a defendant had drugs seized from his townhome without a warrant. the seizure is upheld in court. what might explain why this warrantless seizure was upheld

The command for creating a revised draft is called "revising."

Revising is the process of improving the content, organization, and style of a document. It involves re-reading, editing, and making changes to ensure that your writing communicates effectively and clearly. To make a revised draft, start by reading through your work and taking notes about what needs to be revised. Once you have an idea of what needs to be changed, make any necessary edits, rearrange sentences, add/remove details, and make sure the tone of your writing is appropriate. Finally, make sure you proofread your document to ensure it is free of any spelling or grammar errors.

Know more about draft here:

https://brainly.com/question/29443724

#SPJ11    

The Exodus story is the grand origin tale from which Judaism derives its identity. Jewish tradition holds that the Exodus is the tale of the Israelites' captivity in Egypt and Moses' eventual leading of them to freedom after receiving the Ten Commandments from God at Mount Sinai.

Jewish identity is fundamentally shaped by the Exodus tale, which is remembered annually during the Passover festival. The Passover celebration commemorates the Israelites' freedom from Egyptian slavery and the start of their ascent to freedom and independence. Judaism derives its identity not only from the story of the Exodus but also from other crucial components, such as the conviction that there is only one God, the study of the Torah, and the performance of mitzvot, commandments intended to foster moral conduct and strengthen ties between individuals and their community. These components create a framework for Jewish ideas, practises, and values and serve as the cornerstone of Jewish identity.

To learn more about Judaism, click here:-
https://brainly.com/question/15067009

#SPJ4

Modes of adaptation refer to the ways in which individuals cope with difficult circumstances and challenges in their lives.

When individuals face persistent stress and hardship, they may resort to crime as a means of survival or as a way to cope with their difficulties. This can include theft, drug trafficking, or other illegal activities.

Criminal behavior becomes a mode of adaptation because it provides a way to cope with financial stress and other life challenges, even though it is illegal and often leads to further difficulties.

The link between modes of adaptation and crime highlights the importance of addressing the root causes of criminal behavior, such as poverty and social inequality, to reduce the incidence of crime.

To know more about  Modes of adaptation click on the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/1155272#

#SPJ11

The legislature must approve funding for the budget to create a state budget.

The job of the legislative branch with regards to the financial plan is like that-

The lead representative's proposed financial plan is surveyed and changed by the council until a structure is satisfactory to the lawmaking body, so, all in all it is passed.

The lead representative is given the embraced financial plan to investigate. Lead representatives have the position to reject the full spending plan proposition.

to know more about financial plan click here:

https://brainly.com/question/17586668

#SPJ4

The legislature must approve funding for the budget to create a state budget.

The job of the legislative branch with regards to the financial plan is like that-

The lead representative's proposed financial plan is surveyed and changed by the council until a structure is satisfactory to the lawmaking body, so, all in all it is passed.

The lead representative is given the embraced financial plan to investigate. Lead representatives have the position to reject the full spending plan proposition.

to know more about the financial plan click here:

brainly.com/question/17586668

#SPJ4

The Supreme Court's decision in Furman v Georgia was a statement against the manner in which statutes imposed the death penalty. In Furman v Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty, as it was then imposed, was unconstitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.

The Court found that the manner in which the death penalty was being imposed was arbitrary and capricious, and that it violated the principle of equal protection under the law.

Specifically, the Court found that the death penalty was being imposed in a manner that was racially discriminatory, with African American defendants being disproportionately sentenced to death. The Court also found that the death penalty was being imposed in an arbitrary and inconsistent manner, with factors such as the defendant's socioeconomic status, the quality of their legal representation, and the geography of the crime influencing whether or not a defendant was sentenced to death.

The Furman decision did not completely abolish the death penalty, but it did result in a moratorium on executions in the United States for several years. Many states revised their death penalty statutes in response to the decision, and the Supreme Court later upheld some of these revised statutes in subsequent cases.

To know more about  supreme court here

https://brainly.com/question/25903338

#SPJ4

Answer:

sexual abuse

Explanation:

Answer:

I would assume this would be sexual as*ault/statutory r*pe.

Explanation:

Forgive me if I am wrong, but here is my thinking:

Women typically are believed more than men when it comes to r*pe and sexual as*ault, and there is a serious stigma with men speaking out about r*pe. Typically men are quieter about it too.

I think statistics have shown that women get shorter sentences than men when it comes to a charge like this.

Answer:

Civic Responsibilities

Explanation:

A duty (also called an obligation) is something that a citizen is required to do, by law. Examples of duties/obligations are: obeying laws, paying taxes, defending the nation and serving on juries. Rule of Law: Everyone is under the law. To obey the law, you must know the law.

Answer:

Civic Responsibility

Explanation:

The options available to a plaintiff in an ADA retaliation suit include punitive damages, compensatory damages, reinstatement, and a jury trial.

In an ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) retaliation suit, the available option for a plaintiff includes multiple choices: punitive damages, compensatory damages, reinstatement, and jury trial.

Punitive damages: These are monetary awards intended to punish the defendant for their wrongdoing and deter future similar conduct. Punitive damages may be awarded in cases where the defendant's actions are found to be particularly egregious or malicious.

Compensatory damages: These are monetary awards that aim to compensate the plaintiff for any harm or losses suffered as a result of the retaliation. It includes damages for emotional distress, lost wages, and other tangible or intangible losses.

Reinstatement: If the plaintiff was terminated or faced adverse employment actions, they may seek reinstatement to their former position or a similar position within the organization.

Jury trial: The plaintiff has the right to request a jury trial, where a group of impartial individuals will review the evidence presented and decide the outcome of the case.

These options provide the plaintiff with various avenues for seeking redress, compensation, and protection of their rights under the ADA in cases of retaliation.

Visit here to learn more about compensatory damages:

brainly.com/question/31946441

#SPJ11

Answer:

D: Installation of security cameras

Explanation:

Answer:true

Explanation:

The Department of Financial Services (DFS) may order a hearing based on various actions or circumstances related to financial services. Some examples include:

Learn more about Department of Financial Services (DFS)

brainly.com/question/29991477

#SPJ4

Answer: A.The defense and prosecuting attorneys call witnesses.

Explanation:

In the past, the theoretical basis that drove justice reform efforts was the classical school of thought, which advocated for the use of reason to solve societal problems and punishment that was proportionate to the crime committed. Rehabilition is given to people who are addicted

Justice reform efforts were driven by the classical school of thought, which emphasized reason and proportionate punishment for criminal behavior. However, the positivist school of thought gained traction in the 20th century, shifting the focus from punishment to rehabilitation and addressing the root causes of criminal behavior. These reform efforts have had varying degrees of success. For instance, the introduction of parole and probation has helped to reduce prison overcrowding and provide support for offenders who might otherwise reoffend. However, the War on Drugs, which was intended to reduce drug use and associated criminal behavior, has led to mass incarceration and disproportionately impacted communities of color.

In conclusion, justice reform efforts have been driven by different theoretical frameworks over time, with varying degrees of success. While some reforms have been effective in reducing crime and rehabilitating offenders, others have had unintended consequences, such as mass incarceration. There is a need to continually evaluate justice reform efforts to ensure that they are effective, fair, and equitable.

learn more about Rehabilition visit:

brainly.com/question/32155632

#SPJ11

If you are at a crime scene and ignore the violence around you, instead solely focusing on the needs of an injured victim, you may be guilty of selective perception or inattentional blindness.

Selective perception refers to the tendency to only perceive and pay attention to specific aspects of a situation while ignoring others. In the context of a crime scene, it means intentionally or unintentionally directing your attention solely towards the injured victim and disregarding the surrounding violence or criminal activity.

Inattentional blindness is a related phenomenon where individuals fail to notice unexpected stimuli or events in their environment because their attention is focused on something else. In this case, your focus on attending to the injured victim may lead to a lack of awareness or recognition of the violence happening around you.

It is essential for individuals in such situations, such as witnesses or bystanders, to remain aware of the overall scene and take appropriate action to ensure personal safety and the safety of others. Ignoring the violence or criminal activity around you can hinder the investigation, compromise your own safety, and potentially obstruct justice.

Therefore, it is important to strike a balance between providing immediate assistance to the injured victim and maintaining awareness of the broader situation. By promptly notifying law enforcement or emergency services about the violence and providing necessary information, you can contribute to a comprehensive response to the crime scene and help ensure the safety and well-being of everyone involved.

Learn more about violence here

https://brainly.com/question/1216186

#SPJ11

Answer:

Speed = 2.5 miles / hours

Explanation:

Given:

Distance travel = \(1\frac{1}{4}\) miles = 1.25 miles

Time taken = 1/2 hours = 0.5 hours

Find:

Speed

Computation:

Speed = Distance / time

Speed = 1.25 / 0.5

Speed = 2.5 miles / hours

Res ipsa loquitur, stare decisis, and certiorari all afford stability and predictability to the law. Res ipsa loquitur is a Latin term meaning “the thing speaks for itself” and it is a rule of evidence used in civil suits. The rule allows for an inference of negligence on the part of the defendant.

Stare decisis is a legal principle in which a court should follow its previous decisions when the same legal issues arise. Certiorari is a type of writ (order) used by a higher court to review the decision of a lower court. Stare decisis affords stability and predictability to the law.

The concept of stare decisis means to stand by things decided. It is the principle of determining points of law according to precedent. The term is applied in the sense that courts should follow the principles they had established earlier in making judgments.

It provides that a court should follow the rules and principles made by it in a previous decision that has similar facts and issues. This will provide stability and predictability to the law. It ensures the continuity of the law and helps in maintaining stability and consistency in its application.

Other options: Res ipsa loquitur: This is a legal doctrine that allows the court to presume negligence without the plaintiff providing direct evidence of negligence. This does not afford stability and predictability to the law. Clemency is the act of mercy or leniency shown by the authorities to a person who has committed a crime.

This is not a legal doctrine and does not afford stability and predictability to the law. Certiorari is a writ or order from a higher court to a lower court or tribunal directing it to send up the record of a particular case for review. It does not afford stability and predictability to the law.

To know more about Res ipsa loquitur, stare decisis, and certiorari, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12177870#

#SPJ11

Federal anti-discrimination laws prohibit discrimination based on protected bases, which include characteristics such as race, color, national origin, sex, religion, disability, and age (in certain contexts).

Anti-discrimination laws are legal frameworks designed to prevent unfair treatment and protect individuals or groups from discrimination based on certain protected characteristics.

These laws aim to ensure equal opportunities and rights for all individuals in various aspects of life, such as employment, housing, education, public accommodations, and services.

Anti-discrimination laws typically establish prohibited grounds of discrimination, which may include factors such as race, color, national origin, sex, religion, disability, age, and sometimes additional categories.

They provide mechanisms for individuals to seek legal recourse if they believe they have experienced discrimination, promoting equality, and combating discriminatory practices in society.

Learn more about anti-discrimination laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/14609210

#SPJ4

Federal anti-discrimination laws like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, disallow discrimination based on race, gender, national origin, religion and sexual orientation in employment, housing etc. The laws also include provisions protecting pregnant women from job discrimination.

Federal anti-discrimination laws, particularly Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibit discrimination on specific protected bases. These bases include race, gender, national origin, religion, and sexual orientation. This Act makes it illegal to discriminate against individuals based on these characteristics in different areas like hiring, benefits, promotions, or termination of employment.

Additionally, other amendments such as the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 have come into play which protects women who are pregnant from job discrimination as long as they can effectively perform the required tasks. Furthermore, these laws extend their impact beyond employment to include other areas such as housing, where discrimination based on race, gender, age, and disability is also illegal.

https://brainly.com/question/32410901

#SPJ11

No, this type of circumstances can only be minimized.

Why do we refer to breaking the law?

Is it bad to breach the law morally?

Why breaking the law is not acceptable?

To know more about law, checkout this link:

https://brainly.com/question/820417

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer:

27

Explanation:

A situation in which a government has a great deal of power but does not have political authority might be a military dictatorship. In a military dictatorship, the military is in charge of the state and controls the majority of its resources. The military leadership makes all the decisions without input from the citizenry.

Whether or not the rule of law would be respected in such a government is highly dependent on the values of the leadership of the military. If they value the rule of law, they may respect it even though they have a great deal of power. On the other hand, if they value their own power and authority, they may be more likely to sidestep legal protections in favor of their own interests.

Paradigm shifts occur when one set of thoughts, ideas, beliefs, values, and practices are challenged and then scientific discipline.  replaced with a new set of ideas, thoughts, beliefs, values, and practices.

In other words, a paradigm shift is a fundamental change in the way we perceive the world around us and the way we think about it. This shift often happens in science and technology, where new discoveries challenge existing theories and lead to new ways of understanding the world.

Paradigm shifts can also happen in other areas such as politics, economics, and culture. In these areas, a paradigm shift can occur when new ideas challenge existing beliefs and practices and lead to new ways of doing things.

One example of a paradigm shift is the shift from the geocentric model of the universe to the heliocentric model. For centuries, people believed that the Earth was at the center of the universe and that everything revolved around it. However, the work of scientists like Copernicus, Galileo, and Kepler challenged this belief and led to the development of the heliocentric model, where the sun is at the center of the universe.

In conclusion, paradigm shifts occur when existing ideas, beliefs, values, and practices are challenged and replaced with new ideas, beliefs, values, and practices. These shifts can happen in science, technology, politics, economics, and culture, and they can lead to significant changes in the way we perceive the world around us and the way we think about it.

Know more about Paradigm shifts here:

https://brainly.com/question/13991373

#SPJ8

Answer:

Through the popularly elected branches (not the unelected judiciary).

Answer:

The law that has been evolved from the decisions made in appellate courts and judicial precedent, is known as common law or sometimes as case law. The common law system gives pre-eminence to the common law, as it considers unfair to treat the same facts in a different manner in different situations.

Answer:

Drug Use

Explanation:

Florida is widely recognized as a fun-loving state with an exciting nightlife, partying, vacationing, and more. But, there is a darker side to this because of the rampant drug use. Florida has one of the highest overdose rates within the US.

Answer:

fixed price contracts and cost-reimbursement contracts