7 1/3 x 7/11
simplify the answer completely and change to a mixed number

Answer:

1.13333333333

1.13

Step-by-step explanation:

1: Gather all the numbers

2: Use a calculator to subtract the numbers

3: Answer is 1.13

Hope this helps.

Answer:

61

Step-by-step explanation:

1/5 = .2

so you do 12.2 / .2 which gives you 61

Answer:

Your answer is 61

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1.  Convert 12.2 into a fraction. (I chose to put 12.2 over 10 so in the end it's 122/10.)

Step 2. Layout your problem

Remeber when dividing fractions it Keep, Change, Flip.

122/10 x 5/1

Step 3. Solve

122/10 x 5/1 = 61

That should be your answer to the problem :)

Based on the facts provided, we can create a proportion based on the ratio of time to hot dogs to determine how long it would take to consume 10 hot dogs.

If it takes 5 minutes to eat 8 hot dogs, we can say:

8 hot dogs in 5 minutes equals 10 in x minutes.

We can cross-multiply to find x:

8 hot dogs multiplied by x minutes equals 10 hot dogs multiplied by x minutes

The simplified formula is as follows: 8x = 50

Divide both sides by 8, and the result is 6.25 minutes: x = 50 / 8 x

We can convert the decimal part of the minutes to seconds as there are 60 seconds in a minute:

15 seconds are equal to 0.25 minutes multiplied by 60 seconds each minute.

Consequently, it would take roughly 6 minutes and 15 seconds.

learn more about proportion here :

https://brainly.com/question/31548894

#SPJ11

Answer:

3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

When finding common denominators the answer would be 3/4.

Answer:

2/3 is not greater than 3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

factor of 6 and 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

75,582

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 21,168 ways to form a subcommittee of 3 men and 5 women from the given committee.To form a subcommittee of 3 men and 5 women from a committee consisting of 9 men and 10 women, you can use the combination formula.

A combination is a selection of items from a larger set, where the order of items does not matter. The formula for combinations is:

C(n, r) = n! / (r!(n-r)!)

where n is the total number of items in the set, r is the number of items to be chosen, and ! represents the factorial function (e.g., 5! = 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1).

For this problem, you will first find the number of ways to choose 3 men from the 9 men, and then the number of ways to choose 5 women from the 10 women.

For men:
C(9, 3) = 9! / (3!(9-3)!)
C(9, 3) = 9! / (3!6!)
C(9, 3) = 84

For women:
C(10, 5) = 10! / (5!(10-5)!)
C(10, 5) = 10! / (5!5!)
C(10, 5) = 252

To find the total number of ways to choose the subcommittee, you will multiply the number of ways to choose the men by the number of ways to choose the women:

Total ways = 84 (ways to choose men) x 252 (ways to choose women)
Total ways = 21,168

So, there are 21,168 ways to form a subcommittee of 3 men and 5 women from the given committee.

learn more about combination formulas here: brainly.com/question/22163039

#SPJ11

Answer:

x = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

1.25(4x - 10) = 7.5

~Use the distributive property

5x - 12.5 = 7.5

~Add 12.5 to both sides

5x = 30

~Divide 5 to both sides

x = 6

Best of Luck!

Answer:

two imaginary numbers

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Edge 2021

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

i jut got it right

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

The major shortcoming of the general linear probability model y = β0 + β1x1 + β2x2 + … + βkxk + ε, is that the predicted values of y can be sometimes greater than 1 or less than 0.

The linear probability model does not take into account the fact that probabilities are bounded between 0 and 1. As a result, the predicted values of y can sometimes fall outside of this range, which is not meaningful or interpretable in terms of probability. To address this issue, alternative models such as logistic regression or probit regression can be used, which are specifically designed to model probabilities and ensure that predicted values fall within the appropriate range. These models use non-linear functions to map the values of the independent variables to probabilities, thereby avoiding the problem of predicted values falling outside the valid range.

Therefore,the major shortcoming of the general linear probability model y = β0 + β1x1 + β2x2 + … + βkxk + ε, is that the predicted values of y can be sometimes greater than 1 or less than 0.

Know more about linear probability here,

https://brainly.com/question/30890632

#SPJ11

According to the Ricardian model, the difference in technology among nations causes output per worker in each country to differ.

The model is limited in several ways: 1. Having only 1 factor of production is way too simplistic a view of manufacturing. 2. In real world, almost no country produces only the goods in which they have a comparative advantage.

The Ricardian model assumes that labour is the only factor of production. Under this assumption, the only possible source of comparative advantage is differences between countries in labour productivity.

An important criticism leveled against Ricardian theory of rent concerns the relation between rent and price. According to Ricardo, price determines rent. The higher the price of corn, the higher will be the rent. The price of corn is determined by the cost of producing corn on the marginal land which is rent-free.

Therefore,

According to the Ricardian model, the difference in technology among nations causes output per worker in each country to differ.

To learn more about Ricardian trade visit :

brainly.com/question/15352601

#SPJ4

well, since the y-intercept is at -5, or namely when the line hits the y-axis is at -5, that's when x = 0, so the point is really (0 , -5), and we also know another point on the line, that is (-1 ,6), to get the equation of any straight line, we simply need two points off of it, so let's use those two

\(\stackrel{y-intercept}{(\stackrel{x_1}{0}~,~\stackrel{y_1}{-5})}\qquad (\stackrel{x_2}{-1}~,~\stackrel{y_2}{6}) \\\\\\ \stackrel{slope}{m}\implies \cfrac{\stackrel{rise} {\stackrel{y_2}{6}-\stackrel{y1}{(-5)}}}{\underset{run} {\underset{x_2}{-1}-\underset{x_1}{0}}} \implies \cfrac{6 +5}{-1} \implies \cfrac{ 11 }{ -1 } \implies - 11\)

\(\begin{array}{|c|ll} \cline{1-1} \textit{point-slope form}\\ \cline{1-1} \\ y-y_1=m(x-x_1) \\\\ \cline{1-1} \end{array}\implies y-\stackrel{y_1}{(-5)}=\stackrel{m}{- 11}(x-\stackrel{x_1}{0}) \implies y +5 = - 11 ( x -0) \\\\\\ y+5=-11x\implies {\Large \begin{array}{llll} y=-11x-5 \end{array}}\)

Answer:

Your answer would be 7,600.

Step-by-step explanation:

7,605 rounded to the nearest hundred would be 7,600 because:

The 7 is the thousands.

The 6 is the hundreds.

The 0 is the tens

The 5 is the ones.

So, we need to find which number makes sense to round. Is 605 closer to 600 or 700? 600. So, we have: 7,600

May I have Brainliest please? My next rank will be the highest one: A GENIUS! Please help me on this journey to become top of the ranks! I would really appreciate it, and it would make my day! Thank you so much, and have a wonderful rest of your day!

we cannοt determine the exact number οf zοmbies remaining after a given amοunt οf time.

The expοnential is an example οf a mathematical functiοn that is useful in determining if sοmething is increasing οr decreasing expοnentially is the expοnential functiοn. As implied by its name, an expοnential functiοn uses expοnents.

But take nοte that an expοnential functiοn dοes nοt have a variable as its expοnent and a cοnstant as its base (if a functiοn has a variable as the base and a cοnstant as the expοnent then it is a pοwer functiοn but nοt an expοnential functiοn).

Let's assume that the initial zοmbie pοpulatiοn is denοted by Z, and the rate οf decay is 25% per hοur. This means that the remaining zοmbie pοpulatiοn after t hοurs can be mοdeled by the equatiοn:

Z(t) = Z(0) * \((0.75)^t\)

Fοr t = 5:

Z(5) = Z(0) * (0.75)⁵

Fοr t = 10:

Z(10) = Z(0) * (0.75)¹⁰

Fοr t = 15:

Z(15) = Z(0) * (0.75)¹⁵

Fοr t = 20:

Z(20) = Z(0) * (0.75)⁻²⁰

Hence, we cannοt determine the exact number οf zοmbies remaining after a given amοunt οf time.

Learn more about exponential, by the following link.

https://brainly.com/question/2456547

#SPJ1

The Earth is estimated to be around 4.54 billion years old, while the oldest known rocks found on Earth date back to about 4 billion years ago.

Determining the age of the Earth is a complex process that involves a variety of scientific disciplines. Geologists and other scientists have used a variety of methods to estimate the age of the planet, including radiometric dating, which involves measuring the decay of radioactive isotopes in rocks and other materials.

The age of the oldest known rocks found on Earth has also been determined using radiometric dating techniques. These rocks, which are primarily found in Western Greenland, have been dated to around 3.8 to 4.0 billion years old. The rocks are believed to have formed during the Hadean Eon, a period of Earth's history when the planet was still in its early stages of formation and was subject to intense meteorite bombardment.

It's important to note that the age of the Earth and the age of the oldest known rocks found on its surface are not precise measurements.

To know more about age here

https://brainly.com/question/16413425

#SPJ4

Answer:

x = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Perimeter of the rectangle = 34 ft

Length of the rectangle = 3(x-2) ft

Width of the rectangle = 4x-7+(-2x) ft

= 4x - 7 - 2x

= 2x - 7 ft

Perimeter of a rectangle = 2(length + width)

34 = 2{3(x-2) + 2x - 7 }

34 = 2{3x - 6 + (2x - 7)}

34 = 2(3x - 6 + 2x - 7)

34 = 2(5x - 13)

34 = 10x - 26

34 + 26 = 10x

60 = 10x

x = 60/10

x = 6

Length of the rectangle = 3(x-2) ft

= 3(6 - 2)

= 3(4)

= 12 ft

Width of the rectangle = 2x - 7 ft

= 2(6) - 7

= 12 - 7

= 5 ft

*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆

Answer: Multiplying by 1.23123

Explanation: Slide the decimal points over by 2 points

I hope this helped!

<!> Brainliest is appreciated! <!>

- Zack Slocum

*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆

Multiplying by 1.23123 number is equivalent to finding 123.123%.

In mathematics, multiplication is a method of finding the product of two or more numbers. It is one of the basic arithmetic operations, that we use in everyday life.

here, we have,

123.123%

now, we have,

Multiplying by 1.23123 number is equivalent to finding 123.123%.

To learn more on multiplication click:

brainly.com/question/5992872

#SPJ2

Answer:

true

Step-by-step explanation:

because x-2 is like f(x)

Using the Laplace transform lookup table, we can find that the Laplace transform of u(t-a) is e^-as/s. Therefore, the Laplace transform of u(t-2) is: f(s) = e^-2s/s

To calculate the Laplace transform f(s) of a function f(t), we can use the Laplace transform lookup tables and the known properties of the Laplace transform.

Here are the Laplace transform lookup tables for some common functions:

Function f(t)          |   Laplace Transform f(s)
------------------------------------------------------
1                           |   1/s
t^n                       |   n!/s^(n+1)
e^-at                     |   1/(s+a)
sin(at)                  |   a/(s^2+a^2)
cos(at)                  |   s/(s^2+a^2)
u(t-a)                  |   e^-as/s

Now let's use these lookup tables and the properties of the Laplace transform to calculate the Laplace transform f(s) of some sample functions:

Example 1: f(t) = 3t^2

Using the Laplace transform lookup table, we can find that the Laplace transform of t^n is n!/s^(n+1). Therefore, the Laplace transform of 3t^2 is:

f(s) = 3/s^3

Example 2: f(t) = e^-4t

Using the Laplace transform lookup table, we can find that the Laplace transform of e^-at is 1/(s+a). Therefore, the Laplace transform of e^-4t is:

f(s) = 1/(s+4)

Example 3: f(t) = 2sin(3t)

Using the Laplace transform lookup table, we can find that the Laplace transform of sin(at) is a/(s^2+a^2). Therefore, the Laplace transform of 2sin(3t) is:

f(s) = 6/(s^2+9)

Example 4: f(t) = u(t-2)

Using the Laplace transform lookup table, we can find that the Laplace transform of u(t-a) is e^-as/s. Therefore, the Laplace transform of u(t-2) is:

f(s) = e^-2s/s

To know more about Laplace visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/14487937

#SPJ11

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

88+23x=180

23x=180-88

23x=92

x=92/23

x=4

Hope this helped!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

\(\sf 90+15x+8x-2=180\)

\(\sf 90+23x-2=180\)

\(\sf 23x+90-2=180\)

\(\sf 23x+88=180\)

\(\sf 23x+88-88=180-88\)

\(\sf 23x=92\)

\(\sf \cfrac{23x}{23}=\cfrac{92}{23}\)

\(\sf x=4\)

Answer:

angle B is 38 degree

Step-by-step explanation:

In triangle ADC,

finding angle C

angle A + angle C = 110 degree (sum of two interior opposite angles are equal to the exterior angle formed)

46 + angle C = 110

angle C = 110 - 46

angle C = 64 degree

In triangle ABC

finding angle B

angle A + angle B + angle C = 180 degree (sum of interior angles of a triangle)

78 + angle B + 64 = 180

142 + angle B = 180

angle B = 180 - 142

angle B = 38 degree

Therefore , the solution of the given problem of coordinates comes out to be  there are about 6.4 units separating the two places.

A reference frame can precisely locate coordinates and other arithmetic objects on such a region, including Euclidean space, by using one or more elements or coordinates. A point or item within a double plane can be located using coordinates, which appear to be pairs of integers. Even on a two-dimensional surface, a point's location is indicated by the y and x vectors. a collection of images used to identify specific locations.

Here,

The following formula can be used to calculate the separation between two points:

=> d = √[(x2 - x1)² + (y2 - y1)²]

where (-1, 2) for (x1, Y1) and (x2, Y2) respectively (4, 6)

=>d = √[(4 - (-1))² + (6 - 2)²]

=> √[5^2 + 4^2]

=>√41

=> 6.4 (rounded to the closest tenth)

As a result, there are about 6.4 units separating the two places.

To know more about coordinates visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27749090

#SPJ1

Let's say we have a graph with four nodes: A, B, C, and D. The edges and their lengths are as follows:
- A to B: 3
- A to C: 1
- B to D: 2
- C to D: -5

Using this we can show that the Dijkstra's algorithm fails if negative edge lengths are allowed

If we use Dijkstra's algorithm to find the shortest path from A to D, we would start at A and initially assign a distance of 0 to it. We would then look at its neighbors, B and C, and update their distances accordingly (3 for B and 1 for C). We would then choose C as the next node to visit since it has the shortest distance so far. However, when we update the distance to D through C, we would get a distance of -4 (since -5 + 1 = -4).

This negative distance causes a problem because Dijkstra's algorithm assumes that all edge weights are non-negative. When we update the distance to D through C, it becomes shorter than the distance we assigned to it when we initially looked at it through B. This means that we would have to revisit D and potentially update its distance again, leading to an infinite loop.

Therefore, Dijkstra's algorithm fails if negative edge lengths are allowed.

To learn more about Dijkstra's algorithm visit : https://brainly.com/question/31309462

#SPJ11

Answer:

Tammy must run 5.5 miles more this week to reach her goal

Step-by-step explanation:

10 miles - 4.5 mies = 5.5 miles