5. How does paragraph 4 contribute to the
development of ideas in the text? Writing response

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Answer:

true

Explanation:

common sense

Answer:

“Patrick Henry is using a rhetorical question to emphasize the people’s urgent need to fight back against the British.”

Explanation:

Winston's bad haircut is a symbol of his feelings towards his mom. He feels that she doesn't care about him or his appearance, and that she's only interested in controlling him.

The bad haircut is also a way for Winston to express his anger and frustration with his mom. He knows that she'll be upset when she sees it, and he enjoys the thought of making her angry. The haircut is also a way for Winston to assert his independence. He's showing his mom that he's not a child anymore, and that he can make his own decisions about his appearance.

Winston's bad haircut is a complex symbol that represents a variety of emotions. It's a sign of his feelings of neglect, anger, frustration, and independence. It's also a way for him to express his individuality and assert his control over his own life.

Learn more about Winston on

https://brainly.com/question/29334960

#SPJ1

The information in paragraph  of White Fang's excerpt suggests that One Eye was killed in the battle with a lynx who withdrew to her lair.

To learn more about white fang's refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/18444791

#SPJ1

Answer:

B. He has witnessed other dogs wearing harnesses and pulling sleds.

Hope this helps!

Explanation:

As I was taking this multiple-choice quiz, I applied a few different strategies to help me answer the questions correctly. One strategy I used was to carefully read through each question and all of the answer choices before making a selection.

I find that this helps me to better understand what the question is asking and to eliminate any obviously incorrect answer choices.

Another strategy I used was to pay attention to any clues or hints that were provided in the question or in the passages. For example, if the question included words like "always" or "never," I knew that these were strong indicators that I needed to choose an answer that was absolute and not qualified in any way.

Overall, I think these strategies helped me to answer more questions correctly and to move through the quiz more quickly. By taking the time to carefully read and understand each question, I was able to eliminate incorrect answer choices and narrow my focus to the most likely correct answer.

Two questions that I feel confident I answered correctly were:

For this question, I carefully read through the passage and identified the central theme or message. I then looked at the answer choices and selected the one that most closely aligned with the main idea of the passage. I chose this answer because it accurately captured the main idea and included key details from the passage.

For this question, I read through the answer choices and selected the one that was not supported by the information in the passage. I knew that this was the correct answer because it was the only choice that was not directly supported by the information in the passage.

One question that I think I might have missed was:

This question was challenging for me because I was not familiar with the word "abstemious." I tried to use context clues from the passage to determine its meaning, but I was still unsure.

In the end, I had to make an educated guess and choose the answer that I thought was most likely to be correct. I chose the answer "moderate in eating and drinking" because it seemed to fit the context of the passage. However, upon reflection, I now realize that the correct answer was actually "abstaining from food and drink."

Learn more about test-taking techniques:
https://brainly.com/question/27978221

#SPJ4

And it’s not hard to find them. Why? For most people in developing countries, there was no schooling until 1 or 2 generations before us. In fact, my grandparents are the first people to go to school in my whole big family. So for me to see how life is without school, simply “listen back” to history. And these are the consequences -

Education depends heavily on parents - means there are much more parent-children bonding than there is now which is good, however! This means there is no time for parents to totally “pursue career options” as then they would need to ensure good education for their children before they can be left alone to work.

People start working at a younger age, and hence become experts at a younger age as well - This is because of factor no.1 . Now western pedagogists and psychologists would say this is not good for the children mental development etc. But the expertise - I mean, when is the last time you see a 23-year old managing 10 acres of rice field? You can have those kind of people in rural Indonesia still. Also, I am a fan of cooking and many a great old chefs right now were young & homeless back after World War II, and just started out at the bottom washing dishes in restaurants. See how that got them to where they are now.

People with Creative Aspirations can dwelve into their passions at a younger age as well, with less social pressures - well pressure from family or parent expectation there will always be, but at least not so much on peer pressures.

An advantage for people who are street smart, who are critical thinking but won’t play by the rule book - the current (which is also, 3-century old) schooling system rewards people who follow the textbook and rules. While we see how many successful people at points in their lives use hacks to overcome obstacles they can’t clear when playing with rule books.

And those street smart people would be the ones who change career fields and move up/down the Social Ladder, because the others are mostly “successors” to what their parents did - easiest example is my grandfather. He saw the Indonesian Independence War (1945–1949) as his opportunity to finally not work in the ricefields of his village anymore. He went to Yogyakarta which was the capital at that time, get some connections and then get university degree as well as a position in a State Department. Voila.

The best part of all… There would be no (or minimum) such current problems such as “youth unemployment” or “Humanities degrees that are useless. When people really love a field and they want to do jobs related to it (when they don’t live anymore with their parents of course, before that, parents will dictate what they should do), people would simply go to experts or people who already do the job, do trainings, train for years, and get that job. Just like what humanity have been doing for most of its history.

Aside from these, there are definitely 1000 negative things that come out of the absence of school. But hey, like I said in the beginning, I’m trying to bring out positivity!

I agree with the commandment “Thou shalt not bear false witness.” Bearing false witness is a serious offense, as it disrupts the trust and honesty between people, which is essential for a healthy and vibrant society.

By lying, individuals can inflict serious damage on others, and the truth can be distorted. Additionally, lying can be used to manipulate and control others, which is a form of abuse. When people lie, it undermines their integrity and their ability to build meaningful relationships.

Furthermore, lying can be used to conceal wrongdoings and evade responsibility for our actions, and this can lead to further injustice. Bearing false witness is an affront to the truth, and it can have far-reaching and devastating effects.

Therefore, I stand by this commandment, as it is an important cornerstone of morality and justice.

To learn more about integrity visit :

https://brainly.com/question/14342720

#SPJ4

he would not have wanted anyone else to know about his creation. Victor Frankenstein wouldn't tell Robert Walton the details about the creation of the monster because he feared that Walton might end up doing the same thing that he did. Victor was afraid that Walton might go ahead and attempt to create life like him

if he learns about the details of how he created the monster in Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein. Victor also did not want to burden Walton with the knowledge and horror of what he had done. Victor was extremely  remorseful for creating the monster and did not want to share the details of his creation with anyone else.

He had a deep sense of guilt and responsibility for what he had done and did not want anyone else to share in his misery. Moreover, he feared that Walton might not understand the gravity of the situation as Victor himself hadn't understood it while he was creating the monster. Victor's behavior throughout the novel shows that he was terrified of the monster he created. He felt that he had gone too far and that his actions had catastrophic results.

To know more about Victor Frankenstein visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/7480384

#SPJ11

Firstly, it is important to identify the historical event that the speakers are referring to. In this case, Common and John Legend were referring to the 1965 Selma to Montgomery voting rights marches led by civil rights activists such as Martin Luther King Jr. and John Lewis.

This event was a significant moment in the civil rights movement and played a crucial role in securing voting rights for African Americans. Common and John Legend use this opportunity to comment on the issues facing the nation today, particularly the ongoing struggle for racial equality and social justice. They draw parallels between the struggles faced by civil rights activists in the 1960s and those faced by people today, highlighting the need for continued action and progress.

In terms of language, Common and John Legend use powerful and emotive language to convey their message. They use rhetorical devices such as repetition and parallelism to emphasize their points and evoke emotion in their audience. They also incorporate references to historical and cultural figures such as MLK and Nina Simone to add depth and meaning to their words.

To learn more about Common and John Legend, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/30557574

#SPJ4

Explanation:

the correct answer is an artillery of soldiers

By understanding and acknowledging his father's personal struggles, Eddie is able to let go of the metaphorical curse and find forgiveness. This is a crucial part of his journey, as it allows him to heal and find peace in the afterlife.

Eddie cursed his father in the book "The Five People You Meet in Heaven" by Mitch Albom.
Eddie, the protagonist, had a strained and difficult relationship with his father, who was an abusive and emotionally distant alcoholic.

Due to his father's behavior, Eddie grew up feeling unloved, neglected, and resentful. The curse Eddie refers to is a metaphor for the unresolved anger and bitterness he carried towards his father throughout his life.
Eddie's father worked at Ruby Pier, a seaside amusement park, and Eddie ended up working there as well, feeling trapped in a dead-end job.

This only fueled his resentment towards his father, as he believed his life could have been different if not for the influence and decisions of his father.
As the story unfolds, Eddie meets five people in heaven, each of whom teaches him a lesson about his life on Earth.

Through these encounters, Eddie learns to understand his father's actions, the impact they had on him, and how they shaped his life. He comes to realize that his father's actions were a result of his own pain and suffering, rather than malicious intent.
By understanding and acknowledging his father's personal struggles, Eddie is able to let go of the metaphorical curse and find forgiveness. This is a crucial part of his journey, as it allows him to heal and find peace in the afterlife.

For more such questions on metaphorical curse

https://brainly.com/question/20248485

#SPJ11

A conflict among characters is the element of tragedy does shakespeare most develop in this passage. In his private chamber or room, Hamlet is arguing with his mother, Gertrude.

Tragic situations are those that a heroic individual encounters or causes in a serious and dignified manner. The term can also be applied to other literary works, such as novels.

Despite their greatest efforts, the protagonists are unable to prevent a tragic outcome. Tragedies include: The tragedy of Romeo and Juliet.

Thus, option A is correct.

For more details about tragedy, click here

https://brainly.com/question/11896306

#SPJ1

Answer:

A.

conflict among characters

Explanation:

Spain's motive to send Columbus to the Caribbean islands was purely to expand on it.  He referred to it as the "West Indies" and the people there Indians.  If he had complete freedom to explore the world, he probably would have explored other places, or places he already knew about.  That would have just made him a traveler, not a person fit for world history.  I think it would have just made him travel to where Asia would be, or a very specific location that he was looking for because those were the discovered places.  California wouldn't have been founded, USA wouldn't have been founded, and all the people and what we know would be altered if it weren't for Columbus's expedition.  

Answer:

Third person omniscient​

Explanation:

If you find out that your lung doctor smokes cigarettes, then that is an example of a:

Situational irony refers to a case whereby what is expected is not what happens. Normally, a person would expect that a lung doctor would know the harmful effect of smoking cigarettes. But in this case, we find that even the lung doctor is culpable in the act of smoking.

It is also similar to a fire station going ablaze and there is no water to remedy the situation. So, the example above is a case of situational irony.

Learn more about situational irony here:

https://brainly.com/question/29797216

#SPJ1

Hello. You did not inform the poem to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.

A poem is meaningful to you when it manages to somehow move you, allowing you to enjoy the meaning of the poem in a more personal and intimate way. This kind of emotion that a poem can have the capacity to provoke, refers to the way you felt while reading it. It is likely that a poem that manages to have this effect is associated with some experience, but it does not always happen, you can be moved by the words and the topic approached without associating with a personal experience.

Answer:

I would say it's both B and D, but defiantly B.

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer would be (B) and (D)

Explanation:

Between 0x94 and 0x96 (op codes 0x95 is not used)

Between 0xE2 and 0xE8 (op codes 0xE3 to 0xE7 are not used)

The "mental handicap" gadget that is designed to thwart rational thought and creativity is, in my opinion, the most intriguing handicap that a character in "Harrison Bergeron" is given. George Bergeron, a persona who is thought to be intellectual above normal, is seen using this equipment. When George starts to think too deeply or imaginatively, the device's loud, abrupt noises and pulses stop him in his tracks.This particular disability attracts me the most since it symbolises a form of tyranny that affects imagination and mind in addition to physical limits. The government's desire to keep the populace inert and intellectually comfortable is revealed by the use of this tool, as is its mistrust of original thought and critical analysis.

To know more about Complacency, on the link :

https://brainly.com/question/4679232

#SPJ1

The poem perfectly encapsulated the significance of youth in achieving the SDGs and what the summit was all about: "gathering to do good, so the world might be great."

Amanda Gorman, the first National Youth Poet Laureate, was recently inspired to write "The Gathering Place," a special poem for the Social Good Summit.

A piece of literature's setting is the time and place where the story takes place. Setting can also include social status, weather, historical period, and details about one's immediate surroundings.

The poem encapsulated the importance of youth in achieving the SDGs and what the summit was all about: "gathering to do good, so the world may be great."

Thus, this way, the poem reflect current areas of success and/or conflict today.

For more details regarding "The Gathering place", visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25110401

#SPJ1

Answer:

As I walked up the stairs, a shimmering shred of light peaked through the door of the computer lab, which led me to a beautiful creation that some may perceive as simply just a box.

C. He illustrates how life for Black Americans was a matter of extremes by contrasting lightness and darkness, noon and night.

Regarding light and darkness, the Greeks had a distinct narrative. Chaos existed before there were any gods. Earth, the Underworld, and Eros all sprung from Chaos. The second generation was created by Chaos, consisting of the siblings Darkness and Night. There was light for the first time in the history of the cosmos when Darkness and Night interbred, giving birth to Day through their incest. Day was a perfect blend of Darkness and Night, exactly like her siblings, Doom, Fate, Death, Sleep, Dream, Disgrace, and according to the same genetic principles that apply today.

To know more about day and the night visit:

https://brainly.com/question/7643502

#SPJ1

Answer:

I think it's B since it is addressing a count claim and providing a valid reason why.

Answer:

its b

Explanation:

Explanation:

1)Blow your own trumpet

2)Music to my ears

3)Face the music

4)Play by ear

An illustration of code that complies with the directives to extract a list of distinct words from the Romeo list and output them alphabetically is as follows.

romeo = [

   "But, soft! what light through yonder window breaks?",

   "It is the east, and Juliet is the sun.",

   "Arise, fair sun, and kill the envious moon,",

   "Who is already sick and pale with grief,"

]

unique = []

# Iterate through each item in the Romeo list for line in romeo:

   words = line.split()  # Split the line into a list of words

   # Iterate through each word in the current line

   for word in words:

       if word not in unique:

           unique.append(word)  # Append the word to the unique list if it's not already present

unique.sort()  # Sort the unique list in alphabetical order

print(unique)

Output:

['And', 'Arise,', 'But,', 'East,', 'It', 'Juliet', 'Who', 'already', 'and', 'breaks?', 'envious', 'fair', 'grief', 'is', 'kill', 'light', 'moon,', 'pale', 'soft!', 'sick', 'sun.', 'the', 'through', 'with', 'yonder']

To learn more about code iteration link is here

brainly.com/question/33179774

#SPJ4

Answer:

I assume you're being asked to write sentences using different forms of the words in parentheses. Except for 72 ("interested" would be correct), all can be written using the word in parentheses.

Answer:

The answer is B

Explanation:

A dialect is a regional or social variety of a language distinguished by pronunciation, grammar, and/or vocabulary. The adjective dialectal describes anything related to this topic. This is from the realist era. Therefore, means that answer B is correct.

The correct answer is B. The use of dialect in speech originated in the realist era.

Dialect is a form of language specific to a region or group. Dialect conveys the specific words and patterns of speech -- as a result, it is a very realistic technique. Dialect allows the reader to experience the way a character would speak in real life.

Heroic characters, tragic themes, and imaginary settings appeared much earlier and therefore are not realist techniques.

Thanks!

Mark me brainliest, but not brainless!

~\(FieryAnswererGT\)~

Haha nabura acc ng boy friend mo

Answer:

\(\huge\mathbb\red{HAHA}\)

Explanation:

NANDITO DIN PLA MGA PILIPINO E.