1-Why do you think the british at first approved of the setting up of a national political organisation,but later disapproved?(4)

Answer: here ya go!

I too am waiting for someone to help me with my writing response tho...

From the following was not an idea that impacted the colonies is Socialism. The correct option is (D).

Environmental damage, the spread of illness, economic instability, ethnic conflict, and human rights violations are all effects of colonialism that can last much beyond the time when one group ruled a region.

Domination of people's lives and cultures is what colonialism means. Extraction of economic benefits from the colony is colonialism's primary objective.

Control over natives' lives in the political, economic, cultural, and social domains results from colonialism. While imperialism is more official and belligerent, it is more subdued.

Therefore, from the following was not an idea that impacted the colonies is Socialism.

To know more about the impacted the colonies, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27839439

#SPJ2

Answer:

D. Hobbes believed people exchange many personal freedoms for government protection

The way that the Roman Assemblies contributed to the democratic principle of checks and balances was C. Assemblies provided a balance of power.

The Roman Republic had two main assemblies, the Senate and the Popular Assemblies. These assemblies played a crucial role in the implementation of checks and balances. The Senate, made up of wealthy patricians, was responsible for making laws and advising the consuls.

The Popular Assemblies, on the other hand, represented the plebeians and were responsible for electing magistrates, passing laws, and making decisions on war and peace. This separation of powers between the Senate and Popular Assemblies helped to prevent any one group from having too much power, which was an important principle of checks and balances.

Find out more on Assemblies in Rome at https://brainly.com/question/501861

#SPJ1

C.

How did Roman Assemblies contribute to the democratic principle of checks and balances?

Assemblies checked the qualifications of judges.

Assemblies appointed dictators in times of crisis.

Assemblies provided a balance of power.

Assemblies ran the courts.

Answer:

Being the chairperson of a standing, select, or joint committee is important for several reasons:

1. Leadership: As the chairperson, one plays a vital role in leading and organizing the committee's activities. This involves setting agendas, coordinating meetings, and ensuring that the committee is working efficiently and effectively towards its goals.

2. Influence: The chairperson has the power to influence the direction and outcome of the committee's work. They can shape the discussions and debates, and ensure that all viewpoints are considered and heard.

3. Decision-making: The chairperson has the responsibility of overseeing the decision-making process of the committee. They must ensure that decisions are made in a fair and transparent manner, and that all members are given the opportunity to participate.

4. Representation: The chairperson represents the committee in various settings, including to other committees, to the larger organization, and to the public. They must be able to effectively communicate the committee's work and goals to these audiences.

Overall, being the chairperson of a standing, select, or joint committee is a significant responsibility that requires strong leadership, communication, and decision-making skills. It is important for the success of the committee and the achievement of its goals.

Answer:

Spain

I might be wrong

Martin Luther King Jr. - Black Panthers: No; Black Power: Yes

Malcolm X - Black Panthers: Yes; Black Power: Yes

Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both played significant roles in the Civil Rights Movement in the United States, advocating for the rights of African Americans. However, they had different philosophies and approaches to achieving those goals.

Martin Luther King Jr. believed in nonviolent civil disobedience and integration with white society. He emphasized the importance of love, unity, and peaceful protest, and he rejected the use of violence to achieve social and political change.

Malcolm X, on the other hand, was a more militant activist who advocated for black separatism and self-defense. He believed that white society would never accept or respect black people, and he argued for black people to assert their power through black nationalism and armed self-defense if necessary. Malcolm X supported the Black Panthers

Learn more about Martin Luther king Jr at:

https://brainly.com/question/17746240

#SPJ1

Answer:

Genocide, measles, small pox, Syphilis and gonorrhea.

Explanation:

European colonization’s most impactful changes on Native Americans are genocide, measles, small pox, Syphilis and gonorrhea. The Europeans were the sources of diseases that is transmitted to native Americans. The Europeans also killed thousands of people in Genocide. Measles, small pox, Syphilis and gonorrhea diseases are not present in native Americans before European colonization so these Europeans can cause many problems in the New World.

European colonization’s most impactful changes on Native Americans was Genocide which killed millions.

The Europeans brought small pox.

They introduced measles disease.

Many soldiers from the Native American colonies were suffering from Syphilis contracted from European soldiers.

A mysterious disorder called gonorrhea got transmitted from their European counterparts.

Answer:

Oil, natural gas, commercial fishing, chemicals, and agriculture

Answer:

The United Nations

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

xx gloriouspurpose xx

Answer:

A The empire united Sikhs, Hindus, and Muslims in one culture.

Answer:

The Mughal Empire did not tolerate other religions. They converted people to Islam forcefully.

The Empire united Sikhs, Hindus, and Muslims in one religion.

They didn't exactly unite people, but this would be your best choice.

Answer:

Marxism is a political ideology that calls for central planning of the economy.

Answer:

Most of the indigenous groups died of overwork or disease brought by the Spanish.

Explanation:

The reason why you are paid for serving on a jury is to cover any expenses that you may have incurred for showing up for jury duty.

The reason why people who are serving on juries are paid, is to cater for their expenses in giving up their time to serve their nation as jurors. There is no law that requires for workers to be paid by employers when serving on the jury and so the pay is to ensure that the person remains compensated.

The pay also covers other expenses such as transportation and food as all these are necessary for the juror to be able to serve effectively on the jury.

Find out more on serving on a jury at https://brainly.com/question/28398380

#SPJ1

Answer:

Alexander The Great is probably the greatest general of his time, who managed to spread his country and establish cultural connections with practically whole known world at the time. Although a general and a ruler, he was also someone who believed that the world could be united not through the means of war, but through cultural unification.

Explanation:

Alexander was the son of Macedonian ruler Philip II, who wanted to conquer but also unite the world. During that period he managed to defeat Persian Empire, which at the time seemed as an impossible task. He conquered lands from Egypt to India. During his period, a specific culture, known as Hellenism developed. Still, when he died most of his heritage was destroyed by his successors.

Answer: It adapted many alike rules from other states governments

Explanation: The Northwest Ordinance created a government for the Northwest Territory. It also provided a method for admitting new states to the Union from the territory and gave it a bill of rights.

Answer:

A single government ruled the entire territory.

Explanation:):):):):(:):(:):)

If the state of Texas has a lower opportunity cost for producing beef compared to Alaska, it means that Texas has a comparative advantage in producing beef. This leads to specialization and gains from trade as both states can trade with each other and benefit from lower prices and a wider range of goods and services.

Opportunity cost is the cost of the next best alternative foregone, which means that the benefits of an opportunity or choice are equal to what must be sacrificed to obtain that opportunity. When a state has a lower opportunity cost for producing beef compared to another state, it implies that the first state has a comparative advantage in producing beef than the second state.

Comparative advantage refers to the ability of a country, region, or firm to produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than its competitors. In this context, if the state of Texas has a lower opportunity cost for producing beef compared to Alaska, it means that Texas can produce beef more efficiently and at a lower cost than Alaska. This could be due to factors such as favorable climate, better infrastructure, cheaper labor, or more advanced technology.

Since Texas has a comparative advantage in producing beef, it can produce more beef at a lower cost than Alaska. Therefore, Texas can specialize in producing beef while Alaska can focus on producing other goods or services in which it has a comparative advantage. This specialization leads to gains from trade as both states can trade with each other and benefit from lower prices and a wider range of goods and services.

For more such questions on Alaska, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/22855680

#SPJ8

Five of the Northern self-declared states adopted policies to at least gradually abolish slavery: Pennsylvania in 1780, New Hampshire and Massachusetts in 1783, and Connecticut and Rhode Island in 1784.

Answer:

Pennsylvania,New Hampshire,Massachesetts,Conneticut, And Rhode Island

Explanation:

Answer:

Im pretty sure the answer is A

Explanation:

The three diagrams commonly used for visualizing cause-and-effect relationships are the linear diagram, the systemic diagram, and the circular diagram. Among these diagrams, the systemic diagram most closely resembles how events unfold in reality.

The systemic diagram represents cause-and-effect relationships as a complex network or system of interconnected factors. It recognizes that events and outcomes are influenced by multiple variables that interact with each other in intricate ways. This diagram acknowledges the interdependence and interconnectedness of various factors in a system, reflecting the complexity of real-life cause-and-effect relationships. Historians might choose to use another diagram instead of the systemic diagram for several reasons:

1. Simplification: The systemic diagram can be complex and may not be suitable for all situations. Historians might choose to simplify cause-and-effect relationships by using a linear diagram, which represents events as a straightforward sequence. This simplification can make the relationships easier to understand and communicate.

2. Clarity: In certain cases, historians might opt for a diagram that provides clarity by highlighting the most significant cause-and-effect relationships. They may choose a circular diagram, which emphasizes recurring or cyclical patterns, particularly when studying historical events with repetitive or cyclical characteristics.

3. Specific Focus: Depending on the research question or the aspect of history being examined, historians may find that another diagram, such as a linear or circular diagram, better aligns with their specific focus. Different diagrams can offer different perspectives and insights into cause-and-effect relationships, allowing historians to emphasize particular aspects of the historical narrative.

Ultimately, the choice of diagram depends on the historian's objectives, the complexity of the historical events being studied, and the need for clarity and simplification. Different diagrams offer different visual representations and can help historians convey their analysis and interpretations of cause-and-effect relationships in history effectively.

To know more visualizing cause-and-effect relationships. ,click

brainly.com/question/32152193

Answer:

Hi I actually am from Michigan (Cadillac) I'm bored so I'm just answering random questions about Michigan lore and stuff about the Michigan Dog-Man.

Answer:

shortage of good farmland

Explanation:

The factor did not lure people to the United States from European and Asian nations was the shortage of good farmland.

People from many different countries made the decision to leave their homeland and immigrate to the United States in the late 1800s.

Many people fled crop failure, land and job shortages, rising taxes, starvation, and other problems because they believed the United States to be the country of economic opportunity.

Between 1870 and 1900, almost 12 million immigrants entered the country, many of them came in search of personal independence or protection from political and religious persecution.

The majority of these individuals came from Germany, Ireland, and England in the 1870s and 1880s, which were the main countries from whom immigrants came prior to the American Civil War.

Even yet, between the beginning of the California gold rush in 1849 and 1882, when their immigration was prohibited by federal law, a sizable number of Chinese people traveled to the United States.

Learn more about immigration to Unites States, herehttps://brainly.com/question/7640704

#SPJ2

Answer:

Dont know

Explanation:

Havent decided on which on i want.

Answer: Shindai Akuma or raionrengoku

Explanation:

The Texas Constitution and the United States Constitution are both foundational documents that outline the structure, powers, and rights within their respective jurisdictions. While they share similarities, they also have notable differences. Here's a comparison highlighting some key points:

1. Origin: The United States Constitution was adopted in 1787, establishing the federal government, while the Texas Constitution has undergone multiple revisions since Texas gained independence from Mexico in 1836.

2. Length and Specificity: The United States Constitution is relatively concise, consisting of seven articles and 27 amendments. In contrast, the Texas Constitution is considerably longer and more detailed, reflecting its attempt to address specific issues and anticipate future challenges.

3. Separation of Powers: Both constitutions establish a separation of powers among three branches of government: executive, legislative, and judicial. However, the Texas Constitution emphasizes a more decentralized form of government, granting significant power to local governments and limiting the authority of the executive branch.

4. Amendment Process: The United States Constitution allows amendments through a two-thirds majority vote in both houses of Congress or by a constitutional convention called by two-thirds of the state legislatures. In contrast, the Texas Constitution permits amendments through a two-thirds majority vote in both chambers of the state legislature and subsequent approval by a majority of Texas voters in a statewide referendum.

5. Protection of Rights: While the United States Constitution contains the Bill of Rights as its first ten amendments, the Texas Constitution includes a more extensive list of rights, covering areas such as individual liberties, property rights, and education.

6. Judicial System: The United States Constitution establishes a federal court system, including the Supreme Court, while the Texas Constitution provides for a state-level judicial system with a Supreme Court and several other courts.

This brief comparison highlights some key differences between the Texas Constitution and the United States Constitution. It is important to note that the two documents serve different purposes, with the U.S. Constitution focusing on the overall structure of the federal government, while the Texas Constitution addresses the specific needs and governance of the state of Texas.

for more questions on Constitution

https://brainly.com/question/16385413

#SPJ8

Answer:

The solution that Alexander Hamilton proposed to the problem he describes in this quotation is: "There should be a national court system that is superior to the State courts and can provide a final ruling."

Explanation:

The samurai were a class of Japanese warriors who followed a strict code of conduct known as the  Bushido. They were highly skilled in sword fighting and archery, and were trained in  the martial arts from a young age.

The samurai were loyal to their lord and they would go to great lengths to protect their honor. They often wore distinctive armor and carried weapons such as a katana sword or a yumi bow.

The samurai played a significant role in Japanese history and the  culture, but their power and declined during the Meiji Restoration in the late 19th century.

For more questions on: samurai

https://brainly.com/question/361705

#SPJ11

A summary of president Biden during his State of the Union address is As the situation of the Union changes maintain Congress informed and makes proposals for any actions he thinks are required or suitable.

A summary is a quick introduction to any topic presented in your own words with the intention of supporting the reader in properly understanding the main idea and setting of any event.

In addition to lowering anti-competitive behavior and enhancing worker rights, the address calls for raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans. With House Republicans, the president made a clear separation, and Biden will have the opportunity to discuss the state of the nation in his opinion.

A proposal is chosen by looking for the problems the target is having and the appropriate knowledge, abilities, expertise, and strategy to deal with those problems in order to improve the standard of living.

Learn more about Summary, here:

brainly.com/question/28846379

#SPJ1