3. Why do you think cities such as Oswego, RochesterBuffalo, Cleveland, Sandusky Toledo, Chicago , and Green Bay were important the Underground Railroad ?

In 1914, Nicholas led his country into another costly war, and discontent in Russia grew as food became scarce, soldiers became war-weary, and devastating defeats on the eastern front demonstrated the czar's ineffectual leadership.

Nicholas II was unable to cope with the Serbian crisis due to the food scarcity and the fatigued soldiers.

Nicholas II was the last emperor of Russia, born on May 18, 1868. He was considered a relatively poor leader and many Russians were discontented with his authoritarian rule.

During the Serbian crisis, he was unable to cope with the situation as the discontent of the Russians grew as food scarcity arose in the nation. The war-weary, fatigued soldiers were not in the state to fight further. This demonstrated his ineffectual leadership.

Learn more about Nicholas II here:

https://brainly.com/question/401877

Answer:

A D E

Explanation:

Answer:

A. They lived in Heian-kyo

D. They built the culture of Japan

E. They consisted of a few thousand people

Explanation:

Because it illustrates Greek philosophy regarding women and goddesses, the depictions of ancient Greek women on the pots are similar to the text.

Greek women had essentially no political rights of any kind and were subject to male authority almost their whole lives. The two most important responsibilities for a woman living in a city were to have children, ideally male offspring, and to manage the home.

Aphrodite was revered by women and was portrayed as having a round face, huge breasts, and a pear-shaped figure. She was the goddess of love, sex, beauty, and fertility. This then evolved into the ideal of Greek beauty.

A kore would often marry when she was between the ages of 13 and 15; she would not formally become a gyne until her first kid was born, Women's reputations were always to be protected in ancient Greek culture.

Thus, it illustrates Greek philosophy regarding women and goddesses.

For more information about ancient Greeks treat women, click here

https://brainly.com/question/23110080

#SPJ3

Fall apart because let's be honest this country is already falling apart.

Answer:

D.

The Great Council could approve taxes proposed by the monarch.

The topic of the selection of the Short Read "The protective power of nature preserves" is about the importance of preserving natural areas as a means of protecting biodiversity and mitigating the effects of climate change.

The article discusses how nature preserves can provide habitat for endangered species, protect water resources, and provide carbon sequestration, among other benefits. The author argues that protecting natural areas should be a key part of any effort to address environmental challenges.

The topic of the selection of the Short Read is the protective power of nature preserves, which refers to the importance and benefits of preserving natural areas and ecosystems for the protection of biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services.

Learn more about biodiversity at:

https://brainly.com/question/13073382

#SPJ1

Answer:

because Green light has a higher frequency than orange light.

Explanation:

hope this helps!

Answer: Britain assuming control of Nigeria from the Royal Niger Company.

Explanation:

On January 1st, 1900, the British Government took over direct control of Royal Niger Company territories and paid them £865,000 for them. They then joined it to their own Niger Coast Protectorate and thus established the Northern and Southern Protectorates which were precursor States to the State of Nigeria today.

The introduction of new agricultural technologies such as equipment, practises, and enclosure movements enhanced productivity and efficiency, but they also uprooted small farmers and altered traditional ways of life.

Throughout the 18th and 19th centuries, there was a movement known as the Enclosure Movement that sought to take property that had previously belonged to a village's residents collectively and make it at least accessible to the public for growing food and grazing livestock.

Enclosure was the procedure that put an end to traditional rights on common property that were previously held under the open field system in English social and economic history. The land was no longer available for commoners to utilise once it was fenced, restricting these uses to the owner.

To know more about traditional visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/10933946

#SPJ1

Answer:

C.

A is wrong.

B is wrong - the New Deal was created after the economic conditions plummeted.

D is wrong.

England became the foremost colonial power in the globe. The Great Lakes were used to conquer French forts. The war was formally ended with the signing of the Treaty of Paris.

What was the French and Indian War's key turning point?

The conflict started to alter when William Pitt gained charge of the military operations. He believed that England's domination of the globe depended on North America. Pitt agreed to hand over management of recruiting and supplies in exchange for a promise to reimburse them.

In the French and Indian War, the British prevailed. They took control of the area over which France claimed possession. The French mainland came under American authority. All of the nations from the east coast of North America to the Mississippi River were now under British control. The French and Indian War was ended by the signing of the Treaty of Paris in February 1763. The Brits grabbed Canada from France and Florida from Spain while giving France the right to keep its West Indian sugar islands and giving Spain Louisiana.

Learn more about French and Indian War:

https://brainly.com/question/3223999

#SPJ1

Civil rights laws in the United States brought about significant changes by addressing racial discrimination and promoting equality. These laws aimed to dismantle segregation, eliminate discriminatory practices, and protect the rights of marginalized groups. Some key changes brought about by civil rights laws include:

1. Desegregation: Civil rights laws, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision, prohibited racial segregation in public facilities, including schools, transportation, and housing. This led to the integration of previously segregated spaces and improved access to equal opportunities.

2. Voting Rights: The Voting Rights Act of 1965 aimed to overcome barriers that prevented African Americans and other minorities from exercising their right to vote. It outlawed discriminatory practices such as literacy tests and poll taxes, ensuring broader participation in the democratic process.

3. Equal Employment Opportunities: Civil rights laws prohibited employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) was established to investigate complaints and enforce these laws, promoting equal opportunities in the workplace.

4. Fair Housing: The Fair Housing Act of 1968 prohibited discrimination in housing based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status, or disability. It aimed to address the historical segregation and ensure equal access to housing opportunities.

5. Access to Public Services: Civil rights laws ensured equal access to public services and accommodations, including transportation, hotels, restaurants, and entertainment venues. They prohibited discriminatory practices and promoted equal treatment for all individuals.

These changes brought about by civil rights laws helped to dismantle systemic discrimination and advance the cause of equality in the United States. They laid the foundation for a more inclusive society and continue to shape efforts toward achieving equal rights and opportunities for all individuals.

for more questions on Civil rights

https://brainly.com/question/30092721

#SPJ8

Answer:

yes :)

I can be your friend :D

Answer:

Explanation:

fales,

He worked on boats, but began his career as a journalist and writer.

Answer:

Mark Twain worked on a riverboat. TRUE

Explanation:

have a nice day.

Answer:

1. Freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition.

2. Right to keep and bear arms in order to maintain a well regulated militia.

3. No quartering of soldiers.

4. Freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.

5. Right to due process of law, freedom from self-incrimination, double jeopardy.

6. Rights of accused persons, e.g., right to a speedy and public trial.

7. Right of trial by jury in civil cases.

8. Freedom from excessive bail, cruel and unusual punishments.

9. Other rights of the people.

10. Powers reserved to the states.

Explanation:

The sentence "In order to serve students best, school districts need to ask for additional funding." is punctuated correctly, thus has a right punctuation. So, the correct option is D.

Out of the given options, the sentence "In order to serve students best, school districts need to ask for additional funding." is punctuated correctly.

These errors can create confusion or alter the intended meaning of the sentences, making the sentence "In order to serve students best, school districts need to ask for additional funding." the only correctly punctuated option 'd' "In order to serve students best, school districts need to ask for additional funding" is punctuated correctly. So, the correct option is D.

For more questions on punctuation

https://brainly.com/question/30789620

#SPJ8

Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau were three Enlightenment philosophers who proposed different theories of government based on their respective views on human behavior.

Hobbes believed that in a state of nature, humans are in a constant state of war and chaos, and that government is necessary to establish order and protect citizens from each other. He believed that the source of a government's authority was the people who surrendered their rights to a sovereign ruler in exchange for protection.

In contrast, Locke argued that in a state of nature, humans have natural rights to life, liberty, and property, and that government exists to protect these rights. He believed that the source of a government's authority was a social contract between the ruler and the ruled, and that the people had the right to overthrow a government that failed to protect their rights.

Rousseau's view of government was more idealistic than Hobbes or Locke. He believed that in a state of nature, humans were peaceful and egalitarian, but that the development of private property and societal hierarchies had corrupted human nature. He proposed a social contract in which individuals would surrender their individual wills to the general will of the community, and that government's role was to enforce this general will. Rousseau believed that the source of a government's authority was the people themselves, and that the general will was the highest expression of the people's sovereignty.

To know more about authority here

https://brainly.com/question/31018838

#SPJ1

Liberated Africans were enslaved people freed by the British government after the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade.

Liberated Africans were individuals who were once enslaved but gained their freedom through the British government's efforts following the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade in 1807.

The British navy patrolled the seas to intercept and seize illegal slave ships, and those they freed were known as liberated Africans.

Many were resettled in places like Sierra Leone and the Caribbean, where they established new communities and contributed to the development of these regions.

The term "liberated Africans" reflects their newfound freedom and the important role they played in the broader movement to end slavery worldwide.

For more such questions on abolition, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/1818846

#SPJ11

Answer:

Who had most of the power under the Articles of Confederation?

The states

Was it a good idea?

I believe it was a good idea as it created, the freedoms of religion, speech, and assembly are all protected under the First Amendment, as is the right to petition. Legislators are not allowed to show preference for one religion over another or to limit the religious freedom of any citizen. Free speech is safeguarded because Congress cannot impose any restrictions on the freedom of the press or the rights of individuals to communicate their minds. As a result, residents have the legal right to peacefully gather and petition their government, as well.

Explanation:

This is just my opinion; feel free to alter it as you see fit.

Further details on Articles confederation:

https://brainly.com/question/3148567

#SPJ1

Explanation:

No, it is not possible to give a literal reading of a text, untouched by interpretation. All readings of a text involve some level of interpretation, as language is inherently complex and often ambiguous. The act of reading involves making choices about which meanings to assign to words and phrases, and these choices are influenced by factors such as the reader's cultural background, personal experiences, and worldview.

For example, in legal contexts, judges are often tasked with interpreting the meaning of laws and applying them to specific cases. While some may argue that judges should simply apply the text of the law as it is written, this is not always possible, as laws may be vague or open to multiple interpretations. Judges must therefore use their own judgment and interpretation to determine the intent and scope of the law, and apply it in a manner that is consistent with legal precedent and their own sense of justice.

Similarly, in the context of religious fundamentalism, adherents may argue that their interpretation of religious texts is the only correct one, and that any other interpretation is a distortion or corruption of the true meaning. However, even within a single religious tradition, there may be multiple valid interpretations of sacred texts, and the act of interpretation itself is often shaped by cultural and historical factors.

Overall, while it is important to strive for accuracy and clarity in our interpretation of texts, it is impossible to completely divorce interpretation from the act of reading, and all readings involve some level of subjective judgment and interpretation.

The Clinton presidency impacted the political climate through economic policies and addressing social issues such as healthcare and LGBTQ+ rights.

Firstly, Clinton's economic policies played a crucial role in shaping the nation's fiscal landscape. His administration pursued a combination of fiscal discipline, tax reforms, and deregulation, leading to a period of economic growth, low unemployment rates, and budget surpluses. This fostered a sense of optimism and confidence in the economy, shaping the political discourse and creating a favorable environment for pro-growth policies.

Secondly, the Clinton presidency had a notable influence on social issues. Clinton's administration made efforts to address social challenges such as healthcare reform, education, and LGBTQ+ rights. The push for healthcare reform resulted in the controversial proposal known as "Hillarycare," which ultimately did not pass but sparked national discussions about the role of government in healthcare.

Additionally, Clinton's presidency witnessed advancements in LGBTQ+ rights, including implementing the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy in the military and signing the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). These actions sparked debates and shaped the political climate around issues of equality and social progress.

In conclusion, the Clinton presidency significantly impacted the political climate in the United States. Its economic policies fostered growth and influenced discussions on fiscal responsibility, while its efforts to address social issues contributed to national debates on healthcare, LGBTQ+ rights, and the role of government in shaping society. economic policies and their impact on social issues.

For more questions on Clinton

https://brainly.com/question/30053739

#SPJ8

Answer:

B

Explanation:

The "winner-takes-it-all" rule is a concept that refers to a situation in which the winner of a competition or contest receives the entire prize or reward, while the losers receive nothing.

This rule is often used in contexts where there is a limited number of prizes or rewards available, such as in sporting events, talent competitions, or political elections.

The winner-takes-it-all rule means that the person or team that performs the best or gets the most votes or points is the sole winner, and there is no reward or recognition given to the runners-up. This can create a situation where there is intense competition and pressure to perform at the highest level, as the stakes are very high and there is no consolation prize for second place.

The winner-takes-it-all rule can have both positive and negative effects. On the one hand, it can motivate individuals or teams to work harder and strive for excellence in their performance. On the other hand, it can also lead to a "do-or-die" mentality that can be stressful and demotivating for those who do not succeed. Additionally, it can lead to a concentration of resources and attention on the few winners, while the rest are largely ignored or forgotten.

To know more about Elections, check out:

https://brainly.com/question/1867389

#SPJ1

Below are three important things that the chapter covers:

The French and Indian W.a.r: The conflict between the British and the French in North America known as the French and Indian W.a.r was a pivotal moment in American history. The war lasted from 1754 to 1763 and was fought over control of territory in the Ohio River Valley. The British ultimately emerged victorious, but the war had significant consequences, including increased tensions between Britain and its North American colonies.

The Proclamation of 1763: In the aftermath of the French and Indian W.a.r, the British government issued the Proclamation of 1763, which prohibited colonists from settling west of the Appalachian Mountains. This was done in part to prevent further conflicts with Native Americans, but it was also intended to consolidate British control over its North American colonies. The proclamation was deeply unpopular with colonists who resented what they saw as British interference in their affairs.

The Boston Tea Party: The Boston Tea Party was a protest by American colonists against British taxation policies. In 1773, a group of colonists in Boston boarded a British ship and threw its cargo of tea into the harbor. The incident was one of several that eventually led to the outbreak of the American Revolution.

These three events are important because they played a critical role in shaping American history. The French and Indian War led to increased tensions between Britain and its North American colonies, which eventually led to the American Revolution. The Proclamation of 1763 was a clear example of British attempts to exert control over the colonies, which further fueled colonial discontent. The Boston Tea Party was one of the most significant acts of rebellion by colonists against British authority, and it helped to galvanize support for the American Revolution.

It is difficult to rate these events in terms of importance, as they all played critical roles in shaping American history. The French and Indian War was a pivotal moment in the struggle for control of North America, while the Proclamation of 1763 and the Boston Tea Party were both key factors that contributed to the eventual outbreak of the American Revolution. Each event had its own unique impact on American history and the development of the United States as a nation.

learn more about American Revolution: https://brainly.com/question/18317211

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation: Just look up the african continent then youwill find your answer.

is this a question for school? anyways if not.. I can relate to you , But i now have alot of friends.. We can be friends if you want

Answer:

Why is it so hard to find true friends these days?

Irem,

For most people in this world, the number of true/sincere friends is a small one. Most people can count their good/sincere friends on only one hand and even then they may not be able to count 5 fingers.

It is difficult to have good friends and to maintain friendships throughout life for various reasons:

Sometimes we rush in making friendships. We can be too hasty in trusting people. If we slow down, we will be able to pay better to attention to red flags that we see in a person.

Our own insecurities may lead us to desperately want a friend, even if that friend may not be the best or healthiest person for us.

Our friends have insecurities of their own. They may have their jealousies and other inner demons that can impact the way that they see us, the way that they interpret our words/actions, etc.

Sometimes friends outgrow each other for various reasons. Maybe they take different paths in life or have very little in common. Maybe they are in different mindsets, have different priorities, different goals, different interests, and no longer feel the same connection with each that they once used to.

It can also be about perspective. The thing is……most of us tend to think that our own perspective is the correct one and it might not be. For example, let’s say that a friend wants you to do her a favor that has the potential to put you at a serious risk. You politely refuse and offer to help her in another manner that is more easier for you. But your friend gets angry because she feels betrayed by you. In her eyes, you are now a bad friend. She has now conveniently forgotten all the times you have helped/supported her in the past and is not guilt-tripping you for this one favor that you politely refused to do for her. Does that make you a bad friend? Not necessarily. But in her eyes you might be bad. So, it also depends on the perspective. Sometimes we might think that someone is a bad friend and it could be because our ego might be preventing us from seeing their point of view and respecting their boundaries.

Sometimes we might expect too much from our friends and they might expect too much from us. Friends are not perfect. Even our own parents will not and cannot fulfill our every wish every single time and neither will people in the other “lesser relationships” that we have.

With all relationships we have to pick an choose our battles and let some things go. We can turn everything into a battle that has to be fought because it will get exhausting. When we and our friends can’t let some things slide and perceive everything as an offense, then that can put a strain on a friendship.

This is a strange reason to include in the list. But here goes. Overtime I became distant toward a friend that I was once very close to in high school. She was (and still is) very sweet. But it turned me off that she would lie about petty things. Really trivial stuff. You know how some female friends can’t tell you things like where they got their eyebrows threaded, where they got their nose pierced….because ….I dunno….maybe they don’t want you to have those things…and they treat it as a matter of secrecy. Like why? What is the big deal. You’re not asking about salary, you’re not asking something personal. But they would either prefer to give you a vague answer, or tell you something false that sends you on a wild goose chase. Again, it’s not the biggest betrayal or offense…..but little things like this can add up over time and turn you off

The point is Albright's ability to maintain composure in a difficult and potentially dangerous situation. Albright urged her aides to walk with dignity when confronted by the mob have shaped her perceptions of US actions during the 20th century.

President William Jefferson Clinton nominated Madeleine Korbel Albright to be the first female Secretary of State on December 5, 1996.

She was confirmed by the United States Senate on January 22, 1997, and sworn in the following day. She held the position for four years before leaving on January 20, 2001.

Thus, Albright maintain composure in a difficult and potentially dangerous situation.

For more details about Albright, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/27272935

#SPJ1