Answer:C, Thales
Explanation:
Think about the three diagrams you just learned about for visualizing cause-and-effect relationships. Which type of diagram most closely resembles how events unfold in reality? Why? Why might historians choose to use another diagram instead?
The three diagrams commonly used for visualizing cause-and-effect relationships are the linear diagram, the systemic diagram, and the circular diagram. Among these diagrams, the systemic diagram most closely resembles how events unfold in reality.
The systemic diagram represents cause-and-effect relationships as a complex network or system of interconnected factors. It recognizes that events and outcomes are influenced by multiple variables that interact with each other in intricate ways. This diagram acknowledges the interdependence and interconnectedness of various factors in a system, reflecting the complexity of real-life cause-and-effect relationships. Historians might choose to use another diagram instead of the systemic diagram for several reasons:
1. Simplification: The systemic diagram can be complex and may not be suitable for all situations. Historians might choose to simplify cause-and-effect relationships by using a linear diagram, which represents events as a straightforward sequence. This simplification can make the relationships easier to understand and communicate.
2. Clarity: In certain cases, historians might opt for a diagram that provides clarity by highlighting the most significant cause-and-effect relationships. They may choose a circular diagram, which emphasizes recurring or cyclical patterns, particularly when studying historical events with repetitive or cyclical characteristics.
3. Specific Focus: Depending on the research question or the aspect of history being examined, historians may find that another diagram, such as a linear or circular diagram, better aligns with their specific focus. Different diagrams can offer different perspectives and insights into cause-and-effect relationships, allowing historians to emphasize particular aspects of the historical narrative.
Ultimately, the choice of diagram depends on the historian's objectives, the complexity of the historical events being studied, and the need for clarity and simplification. Different diagrams offer different visual representations and can help historians convey their analysis and interpretations of cause-and-effect relationships in history effectively.
To know more visualizing cause-and-effect relationships. ,click
brainly.com/question/32152193
Using the content of the course and the websites above, create a map of the Ottoman Empire at its height or its greatest geographic extent. Your map must include:
-A title and dates (years at which the empire was at its greatest geographic extent)
-A clear outline of the full extent of the empire at this time
-At least three key cities (must include Constantinople/Istanbul)
-At least three major oceans or seas
-At least three key locations where conflicts happened
-At least three mosques not located in Istanbul
-At least three regions of trade controlled by the Ottomans
The Ottoman Empire at its height or its greatest geographic extent: Map of the Ottoman EmpireTitle: The Ottoman Empire at its greatest extent from 1481 to 1683Outline: The full extent of the empire covered a vast area of southeastern Europe, Western Asia, and North Africa.
The empire's borders stretched from the Danube River basin to North Africa and from Hungary to Iraq. Key Cities: Constantinople (present-day Istanbul), Cairo, JerusalemKey Seas/Oceans:
Mediterranean Sea, Black Sea, Red SeaKey locations where conflicts happened: The Great Siege of Malta, The Battle of Mohács, The Siege of ViennaKey Mosques not located in Istanbul: Suleymaniye Mosque (Edirne), Selimiye Mosque (Edirne), Murat II Mosque (Edirne)Regions of trade controlled by the Ottomans: The Silk Road, The Spice Trade, The Slave Trade
For more questions on: Ottoman Empire
https://brainly.com/question/886144
#SPJ8
multicolor cumanashshcz
Alexander Hamilton's treasury plan proposed to repay Receipts of Congress
at what ratio?
O 200% of the original value
O 150% of the original value
O 75% of the original value
O Face value
Alexander Hamilton's treasury plan proposed to repay the Receipts of Congress at face value.
Alexander Hamilton's treasury plan, put forth during his tenure as the first Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, proposed to repay the Receipts of Congress at their face value. These Receipts, also known as government bonds, were issued by the Congress to raise funds for the young nation. Hamilton recognized the importance of honoring these obligations to maintain the credibility and financial stability of the federal government. By repaying the Receipts at face value, Hamilton aimed to instill confidence in investors and establish a solid foundation for the country's financial system. This approach helped establish the principle of honoring government debts, laying the groundwork for a strong economic future for the United States.In conclusion, Alexander Hamilton's treasury plan advocated for repaying the Receipts of Congress at their face value, highlighting his commitment to maintaining the financial integrity and credibility of the United States government.
For more questions on Alexander Hamilton:
https://brainly.com/question/24714949
#SPJ8
Black Codes were laws passed by the South during Presidential Reconstruction placed many restrictions and controls – as well as bestowing certain rights – on the freedmen, which helped sour many in the North on Presidential Reconstruction and caused them to look to Congress for guidance in reconstructing the South, especially the Radical Republicans?
True
False
True
The black codes restricted the rights of black Americans. Many Northerners disapproved of the laws because they were used to maintain segregation and cheap labor. Congress did several things in reaction to the black codes such as passing the freedman's bureau and the civil rights act.
Why were permanent settlements more advanced than hunter-gathers societies?
Hello there! & welcome to Brainly!
Permanent settlements were typically more advanced than hunter-gatherer societies, as they had a number of points that allowed them to become more advanced.
1) Semi-Permanent food source: Most Permanent settlements relied mostly on domesticated animals and farming, while hunter-gatherers typically followed the animal herds as they migrated. Having a permanent food and water source allows the group to focus more of their time and efforts to making life easier instead of just "surviving".
2) Farmable Lands: To be able to have a permanent food source for the years to come, the land surrounding the city must be fertile (rich in nutrients), and there must either be a seasonal rain (typically the fall rains, which would help with growing, and the spring rains, which happen around harvesting), or a water source (generally a river, sometimes a sea, lake, or mountain springs).
3) Defensible position: Something that is overlooked in many cases. A settlement must be defendable against any aggression that may come. This typically included being built upon a hill, surrounded by the fields, or even built into clefts of rocks, or in a isolated piece of land.
With a ample and steady food supply, people are able to put their efforts that was previously in finding food, to making their lively-hoods easier. This included experimenting and creating new tools that may help in farming, as well as construction plans that gave a sense of "civilization". They also worked on creating a language that could be shared by their neighbors, as well as a cuneiform that not only helps in creating the language, but also in collecting and storing data, stories, history, and other important things.
~
The change from hunter-gatherer societies to permanent settlements allowed people to have the time and energy to create new technology and propel humanity forward technologically.
Answer:
B) Hunter-gatherers did not trade with people in settlements
Explanation:
sampung pagpapaunlad ng komunikasyon sa pamilya at lipunin
Answer:
Explanation:
s sass
Who is the best man in the world?
Explanation:
It's None other then your Dad....
Prophet Muhammad is the best man
Help please I need your music skills
They did not have music so I put history
( Backround check: I am a cellist who has been playing the cello for 5 years and have won 2 state awards )
Ok if you have any more problems please let me know I know it is a bit messy I would have used m ipad but because it was dead I had to do it on my chromebook. Please use the think on the bottom as a refrenece.
What were the motives that drove the United
States' desire to acquire foreign territories?
-cheap land overseas and greed
-fulfillment of Manifest Destiny and desire for raw materials
-need to generate tax revenue and poor leadership of foreign dictators
- overwhelming land choices for acquisition in the United States and strong
leadership
Answer:
cheap land overseas and greed
Explanation:
Which issues most concerned American voters during the 2008 presidential
campaign?
1) The war in Iraq and the failing U.S. economy.
2) The advanced age of one of the candidates and energy policy.
3) illegal immigration and problems with the economy.
4) the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and health care.
The issues that most concerned American voters during the 2008 presidential campaign were:
1) The war in Iraq and the failing U.S. economy.
4) The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and health care.
It can be further explained as:
These two issues were at the forefront of the campaign, with voters expressing deep concerns about the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and the economic downturn that was impacting their lives. Healthcare also emerged as a significant concern, as many Americans were struggling with access to affordable and quality healthcare services. While other issues such as energy policy, illegal immigration, and the advanced age of one candidate also garnered attention, the war in Iraq, the failing economy, wars in Afghanistan, and health care were the primary concerns for voters during the 2008 presidential campaign.Overall, the issues that most concerned American voters during the 2008 presidential campaign centered around the war in Iraq, the failing U.S. economy, wars in Afghanistan, and the need for comprehensive healthcare reform.
For more questions on 2008 presidential campaign:
https://brainly.com/question/543838
#SPJ8
Discuss the differences between the art/architecture of Christianity and the art/architecture of Islam. Explain the theological and historical reasons for the differences.
Answer:
The art and architecture of Christianity and Islam have significant differences that reflect the theological and historical contexts of these two religions.
Christian art and architecture are primarily characterized by their emphasis on the human form and the depiction of religious narratives. Christian art has a long tradition of depicting religious stories through painting, sculpture, and stained glass windows. Christian architecture, particularly in the Gothic style, is characterized by its use of pointed arches, ribbed vaults, and flying buttresses.
In contrast, Islamic art and architecture are marked by their focus on geometric patterns and calligraphy rather than human figures. Islamic art is traditionally non-representational, with the use of calligraphy and geometric patterns used to convey religious messages. Islamic architecture is characterized by the use of domes, arches, and intricate tilework.
The theological and historical reasons for these differences are rooted in the beliefs and practices of these two religions. Christianity has a strong emphasis on the incarnation of God in human form, which is reflected in the use of human figures in Christian art. In contrast, Islam has a strict prohibition against the depiction of human figures, as they are seen as a form of idolatry that detracts from the worship of God alone.
Additionally, the historical contexts of these two religions have also influenced their art and architecture. The rise of Christianity in Europe coincided with the development of Gothic architecture, which was influenced by the Romanesque style and the Islamic architecture of Spain. On the other hand, Islamic art and architecture developed in the context of the Islamic Golden Age, which saw the development of a rich tradition of calligraphy, geometric patterns, and tilework.
In conclusion, the differences between the art and architecture of Christianity and Islam reflect the unique theological and historical contexts of these two religions. While both traditions have their own distinct styles and forms of expression, they both serve as important expressions of the religious beliefs and practices of their respective communities.
What term defines when a countries power is divided between the national and state/providential level?
a. Federalism
b. Nationalism
c. Sectionalism
d. Dictatorship
Answer:
A. Federalism
Explanation:
Federal power is that of a state/ province/ prefecture's governance among their population in that specific area and is overviewed by the national government.
compare and contrast the league of nations with its successor the united nations in terms of its goals structure and effectiveness response in 400-500 words
The United Nations has built upon the experiences and lessons learned from the League of Nations, adapting to the evolving global landscape and striving to fulfill its founding principles.
The League of Nations and its successor, the United Nations (UN), have similarities and differences in terms of their goals, structure, and effectiveness.Both organizations aimed to promote international peace and security, prevent future wars, and foster cooperation among nations. They sought to resolve conflicts through diplomacy and collective security mechanisms. However, there are notable differences in their structures. The League of Nations had a simpler structure with an Assembly and Council, while the UN has a more complex system with the General Assembly, Security Council, and specialized agencies.In terms of effectiveness, the League of Nations faced challenges and limitations, particularly due to the absence of major powers like the United States. It struggled to enforce decisions and prevent major conflicts, such as the outbreak of World War II. In contrast, the United Nations, with its wider membership and stronger support, has been more effective in maintaining global peace, promoting human rights, and providing platforms for international cooperation.Additionally, the UN has expanded its scope beyond peacekeeping to include economic development, environmental protection, and social progress. It has played a crucial role in addressing global challenges, such as poverty, climate change, and health crises. However, both organizations have faced criticism and limitations in achieving their goals, reflecting the complex nature of international relations and the diverse interests of member states.Overall, the United Nations has built upon the experiences and lessons learned from the League of Nations, adapting to the evolving global landscape and striving to fulfill its founding principles.For more questions on landscape
https://brainly.com/question/13996889
#SPJ8
Which statements describe characteristics of an introduction? Select the two correct answers.
point)
It discusses plot events.
It shows us the setting.
It is where characters are developed.
It develops the main conflict.
It reveals the narrator and characters.
Characteristics of an introduction can be described by:
It shows us the setting.
It reveals the narrator and characters.
Thus, options B and E are correct.
What is a introduction?An introduction to a review of the literature could include the following: A brief explanation of the subject being discussed, which could be a description or arguing thesis or recommendation, as well as the breadth of the literature review being examined.
A strong beginning should state the subject, give the necessary background information, and establish the article's specific focus. Also, it must pique the curiosity of your audience.
Characterization seems to be the method a writer uses to convey a character's personality. Both direct and indirect characterizations can disclose a subject's traits. Direct Characterization describes the characteristics of the individual to the viewer.
Therefore, option B and E is the correct option.
Learn more about the introduction, here:
https://brainly.com/question/18119893
#SPJ2
REALLY NEED HELP, this is a history assignment ment
Answer:
solve
Explanation:
lol u already need a source and evidence for it
Why was the Whig Party created?
What did King George iii think about the preambles (ideas about government)
Help me ASAP pleaseeeeeee
Answer:
b.
Explanation:
I am not sure though soo yea
What is the main difference between? goebbels 1943 speech and hitohiyos speech
Twain starts his adult life as a riverboat captain. True or fales
Answer:
Explanation:
fales,
He worked on boats, but began his career as a journalist and writer.
Answer:
Mark Twain worked on a riverboat. TRUE
Explanation:
have a nice day.
based on the information in the timeline, which causal explanation for U.S. involvement in the Wll is most likely accurate?
Explanation:
WAS THIS Answer HELPFUL
MARK ME AS A BRAINLIEST
Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
Power, right to rule
Saladin
policy
excommunicate
clergy
Pope Innocenti III
authority
King Henry IV
heretics
Palestine
convenis
Saint Peter
King Richard I
Crusade
Answer:
Policy or power, right to rule.
Explanation:
plz mark me brainliest
Drag the correct labels to the box. Not all labels will be used.
Identify the statements that correctly describe the story of the ancient Hebrews.
The people first had a polytheistic religion that involved worshiping many gods.
The promises that God made to Abraham would happen only if Abraham obeyed God.
Abraham was chosen by a prophet to be the next leader of the people,
God referred to Abraham as Israel, which is how they got the name Israelites.
The story of the ancient Hebrews is found in the Hebrew Bible.
Twelve Israelite tribes formed the kingdom of Israel in the land of Canaan.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The statements that correctly describe the story of the ancient Hebrews are the following.
A) The people first had a polytheistic religion that involved worshiping many gods.
B) The promises that God made to Abraham would happen only if Abraham obeyed God.
E) The story of the ancient Hebrews is found in the Hebrew Bible.
F) Twelve Israelite tribes formed the kingdom of Israel in the land of Canaan.
The story of the Hebrew people is so interesting. It can be found in the Torah and can be read in the first five books of the Bible, in the Old Testament. Hebrews considered that they are the people of God and that Yahweh asked them to find the promised land. These first books are the Genesis, the Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. Abraham was its patriarch. He born in Ur, Sumeria, and receive God's message to stop being polytheistic and only honor the one God. Then he led the migration to Cannan. Abraham had two sons; Isaac and Ishmael. Jacob was the son of Isaac and he had 12 sons who formed the 12 Tribes of Israel.
Answer:
A) B) E) F)
Explanation:
Joe McCarthy's downfall began
when he falsely accused what
branch of the United States
military of communist activity?
A. Marines
C. Air Force
B. Army
D. Navy
Joe McCarthy's downfall began when he falsely accused the United States Army of communist activity. His tactics and accusations during the Army-McCarthy hearings were widely criticized, and his popularity declined as a result. The hearings ultimately led to McCarthy's censure by the Senate and marked the beginning of the end of his political career.
Joe McCarthy's downfall began when he falsely accused the United States Army of communist activity. In 1953, McCarthy began investigating alleged communist infiltration of the Army, claiming that the Army was harboring known communists and blocking his efforts to root out communist sympathizers. He held a series of public hearings known as the Army-McCarthy hearings, during which he made a number of false and unsubstantiated accusations against Army officials.
The Army-McCarthy hearings were highly publicized and attracted widespread attention, with millions of Americans tuning in to watch the proceedings on television. However, McCarthy's tactics and accusations were widely criticized, and his popularity began to decline. The Army fought back against McCarthy's accusations, presenting evidence that discredited many of his claims.
Ultimately, the Army-McCarthy hearings were a turning point in McCarthy's career. While he had previously been seen as a powerful and influential figure, his tactics and accusations during the hearings were widely condemned. McCarthy's downfall was cemented when the Senate voted to censure him in 1954, citing his abusive behavior and misuse of power.
for more such questions on United States
https://brainly.com/question/25899399
#SPJ11
What does the statement "extinction and speciation are both parts of evolution" mean?
The statement means that extinction and speciation, the processes of species dying out and new species emerging, contribute to the overall process of evolution.
The statement "extinction and speciation are both parts of evolution" reflects the interconnected nature of these processes within the broader framework of evolutionary biology.
Evolution is the change in the inherited characteristics of a population over successive generations, and it occurs through mechanisms such as natural selection, genetic variation, and reproductive isolation.
Extinction refers to the complete disappearance of a species from the Earth. It can occur due to various factors, including environmental changes, competition, predation, or human activities. When a species becomes extinct, it represents the loss of a distinct lineage and a reduction in overall biodiversity.On the other hand, speciation is the process by which new species arise. It occurs when populations of the same species become reproductively isolated from one another, leading to genetic divergence over time. Speciation can happen through various mechanisms, including geographic isolation, genetic drift, and natural selection.Both extinction and speciation are integral components of evolution.Extinction represents the removal of certain genetic lineages from the evolutionary pool, while speciation contributes to the generation of new genetic diversity and the branching out of distinct lineages. Together, these processes shape the diversity of life on Earth and the ongoing changes within biological populations.
For more questions on extinction
https://brainly.com/question/31920386
#SPJ8
Read the passage and examine the painting.
In 1756, George Washington visited New York City for
the first time. He was traveling to Boston to meet with
Britain's military commander. At the time of his visit,
Washington was well known for his accomplishments as
leader of the Virginia militia. New York's high-society
crowd welcomed Washington as royalty and showered
him with attention.
Mark this and return
Which statement best shows how the passage and the
painting use an archetype to express a theme?
O Both use the archetype of a warrior to show a theme
of achieving victory over one's enemies.
O Both use the archetype of a hero to show the theme
of achieving greatness while leading others.
O Both use the archetype of a mentor to show a theme
of sharing wisdom from experiences.
O Both use the archetype of a sidekick to show a theme
of friendship and solving problems together.
George Washington's term as president of the United States began on April 30, 1789, with his inauguration, and it concluded on March 4, 1797.
The District of Columbia, along the Potomac River, is designated as the permanent location of the nation's capital by President Washington, who also signs the legislation into law. A bill directing the federal government to take on the states' obligations from the Revolutionary War is signed into law by President Washington.
The first President of the United States, George Washington, took his oath of office on April 30, 1789, while seated on the balcony of Federal Hall on Wall Street in New York.
Learn more about George Washington here:
https://brainly.com/question/14598321
#SPJ1
Answer:
b
Explanation:
got it right on edge 23
Thomas Paine the author of Common Sense and American Crisis was very influential in the revolutionary efforts. true or false
I NEED THIS QUESTION FAST
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Thomas Paine was an English-born American political activist, philosopher, political theorist, and revolutionary. He authored Common Sense (1776) and The American Crisis (1776–1783), the two most influential pamphlets at the start of the American Revolution, and helped inspire the patriots in 1776 to declare independence from Great Britain
Answer:this answer is true
Explanation:
What did Chief Watie and Chief Ross disagree over regarding freedmen?
Otheir freedom from slavery
Otheir access to tribal lands
their ability to marry within the tribe
the use of black laborers
Chief Watie and Chief Ross had differing views on several issues regarding freedmen. One of the key areas of disagreement between the two chiefs was b)the freedmen's access to tribal lands.
Chief Watie, a prominent Cherokee leader and a slaveholder himself, believed that the freedmen should not be granted access to tribal lands and resources.
He argued that the land belonged to the Cherokee people and should be exclusively reserved for their use.
Chief Watie feared that if the freedmen were given access to tribal lands, it would dilute the rights and privileges of the Cherokee people.
On the other hand, Chief Ross, who was also a prominent Cherokee leader, held a more inclusive stance.
He believed that the freedmen, as former slaves of Cherokee citizens, should have the right to access tribal lands and resources.
Chief Ross recognized the contributions made by the freedmen to the Cherokee Nation and believed in providing them with equal opportunities within the tribe.
He argued that denying the freedmen access to tribal lands would perpetuate inequality and hinder the progress of the Cherokee Nation as a whole.
For more questions on freedmen
https://brainly.com/question/16816388
#SPJ8
The narrow isthmus of Panama had long excited dreams of an interoceanic canal. From 1881 to 1887, the French company that previously engineered the Suez Canal in Egypt, spent nearly $300 million and lost 20,000 Panamanian lives digging less than 1/3 of the Panama Canal. At the time Panama under the control of Colombia but the canal itself was owned by the French company developing it. The French company decided the task and risk was too high and decided to attempt to sell the unfinished Panama Canal. The French company originally asked $109 million for it. When no nation showed interest, the French company slowly lowered its price to $40 million.
Naval Admiral, Alfred Thayer Mahan, regarded a canal as crucial to the expansion of economic and naval power for the United States. The United States was interested in purchasing the canal at the cost of $40 million but knew that there would be additional costs to hold a canal in a territory that did not belong to the United States. The United States offered a rental fee of $250,000 per year to Colombia for usage in Panama. The Colombian senate rejected that offer and instead wanted $25 million in cash up front.
In response, the United States sent federal agents to Panama to stir up a revolution among the Panamanians against Colombia. Panama then rebelled for independence with United States military assistance. Colombian troops could not move through the dense overland jungle around Panama and found United States ships blocking the sea. Colombia was thwarted. Roosevelt was quick to recognize Panama as independent and receive its first ambassador to Washington D.C. Panama agreed to extend the canal zone in size and to accept $250,000 per year in rental for perpetual use. A similar deal to what the United States had attempted with Colombia, but actually better in terms of landmass.
In his annual address to Congress in 1904, Theodore Roosevelt set forth what came to be known as the Roosevelt Corollary. Whereas the Monroe Doctrine had closed the western hemisphere to European expansion and increased influence, the Roosevelt Corollary notified the world that the United States would now take the liberty of intervening in any international affairs in the western hemisphere preventatively. This meant that if the United States thought something might happen in the future, they would not take advance action as they saw fit. This made the United States the international police power of the western hemisphere.
1) Considering what we have learned in this module about the United States during the expansionist period, why might a nation like Colombia have asked such a high price to allow the United States to operate in their territory of Panama? Consider especially the experiences of Samoa and Hawaii.
Answer:
Colombia may have asked such a high price for the United States to operate in their territory of Panama because they had seen the way the United States had taken control of other territories, such as Samoa and Hawaii, through aggressive expansionist tactics. They may have wanted to protect their own sovereignty and interests by demanding a large sum of money in exchange for allowing the United States to operate in Panama. Additionally, they may have been aware of the strategic importance of the Panama Canal and wanted to ensure they were being compensated fairly for the potential economic and military benefits the United States would gain from its construction and operation.