Under which exception can a police officer legally enter a home and seize evidence without a warrant?
A. The police believe the person has committed a crime based on eyewitness testimony.
B. The evidence is in plain sight and the officer has a legitimate reason for finding the evidence.
C. The police officer believes that the person in the home is harboring a fugitive.
D. The person who owns the home has already been arrested by the police.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
since the answer is in plain sight he has an actual reason to go in because he's almost definetely finding an evidence
Are there any lobbying techniques that should be off limits in a democracy ?
Answer:
There is nothing inherently wrong with lobbying. Lobbying encourages people to play an active role in their government — it’s protected by the First Amendment as our right “to petition the government.”
Explanation: to me this can be an opinion.
Please help me
Do you think drug offenders today should have a minimum prison sentence for using or selling drugs? Why or why not?
Answer:
I think that they should have a minimum sentence for using them.
Explanation:
This is because if your putting them on the street that can harm thousands of people but if you use you are only harming yourself.
Which of the following is NOT a Core Value of SkillsUSA?
O Competitiveness
O Citizenship
0 Integrity
0 Responsibility
Competitiveness is not a Core Value of SkillsUSA.
Competitiveness is a measure of a person's desire to surpass others. A largely competitive person is more likely to see a situation as a competition, indeed when there's no unequivocal winner or clunker.
Competitiveness can be defined as The capability of a business to deliver better value to guests than challengers. A crucial part of all business exertion – in which marketing plays a crucial part – is the hunt for sustainable competitive advantage. A basic profitable proposition demonstrates that when enterprises have to contend for guests, it leads to lower prices, advanced quality goods and services, lesser variety, and further invention.( 1) Competition is critical not only in product requests but also in labor requests.
Learn more about Competitiveness here: https://brainly.com/question/26514848
#SPJ1
How are delinquency hearings different than criminal trials?
Need ASAP : Question # 1 File Upload Project: Protecting the Crime Scene and Evidence You've now read about the first moments of a crime scene. You know that taking care of the injured is important and a primary task of the first responders. You've also learned that protecting the evidence is a big responsibility for all first responders, officers, investigators, and the forensic team. In this assignment you'll get a chance to find evidence, identify the steps necessary to secure a crime scene, and organize the evidence to help a crime investigator solve a crime. The Crime Scenario The backdoor alarm went off at the residence of 979 West Valley Road at 11:27 pm. Alarm company tried to reach the customer at 11:28 pm with no response, so at 11:29 pm the police were notified and dispatched to the residence. The police arrived at 11:36 pm and both officers got out of the car to inspect the home. As they were walking toward the front door, they heard a cry for help. Both officers drew their guns and proceeded to walk around the home toward the back door. Once at the back door, which was ajar, officers entered announcing themselves loudly. They did see a hammer lying on the kitchen floor. As they continued through the room again calling out that they were the police, the only answering sound was from a woman calling for help. The officers went through the kitchen and entered the living room noticing the woman on the floor. As one officer, Dan Forte went to the woman, the other officer Max Crenn called for back-up and an ambulance. Officer Crenn then proceeded down the hallway toward the bedroom to examine it, and then toward an office which was completely in disarray. He noticed that the office window was open. Officer Crenn then continued to look into another bedroom, its closets, and the two bathrooms in order to secure the one story home. In the meantime, Officer Forte was busy assessing the woman’s condition. She was coherent enough to give the officer her name and to explain what had happened. The victim, Mrs. Karen Mart
The steps and evidences necessary to help a crime investigator in solving a crime are fingerprints on the hammer lying on the kitchen floor; the woman on the floor; office window was open; the detailed explanation of the whole situation by a woman, proper investigation of every part of the home.
What is crime investigation?The crime investigation is the process of gathering information and evidence to determine who committed a crime and to build a case against them. The investigation is typically conducted by the law enforcement agencies and police.
The primary objective of a crime investigation is to identify and arrest the person or persons responsible for a crime. This may involve gathering evidence on the basis of crime scene.
The crime scene reported in the scenario of the above question can be protected by the following steps: examining the fingerprints on the objectionable objects which were at the place of crime; the detailed explanation of the whole situation by the victim, proper investigation of every part of the premise where the crime has done.
Learn more about crime investigation here:
https://brainly.com/question/27660961
#SPJ1
is/are a drug. a. Medicine c. Cigarettes b. Alcohol d. All of the above Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
Develop an argument that explains if the framers of the U.S. Constitution would approve of the current balance of power between of the national government relative to that of the states.
In your essay, you must:
• Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning.
• Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information
o At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents:
U.S. Constitution
Brutus 1
United States v. Lopez
Marbury v. Madison
o Use a second piece of evidence from another foundational document from the list or from your study of the structure of American government.
• Use reasoning to explain why your evidence supports your claim/thesis.
• Respond to an opposing or alternative perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal
Answer:
Develop an argument that explains if the framers of the U.S. Constitution would approve of the current balance of power between of the national government relative to that of the states.
In your essay, you must:
• Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning.
• Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information
o At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents:
U.S. Constitution
Brutus 1
United States v. Lopez
Marbury v. Madison
o Use a second piece of evidence from another foundational document from the list or from your study of the structure of American government.
• Use reasoning to explain why your evidence supports your claim/thesis.
• Respond to an opposing or alternative perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal
Explanation:
Terry was named in his parents’ will as the trustee of the family farm. He does not want the position as he has no interest in farming. His brother, Harold, has worked the farm for the last five years and would be a far better trustee. His parents chose Terry, however, because he was older. What can Terry do in this situation?
Terry can resign as the trustee and nominate Harold to take his place. He can do this by submitting a written resignation to the probate court.
What is probate court?
Probate court is a court of law that handles matters related to the estate of a deceased person. Probate court oversees the distribution of a person's assets, including real estate, investments, and other property. The court also determines the validity of any wills and trusts left by the deceased and appoints guardians for any minor children. The court also investigates any disputes over the estate, such as disagreements among heirs or creditors. The court also ensures that all taxes and debts of the deceased are paid before any assets are distributed.
The court will then consider whether Harold is qualified to serve as trustee, and if so, they will likely approve the nomination. This will allow Harold to take on the responsibility of being the trustee of the family farm.
To learn more about probate court
https://brainly.com/question/15055462
#SPJ1
should there be laws using cell phones while driving? why?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Because people could get seriously hurt while driving with cellphones
Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
Which pretrial motion should Martha file in the given scenario?
Martha is a defense attorney who is preparing for a criminal trial. She suspects that media reports and local opinion might influence the local jury, and make the jury hostile toward the defendant. She thus plans to file a pretrial motion for
.
Answer:
Answer:
Speed of the wave in the string will be 3.2 m/sec
Explanation:
We have given frequency in the string fixed at both ends is 80 Hz
Distance between adjacent antipodes is 20 cm
We know that distance between two adjacent anti nodes is equal to half of the wavelength
So \frac{\lambda }{2}=20cm
2
λ
=20cm
\lambda =40cmλ=40cm
We have to find the speed of the wave in the string
Speed is equal to v=\lambda f=0.04\times 80=3.2m/secv=λf=0.04×80=3.2m/sec
So speed of the wave in the string will be 3.2 m/sec
A.what hazards might a motorcyclist encounter B. what precautions should be taken by a driver when traveling near a motorcyclist
A Hazards that a motorcyclist might encounter include: Lack of visibility, Road conditions, Driver inattention B. Precautions that should be taken by drivers when traveling near a motorcyclist include: Increase awareness, Maintain a safe following distance, Signal intentions
What hazards might a motorcyclist encounter?A. Hazards that a motorcyclist might encounter include:
1. Lack of visibility: Motorcycles are smaller and less visible compared to cars, making it harder for other drivers to spot them. This increases the risk of being involved in accidents due to drivers not seeing the motorcycle.
2. Road conditions: Uneven road surfaces, potholes, debris, or wet and slippery conditions can pose significant hazards for motorcyclists. These conditions can cause loss of control, skidding, or difficulty in maneuvering the motorcycle.
3. Driver inattention: Other drivers on the road might be distracted, not paying attention, or not properly checking blind spots. This can lead to collisions or near-misses with motorcyclists.
B. Precautions that should be taken by drivers when traveling near a motorcyclist include:
1. Increase awareness: Drivers should actively scan the road for motorcycles, especially in blind spots, during lane changes, and at intersections. Being aware and alert can help prevent accidents.
2. Maintain a safe following distance: Keep a safe distance between your vehicle and the motorcycle in front of you.
3. Signal intentions: Use your turn signals to indicate lane changes or turns well in advance, allowing motorcyclists to anticipate your actions.
Learn more about Hazards at https://brainly.com/question/30090471
#SPJ1
What is a law you believe should be added?
What is a law you believe should be abolished?
There are many laws and principles that people believe in. Some people believe in religious laws such as the Law of Christ which includes the commandments to love God with all your heart, soul, and mind and to love your neighbor as yourself. So, i believe in this so.
How does the fire department give firefighter candidates experience of a real fire?
by using one of their burn buildings
by starting a fire in a run-down building
by setting up a partner system so that the candidate can accompany his or her partner on a future fire
by placing the candidates on-call for a future fire
Answer:
By using one of their burn buildings
Explanation:
Firefighting is ruthless, physically challenging, and can be psychologically exhausting. It is also very satisfying to understand you are serving people on what is often the most distressing day of their lives. Physical consistency is very crucial for firefighters. Overall, most fire institutions are pretty hard to successfully concluded. You must be materially and psychologically programmed for the task.
Answer:
by using one of their burn buildings
Explanation:
Just took the quiz. Hope this helps :)
i don't need help but why do you need to pay for pemium
Answer:because the people are greedy and want more money they cant just help lol
Explanation:
Why should juvenile offenders not be subject to deportation?
Answer:
Since dispositions of juvenile delinquency are not considered to be convictions under immigration law, regardless of the nature of the offense, they do not trigger these conviction-based grounds of inadmissibility or deportability.
Explanation:
Which of the following statements is true about negligence actions?
O A. A negligence action is an example of a crime.
B. A negligence action is an example of a civil claim:
C. A negligence action is an example of a contract action.
D. A negligence action is an example of a family law matter.
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
Negligence actions can be defined as those behavior in which a person fails and causes injury or harm to the other person. Negligence is a failure to act ehtically when it is expected from the person.
A negligence action is an example of civil claim. Som examples of negligence action include vehicle collision, medical malpractices, etc. These action comes under civil claims, where a person is expected to act ethically.
Therefore, option B is correct.
B. A negligence action is an example of a civil claim
Write at least one page describing your topic and topic question; state your position on the topic (pro or con?) homelessness
Answer:
Homelessness refers to the state of not having a fixed and stable place to live. It is a complex issue that affects individuals and families from all walks of life, and can be caused by a variety of factors including poverty, unemployment, mental illness, substance abuse, and family breakdown.
Homeless individuals can be found living on the streets, in shelters, or in temporary accommodations such as cars or abandoned buildings. They often lack access to basic necessities such as food, clothing, and healthcare, and face a wide range of challenges related to their living situation, including violence, exploitation, and discrimination.
Homelessness can have significant negative impacts on physical and mental health, as well as on social and economic outcomes. Homeless individuals often face barriers to employment and education, which can make it difficult for them to break out of the cycle of poverty and homelessness.
Addressing homelessness requires a multifaceted approach that involves addressing the root causes of homelessness, providing housing and support services to those in need, and addressing social and economic inequalities that contribute to homelessness. It also requires a commitment to treating homeless individuals with dignity and respect, and recognizing their right to access basic human rights and necessities.
I HOPE THIS WILL HELP YOU OUT :))
Tyrone and Angelique see an ad for "freight-damaged dining room tables on sale for $300." They go to the store where Al explains that the damaged tables have been sold.
However, they do have dining room tables for $600 in stock.
Answer:False advertisment
Explanation:
What issues does article 1 of the constitution deal with
Answer:
Article I describes the design of the legislative branch of US Government -- the Congress. Important ideas include the separation of powers between branches of government (checks and balances), the election of Senators and Representatives, the process by which laws are made, and the powers that Congress has.
Gumball says...
"Uh, if the food enters your body and exits it while it's still in the supermarket, it's technically not stealing."
Is he correct or not? Explain why?
It is untrue to say that if food enters your body and then leaves it while it is still in the store, it is not technically theft.
What is stealing or theft?In order to deprive the legitimate owner of something, theft is the act of taking another person's goods or services without that person's knowledge or agreement.
For several crimes against property, including larceny, burglary, embezzlement, extort, blackmail, or receiving stolen items, the word "theft" is also used as a synonym or informal shorthand.
While theft is defined broadly in some countries, larceny is regarded to be synonymous with stealing in others. The term "thief" can refer to a person who commits an act of theft.
Learn more about stealing or theft, from:
brainly.com/question/14896762
#SPJ1
This chapter discusses that drug use can have both positive and negative results, depending on how it is used and why. Do you think a drug that is currently illegal but is found to have some positive results in the medical field should be completely
outlawed for any type of use? Think of heroin or cocaine, it is illegal to use or possess in the U.S. but if something positive could come from the use do you think it should be allowed. Explain your answer. 2 cited sources.
I do not have personal beliefs or opinions, but I can provide a balanced perspective on the topic. The question of whether a currently illegal drug with potential medical benefits should be completely outlawed for any type of use is a complex issue that requires a nuanced approach.
On one hand, it is important to consider the potential benefits that such drugs can have in the medical field. For example, studies have shown that heroin-assisted treatment can be an effective option for treating opioid addiction (Kerr et al., 2017). Similarly, cocaine has been used as a local anesthetic in eye surgery and is still used in some countries for that purpose (Narvaez, 2014). Banning the use of these drugs outright may prevent patients from receiving effective treatment for their medical conditions.
On the other hand, legalizing drugs with a history of abuse and addiction carries significant risks. It may lead to increased availability, misuse, and addiction, especially among vulnerable populations such as teenagers and low-income individuals. Additionally, drug legalization may send the wrong message to society that drug use is acceptable and may lead to an increase in crime rates, accidents, and public health costs.
In conclusion, while the potential medical benefits of currently illegal drugs should be considered, the risks of legalization should also be carefully evaluated. A thorough analysis of the benefits and risks, as well as the potential impact on public health and safety, should guide any decision regarding drug policy.
Explain what the plaintiff would need to prove in order to win the case
Jerry, Carol, and Tamika are 17-year-old students who attended a high school graduation party hosted by Calvin Smith’s parents. The Smiths allowed Jerry, Carol, Tamika, and the other high school students at the party to drink beer and wine.
When Jerry was driving Carol and Tamika home, he ran a stoplight, and his car collided with a car driven by Mr. Carver. The entire Carver family was injured in the crash, and the youngest child was very seriously injured. The Carvers sued Jerry, his parents, and Mr. and Mrs. Smith. The Carvers want all of their medical and rehabilitation bills paid for and seek additional damages for Jerry’s reckless drunk driving.
Answer:
The four elements that a plaintiff must prove to win a negligence suit are 1) Duty, 2) Breach, 3) Cause, and 4) Harm
Explanation:
pls, I am so desperate I'll give brainliest!!! Jordan is especially interested in the concept of being presumed innocent until proven guilty. He is convinced that most jurors will form an initial opinion about whether or not the defendant is innocent or guilty from the first time they see the defendant. Jordan believes that initial impression can have a negative impact on the outcome of the case and plans to take that angle in the story he will be writing for the newspaper. To help Jordan determine if his theory is correct, you’ve decided to attend the trial with him and take on the role of a juror. You are determined to maintain an open mind and not form an initial impression of the defendant’s guilt or innocence.
Answer the following questions using a total of 3-5 sentences each:
How would you keep an open mind and truly presume the defendant is innocent at the start of the trial?
Describe at least three things you could do to uphold the presumption of innocence as a juror is supposed to do.
The key to keeping an open mind is to go in truly blind to the trial. That means the potential juror shouldn't have any exposure to media about the defendant or the events in question. The juror should learn everything during the court case itself when the prosecution presents the case carefully laid out, and the juror should also weigh the defenses argument as well. This is why jurors are not allowed to consume outside media, especially news articles or watch news on tv. In some cases, jurors are sequestered to isolate them further from the outside world to prevent accidental jury tampering. Unfortunately a lot of news in the modern era tends to have an editorialized spin to it. Meaning there are opinions, conjecture and speculation injected into things when they shouldn't be there. It should be facts only.
In addition to going into the case blind, the juror should also be free of any prejudices about the person's class, race, etc. These preconcieved notions tend to potentially affect the decision a juror would make, and these notions tend to be unintentional. If the juror could spot these tendencies and try to eradicate them (before they get worse), then it likely would lead to a more impartial juror.
Here are 3 things you could do to adhere to the philosophy of "innocent before proven guilty"
Keep the idea in your head that another person could be guilty.Try to put yourself in the shoes of the defendant.Everyone is human. Even if the first impression may have been a bad one, it could have just been a bad day for the defendant. The same may apply for the day in question involving the crime.At the end of the day, keep in mind the most important thing: The burden of proof lies with the prosecution and not the defense. It's up to the state to prove the defendant guilty. This is why the verdict is a simple binary choice of "guilty" vs "not guilty". It's because the jury is testing the claims made by the prosecution.
How is the "Declaration of Rights" of Florida's constitution similar to the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution?
Responses
A. Both outline requirements for elections for legislative and executive positions.
B. Both ensure and outline similar fundamental citizen rights.
C. Both outline public education standards for all grades.
D. Both outline the separation of government into judicial, executive, and legislative branches.
The "Declaration of Rights" of Florida's constitution is similar to the Bill of Rights because B. Both ensure and outline similar fundamental citizen rights.
How are the Bills of Rights similar ?The "Declaration of Rights" in Florida's constitution and the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution both outline fundamental rights and protections for citizens. These include the right to free speech, freedom of religion, the right to bear arms, and protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
While the wording and specific rights included may differ between the two documents, they are both grounded in the idea of protecting individual liberties and limiting the power of government over its citizens.
Find out more on the Bill of Rights at https://brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ1
Paragraph #1
In this paragraph, restate what rights you get according to the 4th amendment. Then, write your thesis statement. Your thesis should restate the question and pick a side - either Yes, the government did violate the 4th amendment or No, the government did not violate the 4th amendment.
STUDENT ANSWER:
Paragraph #2
In this paragraph we are going to use the evidence to support your thesis. Use two pieces of evidence from the document analysis work from Thursday to support your thesis.
Evidence #1, and why it supports your thesis:
Evidence #2, and why it supports your thesis:
Paragraph #3
In this paragraph, restate your evidence and your thesis as your conclusion.
The 4th amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.
What rights do you get according to the 4th amendment?The Fourth Amendment provides protection to the people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment protects people from searches that are deemed unreasonable under the law.
So we can conclude that the 4th amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.
Learn more about amendment here: https://brainly.com/question/687600
#SPJ1
In 1972, U.S. courts ruled that the members of the National Socialist (NAZI) Party could not be banned from marching in a largely Jewish neighborhood of Chicago. Many of the residents of this neighborhood were Holocaust Survivors, to whom seeing this march would be horribly painful. On what understanding of the right of peaceful assembly might the court have made this ruling?
1.There were fewer Holocaust survivors than National Socialists, so the rule of the majority came into play.
2.The National Socialists had the right to assemble peacefully and march, despite how unpopular their views might be.
3.The NAZI point of view was rejected by society as a whole, so they could not march in this Jewish area, but must march elsewhere.
4.It would be okay for them to march as long as they didn’t wear NAZI uniforms, which might promote violence.
The correct answer choice is (2). The court's ruling was based on the understanding that the National Socialists had the right to assemble peacefully and march, despite how unpopular their views might be.
We all have the right to assemble peacefully and to form association with others. We have the right to form or to join trade unions in the act of protecting our interests.
If any restrictions are placed on this right, then they are according to the law and necessary in the interest of national security and public order. The restrictions can be placed for the prevention of crime or mishap, for the protection of freedom of others and for maintaining law and order situation in the area.
To know more about right to assemble here
https://brainly.com/question/2141285
#SPJ1
3. Raoul is researching the history of fingerprint identification. Who is he MOST likely to discover in his research?
Sir Edward Henry
Karl Landsteiner
Cora Crippen
Trenton Laminal
Raoul is researching the history of fingerprint identification. Sir Edward Henry MOST likely discovered this in his research
What is Sir Edward Henry?Generally, Sir Edward Richard Henry, 1st Baronet, GCVO, KCB, CSI, KPM served as the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis from 1903 to 1918. His full title is Sir Edward Richard Henry, 1st Baronet, GCVO, KCB, CSI, KPM.
His commission coincided with the introduction of police dogs into the force; nevertheless, he is most recognized today for his advocacy of the use of fingerprinting as a technique of identifying offenders. This is because he was the first person to do so.
In conclusion, Raoul is looking into the background of fingerprint identification at the moment. In the course of his investigation, Sir Edward Henry most certainly came upon.
Read more about Sir Edward Henry
https://brainly.com/question/1193750
#SPJ1
5.The Supreme Court outlawed malapportionment because it
A.gives too much power to city dwellers
B.is unfair to minority groups
C.does not allow senators to represent enough people
D.does not give each citizen an equal voice in government
What’s a crime and explain at least to key elements
A crime is an act or omission that is prohibited by law and punishable by the legal system. Actus reus and mens rea, are generally required to establish criminal liability.
What is a crime and its elements?A crime is an offense against society as a whole, and the state or government is responsible for investigating, prosecuting, and punishing individuals who commit crimes. Here are two key elements that are generally associated with a crime:
1. Actus Reus: Actus reus refers to the physical or external element of a crime, often translated as the "guilty act." It represents the actual behavior or action committed by an individual that is considered unlawful. The actus reus can include various actions, such as theft, assault, murder, fraud, or any other action that is prohibited by law. In some cases, the failure to act when there is a legal duty to do so can also constitute actus reus. For example, not providing necessary care to a dependent person may be considered a crime.
2. Mens Rea: Mens rea refers to the mental state or intention of the person committing the act. It translates to "guilty mind" and signifies the state of mind or awareness of the person at the time of committing the crime. It encompasses the individual's knowledge, intent, recklessness, or negligence associated with the criminal act. The presence of mens rea distinguishes between intentional acts and acts that may have been committed without any criminal intent. Different levels of mens rea exist, such as intent to commit a crime, knowledge of the consequences of one's actions, or recklessness in disregarding potential harm caused by one's behavior.
Both elements, actus reus and mens rea, are generally required to establish criminal liability. It is crucial for the prosecution to prove that the accused person committed the prohibited act (actus reus) and had the requisite mental state (mens rea) at the time of the offense. The specific elements and requirements can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the crime.
learn more about crime: https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1