establishing the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. Vice President Mike Pence chairs the Commission, and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach serves as the vice chair.
Explanation:
Did any of their judgeships fall into their laps
Answers
Public Administrators often have what interaction
with civilians?
A. administer punishments for them
B. do not engage with them much
C. work face to face
Answers
Hope this helps :)
HURRY PLEASE You pay $38.76 for a phone case, a selfie-stick, and 2 USB drives. The phone case costs $14.29 and the selfie-stick costs $10.49. The USB drives cost the same amount. How much does each USB drive cost
Answers
Answer:
$0.78 i think
Explanation:
Answer:
12.235
Explanation:
BECAUSE
What do you already know about friction? How does it apply to Newton’s First Law?
Answers
Answer:
Friction can increase gravity on a surface
Explanation:
This applies because of the increase in gravity
Why is the forensic interview especially important in child abuse cases? What are key tips to ensure facts gathered in the interview can withstand judicial scrutiny and why are all forensic interviews with children recorded?
Answers
Forensic interviews are especially important in child abuse cases because it enable the acquisition of factual information and evidence relating to those cases.
To ensure that facts are gathered in a way that can be proven in court, forensic interviews are carefully controlled: the interviewer's utterances and body language must be neutral, alternative explanations for a child's assertions are thoroughly explored, and the results of the interview are substantiated in a way that can be proven in court.
What is the importance of Forensic interviews?The purpose of a forensic interview is to get a statement from a kid in a way that is objective, developmental, and legally acceptable.
Child welfare officials frequently conduct these interviews in the privacy of their automobiles or vacant classrooms. These "improved" settings, while convenient, may not be perfect.
Because a person's capacity to recall past events is often impacted by his or her environment, best practice in forensic interviewing—even if it occurs "in the field"—entails establishing a neutral, comforting, and child-friendly site prior to the interview.
Learn more about Forensic Interviews:
https://brainly.com/question/15213328
#SPJ1
thompson's spouse died in year 1. thompson did not remarry in year 2 and lived alone the entire year. what is thompson's year 2 filing status?
Answers
Thompson's filing status for year 2 would be "Single." Filing status is determined based on the taxpayer's situation as of the last day of the tax year (December 31st).
"Filing status" is a term used in United States tax law to determine the tax rates, deductions, and credits available to taxpayers. There are five possible filing statuses:
Single: This filing status is for unmarried individuals who are not a qualifying widow(er) or head of household.
Married Filing Jointly: This filing status is for married couples who choose to file their tax return together.
Married Filing Separately: This filing status is for married couples who choose to file their tax return separately.
Head of Household: This filing status is for unmarried individuals who provide a home for a qualifying child or dependent.
Qualifying Widow(er): This filing status is for a surviving spouse who meets certain requirements and has not remarried.
A taxpayer's filing status is determined by their marital status and living situation as of the last day of the tax year.
To know more about filing status here
https://brainly.com/question/29733204
#SPJ4
Which two functions of congress frequently create conflicts for congressional representatives?
Answers
Representing the interests of voters in their home states and passing laws that help the country as a whole and Empowering their own political party and encouraging the political participation by member of all parties are two functions of congress.
What are implied powers of Congress?The "Elastic Clause" of the Constitution gives Congress the ability to adopt any legislation deemed "necessary and suitable" for properly performing its "enumerated" powers.
Laws passed under the implied powers doctrine and supported by the Elastic Clause are frequently contentious and divisive.
Thus, option A and B are correct.
For more details about Congress, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/9530702
#SPJ2
A person may legally ride in the back of a pickup truck when:________
Answers
A person may legally ride in the back of a pickup truck when - In secured seats and using approved safety belts.
Riding in the back of pickup trucks is subject to a variety of state regulations, some of which do not allow it at all. If you follow certain guidelines, such as using an approved safety belt and having seats that are fastened, it might be acceptable to ride in the back of a pickup truck in some locations. High sidewalls or camper shells may also be required by some states.
It is important to review the laws in your particular state or region to determine the requirements for riding in the back of a pickup truck.
Learn more about safety belts at:
brainly.com/question/5626690
#SPJ4
Congress has enacted many laws regulating navigation generally, but not regarding the specific subject of water pollution by ships sailing on navigable bodies of water. A state enacted a law prohibiting any ship from discharging specified pollutants, including oil, into the navigable waterways of the state. Violation of the law was punishable by fines based on the amount of the discharge. The law is necessary to the important state interest of preventing pollution; there are no reasonable alternatives available. In addition, the benefits of the law to the state outweigh the burdens it imposes on interstate commerce. A ship owner from another state is fined pursuant to this law for discharging oil into a waterway in the state. Will the ship owner's challenge of the state law as unconstitutional be successful?
a. Yes, because the law regulates interstate commerce, which may be regulated only by Congress.
b. Yes, because the fine constitutes an impermissible ad valorem tax.
c. No, because the law is necessary to the important state interest of preventing pollution and there are no reasonable alternatives available.
d. No, because the law does not discriminate against interstate commerce and does not impose an undue burden on interstate commerce.
Answers
d. No, because the law does not discriminate against interstate commerce and does not impose an undue burden on interstate commerce.
The correct answer is d. No, because the law does not discriminate against interstate commerce and does not impose an undue burden on interstate commerce.
The state law prohibiting ships from discharging specified pollutants into navigable waterways is necessary for the important state interest of preventing pollution. Additionally, there are no reasonable alternatives available. The law does not discriminate against interstate commerce, as it applies to all ships regardless of their state of origin. Furthermore, the benefits of the law to the state in preventing pollution outweigh the burdens it imposes on interstate commerce. Therefore, the ship owner's challenge of the state law as unconstitutional would not be successful.
For more details of Congress :
https://brainly.com/question/10037853
#SPJ11
Juan, a man, thinks a new state law prohibiting abortion is unconstitutional. Which jurisdictional requirement prevents Juan from filing suit to challenge the law?
A: Standing
B: Mootness
C: Ripeness
D: Res Judicata
Answers
Create a want ad for a member of Congress. In the ad, include qualifications, benefits and salary, and skills needed.
Answers
Answer:
wdym
Explanation: