6300 and 530. The value of 3

Based on the statistical analysis, there is not enough evidence to conclude that the water from the new source contains unsafe levels of copper at the 0.05 significance level.

Statistics is a branch of mathematics that deals with the collection, analysis, interpretation, presentation, and organization of data. It involves applying mathematical and statistical techniques to extract meaningful insights from data, and to make decisions and predictions based on this information. Statistics is used in a wide range of fields, including business, economics, social sciences, health sciences, engineering, and more. It helps researchers, analysts, and decision-makers to identify patterns, relationships, and trends in data, and to draw conclusions based on statistical evidence.

(a) To test whether the water from this source contains unsafe levels of copper, we need to perform a one-sample t-test with the null hypothesis that the mean copper content in the water is less than or equal to 1.3 mg/l and the alternative hypothesis that the mean copper content in the water is greater than 1.3 mg/l.

The test statistic is calculated as:

t = (x - μ) / (s / √n)

where x is the sample mean (1.36 mg/l), μ is the hypothesized population mean (1.3 mg/l), s is the sample standard deviation (0.18 mg/l), and n is the sample size (30).

Plugging in the values, we get:

t = (1.36 - 1.3) / (0.18 / √30) = 1.47

The degrees of freedom for this test is n - 1 = 29.

Using a t-table or calculator, we find the p-value associated with a t-statistic of 1.47 and 29 degrees of freedom to be approximately 0.076.

Since the p-value is greater than the significance level of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, there is not enough evidence at the 0.05 level to conclude that the water from this source contains unsafe levels of copper.

Conditions for Independence: It is assumed that the water samples are independent of each other. This is because the sample is randomly selected and the size is less than 10% of the population. Also, it is assumed that the copper content in one water sample does not affect the copper content in another water sample.

Conditions for Normality: It is assumed that the distribution of the copper content in the population is approximately normal. We can justify this assumption based on the central limit theorem, which states that the distribution of the sample mean approaches normality as the sample size increases. Since the sample size is 30, we can assume that the sample mean follows a normal distribution. We can also check the normality assumption by creating a histogram or a normal probability plot of the data.

Therefore, based on the statistical analysis, there is not enough evidence to conclude that the water from the new source contains unsafe levels of copper at the 0.05 significance level.

To know more about statistics visit :

https://brainly.com/question/15525560

#SPJ1

Answer:

  X ≈ 117.9°

Step-by-step explanation:

The law of cosines formula is given. Solving it for C, we find ...

 C = arccos((a^2 +b^2 -c^2)/(2ab))

where a and b are the sides adjacent to the angle of interest.

Here, we have ...

  X = arccos((50^2 +55^2 -90^2)/(2·50·55)) = arccos(-2575/5500)

  X ≈ 117.9°

Answer:

−2√85/85

Step-by-step explanation:

The required value of the cosθ is −2√85/85. Option D is correct.

Given that,
The value of cosθ given that (−2, 9) is a point on the terminal side of θ is to be determined.

These are the equation that contains trigonometric operators such as sin, cos.. etc.. In algebraic operations.

here,
horizontal run b = -2, vertical rise p = 9
Slant height,
h = √ -[2]² + [9]²
h = √4 + 81
h = √85
Now,
cosθ = b / h
cosθ = -2 / √85
cosθ = -2 √85/85

Thus, the required value of the cosθ is −2√85/85. Option D is correct.

Learn more about trigonometry equations here:

brainly.com/question/22624805

#SPJ2

Answer:288ft

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

17

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 17:850  

Step-by-step explanation:

A Ratio explains how two commodity or items are related and how much of one is contained in another. in the ratio 7 : 350, 7 is contained in 350 by 50 times, this is gotten by dividing 350 by 7 to get a reduced ratio of 1:50. :(Tip-Divide the first number by the second.)

we can not use synthetic division when you need to divide by a polynomial with higher degree that is greater than 1 or one that doesn't have a 1 as the leading coefficient.

Given:

Not using synthetic division:

If you need to divide by a polynomial with a higher degree or one that doesn't have a 1 as the leading coefficient.

Example:

= \(\frac{x^5+2x^4+5}{x^2+5}\)

Here the denominator has degree 2 so here we cannot use synthetic division.

= \(\frac{x^4+3x^3 + 7}{x^3+6}\)

Here the denominator has degree 3 so here we cannot use synthetic division.

Learn more about the synthetic division here:

https://brainly.com/question/28824872

#SPJ4

The given system of equations has no solution.

Given that a system of equations, 12x + 36y = −3 and −12x − 36y = 0, we need to solve it,

We know for a system of equations =

a₁x + b₁y = c₁ and a₂x + b₂y = c₂

If a₁ / a₂ = b₁ / b₂ = c₁ / c₂ then the system has infinite solutions.

If a₁ / a₂ = b₁ / b₂ ≠ c₁ / c₂ then the system has no solutions.

If a₁ / a₂ ≠ b₁ / b₂ then the system has a unique solution.

comparing the coefficients given,

-12/12 = -1

-36/36 = -1

-3/0 = -3

We get here the condition of a₁ / a₂ ≠ b₁ / b₂, which means that the system has no solution.

Hence the given system of equations has no solution.

Learn more about system of equations click;

https://brainly.com/question/12895249

#SPJ1

Answer:

volume of a cylindrical water tank = 70,650cm³

Step-by-step explanation:

volume of cylinder, V = πr²h

where π = 3.14

h = 100cm

r = ?

given is diameter = 30cm

r = d/2 = 30/2 = 15cm

substituting the values in the formula,

V = 3.14 * 15² * 100

= 3.14 * 225 * 100

= 70,650cm³                        

Answer:

How much space it would take up: 706.86 square centimeters of floor space and extend vertically to a height of 100 cm

Volume: 706,500 cm³

Step-by-step explanation:

How much space it would take up:

To determine the space occupied by a cylindrical water tank in a room, we need to consider its dimensions and the area it covers on the floor.

The diameter of the tank is given as 30 cm, which means the radius is half of that, 15 cm.

To calculate the space it occupies on the floor, we need to find the area of the circular base. The formula for the area of a circle is A = πr², where A is the area and r is the radius.

A = π(15 cm)²

A = π(225 cm²)

A ≈ 706.86 cm²

So, the circular base of the tank occupies approximately 706.86 square centimeters of floor space.

The height of the tank is given as 100 cm, which represents the vertical space it occupies in the room.

Therefore, the cylindrical water tank would take up 706.86 square centimeters of floor space and extend vertically to a height of 100 cm in the room.

Volume:

To calculate the volume of a cylindrical water tank, we can use the formula V = πr²h, where V is the volume, r is the radius, and h is the height.

First, we need to find the radius by dividing the diameter by 2:

Radius = 30 cm / 2 = 15 cm

Now we can calculate the volume:

V = π(15 cm)²(100 cm)

V = 3.14 * 225 cm² * 100 cm

V = 706,500 cm³

Therefore, the cylindrical water tank will occupy a volume of 706,500 cm³ or 706.5 liters.

\(\begin{array}{llll} \textit{Logarithm Cancellation Rules} \\\\ \stackrel{ \textit{we'll use this one} }{log_a a^x = x}\qquad \qquad a^{log_a (x)}=x \end{array} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \log_2\left( \cfrac{1}{16} \right)+4\implies \log_2\left( \cfrac{1}{2^4} \right)+4\implies \log_2(2^{-4})+4\implies -4+4\implies \text{\LARGE 0}\)

\(\rule{34em}{0.25pt}\\\\ \textit{exponential form of a logarithm} \\\\ \log_a(b)=y \qquad \implies \qquad a^y= b\qquad\qquad \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \log_2\left( \cfrac{1}{16} \right)=y\implies 2^y=\cfrac{1}{16}\implies 2^y=2^{-4}\implies y=-4\)

Any two sides of a triangle's length total must be longer than the third side's length then this set of side lengths will make a triangle.

The two smallest sides must be longer than the longest side in order for them to be able to angle up and form a triangle if the two are placed end to end.

It's simpler than it seems to determine whether a triangle has three side lengths. The Triangle Inequality Theorem, which asserts that the sum of a triangle's two side lengths is always greater than the third side, will suffice.

One will have a triangle if this holds true for each of the three possibilities of increased side lengths.

This theorem merely states that the third side of a triangle cannot be smaller than the total of the first two sides. You will have a valid triangle if this holds true for each of the three possible combinations.

To confirm that the triangle is feasible, one will need to go through each of these combinations one at a time.

To find similar questions related with 'triangle'

visit- https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ4

The normal distribution is N(151, 7), the z-score for verbal and quantitative reasoning are 1.29 and 0.52 respectively.

(a) The shorthand for the normal distribution of the Verbal Reasoning section is N(151, 7), where 151 is the mean score and 7 is the standard deviation. The shorthand for the normal distribution of the Quantitative Reasoning section is N(153, 7.67), where 153 is the mean score and 7.67 is the standard deviation.

(b) Sophia’s Z-score on the Verbal Reasoning section is (160-151)/7 = 1.29. Her Z-score on the Quantitative Reasoning section is (157-153)/7.67 = 0.52.

(c) The Z-scores represent how many standard deviations above or below the mean Sophia’s scores are. A Z-score of 1.29 on the Verbal Reasoning section means Sophia’s score is 1.29 standard deviations above the mean score of all test takers. A Z-score of 0.52 on the Quantitative Reasoning section means Sophia’s score is 0.52 standard deviations above the mean score of all test takers.

(d) Sophia did better on the Verbal Reasoning section because her Z-score is higher for that section.

(e) To find the percentile scores, we use the standard normal distribution table. Sophia’s percentile score on the Verbal Reasoning section is the percentage of test takers who scored lower than her. Using the Z-score of 1.29 and the table, we find that her percentile score is approximately 90.7%. Her percentile score on the Quantitative Reasoning section is the percentage of test takers who scored lower than her. Using the Z-score of 0.52 and the table, we find that her percentile score is approximately 69.4%.

(f) To find the percentage of test takers who did better than Sophia on each section, we can use the standard normal distribution table again. For the Verbal Reasoning section, we need to find the area to the right of Sophia’s Z-score of 1.29. Using the table, we find that this area is approximately 9.3%. Therefore, approximately 9.3% of test takers did better than Sophia on the Verbal Reasoning section. For the Quantitative Reasoning section, we need to find the area to the right of Sophia’s Z-score of 0.52. Using the table, we find that this area is approximately 30.4%. Therefore, approximately 30.4% of test takers did better than Sophia on the Quantitative Reasoning section.

Learn more on normal distribution here;

https://brainly.com/question/4079902

https://brainly.com/question/23418254

#SPJ1

Answer:

\(|\frac{x}{y} |\)

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the following expression: \(\sqrt\frac{x^3y^5}{xy^7}\), where x > 0 and y > 0.

We want to simplify it.

To do that, we can first simplify what is under the radical, then take the square root of what is left.

Recall that when simplifying exponents, we don't want any negative or non-integer radicals left.

To simplify what is under the radical, we can remember the rule where \(\frac{a^n}{a^m} = a^{n-m}\).

So, that means that \(\frac{x^3}{x} = x^2\) and \(\frac{y^5}{y^7} = y^{-2}\) .

Under the radical, we now have:

\(\sqrt{x^2y^{-2}}\)

Now, we take the square root of both exponents to get:

\(|xy^{-1}|\)

The reason why we need the absolute value signs is because we know that x > 0 and y > 0, but when we take the square root of of \(x^2\) and \(y^{-2}\) , the values of x and y can be either positive or negative, so by taking the absolute value, we ensure that the value is positive.

However, we aren't done yet; remember that we don't want any radicals to be negative, and the integer of y is negative.

Recall that if \(a^{-n}\), that is equal to \(\frac{1}{a^n}\).

So, by using that,

\(|x * \frac{1}{y} |\)

This can be simplified to:

\(|\frac{x}{y} |\)

Answer:

Y=-4x 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6.890625 Tons

Step-by-step explanation:

To get total in ounces: [(14,700 x 15) = 220,500 OZ].

To convert ounces to tons: [(220,500/32,000) = 6.890625 Tons]

so we get that

so $35 is the 50/3% of 210

In order to explain why -4 - 2 equals -8, let's start with the equation 0.2 = 0. By analyzing this equation, we can uncover the reason behind this seemingly counterintuitive result.

1. Begin with the equation 0.2 = 0.

2. Subtract 0.2 from both sides of the equation to isolate the variable: 0.2 - 0.2 = 0 - 0.2.

  This simplifies to 0 = -0.2.

3. Observe that the right side of the equation, -0.2, is a negative number.

4. Recall that subtracting a negative number is equivalent to adding its positive counterpart. Therefore, -0.2 is the same as +0.2.

5. Rewrite the equation as 0 = +0.2.

6. Notice that 0 on the left side of the equation is equal to 0 + 0, since any number added to zero remains unchanged.

7. Substitute 0 + 0 for 0 in the equation: 0 + 0 = +0.2.

8. Simplify the equation to 0 = +0.2.

9. Finally, recognize that a positive number cannot equal zero. Hence, the equation 0 = +0.2 is false.

10. As a result, the original equation 0.2 = 0 is invalid.

11. Therefore, the logical consequence is that any subsequent deductions based on this invalid equation would also be incorrect.

12. Consequently, -4 - 2 does not equal -8, as per the explanation derived from the flawed equation.

To summarize, by analyzing the equation 0.2 = 0, we can determine that subsequent deductions based on this equation are incorrect. Hence, -4 - 2 does not equal -8.

For more such questions on counterintuitive, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/17004386

#SPJ8

Answer:

20 percent

Step-by-step explanation:

\(\frac{400}{500}\)\(=0.8\)

\(1-0.8=0.2\)

This means that 20 percent off of 500 is 400.

Answer:

The answer should be 20%

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps

Based on the information we can infer that the equation shown in the image is 1.23 - 0.35 = 0.88 (option B).

To identify the correct equation we must look at the graph and identify the information it provides. In this case we have two squares divided into 100 squares each. Additionally, the square on the left has 88 squares painted in red and 12 squares with an X inside. In the case of the square on the right, it has 23 squares colored in red with an X inside.

In total we have 123 squares painted in red, which in decimal number is equivalent to 1.23. On the other hand, the number of squares painted red and with an X inside is 35, this value would be 0.35.

On the other hand, the squares painted only in red are 88, so the equivalent in decimal numbers would be 0.88. Therefore, the correct way to express this relationship through an equation would be:

Learn more about equations in: https://brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ1

Answer:

\(\displaystyle \cos(\alpha+\beta)=\frac{120+8\sqrt{161}}{255}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the conditions:

\(\displaystyle \sin(\alpha)=-\frac{8}{17}\text{ and } \cos(\beta)=-\frac{8}{15}\)

Where α is in QIII and β is in QII and we want to find the exact value of cos(α + β).

The first ratio gives us the opposite side and the hypotenuse with respect to α . Then the adjacent side is (we can ignore negatives):

\(a=\sqrt{(17)^2-(8)^2}=15\)

The second ratio gives us the adjacent side and the hypotenuse with respect to β. Then the opposite side is:

\(o=\sqrt{(15)^2-(8)^2}=\sqrt{161}\)

Therefore, for α, ignoring negatives, the adjacent side is 15, the opposite side is 8, and the hypotenuse is 17.

And for β, ignoring negatives, the adjacent side is 8, the opposite side is √(161), and the hypotenuse is 15.

We can rewrite our expression as:

\(\displaystyle \cos(\alpha+\beta)=\cos(\alpha)\cos(\beta)-\sin(\alpha)\sin(\beta)\)

Since α is in QIII, sin(α), cos(α) < 0, and tan(α) > 0.

And since β is in QII, cos(β), tan(β) < 0, and sin(β) > 0.

Using this information, substitute:

\(\displaystyle \cos(\alpha+\beta)=\left(-\frac{15}{17}\right)\left(-\frac{8}{15}\right)-\left(-\frac{8}{17}\right)\left(\frac{\sqrt{161}}{15}\right)\)

Therefore:

\(\displaystyle \cos(\alpha+\beta)=\frac{120+8\sqrt{161}}{255}\)

The odd one out in the set is "FOQZ." It deviates from the pattern  by the other sets, where the letters are arranged in Alphabetical order.

The set of letters "BCDEGPTV AJK FOQZ IY" seems to follow a specific pattern. If we examine the letters in each group, we can identify a difference that sets "FOQZ" apart from the others.

In the first group "BCDEGPTV," the letters are arranged in alphabetical order. Similarly, in the second group "AJK," the letters are also in alphabetical order. However, when we look at the third group "FOQZ," the letters do not follow alphabetical order.

Based on this pattern, we can conclude that the odd one out in the set is "FOQZ." It deviates from the pattern followed by the other sets, where the letters are arranged in alphabetical order.

It's worth noting that the pattern could be based on different criteria, such as the position of the letters in the alphabet or some other sequence. Without additional information or context, it is difficult to determine the exact pattern or reason for the deviation.

To know more about  Alphabetical order.

https://brainly.com/question/27870403

#SPJ11

The percentage by which the cost is increasing will be 75%.

The quantity of anything is stated as though it were a fraction of a hundred. A fraction of 100 can be used to express the ratio.

The percentage of the 8th graders who want to go to the water slides is found from;

In the year 2000, a house was valued at $60 000.

In 2010, the same house was valued at $80 000.

The percentage value is found as;

\(\% = \frac{60000}{80000} \times 100 \\\\ \% =75 \%\)

Hence the percentage by which the cost is increasing will be 75%.

To learn more about percentages, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/13450942

#SPJ1

Answer: 104

Step-by-step explanation:

100 x 1.01^4 = 104.060401

                    = 104 (rounded)

The average number of people attending local baseball games in 2022 when this trend continues is,

⇒ 146

Ratio or numbers which can be expressed as a fraction of 100 or a relative value indicating hundredth part of any quantity is called percentage.

Calculate the percent of a number , We can divide the number by whole number and multiply by 100.

Given that;

Here, For the last few years, Attendance for local baseball games is increasing by an average of 10% per year.

And, In 2018, the average attendance was 100 people.

Hence, After 4 years, Average number of people attending local baseball games in 2022 when this trend continues is,

⇒ 100 (1 + 0.1)⁴

⇒ 100 × ( 1.1 )⁴

⇒ 100 × 1.46

⇒ 146

Therefore, the average number of people attending local baseball games in 2022 when this trend continues, 146.

Learn more about the percent visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24877689

#SPJ2

To find the subtracted value, we need to calculate the multiplicative inverse of (4/3 - 4/9) and then subtract it from the sum of 7/12 and 7/8.

First, let's find the multiplicative inverse of (4/3 - 4/9):

Multiplicative inverse = 1 / (4/3 - 4/9)

To simplify the expression, we need a common denominator:

Multiplicative inverse = 1 / ((12/9) - (4/9))

= 1 / (8/9)

= 9/8

Now, we need to subtract the multiplicative inverse from the sum of 7/12 and 7/8:

Subtracted value = (7/12 + 7/8) - (9/8)

To perform this calculation, we need a common denominator:

Subtracted value = (7/12 * 2/2 + 7/8 * 3/3) - (9/8)

= (14/24 + 21/24) - (9/8)

= 35/24 - 9/8

To simplify further, we need a common denominator:

Subtracted value = (35/24 * 1/1) - (9/8 * 3/3)

= 35/24 - 27/24

= 8/24

= 1/3

Therefore, subtracting 1/3 from the sum of 7/12 and 7/8 will give you the multiplicative inverse of (4/3 - 4/9).

Answer:

214 seconds

Step-by-step explanation:

3 times 60 is 180. 180 plus 34 is 214.