The form of executive clemency that clears the record of the offender is called a pardon.
A pardon is a government decision to allow a person who has been convicted of a crime to be free and absolved from some or all of the consequences of their conviction. It may also restore some of the rights that have been lost due to their conviction.
Pardons can be granted by the governor or president of a state, or by the president of a country, depending on the jurisdiction. It is a legal way of forgiving an individual for a crime they committed and can be granted before or after a conviction.
The purpose of pardons is to reduce the punishment of an offender who has been convicted of a crime, and it is typically granted in situations where the punishment is considered to be too severe or unjust.
Hence, the form of executive clemency that clears the record of the offender is called a pardon.
Read more about Clemency at https://brainly.com/question/14315431
#SPJ11
The american law institute established the law model penal code to unife criminal law across tge 50 states. how many staes have adopted the entire code
As per the cutoff in September 2021, not all 50 states in the United States have adopted the entire Model Penal Code (MPC) The entire Model Penal Code (MPC) was established by the American Law Institute (ALI).
The MPC is a comprehensive model code that seeks to harmonize criminal laws across jurisdictions and provide a framework for the revision and development of criminal statutes.
Whereas the MPC has been persuasive in forming criminal laws and has been received in shifting degrees by diverse states, it is vital to note that the selection of the complete code isn't widespread. A few states have received parts or areas of the MPC, whereas others have not received it at all.
The degree of appropriation and joining of the MPC's provisions shifts from state to state, and there's no definitive number of states that have embraced the whole code. A few states may have consolidated considerable parcels of the MPC into their criminal statutes, whereas others have made more restricted appropriations or alterations.
To learn about Model Penal Code visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31667549
#SPJ4
How would you compare and constrast the theories of Locke and montesquieu
Answer:
They were both enlightenment philosophers, some of Locke's ideas were consent of the govrned and if the government abused its power its cetizens have the right to overthrow the givernment and creat a new one. Mostesquieu's ideas were the sapration of power (three branshes of gorernment) to stop any one person from having to much power and abusing it and pretty much becoming a dictator
Explanation:
Also both philosophers's ideas were used in the united stats constitution.
Can a supreme court justice be impeached and removed.
Answer: The Constitution states that Justices "shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour." This means that the Justices hold office as long as they choose and can only be removed from office by impeachment. Has a Justice ever been impeached? The only Justice to be impeached was Associate Justice Samuel Chase in 1805.
Explanation:
if wynn executes a document that gives timothy the authority to sign legal documents on his behalf, wynn has granted timothy a(n) .
Answer:
he has granted Timothy the right to control his documents/ business
How did the fact that justice marshall was a federalist influence his ruling in the mcculloch case?.
Answer: The case is in maintaining the rule of suggested powers, broadening the control of the government impressively, and laying the sacred establishments for the modern bargain in 1930 and the welfare state of 1960.
Explanation:
compare and contrast the views of those in favour and against RA 1425, considering the context and views of the 1950's wouod similar arguments have forced today
The views in favor of Republic Act 1425 (also known as the Rizal Law) saw it as a way to promote national identity, patriotism and love of country through the study of the life, works and writings of national hero Jose Rizal.
Proponents believed that learning about Rizal and his ideals would inspire young Filipinos to be patriotic, hard-working and dedicated to their country.
On the other hand, opponents of RA 1425 were concerned that it would promote blind hero worship and stifle critical thinking and intellectual freedom. They argued that the law would impose a particular view of Philippine history and national identity, and that students would be required to accept this view without question.
In today's context, the arguments for and against RA 1425 would still hold relevance. Proponents would still see it as a way to promote national pride and values, while opponents would continue to express concern about limiting critical thinking and intellectual freedom. However, there may be additional arguments that take into account the changes in Philippine society and the education system since the 1950s. For example, proponents may argue that the study of Rizal is even more important in light of the current challenges facing the Philippines, such as corruption, political instability, and inequality. Conversely, opponents may argue that there is now even more need for critical thinking and intellectual freedom, as students need to be equipped to navigate an increasingly complex world.
For such more question on Republic Act
https://brainly.com/question/28666845
#SPJ4
Rojan (Roy) worked for the Metropolis City Government. One day at work a co-worker approached him and asked whom he planned to vote for as mayor in the next election. Roy told his colleague that he didn't think much of either candidate, and he didn't plan on voting for either one. The next day Roy's boss fired him because he felt that Roy should not have expressed any negative views about elected officials. Roy plans to file a lawsuit against the city based on its violation of his federal constitutional freedom of speech right. If Roy files his lawsuit in federal district court ( Rojan Degoey v. Metropolis City):________
a. The court may hear his case based on federal-question jurisdiction.
b. The court may hear his case based on diversity jurisdiction.
c. The court cannot hear his case because it does not have jurisdiction of this matter.
d. A and B only.
Answer:
d.
Explanation:
One good way to improve your gas mileage is to ___.
A. Accelerate as slowly as possible
B. Accelerate smoothly and directly to a safe speed
C. Inflate your tires with more air than manufacturer recommended
D. Inflate your tires with less air than manufacturer recommended
Answer: it’s probably B (I’m doing it rn and A was incorrect)
Explanation:
the u.s. supreme court has held that trial judges must give juries a strict definition of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. true of false
It is true to say that the U.S. Supreme court has held that trial judges must give juries a strict definition of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Supreme Court said on Monday that a choice last term holding that the Constitution requires consistent jury decisions for state criminal preliminaries doesn't matter retroactively.
The decision is a misfortune for Thedrick Edwards and many others in Oregon, Louisiana and Puerto Rico, purviews that permitted non-consistent decisions under the steady gaze of the High Court's choice last year in Ramos v. Louisiana.
The 6-3 greater part choice was written by Equity Brett Kavanaugh, who was joined by the court's other moderate individuals.
In her contradiction, Equity Elena Kagan, joined by the court's other two liberal individuals, composed that last year's choice "accompanies a commitment, or in any event."
"On the off chance that the right to a consistent jury is so key - in the event that a decision delivered by a partitioned jury is 'no decision by any means' - then Thedrick Edwards shouldn't consume his time on earth in the slammer more than two hearers' resistance. I consciously disagree," she composed.
To know more about court,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/29786682
#SPJ4
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Mica is an employee of Natural Gas Company and a member of a union of company employees. Under federal law, Mica and other union members have the right to
Answer:
a. Bargain collectively with their employer through their representative.
Explanation:
As an employee of the company and a member of the union of the company's employees, Mica has certain rights that prioritize his interests over that of the company. It also ensures that he, along with the others, have the right to oppose any mistreatment by the company.
Under federal law, Mica and his other union members have the right to bargain with their employer through their representatives. This is their right under the federal law, which not even the Natural Gas Company can ignore or declare void or baseless.
Thus, the correct answer is option a.
Which statement best explains how Kayla can identify her purpose for writing? The word “research” suggests that her main purpose is to learn about the Civil War. The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim. The word “present” suggests that her main purpose is to entertain with interesting facts. The word “cause” suggests that her main purpose is to inform and educate.
Answer:
the answer is B) The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim.
Explanation:
have a good day
Answer:
B
Explanation:
What do you understand by the terms ‘Law’ in general and ‘Business law in particular’?
Answer:
Laws are binding rules that relate to the conduct of individuals and businesses and are designed to prescribe obligation or duty and enforce justice. ... Business owners must follow all regulations and laws to avoid fines. Vacationers and visitors to other countries should understand and respect local laws.
Explanation:
Business law is the law that governs what happens with commercial matters, and there are two main types: regulation of commercial entities and regulation of commercial transactions. Laws have evolved over centuries, and have had to adapt to changes in technology and society.
What is ses many till me please
Answer:
Suspended Execution of Sentence
Explanation:
A Suspended Execution of Sentence (SES) involves probation WITH A CONVICTION. This means that when you enter your plea of guilty, the Court will then enter a sentence, usually involving jail time. The Court will then suspend the execution of the sentence and place you on probation for a period of time.
Instructions: Read the following classic selection: Howard Becker's Becoming a Marijuana User. Explain how differential association and social learning theories apply to the example presented by Becker. What particular aspects of the theories do you see in the study?
The theory of Social learning is the aspect that is present in deviant behavior of Marijuana user because the theory holds that a social behavior is learned by observing and imitating the behavior of others.
What do "How Becoming a Marijuana User" explained?Howard Becker’s work titled “How to Become a Marihuana User” was written during when marijuana smoking was not as “main stream” as it is today. It was during when the people were not debating on whether or not to legalize its but rather, they were trying to discover where this drug fit into society.
In Becker’s paper, he makes an argument that marijuana users are not deviant people who are participating in deviant behavior but rather, that the deviant behavior in smoking marijuana and the pleasure gotten creates a person who is then in turn thought of as deviant. This shows that the person has to first experience an action that people would consider deviant, get a pleasure out of that action and then continue to participate in that activity in order to become what society considers a deviant person.
Read more about Social learning
brainly.com/question/17606689
#SPJ1
As a consultant for the YMCA in Edmond, Oklahoma, you have been hired to complete a site selection report. The Y is currently looking at 3 different locations and they have asked you to prioritize them. Discuss, in detail, the steps (discussed in your textbook) that you would take to complete this report. Use relevant examples form the Edmond area.
To complete the site selection report for the YMCA in Edmond, Oklahoma, I would follow several steps outlined in the textbook. These steps include conducting a feasibility study, analyzing the site characteristics, assessing community needs, and evaluating potential risks and benefits.
Feasibility Study: I would begin by conducting a feasibility study for each location under consideration. This study would involve analyzing factors such as demographics, market demand, competition, and economic indicators. For example, I would examine the population growth rate in the Edmond area, income levels, and trends in health and fitness participation.
Site Characteristics: Next, I would analyze the specific characteristics of each location. This would include evaluating factors such as size, accessibility, visibility, zoning regulations, infrastructure, and proximity to amenities. For instance, I would assess the available parking space, the ease of transportation access, and the visibility of each location from major roads.
Community Needs: It is crucial to assess the community's needs to ensure the YMCA can effectively serve the target population. This would involve conducting surveys, interviews, or focus groups with residents to gather information on their preferences and expectations. Additionally, I would research existing community facilities and programs to identify any gaps or opportunities for the YMCA to address.
Risk and Benefit Analysis: To evaluate potential risks and benefits, I would consider factors like operational costs, revenue potential, environmental impact, and potential partnerships. For example, I would assess the cost of acquiring or leasing each location, ongoing maintenance expenses, and the revenue-generating potential through membership fees or program offerings. Additionally, I would evaluate the potential for collaborations with schools, healthcare providers, or local businesses.
By following these steps, the site selection report would provide a comprehensive analysis of each location's suitability for the YMCA in Edmond. It would prioritize the locations based on their alignment with the community's needs, financial viability, and overall potential for success.
For more questions on feasibility study
https://brainly.com/question/30985089
#SPJ8
Comente sobre a importância dos Direitos Humanos para o Estado Democrático de Direito e seus fundamentos na efetividade dos direitos fundamentais.
Answer:
Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the principle of holding ... The Rule of Law and Democracy Section stands as OHCHR focal point for ... Since its establishment in 2006, the Human Rights Council (successor to the ... relevant intergovernmental bodies and international organizations, published a .
Explanation:
Why did Congress have so much trouble passing laws under the terms of
the Articles of Confederation?
patty principal fired al agent because al had been careless in his record keeping and had comingled personal and business funds. unless patty notifies the third parties who dealt with al that he is no longer her agent, al will continue to have authority and patty will be bound by his actions.
Patty Principal fired Al Agent because Al had been careless in his record keeping and had comingled personal and business funds. Unless Patty notifies the third parties who dealt with Al that he is no longer her agent, Al will continue to have apparent authority and Patty will be bound by his actions.
The type of authority that Al will continue to have depends on the circumstances of his relationship with Patty and the way he presented himself to third parties.
First, it's important to understand that there are four types of authority in agency law: actual authority, apparent authority, implied authority, and incidental authority.
Actual authority refers to the express or implied powers that the principal grants to the agent. Apparent authority arises when the principal creates the appearance of authority in the agent's actions, even if the principal did not actually grant that authority.
Implied authority refers to the powers that are necessary or customary for the agent to carry out the principal's express or apparent instructions. Incidental authority refers to the powers that are incidental to the agent's express or implied authority.
In this case, Patty would be bound by Al's actions if he continues to act as her agent, even though she fired him. In summary, if Patty does not notify third parties that Al is no longer her agent, then Al may continue to have apparent authority and Patty will be bound by his actions.
However, if Patty properly terminates Al's actual and apparent authority, then Al will no longer be able to act on her behalf, regardless of any remaining implied or incidental authority.
For more question on "Apparent Authority" :
https://brainly.com/question/29893631
#SPJ11
Complete Question
Patty Principal fired Al Agent because Al had been careless in his record keeping and had comingled personal and business funds. Unless Patty notifies the third parties who dealt with Al that he is no longer her agent, Al will continue to have __________authority and Patty will be bound by his actions.
implied
incidental
actual
apparent
Where does Hamlet Act 2 Scene 1 take place?
Scene 1: Polonius summons his astute servant Reynaldo and orders him to spy on Laertes in Paris. Hamlet orders the servant to track down any Danes in Paris and question them about Laertes'.
Whereabouts and reputation. Reynaldo sends his servant Reynaldo to France with money and written notes for Laertes, as well as instructions to inquire about and spy on Hamlet' personal life. He gives him specific instructions on how to conduct his investigations and then sends him on his way. "A room in Polonius' house," from Act 2, Scene 1 of Shakespeare's Hamlet, is an example of the setting.
To learn more about Hamlet, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30104887
#SPJ4
employment law recognizes two types of sexual harassment they are
The two types of sexual harassment recognized by employment law are quid pro quo and hostile work environment. Quid pro quo harassment occurs when a person in authority, such as a supervisor or manager, offers a job benefit in exchange for sexual favors or makes employment decisions based on the submission to or rejection of such advances.
Hostile work environment harassment occurs when unwelcome sexual conduct, comments, or behaviors create an intimidating, offensive, or hostile work environment for an employee. Both types of sexual harassment are prohibited under employment law, specifically Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the United States.
To learn more about "Sexual harassment" visit: https://brainly.com/question/9647226
#SPJ11
Basing government decisions on known legal principles is known as which of the following? Democracy Republicanism Rule of law Separation of power
Answer:
Rule of Law
Hope this helps, even though it’s been 3 days
which kind of court would handle a criminal case in which the accused is charged with illegally acquiring guns in mexico and selling them to someone in california?
A criminal case involving the illegal acquisition of guns in Mexico and their sale to someone in California would typically be handled by a federal court, specifically the United States District Court for the district where the crime occurred.
The reason for this is that the crime falls under federal jurisdiction because it entails breaking both state and federal laws as well as crossing international and interstate borders.
Federal offences, such as the unlawful importation or exportation of firearms, fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal court system, as do other federal offences.
As a result, the matter would be heard and decided by a federal court.
For such more question on criminal:
https://brainly.com/question/740707
#SPJ11
Criminal charges made against an accused person and put in writing prior to their being put on trial, is called what?
Answer:
Indictment.
Explanation:
List two requirements to become a state supreme court judge
Answer:
NONE
There are no explicit requirements in the U.S. Constitution for a person to be nominated to become a Supreme Court justice. No age, education, job experience, or citizenship rules exist. In fact, according to the Constitution, a Supreme Court justice does not need to even have a law degree.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Pls mark brainliest :}
And have an amazing day <3
Si tuvieras la oportunidad de crear una ley en contra del Racismo (sentimiento de superioridad de un grupo étnico que conlleva a discriminar a grupos distintos colocándolos en el nivel de inferiores). ¿Qué ley propondrías y cuáles serán sus principales características? (5 puntos)
Answer:
Si tuviese la oportunidad de crear una ley en contra del Racismo, propondría crear una normativa que sancione con penas graduales a quienes incurran en conductas discriminatorias. Así, crearía un registro público de delitos racistas, donde se registrarían los delitos cometidos por cada persona, la cual tendría cada vez mayores penas según vaya reincidiendo en sus conductas: pasando desde los trabajos comunitarios hasta las multas, las inhabilitaciones para determinadas actividades o incluso la prisión en ciertos casos de gravedad.
Is the study of politics scientific
Politics and power have long been studied, but political science as a field is relatively young. Political scientists conduct their research objectively, logically, and methodically, just like other social scientists do. This is known as a "scientific" approach.
Which of the following acts by licensee violates illinois license law?
Disclosing the listing price when a neighbor inquires
Charging the seller for the filing fees incurred on the sellers behalf
Selling a house without disclosing that the licensee has an interest in the property
Depositing earnest money before the end of the next banking day after an offer is accepted
Among the given options, the act of selling a house without disclosing that the licensee has an interest in the property violates Illinois license law.What is the Illinois License Law?Illinois License Law is the legal document that governs how Real Estate Brokerage operates in Illinois.
The License Law includes provisions for creating the Illinois Real Estate License Act of 2000, which provides criteria for obtaining and maintaining a real estate license in the state. It specifies the rights and responsibilities of both licensees and clients.Broker and salesperson are both required to be licensed under the Act.
Brokers are real estate agents who have completed additional education and are qualified to supervise salespeople. Salespersons are agents who have passed the licensing exam but work under the supervision of a broker. All real estate licensees must be at least 18 years old and meet the state's educational requirements.Licensees must follow certain rules when conducting real estate transactions.
Any violation of these rules is referred to as a breach of the law, and licensees may face disciplinary action. Among these are acts such as selling a house without disclosing that the licensee has an interest in the property.Option C, "Selling a house without disclosing that the licensee has an interest in the property," violates the Illinois license law.
Learn more about disciplinary action
https://brainly.com/question/27841523
#SPJ11
Pretend you are the world's leading expert in all things Critical Incident Management. Because of your expertise, you often consult with businesses about emergency preparedness. Create a document to summarize what an Executive Policy Group is as well as why a business should have one. For this exercise we will pretend you are presenting to a new Tech company, breaking into the social media world with a new platform. Company has 100 employees total. Your proposal for the business's EPG should be a page or more in length.
An Executive Policy Group (EPG) is a critical component of a business's overall emergency preparedness strategy, particularly for a tech company like yours, entering the competitive social media platform market. With a workforce of 100 employees, establishing an EPG helps to ensure your organization is well-prepared for any potential critical incidents.
An EPG is a team of senior executives and key decision-makers responsible for developing, implementing, and maintaining a comprehensive emergency response plan. This group ensures that the organization is well-equipped to handle critical incidents effectively and efficiently while minimizing potential impacts on operations, staff, and customers. Having an EPG is essential for several reasons. Firstly, it ensures a systematic and coordinated response to emergencies, enabling your company to react promptly and minimize potential damage. Secondly, it demonstrates a commitment to employee safety and security, fostering a positive work environment and attracting top talent. Thirdly, it safeguards the company's reputation and brand image by showing stakeholders that your organization takes crisis management seriously.
Learn more about Executive here:
https://brainly.com/question/31129751
#SPJ11
a broker showed an owner-occupied property that had window screens, custom venetian blinds, and a wall bed to a buyer whose offer was then accepted by the owner. before the close of escrow, the seller may remove
The broker who showed an owner-occupied property that had window screens, custom venetian blinds, and a wall bed to a buyer whose offer was then accepted by the owner, may take some of the items away from the house before the close of escrow.
What happens when the seller takes away the items from the house before the close of escrow ? Sellers can do this without changing the terms of the offer, but only if they reserve that right before accepting the offer, and the right is included in the purchase contract.
The purchase agreement should state if there are specific items included in the sale, such as appliances or window coverings, and if the seller is permitted to keep or remove them, as well as the date and time by which the seller must remove them. In the case above, if the broker did not reserve the right to take away the items and it is not mentioned in the purchase agreement, then the seller has no right to remove them.
The items are then supposed to be included in the sale of the house.
To know more about owner-occupied property refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/13189875#
#SPJ11