A circle of radius 1 is tangent to a circle of radius 2. The sides of $\triangle ABC$ are tangent to the circles as shown, and the sides $\overline{AB}$ and $\overline{AC}$ are congruent. What is the area of $\triangle ABC$

Lacey's pay in state income tax is $132.60.

To determine Lacey's pay in state income tax, we need to calculate the difference between her gross pay and her pay after taxes.

Lacey's gross pay is $680 per week. She pays $91.80 in federal taxes and $17.00 in other taxes, so her total tax amount is $91.80 + $17.00 = $108.80.

Lacey's pay after taxes is $547.40.

To find the state income tax, we subtract the pay after taxes from the gross pay:

State income tax = Gross pay - Pay after taxes = $680 - $547.40 = $132.60.

Therefore, Lacey's pay in state income tax is $132.60.

Learn more about income tax here:

https://brainly.com/question/13143081

#SPJ11

Lacey earns $680 each week. She pays $91.80 in fed other taxes are $17.00. Her pay after taxes is $547.40 Lacey pay in state income tax? $132.60 $38.60 $23.80 $115,60

Answer:WAIT HE IS TELLING THE TIME

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

59

Step-by-step explanation:

60 + 61 + m<4 = 180

m<4 = 59°

The expression that represents well the geometric sequence is \(f(n) = 8 \cdot 2^{n-1}\) and the value of the fourth term is 64. (Correct choice: B)

Geometric sequences are exponential expressions with discrete domain, whose form is presented and explained below:

\(f(n) = a \cdot r^{n-1}\), where a, r are real numbers and n is a natural number.     (1)

Where:

According to the statement, we know that the first term of the geometric sequence is 8 and between any two consecutive terms there is a common ratio of 2. If we know that a = 8, r = 2 and n = 4, then the fourth term of the series by means of (1) is:

\(f(4) = 8 \cdot 2^{4-1}\)

f(4) = 8 · 8

f(4) = 64

The expression that represents the geometric sequence is \(f(n) = 8 \cdot 2^{n-1}\) and the value of the fourth term is 64.

To learn more on geometric sequences: https://brainly.com/question/11266123

#SPJ1

Answer:

C.

Brainliest, please!

Step-by-step explanation:

A negative exponent means that the number is really small, which is true in this case.

Answer:

0.00000135

Step-by-step explanation:

1.35 x 10-5 means,

1.35/100000

=>0.00000135

we need to know how many students each circle represents to calculate how many chose chicken Maybe try 4 3/4 but im not quite sure

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

19

Step-by-step explanation:

24 students said veggie and there is 6 circles in the pictogram for veggie so we can divide 24 by 6 to find the value of one circle.

\(\frac{24}{6} = 4\)

Now we have the value of a circle we can figure out how many students chose chicken.

There are 4 full circles which is \(4*4 = 16\)

Finally, there is a 3/4 of a circle which is \(4*\frac{3}{4} = 3\)

Then we add all the values together to find the number of students who chose chicken.

16+3=19

Hope this helps!

Brainliest is much appreciated!

a) Using the Avrami equation with n = 1.2 and 90% completion in 180 seconds, the parameter k is found to be approximately 0.00397. b) The rate of transformation, r, is approximately 0.0367 per second.


a) The Avrami equation is given by the equation t = k * (1 – exp(-r^n)), where t is the transformation time, k is a parameter, r is the rate of transformation, and n is a constant (in this case, n = 1.2). Given t = 180 seconds and the transformation is 90% complete, we can rearrange the equation to solve for k: k = t / (1 – exp(-r^n)). By substituting the values, we find k ≈ 0.00397.
b) To determine the rate of transformation, we can rearrange the Avrami equation and solve for r: r = (-ln(1 – (t / k)))^(1/n). Plugging in the values t = 180 seconds and k ≈ 0.00397, and n = 1.2, we can calculate r ≈ 0.0367 per second. This represents the rate at which the transformation progresses per unit time.

Learn more about Avrami equation here: brainly.com/question/31804133
#SPJ11

a) The Formula for A(t) is A(t) = 5000 \(e^{0.075t\)

b) The differential equation is satisfied by A(t) is

dA/ dt = 375  \(e^{0.075t\)

c) Amount after 2 year is $5, 809.

d) t= 4.48 years

We have,

R= 7.5%

P= $5000

a) The Formula for A(t) is

A(t) = P\(e^{rt\)

Where P is Principal , t is time.

So, A(t) = 5000 \(e^{0.075t\)

b) The differential equation is satisfied by A(t) is

dA/ dt = 375  \(e^{0.075t\)

c) Amount after 2 year

A(2) = 5000 (2.71828\()^{0.15\)

A(2) = 5000 x 1.1618

A(2)= $5, 809.

d) 7000 = 5000   \(e^{0.075t\)

 \(e^{0.075t\)= 1.4

Taking log on both side

0.075t log e= log 1.4

0.075t=   0.14612803567/0.4342944819

0.075t= 0.3364

t= 4.48 years

Learn more about Compound interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/14295570

$SPJ4

The real square roots of 0.0036 will be A 0.06 and -0.06.

The result of multiplying a number by itself yields its square value, while the square root of a number can be found by looking for a number that, when squared, yields the original value. It follows that a a = b if "a" is the square root of "b."

It should be noted that this is a component of a number that yields the original number when multiplied by itself

The square root will be illustrated as:

= ✓0.0036

= 0.06 and -0.06

Therefore, the correct option is A.

Learn more about square root on:

https://brainly.com/question/3617398

#SPJ1

40% first you turn it into a decimal, then u multiply it by 100 to get your percent.

For solving this question we will use the Unitary method

The unitary approach is a strategy for problem-solving that involves first determining the value of a single unit, then multiplying that value to determine the required value. The term "unitary method" refers to a process where the value of one item is initially determined before determining the values of any other items.

The unitary method's formula is to identify the value of a single unit, then multiply that value by the number of units to obtain the required value.

2/5 = 0.4

0.4 x 100 = 40% first u turn it into a decimal, then u multiply it by 100 to get ur percent

Know more about the percentage at

https://brainly.com/question/843074

#SP4

The full question will be

Tyrone is converting StartFraction 45 Over 50 EndFraction to a percent. Which method should he use to find the percentage?

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's call the number of girls in the school "g". We know that there are 1000 boys, so the total number of students is 1000 + g.

The problem states that 48% of the total number of students were successful in the examination. Therefore, we can write an equation:

0.48(1000 + g) = 0.5(1000) + 0.4(g)

Simplifying and solving for g:

480 + 0.48g = 500 + 0.4g

0.08g = 20

g = 250

Therefore, the number of girls in the school is 250.

Answer:

250

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi dear,

Firstly, let the girls be G

1000 + G = Total number of students

50% of boy = 1000 × 0.5 = 500

40% of girls = G × 0.4 = 0.4G

0.48 • (1000 + G) = 480 + 0.48G

480 + 0.48G = 500 + 0.4G

Collect Like Terms

0.48G - 0.4G = 500 - 480

0.08G = 20

G = 20/0.08

G = 250

Therefore, the girls are 250( two hundred and fifty)in the school

To calculate the dosage strength of digoxin, which is supplied by the pharmacy in mg per tablet, the physician orders digoxin 0.25 mg po daily.

In other words, The physician ordered 0.25 mg of digoxin to be administered orally every day. The medication provided by the pharmacy is to be taken in tablet form. To calculate the amount of digoxin in each tablet, you need to divide the ordered dose by the amount of tablets.

The equation is:Dose Ordered / Tablets = Dose per tablet

Substitute the known values:Dose Ordered = 0.25 mgTablets = 1 tablet0.25 mg / 1 tablet = 0.25 mg per tablet.

Therefore, the dosage strength of the digoxin supplied by the pharmacy is 0.25 mg per tablet.

To know more about digoxin click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/15180878#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer would be C. An obtuse equilateral triangle :)

The chances that the coin is unbiased are 0.08 or 8%.

Probability is the measure of the likelihood of an event occurring.

Probability is calculated by dividing the number of successful events by the total number of possible events.

The probability of an event ranges between 0 and 1.

An event with a probability of 0 has no chance of occurring, whereas an event with a probability of 1 is certain to occur.

In the given question, a coin was tossed 500 times.

The result was heads 230 times and tails 270 times.

Let us calculate the probability of getting heads when the coin is tossed.

P(h) = Probability of getting heads = Number of heads/Total number of tosses = 230/500 = 0.46

Similarly, let us calculate the probability of getting tails when the coin is tossed.

P(t) = Probability of getting tails = Number of tails/Total number of tosses = 270/500 = 0.54

The coin is unbiased if the probability of getting heads is equal to the probability of getting tails when the coin is tossed.

P(h) = P(t)0.46

= 0.54 0.54 - 0.46

= 0.08

Thus, the chances that the coin is unbiased are 0.08 or 8%.

Know more about Probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/25839839

#SPJ11

(A) the number of ways to pass out 13 cards to each of the two players is (52! / (13! × 13!)) × (39! / (26! × 13!)) (B) We can calculate probability by dividing the number of favorable outcomes by the total number of possible outcomes. (26! / (13! × 13!))²] / [(52! / (13! × 13!)) × (39! / (26! × 13!))]

A) To determine the number of ways to distribute 13 cards to each of the two players, we can use the concept of combinations. Since the order of distribution does not matter, we'll use the formula for combinations:

C(52, 13) × C(39, 13)

= (52! / (13! × (52 - 13)!)) × (39! / (13! × (39 - 13)!))

Simplifying this expression:

= (52! / (13! × 39!)) × (39! / (13! × 26!))

= (52! / (13! × 13! × 26!)) × (39! / (26! × 13!))

= (52! / (13! × 13! × 26!)) × (39! / (26! × 13!))

= (52! / (13! × 13!)) × (39! / (26! × 13!))

Therefore, the number of ways to pass out 13 cards to each of the two players is (52! / (13! × 13!)) × (39! / (26! × 13!)).
B) To calculate the probability that player 1 will receive 13 cards of one color and player 2 will receive 13 cards of the other color, we need to find the favorable outcomes and divide it by the total number of possible outcomes.
The favorable outcome is when player 1 receives 13 cards of one color and player 2 receives 13 cards of the other color.
For player 1 to receive 13 red cards, there are C(26, 13) ways, and for player 2 to receive 13 black cards, there are C(26, 13) ways.

Therefore, the number of favorable outcomes is C(26, 13) ×C(26, 13).
The total number of possible outcomes is the same as the answer to part A, which is C(52, 13) × C(39, 13).
Finally, we can calculate the probability by dividing the number of favorable outcomes by the total number of possible outcomes.

To know more about probability visit :

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

There are approximately \(6.54 \times 10^{11}\) ways to distribute 13 cards to each of the two players, and the probability that player 1 will receive 13 cards of one color and player 2 will receive 13 cards of the other color is approximately 0.76%.

a. To determine the number of ways to pass out 13 cards to each of the two players, we can use the concept of combinations. We need to select 13 cards out of the total 52 cards for the first player, and then the remaining 13 cards will automatically go to the second player. The number of ways to choose 13 cards out of 52 is given by the combination formula: \(52_C_{13} = \frac{52!}{(13!(52-13)!)}\). Evaluating this expression, we find that there are approximately \(6.54 \times 10^{11}\) ways to distribute the cards.

b. The probability that player 1 will receive 13 cards of one color and player 2 will receive 13 cards of the other color depends on the specific color that each player receives. Let's consider the case where player 1 receives all red cards and player 2 receives all black cards. There are 26 red cards and 26 black cards, so the probability of player 1 receiving all red cards is given by: \(\frac{26_C_{13} \times 26_C_0}{52_C_{13}}\). Evaluating this expression, we find that the probability is approximately 0.0076, or 0.76%.

In conclusion, there are approximately \(6.54 \times 10^{11}\) ways to distribute 13 cards to each of the two players, and the probability that player 1 will receive 13 cards of one color and player 2 will receive 13 cards of the other color is approximately 0.76%.

Learn more about probability from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/31120123

#SPJ11

Answer:

2, 4,6,8,12,20

Step-by-step explanation:

when in [ ] it turns negatives into positives, and 2 3/10 is around 2.3 in decimal form.

Answer:

exactly like thast

Step-by-step explanation:

A. The number of red balls he had was 8  at the beginning.

Duke's starting red ball total can be found by setting up a system of equations. First, let x represent the number of red balls and y represent the number of blue balls.

After 5 days, the equation is x-15=y+10. This equation states that after 5 days, the number of red balls (x) minus 15 will equal the number of blue balls (y) plus 10. After 9 days, the equation is x-27=2y+20.

This equation states that after 9 days, the number of red balls (x) minus 27 will equal twice the number of blue balls (y) plus 20. To solve for x, both equations can be set equal to each other and solved. This results in x=8. Therefore, Duke had 8 red balls at the beginning.

For more questions like Equation click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/29657992

#SPJ4

Answer:

a=8/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Ok, so first, we are gonna make this an equation

13-3a=5

Now, we will subtract 13 from 5

Now we have -3a=-8

Now, divide -8 by -3 and we get...

a=8/3

Answer:

7b(4b+4c)-3c(4b+4c)

28b²+28bc-12bc-13c²

hope this helps

sorry dunno the other

2.1 To show that all partial derivatives of u and v exist at (x, y) = (0, 0) and satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations, we need to calculate the partial derivatives of u and v and check their existence and the Cauchy-Riemann conditions.

The function is given as u(x, y) = xy and v(x, y) = x² + y².

Partial derivatives of u:

∂u/∂x = y

∂u/∂y = x

Partial derivatives of v:

∂v/∂x = 2x

∂v/∂y = 2y

All partial derivatives exist at (x, y) = (0, 0) since they are simple functions and do not have any singularities.

Now, let's check if the Cauchy-Riemann equations are satisfied:

∂u/∂x = ∂v/∂y

y = 2y

This equation holds true for all values of y, including y = 0.

∂u/∂y = -∂v/∂x

x = -2x

This equation also holds true for all values of x, including x = 0.

Therefore, all partial derivatives of u and v exist at (x, y) = (0, 0), and they satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

2.2 To show that f is not continuous at (0, 0) and hence not differentiable at (0, 0), we can examine the behavior of f as (x, y) approaches (0, 0).

The function f(x, y) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) = xy + i(x² + y²)

As (x, y) approaches (0, 0), both u(x, y) = xy and v(x, y) = x² + y² approach 0. However, f(x, y) = xy + i(x² + y²) approaches 0 + i(0) = i(0) = 0i = 0, which is a different value.

Therefore, f is not continuous at (0, 0), and hence it is not differentiable at (0, 0).

2.3 To investigate whether f is analytic or not, we need to check if it is differentiable in a neighborhood around every point.

Since we have already shown that f is not differentiable at (0, 0), it implies that f is not analytic because differentiability is a necessary condition for analyticity.

2.4 To investigate whether f has a harmonic complex conjugate or not, we need to check if u and v satisfy the Laplace's equation (∇²u = 0 and ∇²v = 0) and if they satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

The Laplace's equation is not satisfied by u(x, y) = xy because ∇²u = ∂²u/∂x² + ∂²u/∂y² = 0 + 0 ≠ 0.

Therefore, f does not have a harmonic complex conjugate.

2.5 To show that the function f(x, y) = x² - y² - iy is harmonic, we need to demonstrate that it satisfies the Laplace's equation (∇²u = 0 and ∇²v = 0).

For u(x, y) = x² - y², we have ∇²u = ∂²u/∂x² + ∂²u/∂y² = 2 - 2 = 0.

For v(x, y) = -y, we have ∇²v = ∂²v/∂x² + ∂²v/∂y² = 0 + 0 = 0.

Both u and v satisfy the Laplace's equation, indicating that f(x, y) = x² - y² - iy is a harmonic function.

To determine the harmonic conjugate of f, we can integrate the partial derivative of v with respect to x and y, and obtain the imaginary part of the function:

h(x, y) = ∫ (∂v/∂y) dy = ∫ 0 dy = C(y)

Where C(y) is an arbitrary function of y.

The harmonic conjugate of f is given by:

g(x, y) = u(x, y) + ih(x, y) = x² - y² + iC(y)

Therefore, the harmonic conjugate of f(x, y) = x² - y² - iy is g(x, y) = x² - y² + iC(y), where C(y) is an arbitrary function of y.

Learn more about  Cauchy-Riemann here -: brainly.com/question/30385079

#SPJ11

To show that all partial derivatives of u and v exist at (x, y) = (0, 0) and satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations, we need to calculate the partial derivatives of u and v and check their existence and the Cauchy-Riemann conditions.

The function is given as u(x, y) = xy and v(x, y) = x² + y².

Partial derivatives of u:

∂u/∂x = y

∂u/∂y = x

Partial derivatives of v:

∂v/∂x = 2x

∂v/∂y = 2y

All partial derivatives exist at (x, y) = (0, 0) since they are simple functions and do not have any singularities.

Now, let's check if the Cauchy-Riemann equations are satisfied:

∂u/∂x = ∂v/∂y

y = 2y

This equation holds true for all values of y, including y = 0.

∂u/∂y = -∂v/∂x

x = -2x

This equation also holds true for all values of x, including x = 0.

Therefore, all partial derivatives of u and v exist at (x, y) = (0, 0), and they satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

2.2 To show that f is not continuous at (0, 0) and hence not differentiable at (0, 0), we can examine the behavior of f as (x, y) approaches (0, 0).

The function f(x, y) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) = xy + i(x² + y²)

As (x, y) approaches (0, 0), both u(x, y) = xy and v(x, y) = x² + y² approach 0. However, f(x, y) = xy + i(x² + y²) approaches 0 + i(0) = i(0) = 0i = 0, which is a different value.

Therefore, f is not continuous at (0, 0), and hence it is not differentiable at (0, 0).

2.3 To investigate whether f is analytic or not, we need to check if it is differentiable in a neighborhood around every point.

Since we have already shown that f is not differentiable at (0, 0), it implies that f is not analytic because differentiability is a necessary condition for analyticity.

2.4 To investigate whether f has a harmonic complex conjugate or not, we need to check if u and v satisfy the Laplace's equation (∇²u = 0 and ∇²v = 0) and if they satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

The Laplace's equation is not satisfied by u(x, y) = xy because ∇²u = ∂²u/∂x² + ∂²u/∂y² = 0 + 0 ≠ 0.

Therefore, f does not have a harmonic complex conjugate.

2.5 To show that the function f(x, y) = x² - y² - iy is harmonic, we need to demonstrate that it satisfies the Laplace's equation (∇²u = 0 and ∇²v = 0).

For u(x, y) = x² - y², we have ∇²u = ∂²u/∂x² + ∂²u/∂y² = 2 - 2 = 0.

For v(x, y) = -y, we have ∇²v = ∂²v/∂x² + ∂²v/∂y² = 0 + 0 = 0.

Both u and v satisfy the Laplace's equation, indicating that f(x, y) = x² - y² - iy is a harmonic function.

To determine the harmonic conjugate of f, we can integrate the partial derivative of v with respect to x and y, and obtain the imaginary part of the function:

h(x, y) = ∫ (∂v/∂y) dy = ∫ 0 dy = C(y)

Where C(y) is an arbitrary function of y.

The harmonic conjugate of f is given by:

g(x, y) = u(x, y) + ih(x, y) = x² - y² + iC(y)

Therefore, the harmonic conjugate of f(x, y) = x² - y² - iy is g(x, y) = x² - y² + iC(y), where C(y) is an arbitrary function of y.

Learn more about  Cauchy-Riemann here -: brainly.com/question/30385079

#SPJ11

Answer:Here you go

Step-by-step explanation:

Change everything into terms of sine and cosine.

Use the identities when you can.

Start with simplifying the left-hand side of the equation, then, once you get stuck, simplify the right-hand side. As long as the two sides end up with the same final expression, the identity is true.

Answer:

(2,0)

Step-by-step explanation:

I have done this before I rlly hope this helps!! :)

The smallest possible length of the hypotenuse is 118

The given parameters are:

The non-degenerate implies that the right triangle has a positive area.

Since at least one length is 84, then both lengths can also be 84.

The hypotenuse is then calculated using the following Pythagoras theorem.

h^2 = 84^2 + 84^2

Evaluate the sum

h^2 = 14112

Take the square root of both sides

h = 118.8

Round down

h = 118

Hence, the smallest possible length of the hypotenuse is 118

Read more about right triangles at:https://brainly.com/question/2437195

#SPJ1

Answer:

Terry had £780 initially and Faye had £1300

Step-by-step explanation:

System of Equations

We'll call the following variables:

x = Terry's balance in his bank account

y = Faye's balance in her bank account

The initial relation between them is:

\(\frac{x}{y}=\frac{3}{5}\)

Cross-multiplying:

5x = 3y        [1]

If Terry put £220 in his account he had x+220 and if Faye withdrew £300 from her account, she had y-300. Both quantities are equal, thus

x + 220 = y - 300

Subtracting 220:

x = y - 520         [2]

Substituting in [1]

5(y - 520) = 3y

Multiplying:

5y - 2600 = 3y

Adding 2600 and subtracting 3y:

2y = 2600

Dividing by 2:

y = 1300

From [2]:

x = 1300 - 520

x = 780

Terry had £780 initially and Faye had £1300

The following statements are accurate conclusions:

The null hypothesis is: The proportion of California college students who currently drink alcohol is the same as the proportion nationwide (p = 0.60).

The alternative hypothesis is: The proportion of California college students who currently drink alcohol is different from the proportion nationwide (p ≠ 0.60).

p in the hypotheses represents the proportion of college students who currently drink alcohol.

The Z-score is calculated as:

Z = (0.66 - 0.60) / 0.023 = 2.61

The P value can be obtained from a standard normal distribution table or calculator:

P = 0.0045 (for a two-tailed test)

We reject the null hypothesis and come to the conclusion that there is a statistically significant difference between the proportion of drinkers in the population of California college students and the proportion of drinkers in the American adult population because the P value (0.0045) is less than the significance level (which is not stated in the question) (0.66).

For the given question:

The following statements are accurate conclusions:

The result that "There is a 0.06 difference in the proportion of drinkers when we compare the US adult population to the population of CA college students" is untrue since the hypothesis test is not concerned with proportional differences.

The complete question is:-

Normal Distribution Calculator Drag the orange flag left or right to change the Z-score Alternatively, enter a Z-score into the textbox and click enter. Enter 8 -1 Z-score: -1.000 0 Z-score The area to the left of the Z value is 0.1587 The area to the right of the Z value is 0.9413 Question 1 6 pts California College Students Who Drink According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 60% of all American adults ages 18 to 24 currently drink alcohol. Is the proportion of California college students who currently drink alcohol different from the proportion nationwide? A survey of 450 California college students indicates that 66% currently drink alcohol. The null hypothesis is (Select] The alternative hypothesis is Select] p in the hypotheses represents [Select) The standard error is 0.60(1-0.60) 450 = 0.023 The Z-score is (Select] The P value is Select) The conclusion is Select Question 2 4 pts For the previous example, which statements are accurate conclusions? The proportion of drinkers in the population of CA college students is not 0.60. There is a statistically significant difference between the proportion of drinkers in the American adult population (0.60) and the proportion of drinknes in the population of CA college students A larger proportion of CA college students drink alcohol compared to the adults nationwide When we compare the American adult population to the population of CA college students, there is a 0.06 difference in the proportion of drinkers

To learn more about the null hypothesis, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ1

Answer:

alright so you have to do math to do it

Step-by-step explanation:

The solution of the system of equations is given by the ordered pair (-4, 5).

In order to graph the solution to the given system of equations on a coordinate plane, we would use an online graphing calculator to plot the given system of equations and then take note of the point of intersection;

x - y = -9    ......equation 1.

3x + 4y = 8  ......equation 2.

Based on the graph shown in the image attached above, we can logically deduce that the solution to this system of equations is the point of intersection of the lines on the graph representing each of them, which lies in Quadrant II, and it is given by the ordered pairs (-4, 5).

Read more on solution and equation here: brainly.com/question/25858757

#SPJ1