5. What did women gain from working during the war?

Answer: The answer i have is C. I did a lot of researching on WW l in school.

Explanation:

Hope this help and plz help me get THE BRAINLIEST!!

It forced many artists to create propaganda in the service of totalitarian governments.

During and after World War I, flowery Victorian language was blown apart and replaced by more sinewy and R-rated prose styles. In visual art, Surrealists and Expressionists devised wobbly, chopped-up perspectives and nightmarish visions of fractured human bodies and splintered societies slouching toward moral chaos.

The Surrealist movement started in Europe in the 1920s, after World War I with its nucleus in Paris. Its roots were found in Dada, but it was less violent and more artistically based. Surrealism was first the work of poets and writers.

Learn more about Surrealism here https://brainly.com/question/10694036

#SPJ2

If I were supporting Indian removal before the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1830s, I would argue that it is necessary for the expansion and progress of the United States.

I would also promoting the concept of Manifest Destiny, and asserting that the Native American tribes were hindering the nation's development and impeding the settlers' right to utilize the land for economic and agricultural purposes. I would emphasize the cultural and technological differences between the Native Americans (including Indian for sure) and the American settlers, portraying removal as a means of safeguarding the tribes from inevitable conflicts and assimilation, while also emphasizing the government's responsibility to protect and provide for the tribes in their new designated territories.

Learn more about Supreme Court: https://brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ11

Answer:

Fiji's relationship with both the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC) is important for several reasons:

Economic benefits: Both the PRC and ROC are major economic powers, and having a relationship with both countries can help Fiji to increase its trade, investment, and tourism opportunities. This can lead to economic growth and job creation in Fiji.

Diplomatic leverage: Having a relationship with both the PRC and ROC allows Fiji to maintain diplomatic leverage and avoid taking sides in the ongoing political dispute between the two countries. This can help Fiji to maintain its neutrality and independence, and avoid being seen as aligned with any particular country or ideology.

Cultural exchange: Both China and Taiwan have rich cultural traditions and histories, and having a relationship with both countries can allow Fiji to benefit from cultural exchange and cooperation in areas such as education, language, and arts. This can help to promote mutual understanding and appreciation between Fiji and the two countries.

Regional stability: Fiji is an important player in the Pacific region, and having good relationships with both the PRC and ROC can help to promote regional stability and cooperation. This is particularly important given the strategic importance of the Pacific region and the increasing interest of major powers such as China in the region.

Overall, maintaining good relationships with both the PRC and ROC can bring a range of benefits to Fiji, including economic growth, diplomatic leverage, cultural exchange, and regional stability.

Explanation:

The classical-era orchestra is typically composed of four main sections: strings, woodwinds, brass, and percussion. Each section consists of various instruments that contribute to the overall sound and texture of the orchestra.

The string section forms the foundation of the classical-era orchestra and is the largest section. It includes instruments such as violins, violas, cellos, and double basses. These instruments provide richness, warmth, and melodic lines to the ensemble.

The woodwind section consists of instruments like flutes, oboes, clarinets, and bassoons. They add color, texture, and often play intricate melodic passages and solos.

The brass section includes trumpets, French horns, trombones, and tubas. Brass instruments provide power, resonance, and grandeur to the orchestra. They often play majestic fanfares and harmonies.

The percussion section includes various instruments like timpani, snare drums, cymbals, and bass drums. Percussion instruments provide rhythm, accents, and special effects to the orchestral sound.

In conclusion, the classical-era orchestra is composed of the strings, woodwinds, brass, and percussion sections. Each section contributes unique qualities to the overall sound, resulting in a rich and balanced ensemble.

The combination of these sections allows for a wide range of expressive possibilities and the performance of complex and dynamic classical compositions.

To know more about classical-era refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/33440618#

#SPJ11

Why did Rochambeau prefer to engage the British in Chesapeake Bay rather than New York City  Because there were more Patriot & French soldiers there.

Patriotism is defined as a love, devotion, and connectedness to one's country. This attachment can be a mixture of various feelings, language related directly to one's own homeland, such as ethnic, cultural, political as well as historical aspects.

Patriots were colonials who were tired of British rules & policies, especially since they had no say on how these laws were created or implemented. They sought independence from a tyrannical british crown, which was frequently led by Royal Rulers who suppressed any expression of rebellion.

To know more about patriot visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14855779

#SPJ1

In ancient Greek religion and mythology, the twelve Olympians are the major deities of the Greek pantheon, commonly considered to be Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, Demeter, Athena, Apollo, Artemis, Ares, Hephaestus, Aphrodite, Hermes, and either Hestia or Dionysus.

Explanation:

Answer:

The grasslands.

Explanation:

The area indicated is known as the grasslands because of its flat terrain and well grass.

Answer:  The village and crops were destroyed

Answer:

jsbdusushskebfbdjsjsb

Explanation:

nsjxndnzjs

Based on the text and the available options, the statement that best summarizes a central idea is "the harsh policies of the Treaty of Versailles and the toothless authority of the League of Nations contributed to future tragedy and conflict."

The article that this question referred to is titled "The Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations."

The text revealed that the League of Nations has no power to stop the like of Japan invasion of China, Soviet expansion, etc.

This situation would later lead to World War II.

Hence, in this case, the statement that best summarizes a central idea is in option D.

Learn more about World War here: https://brainly.com/question/1174232

Tennessee Valley Authority would considered by many to be the most controversial and radical, to the point of creeping socialism.

The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is a U.S. government organisation that was founded in 1933 with the goals of reducing flooding, enhancing navigation, raising farmer living standards, and generating electricity along the Tennessee River and its tributaries.

The Tennessee River had frequent, catastrophic flooding, and a chain of shoals at Muscle Shoals, Alabama, made it difficult to navigate the river's middle course. The functions of the different government agencies in the region were consolidated under the jurisdiction of the TVA in 1933 after a measure to that effect was passed by the U.S. Congress.

Know more about Tennessee Valley Authority here

https://brainly.com/question/11210847

#SPJ4

The question is incomplete but I have the entire one:

Which practice was more likely to be accepted after the scientific revolution than before?

A. Scientists deriving much of their knowledge from the Bible

B. Scientists claiming that the Earth was at the center of the solar

system

C. Scientists challenging traditional beliefs about the way the

universe works

D. Scientists attending universities controlled by the Catholic Church

Answer:

B). Scientists claiming that the Earth was at the center of the solar system.

What was revolutionary about the Scientific Revolution? How did the study of nature in the 16th century differ from the study of nature in the Middle Ages?

Disclaimer: I can only write with confidence about paradigm shifts between medieval and Renaissance alchemy.

Here's what Robert Boyle wrote in The Sceptical Chymist (1661):

And, to prevent mistakes, I must advertize you, that I now mean by elements, as those chymists that speak plainest do by their principles, certain primitive or simple, or perfectly unmingled bodies; which not being made of any other bodies, or of one another, are the ingredients of which all those called perfectly mixt bodies are immediately compounded, and into which they are ultimately resolved: now whether there be any such body to be constantly met with in all, and each, of those that are said to be elemented bodies, is the thing I now question.

[Note: I realize this is not from the 16th Century, but the 16th Century is just too soon if you want solid answers about the differences you are inquiring about.]

Bear with me here because this might get a bit out of hand.

In The Birth of the Clinic, Michel Foucault explains in great detail what he refers to as the "medical gaze" of the 19th Century. According to Foucault, the "medical gaze" was a state of mind in which physicians at the time were able to "gaze" upon any number of patients and read and interpret the various signs in order to determine the symptoms.

For example, let's say two patients have pneumonia, but one patient coughs violently whereas the other patient simply wheezes. Both possess the symptom of fluid in the lungs, but the signs are completely different.

For Foucault, the "medical gaze" represents a newfound perception of nature anticipating the advent of what we now call structural linguistics. In structural linguistics, language consists of two elements--the sign and the signified, where the sign is the symbol or word on the page and the signified is the meaning. According to Ferdinand de Saussure, the founder of structural linguistics, the sign is completely arbitrary: we agree to call red "red", but we could just as easily agree to call red "farfignuggen" and none would be the wiser.

So the signified is static, but the sign can be dynamic. This is the crux of the "medical gaze": regardless of how many different signs there are (coughing, wheezing, heaving breathing), the physician can still read and interpret those signs in order to determine the symptom (fluid in the lungs). The signs are dynamic, the symptom is static.

Now let's answer your question.

Up until Robert Boyle wrote The Sceptical Chymist, alchemists approached nature the same way physicians approached symptoms in the 19th Century.

During the Middle Ages, every aspect of nature--from wood to metal to the planets themselves--consisted of two opposing elements, Mercury and Sulphur. The problem is that the signs alchemists used to signify those elements changed as if based on the time of day. For one alchemist, Mercury was a woman bearing buckets of water from a well. For another, Mercury was a green lion. For others, Mercury was simply Quicksilver. The element remained the same (for the most part) all the way into the Renaissance, but the signs (woman with water, green lion, quicksilver, etc) changed constantly.

While the signs of symptoms changed based on patients' immune systems, the signs of Mercury changed based on which alchemist was writing about Mercury.

And while Foucault called attention to the "medical gaze" of the 19th Century, one could just as easily call attention to an "alchemist's gaze" of the Middle Ages and the Early Renaissance.

Robert Boyle changed all of that. He came out and he said, "Forget this fickleness! We need one sign and one sign only. And we need to agree! No more calling this element by ten different names. No more correspondence systems. We need to agree and we need to do it now."

Of course, I am paraphrasing in a rather silly way, but that's the gist of what he meant when he wrote the passage I quoted at the beginning. What eventually became a rising trend in medicine was an old trend in alchemy that needed to be quashed for completely different reasons.

So it's not a matter of how the 16th Century differed from the Middle Ages, but how the Late Renaissance called an end to the fickleness of the Natural Philosophy that preceded it.

When Jews in the United States played and excelled in sports during the last century, their motivation often was to break down barriers and stereotypes and prove that they were just as capable and talented as any other group of athletes.

Throughout the 20th century, Jewish athletes in the United States faced a range of discriminatory attitudes and barriers that prevented them from participating fully in sports. Many were excluded from elite athletic clubs and teams due to their religion, while others faced overt discrimination and prejudice from fans and opponents. In response, many Jewish athletes were motivated to prove themselves on the field, not only to show their abilities but also to challenge the stereotypes and prejudice that held them back. This drive to excel in sports became a source of pride and identity for many Jewish communities, and it helped to break down some of the barriers that had previously held them back.

Despite the challenges they faced, Jewish athletes in the United States achieved significant success and recognition in a range of sports. From baseball and boxing to basketball and track and field, Jewish athletes made their mark on the field and in popular culture. Notable examples include baseball legend Hank Greenberg, Olympic swimmer Mark Spitz, and basketball star Dolph Schayes, among many others. By excelling in sports, these athletes not only demonstrated their abilities but also helped to change attitudes and perceptions about Jews in the United States, paving the way for greater acceptance and inclusion in sports and other areas of society.

Know more about Jewish athletes:

https://brainly.com/question/15246407

#SPJ11

Subsistence farming is a farming that is done solely for personal consumption. The Bantu(African Group) were primarily engaged in subsistence farming.

What is Subsistence farming?

Subsistence farming is a type of farming in which nearly all of the crops or livestock raised are used to support the farmer and his or her family, leaving little, if any, surplus for sale or trade.

Despite self-sufficiency in subsistence farming, most subsistence farmers now engage in some form of trade. Although their cash trade is less than that of consumers in modern complex markets, they use these markets primarily to obtain goods rather than to generate income for food; these goods are typically not necessary for survival and may include sugar, iron roofing sheets, bicycles, used clothing, and so on.

The majority of subsistence farmers today work in developing countries.

To learn more on Subsistence farming from the link:

https://brainly.com/question/26473814

#SPJ4

Answer:

The french revolution

Explanation:

Reconstruction (1865–1877) was a period in which African-Americans, who had been enslaved before the Civil War, gained political power and held over 2,000 public offices in the South. This included positions in state and local governments as well as in Congress. This was a significant shift in politics, as African-Americans had been excluded from political participation for centuries.

However, this progress was not maintained, as white supremacist groups, such as the Ku Klux Klan, used violence and intimidation to regain control of Southern politics and suppress the political power of African-Americans. This led to the eventual disfranchisement of black voters and the withdrawal of African-Americans from politics.

Today, the legacy of this historical period continues to impact African-Americans holding public office, as they are underrepresented in elected positions at all levels of government. Despite some progress in recent years, African-Americans are still underrepresented in Congress, state legislatures, and local governments and face significant barriers to political participation and representation.

Learn more about Reconstruction Period here: brainly.com/question/19158215

#SPJ4

Answer:

Here's a paragraph if you think the American Revolution influenced the French Revolution

Explanation:

The American Revolution influenced the French Revolution. This was because the French faced similar problems as the Colonists during the war. One of these similar problems were the heavy taxes placed on the poor. King Louis XVI imposed taxes and used the tax money for his own spendings.   The American Revolution was against the actions of England's Monarchy, such as taxes and unfair laws. The victory of the American Revolution had a big influence on the French Revolution and the French fully believed that they could win as well.

Around 220 B.C., Qin Shi Huang, the first emperor of a united China under the Qin Dynasty, ordered the demolition of several walls and older defences between states.

To ward off invasions from some northern nomadic nations, the Great Wall of China was constructed as a military defence line. In addition to its security role, the wall served as a catalyst for economic growth, the exchange of cultures, and national integration on both sides of it.

By 121 BC, the Great Wall of the Han Dynasty had been mostly constructed. Its purposes were to defend against the Xiongnu (the Mongol Empire at the time), stabilise borders, and safeguard trade ties with nations in West Asia.

Learn more about china wall

https://brainly.com/question/8912561

#SPJ4

Disclaimer: This answer is in my own words, and it is also my own opinion. But I hope this helps you!

The Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 and the Gettysburg Address of 1863 didn't exactly change the purpose, or output of the American Civil War. It's known that the Emancipation Proclamation didn't truly free all slaves; rather, it freed those who weren't under Union control. The American Civil War rooted from slavery, and the status of African American citizens. As we've seen, despise his best efforts, Lincoln's speeches didn't change the fact that slavery was still happening. Therefore, this makes the speeches seem null and void - nothing more than empty gestures, and empty promises for a better future.

Again, this is my opinion, feel free to tweak this in any way you want.

During Reagan's presidency, a new disease called acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) affected over 100,000 people. It is considered one of the most catastrophic public health disasters in modern history. The Reagan administration's response to the epidemic was widely criticized.

Despite the fact that scientists had identified the virus that caused AIDS in 1983, the Reagan administration did not address the epidemic until years later. The President himself did not publicly acknowledge the crisis until 1987, and even then, he did not propose any major funding for AIDS research or prevention.

During Reagan's presidency, AIDS emerged as a major public health issue. His administration has been accused of not doing enough to combat the epidemic. Reagan did not make a public statement about AIDS until 1985, and it was not until 1987 that he proposed a $1 billion funding bill. Reagan's response to the AIDS epidemic was frequently criticized by AIDS activists, who felt that the government was not doing enough to address the crisis.

Additionally, his administration implemented discriminatory policies like mandatory HIV testing and restrictions on travel for people with HIV.

Here is the complete answer. During Reagan's presidency, a new disease called _____ affected over 100,000 people.

Learn more about AIDS: brainly.com/question/29963623

#SPJ11

During Reagan’s presidency, a new disease called AIDS affected over 100,000 people.

AIDS is an acronym for Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, and it’s a chronic viral disease that slowly weakens the immune system of an infected person. Reagan became president in 1981, and it was around this time that the first cases of AIDS were reported in the United States. However, Reagan's administration was slow to respond to the AIDS crisis, and it was not until 1985 that he made his first public speech on the issue.By the time Reagan made his first public speech on the issue, more than 5,000 people in the United States had already died from AIDS-related illnesses. There was a lot of fear and confusion about the disease because there was no known cure or effective treatment, and it was primarily affecting gay men and drug users, two marginalized groups in American society at the time.The Reagan administration's response to the AIDS crisis was criticized for being inadequate and too slow. It wasn't until 1987 that the first anti-retroviral drug was approved for the treatment of HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. Reagan's successor, President George H.W. Bush, would go on to increase funding for AIDS research and treatment during his presidency.In conclusion, during Reagan’s presidency, the new disease called AIDS affected over 100,000 people. Unfortunately, his administration was slow to respond to the crisis, and it wasn't until the late 1980s that effective treatments for HIV became available.

To know more about Reagan visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/27970609

#SPJ11

Answer:

D, the Articles purposely made a very weak Central Government

Under the Articles of Confederation, the states had more power than the national government.

Therefore we can conclude that the Articles of Confederation had a weak central government and strong states.

Thus option D. is the correct answer.

Learn more about "the Articles of Confederation" here:

brainly.com/question/16379544

Answer:

Hello!!! Princess Sakura here ^^

Explanation:

The answer would be choice C because the 5th Amendment would be allow about a witness that may refuse to testify if doing so would have him or her self-incriminate, even if the criminal conduct in question is not related to the actual case.

The correct answer is "heavy rainfall." Heavy rainfall is not a factor that changed the American prairie.

In fact, it would typically be beneficial for the prairie ecosystem, providing sufficient water for the growth of vegetation and supporting the diverse plant and animal life that is characteristic of the prairie. The other options, such as windmills and irrigation, the extermination of the buffalo, and the introduction of barbed wire, had significant impacts on the American prairie and its transformation

To know more about rainfall  visit;

https://brainly.com/question/26690779

#SPJ4

Manifest Destiny in the 1840s was the belief that the United States should expand from the Atlantic to the Pacific, becoming the most powerful country in the world.

It was based on the idea of Americans' special mission to spread democracy and civilization to the continent.

Manifest Destiny was a widely held belief in the 1840s that the United States should spread democracy and civilization to the continent, growing from the Atlantic to the Pacific and becoming the most powerful country in the world.

This idea was based on the American mission of self-government and the advancement of the idea of liberty for all citizens. Manifest Destiny held that this mission could only be fulfilled by the expansion of the United States.

This belief justified the expansion of the United States into land that belonged to Native Americans and other foreign countries, such as Mexico and Canada.

Expansion was based on the idea of Anglo-Saxon superiority, and that it was the duty of the United States to civilize the continent. This belief justified the expansion of the United States, as well as many of the policies that were enacted, such as the Indian Removal Act.

To know more about Manifest Destiny click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/11669373#

#SPJ11

Answer:    From the rocky terrain of the north, humid swamplands of the south and dense forests of the west, the Continental Army's superior knowledge of the varied geography gave them an incredible advantage. As such, mapping was critical to the colonists' victory

Explanation:

Answer:

I think that it's Rapidly industrialized the Soviet Union(B) I hope that helps.

At the conclusion of the play,  Hamlet say he wants Fortinbras to be the next king of Denmark. He dies after expressing his desire for Fortinbras to become King of Denmark.

As Fortinbras walks into the room, Hamlet dies, leaving Horatio to tell the story all that had occurred in the play. Fortinbras is presumably crowned King of Denmark, as there is no one to prevent him from doing so. King Fortinbras (Rufus Sewell) is crowned.

Learn more on Hamlet -

brainly.com/question/13656079

#SPJ4

The inference is that the law that dealt with the important Goddess Kihawahine is that the goddess made his son his political heir.

It should be noted that a law simply means the rules and regulations that we used to guide the people.

In this case, the inference is that the law that dealt with the important Goddess Kihawahine is that the goddess made his son his political heir.

Learn more about law on:

brainly.com/question/4384

#SPJ1

Answer:

The British

Explanation:

The British thought the colonists should help pay for the cost of their own protection. Furthermore, the French and Indian War had cost the British treasury £70,000,000 and doubled their national debt to £140,000,000.